1. Dr. Dawn Person Chieh-hsing Chou (Jessie) Spring 2010

2.  iFalcon infused in the curricula of the college will enhance student success.  Coordinating institutional services and programs will increase student success.  Training and support for faculty/staff will lead to infusion in iFalcon classroom.

3.  Strategies to help students develop the six habits of the mind.  Faculty and staff development to support HOM for student success.  Infusing HOM across developmental education program.  Coordination of Institutional Services and Programs to Support HOM initiative.

4.  Increase in students who achieve transferring into 4 yr. or earn AA/AS or certificate  Increase retention of first year students  Increase percentage of students who earn at least 30 units.  Increase in students who successfully complete math, English, and reading basis skill courses.  Increase in students who progress through basic skills courses sequence in a more timely manner.  Systematic change to a college culture of student success using iFalcon as the basic model for success.  Implementation of evaluation model that measures effectiveness of the iFalcon model for student success.

5.  To implement iFalcon by involving faculty, staff, and other resources people to engage students in developing HOM by making them aware of the HOM, teaching habits, and helping students apply their habits in their daily academic, personal, and work lives.  Improve percentage of first time students who achieve transferring into 4 yr. or earn AA/AS or certificate.  Increase student persistence and retention as evidence by increase transfer and success in developmental course sequences.  Document the impact of iFalcon for faculty, staff, and students.

6.  Monitor program’s progress  Track faculty/staff engagement and use of iFalcon  Provide feedback for program improvement  Track students’ academic progress/participation of HOM  Assess systematic change in support of college success culture.

7.  Student Academic Progress and Participation  Student Feedback  Faculty/Staff Feedback

8.  Student Academic Progress and Participation  Student Feedback  Faculty/Staff Feedback  Program Impact on Student retention/persistence  Interaction/Intervention dimension: (faculty, counselor, peer, tutors, counter, web)

9.  Who has participated in which services of the project, in what ways and to what degree or level?  How well are the project strategies being implemented?  What systematic change has been made to maintain a college culture of student success?  What is the progress for implementation of evaluation?  What progress has been made on program objectives, anticipated outcomes, and measurable indicators:  A. Improved academic performance of students especially first year students.  B. Increased educational success in student transfer, AA/AS attainment or certificate.  C. Increased student awareness, knowledge, and application of the HOM.  D. Improvement in completion of and decrease in time needed to complete development English, math, and reading course sequences.  E. Impact of intervention dimensions on students that include: faculty, counselors, web, peers, tutors, staff, counter interactions, and campaigns.

10.  Student Academic Records  Program participation by students, faculty/staff  Formative Assessment- Program effectiveness through surveys and focus groups  Comparison group between-orientation and non-orientation students. conclusion of each semester or year  Survey of awareness, knowledge and application of HOM, long and short of students and faculty/staff over time.

11.  Faculty/staff perceptions of HOM through survey and focus group  Impact of faculty/staff developmental training  Faculty Inquiry group  Innovation Center

12.  Observation meetings of the team  Review documents of work progression  Focus groups  Interview with co-PI’s

13.  Conduct regular meetings with the project co-directors for data feedback and discussions  Provide an annual project evaluation report that provides the data necessary for project documentation and decision-making, as well as what is required by funding agents.

14. Person ResponsibleActivitySchedule PIObservation of leadership team meetings On-going PI and Research team facilitatorsIdentifying groups to be surveyed-comparison/dev non- developmental Feb 2010 PI and Research team facilitatorsInstrumental development for students, faculty, and staff March 2010 PIStudent and faculty surveyApril 2010 PIStudent and faculty focus groupsApril 2010 PI/Research TeamAssessment of Quantitative data for year 1-baseline April 2010 PI/Research TeamPreliminary reportMid April 2010 PI/Research TeamDocument analysis of faculty/development/training May 2010 PI/Research TeamDocument analysis of web and other program outreach pr usage May 2010 PI/Research TeamAnalysis of comparison group, document analysis and observation June 2010 PI/Research TeamAnnual evaluation reportAugust 2010