College-wide Governance Meeting October 17, 2012 Baker 146, 12:45PM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Advertisements

Student Engagement Task Force Cindy Horn and John Thorp, Co-Chairs December 15, 2005.
Institutional and Student Characteristics that Predict Graduation and Retention Rates Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Framing a Quality Enhancement Plan for Lamar University.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
Students who are… …engaged in the classroom – pass; …engaged in their academic program - return; …engaged in deep learning – graduate. What constitutes.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Global Awareness and Student Engagement Allison BrckaLorenz Jim Gieser Program presented at the 2011 ASHE Annual Conference in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
National Survey of Student Engagement—Technology and Diversity Indicators for Student Success Indiana State University College of Education.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Using What Faculty Say about Improving Their Teaching Thomas F. Nelson Laird, IUB Jennifer Buckley, IUB Megan Palmer,
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
An Equal Opportunity University Third Annual Meeting of the Provost’s Committee on Undergraduate Student Success October 22, 2009.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Lamar University’s QEP: FRESHMAN SUCCESS Making it happen...
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
 Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
“Building an Inclusive Community” Presented by Dr. Mordean Taylor-Archer Vice Provost for Diversity and International Affairs 1 University of Louisville.
Helping Freshmen Succeed February 2013 Scott Belobrajdic Assistant Vice Chancellor for Enrollment Management Rendleman Hall 1313 X 2043.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning and Institutional Research apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm.
Measuring the Gap Between Faculty and Student Perceptions of Engagement: Results from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement University Assessment Office.
Enrollment and Intersession Office of Senior Vice Provost for Academic Affairs presented to UB Information Technology February 26, 2013.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Provost’s Address to the University Senate December 13, 2004.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
 NSSE Results Austin Peay State University.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American
NSSE Results for Faculty
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

College-wide Governance Meeting October 17, 2012 Baker 146, 12:45PM

Agenda 1.Announcements 2.Robert C. French, VP Enrollment Management and Marketing 3.Student Life Committee Report (McGee) 4.Faculty Ownership of Instructional Content (Donaghy) 5.College Common Hour Scheduling (Donaghy) 6.New Business

Fall 2012 ESF A Five-Year Perspective Robert C. French October 17, 2012

Enrollment Headcount (Without SU or HS)

Full-Time Undergraduates

Matriculated Undergraduates (Full & Part-Time) DepartmentFall 2007Fall 2012Change Chemistry6242(-20) EFB572641(+69) ERE92128(+36) Env. Science111188(+77) Env. Studies141148(+7) FNRM117172(+55) Ranger School4449(+5) LA162163(+1) PBE4186(+45) SCME9478(-16) Undecided510(+5)

Quality Metrics – Entering Freshmen Fall 2007Fall 2009Fall 2011Fall 2012 Applications Acceptance Rate51%43%47%51% SAT Average ACT Average Top Tenth Rank23%39%37% Top Quartile Rank55%77%73%72% Top Half Rank91%96%97%95% HS GPA90%92%

Diversity Metrics – Undergraduate Full-Time Fall 2007 Fall 2012 Women511 (37%) 726 (44%) Underrepresented109 (8%) 148 (9%) International13 (1%) 28 (2%) Out-of-State U.S.150 (11%) 260 (16%) States Represented26 36 Countries Represented6 13

First Year Retention Rates Fall EntryFreshmenSecond YearRetention % % % % %

Six Year Graduation Rates Fall EntryFreshmenGraduatedRate % (5 yr) % % % %

Undergraduate Costs Fall EntryTuition & FeesRoomBoardTotal 2007 NY-Resident$5,100$5,660$5,930$16, NY-Resident$6,593$7,500$6,900$20,993 (+26%) 2007 Non-Resident$11,360$5,660$5,930$22, Non-Resident$15,843$7,500$6,900$30,243 (+32%)

Faculty Governance Committee on Student Life Annual Report Caroline Bailey – LA Scott Blair – Student Life Bob Dugan – Public Safety Tom Fletcher – Admissions Cat Foley - GSA Ivan Gitsov/Paul Caluwe – Chemistry Kavya Krishnan/Lauren Ziska – USA Greg McGee – EFB Giorgos Mountrakis – ERE Douglas Morrison – FNRM John View – Financial Aid [Kevin Reynolds, Laura Crandall – Student Life] Anne Lombard (ex officio)

Academic Integrity 2011 Review of Policies & Procedures Faculty familiarity with policies/procedures Faculty reporting tendencies Student Life record keeping o 20 incidents 2011 o 55 incidents 2012 Next Steps: education and exchange

2011 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

NSSE 85 questions 5 “benchmarks” of engagement – Level of Academic Challenge – Active and Collaborative Learning – Student-Faculty Interactions – Enriching Educational Experiences – Supportive Campus Environment

NSSE 120 freshmen, 151 seniors Comparison Institutions – RU/H: Carnegie Classification, >20 PhD degrees/year, ~61,000 – NSSE 2011: ~470,000 – Mid East Public: ~36,000

Level of Academic Challenge Benchmark g= top 10% g=.2.2 “Effect Size” (g).2 small.5 moderate.8 large

Enriching Educational Environment Benchmark g= top 10% g= g=.2 small.5 moderate.8 large

Some things we can say…relative to RU/H ESF students tend to: -work more collaboratively on assignments -discuss ideas outside of class more -integrate concepts among different classes more -think more critically -analyze quantitative problems -address complex real-world problems -acquire a more narrow general education -acquire higher levels of job-related training and skills development

Some things we can say…relative to RU/H ESF Seniors vs. RU/H Seniors 77% 49% participate in internship, field experience, co-op 36%20% work on research projects with faculty 53%32% participate in culminating senior experience

Some things we can say…relative to RU/H Community Service ESFRU/H Freshmen84% 41% Seniors71%58%

Some things we can say…relative to RU/H ESF students are: -seniors are less likely to have serious conversations with students of different race or ethnicity -freshmen are more likely to have serious conversations with students of different religious/political backgrounds -seniors are less likely to engage in classroom discussions and assignments that include perspectives based on race, religion, political belief -seniors are not asked to understand people of different racial and ethnic backgrounds -Foreign language22% ESFvs. 41% RU/H

Faculty Ownership of Instructional Content Copyright Law - Work for hire – Work prepared by an employee within the scope of employment – Work specifically ordered or commissioned and prepared per written contract Instructional text, tests and test answers

SUNY’s Copyright Policy Written in 1954 – Under 1909 federal copyright act – Common-law exception – Faculty work vests in the faculty not SUNY At the time, the term used was all “written works”….

Instructional Materials for the Web Blackboard, On-line Courses No difference from classroom “You own what you produce unless you have knowingly given up your rights to the product.” -UUP Copyright FAQ,

Commercial Lecture Note Companies On-Line Courses – College use course after you’ve “left” Commerical Lecture Note Companies – CourseHero… Lawsuits require registration United States Copyright Office at