Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
EC Referrals Marsha Holleman/Nancy Simmons Jolee Harney/Jenny Kurzer.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
Best Practices in IEP writing September 26, 2012.
Connecticut State Department of Education
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
1 The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Finalizing the IEP Process Consent for Initial IEP PWN following the IEP Copies to Parent IEP Amendments Revocation of Consent West Virginia Department.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
Charter School Institute A REVIEW: ENROLLMENT PROCEDURES Matt Hudson, ES Director.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Prior Written Notice Documenting Decisions EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN DIVISION.
Q and A Regarding 34 CFR § (b)(4). On December 1, 2008, USDOE issued a series of new regulations for IDEA. These newly amended regulations took.
October 10, The Texas Education Agency has recently clarified and expanded the use of Prior Written Notice (PWN) in Special Education.
Charter School Institute Department of Exceptional Students Enrollment Determination Procedures.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
New York State Education Department (NYSED) Prior Written Notice (Notice of Recommendation) This presentation is presented using Power Point with an.
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Week 4 September 26th IEP Amendments, Exit, Written Notice, meeting notes Determining ESY, Special transportation, Alt-Assess, our paperwork, Cum files,
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
PLOP, Goals & Objectives Notes PLOP – Free of grammatical and spelling errors – Statement describing how the student is performing the annual goal currently.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
Prior Written Notice (PWN) Training Rock Hill Schools Exceptional Student Education 2009.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Section 7: Special Education Services and Programs Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS August 4,
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009.
Students with Exceptionalities
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
The New IDEA in Special Education
FAPE “The Big Three”. FAPE Free and Appropriate Public Education Legal and Effective IEP Process Eligibility Procedural Safeguards.
I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Prior Written Notice of Action & Notice of Conference March 2014 ADE-SEU.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
What To Do When The School Says No
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
It All Starts with the Student Study Team
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Seven: Determining the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) SBIEP Module Seven: Determining the.
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
New Enrollment and Transfer Students
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines

Evaluation (Present Levels) 2 Evaluations administered/Date and/or Information Reviewed: To make clear the team’s use of multiple sources of info, including assessments administered (and purpose for which they were selected, if appropriate), modifications in administration of assessments, assessment results—the numbers. May also include discussion of specific test results that require use of numbers and data points. Interpretation of Results: 3 parts Provide in plain English an integrated, narrative statement of the evaluation data (without numbers); Answer the question, “How does the student’s disability impact access to and progress in the general curriculum, including standards?” Identify Educational Needs to be addressed by the IEP.

Goals and Objectives 3 Purpose: To address the educational needs identified by the IEP team through the development of present levels. Write goals as long-term, broad-based statements and objectives that describe specifically the skill the student can reasonably expect to achieve within one school year. Ensure the goals/objectives are measurable, e.g. words per minute, outbursts per hour, number of times correct out of a number of trials—4 out of 5 trials with less than 2 verbal prompts. Some baseline information is a necessary part of measurability. Douglas County Specail Education Practitoner’s Manual, E-G-10. 3

Academic Content Standards 4 The IEP shall specify: Whether the child shall achieve the content standards adopted by the district in which the child is enrolled; or Whether the child shall achieve individualized standards which would indicate that the child has met the requirements of his or her IEP. ECEA Rule 4.03 (6)(c)(i); Manual, E-G-14.

Accommodations/Modifications 5 Accommodations allow access to the curriculum, but do not substantially change the instructional level, content, standards, or expectations. CDE explains, “Accommodations consist of adaptations to instructional strategies (materials, manner of presentation, grouping, format), and/or the classroom environment (seating arrangements, lighting, sound, etc.)” Modifications are changes to the program or curriculum that alter the scope or content of the curriculum when accommodations cannot be effective. The IEP team must discuss accommodations/modifications that may enable students to participate in extracurricular/nonacademic activities, such as field trips, intramurals, and band/orchestra performances.

