An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Presented by Jan Connal, PhD March.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
A Guide to Implementation
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
PORTFOLIO.
Foundation Competencies New CSWE procedures
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Rob Johnstone Educause ELI Institute January 30, 2012 Making Your Data Work.
Assessing CADE Student Learning Outcomes Karla Kennedy-Hagan, PhD, RD, LDN Eastern Illinois University Charleston, IL.
ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009 Veronica Jaramillo, Ph.D. Mona Panchal Anthony Cadavid ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009.
The Academic Assessment Process
11 STUDENT SUCCESS 2020 Felicia Patterson Vice President, Learner Support Services Anne Arundel Community College ACCT New and Experienced Trustees Governance.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Assessing Institutional Effectiveness An RP Group initiative funded by.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Assessment and Accreditation: Planning for a Compatible Relationship Is it possible?
Student Data Reporting Tools Michele J. Hansen, Ph.D. Executive Director Student Data, Analysis, and Evaluation Enrollment Management Advisory Council.
An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Three Studies to Drive Campus Conversations on Student Success Rob Johnstone,
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Janet Fulks, ASCCC Bakersfield College Bob Pacheco, RP, Barstow College.
Andrea Chapdelaine Albright College
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Maximizing the Impact of Service-Learning Shelley H. Billig RMC Research Corporation Teri Dary WI Dept of Public Instruction 2008.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
Student Services Learning Outcomes and Assessment Jim Haynes, De Anza College Sept. 17, 2010.
EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE Spring PDD, March 23, 2012 PRESENTED BY DR. ABDIE TABRIZI ENGINEERING FACULTY SLO COORDINATOR LYNETTE APEN RN, MS SLO Assessment.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Using edTPA Data for Program Design and Curriculum Mapping Mary Ariail, Georgia State University Kristy Brown, Shorter University Judith Emerson, Georgia.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.
Dr. Dawn Person Chieh-hsing Chou (Jessie) Spring 2010.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Basic Skills, Outcomes, and Fostering a Culture of Evidence and Inquiry | 2009 | RP Group.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Data Driven Instruction It’s not….. What did the Teacher Teach? It’s ………. What did the Student Learn? Prepared by Robin Hecht.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
SLOs: What Are They? Information in this presentation comes from the Fundamentals of Assessment conference led by Dr. Amy Driscoll and sponsored by.
Educator Evaluations DARTEP 2017
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment at the
SLO Assessment Cycle Course and Program
Presentation transcript:

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Presented by Jan Connal, PhD March 25, 2011 An RP Group initiative funded by the Hewlett Foundation Fall 2010

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Introduction My focus today: Share SLO assessment strategies and models for instructional courses and programs Generate ideas about embedding assessment into our regular practices Prompt reflection about where you are and where you can go with your Instructional SLO assessment activities

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Why do we Assess? What are the major overarching principles?  To implement strategies that respond to diverse needs.  To improve effectiveness by: Measuring how and what students learn, Developing new and varied educational experiences, and Revealing students mastery. 1. Promotes collaboration 2. Is dynamic and continuous 3. Ensures quality education 4. Focuses on learning; how, what and how well students learn 5. Is integrated into our daily teaching and planning Description Pg. 6 – Description

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Background: Questions Facing Colleges Pg. 7– Background Can students apply information to real world applications? Are students acquiring needed skills and values?

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Six Building Blocks to Assessment Pg. 10– Six Building Blocks

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Research and Align SLOs Pg. 11– Building Blocks Building Block #1

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Define Measurable SLOs 1. Can be observed and measured 2. Address knowledge, skills or attitudes as they relate to:  Cognitive Domain: Critical thinking  Behavioral Domain: Concrete actions  Affective Domain: Feelings and attitudes 3. Represent the overarching outcomes of a course, program, degree or certificate 4. Are larger and more encompassing than objectives Pg. 12– Building Blocks Building Block #2

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Questions in the SLO Process Pg. 12– Building Blocks Building Block #2

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Define and Conduct Assessment Assessment is a process that generates continual flow of evidence to demonstrate learning and to suggest areas for improvement. Data must be manageable and directly tied to decision-making. Evidence can be:  Quantitative: capable of numerical manipulation and analysis  Qualitative: performance or observational based experience Embedded assessment are those that are built into curricular or program activities. Pg. 13– Building Blocks Building Block #3

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Analyze the Results Types of student performance from assessments Pg. 14– Building Blocks Building Block #4 Measures student attainment against a set of criteria Sets baseline levels of performance so that retest can be done after an intervention has been implemented.

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Report the Results Pg. 15– Building Blocks Building Block #5

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Improved Practice Ultimate goal of assessment:  Continued quality improvement  Positive changes in teaching and learning When examining improvements consider: 1. Modifying instruction 2. Improving student feedback 3. Changing programmatic structure 4. Integrating outcome results into program review 5. Linking results to inform integrated planning and resource allocation Pg. 16– Building Blocks Building Block #6

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges RP Group Website BRIC Rob Johnstone, BRIC Project Director Kathy Booth, RP Group Executive Director Priya Chaplot, BRIC Project Coordinator Find Out More!

An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges BRIC TAP Inquiry Guide Series 1.Assessing Student Learning Outcomes 2.Assessing Strategic Intervention Points in Student Services 3.Assessing Institutional Effectiveness 4.Assessing Basic Skills Outcomes 5.Maximizing the Program Review Process 6.Turning Data into Meaningful Action 7.A Model for Building Information Capacity and Promoting a Culture of Inquiry 8.Research and Assessment for Non-credit Institutions