Service Delivery = Placement A student’s “placement” is comprised of the special education and related services provided in the child’s IEP, not the physical location in which the services are implemented. Placement must be determined by the IEP team (at the IEP meeting) and based on the child’s present levels and goals and objectives. Do not complete Page 8 of the IEP in advance of the meeting or include a completed Page 8 with a draft IEP. Begin with the general education setting and actually address the options. 6

Service Delivery Do: include frequency, location, and duration of services and modifications. include specific implementation dates. Do Not: include specific school buildings, teachers, or instructional methodologies, unless they are necessary for FAPE. argue too much over language, just attribute it to the source (e.g. “the parent reports…,” “the teacher observed…”). 7

Documenting the Meeting Purpose: For the parent to leave the meeting with accurate documentation of all of the IEP team’s decisions. Computer-Based IEP Program Best Practice: Live in the meeting, leave with final. Alternative: Leave with handwritten draft, followed later by final computer-generated IEP mailed with cover letter to parents. Manual, Appendix B, Sample Letters. IEPs are legally binding documents and the decisions about IEP contents must be made by a properly constituted IEP team or by written amendment. Manual, E-G-3. 8

IEP Amendments Outside of an IEP meeting: Only when the School District and parents agree to the change AND agree to make the change without a meeting. Documentation: parents’ agreement to the change and agreement to complete the change without an IEP meeting. prior written notice. confirming correspondence with a copy of the amended IEP. Manual, E-G-2; Appendix B, Sample Letters. 9

Prior Written Notice Purpose: To provide a final detailed document setting forth the District’s plan for the student’s education and ensure the parent/student understands the offer. A school district must provide prior written notice (PWN) to the parents of a student with a disability before it: Proposes to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child or the provision of FAPE to the child; Refuses to initiate such a change. Manual, Appendix C, PWN Chart. (Continued... ) 10

Prior Written Notice (continued) The contents of the PWN must contain: A description of the proposed or refused action; An explanation for the proposal or refusal; A description of each evaluation, assessment, record, or report used as a basis for the proposal or refusal; A description of other options that the IEP team considered and why those options were rejected; 11 (Continued... )

Prior Written Notice (continued) A description of other factors relevant to the proposal or refusal; A statement that the parents have procedural safeguards and the means by which a copy of the procedural safeguards notice may be obtained (See, Manual Section J, Procedural Safeguards and Dispute Resolution); Sources for the parents to contact to obtain assistance in understanding the PWN and their rights. 12

Implementing IEPs Accessibility of the child’s IEP to teachers and others. Each school district must ensure that— The child’s IEP is accessible to each regular education teacher, special education teacher, related services provider, and any other service provider who is responsible for its implementation; and Each teacher and provider described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section is informed of— His or her specific responsibilities related to implementing the child’s IEP; and The specific accommodations, modifications, and supports that must be provided for the child in accordance with the IEP. 34 C.F.R. § (d); Manual, E-G-6. (Continued...) 13

Implementing IEPs (continued) Inform teachers how to access the complete IEP. Inform teachers of their specific role in implementing the IEP, including the specific accommodations, modifications, and supports that must be provided. Check with teachers for understanding. Collect data periodically. Convene follow up meeting(s) to address staff/parent/student concerns or lack of progress. 14

Timelines 60 calendar daysfrom the day the School District receives signed consent to complete initial evaluations. 30 days to convene an IEP meeting after eligibility determination. 3 calendar days to implement IEP services for an in-state transfer student. Reevaluation—conducted every 3 years, unless the parents and School District agree that no reevaluation is necessary. When not otherwise specified, “reasonableness” is the standard. Eligibility meeting—within a “reasonable period of time” after the initial evaluation is completed. Notice of IEP meetings—reasonable, which is usually 10 days, but can be fewer. Implementation of IEP services—as soon as possible following IEP development or as otherwise determined by the IEP team. 15