Jenkins Independent Schools STATE INFORATION RELATED TO 2007 NCLB DATA: Data indicate that 75.8 percent – 884 – of Kentucky's 1,167 public schools made.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
When you look at NCLB data, WHAT are you looking at????? JES: Grade 4 and Grade 5 JMHS: Grades 7,8,10, 11 So what is assessed with KCCT at these grade.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Title I Ozark East Ozark North Ozark South Ozark West.
RECYCLE Jenkins Independent District Data STATE NCLB DATA 103 of 175 school districts (58.9%) met 100% of their No Child Left Behind (NCLB) AYP goals.
Jenkins Elementary KPREP Reading  Grades 3, 4 and 5.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
 According to the U.S. Department of Education the purpose of Title 1 funding, “is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
What you need to know About Title I Parent Meeting Presentation.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Discussion on Virginia’s State Assessment Program
Presentation transcript:

Jenkins Independent Schools

STATE INFORATION RELATED TO 2007 NCLB DATA: Data indicate that 75.8 percent – 884 – of Kentucky's 1,167 public schools made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in the school year under the requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, the Kentucky Department of Education announced September 12 th. AYP results are based on the Kentucky Core Content Tests' (KCCT) items in reading and mathematics. Schools are required to have specific percentages of students reaching proficiency or above in reading and mathematics each year and to meet other criteria in order to make AYP.

STATE INFORATION RELATED TO 2007 NCLB DATA: According to the data, 884 Kentucky public schools met 100 percent of their NCLB goals for AYP, while 283 schools did not. Of the 283 schools that did not make AYP, 231 made 80 percent or more of their goals.

STATE NCLB DATA Statewide, 92 percent of the 25 target goals were met.

Consequences RELATED TO 2007 NCLB DATA: Schools and districts that are funded by the federal Title I program, which provides funds to ensure that disadvantaged children receive opportunities for high-quality educational services, will be subject to federal consequences if they do not make AYP in the same content area in any student group for two or more consecutive years. Student groups in Kentucky are minority students, low-income students, students with disabilities and students with limited-English proficiency. Statewide, 147 schools are subject to consequences outlined through NCLB: · 47 Title I schools are in Tier 1 consequences. · 34 Title I schools are in Tier 2 consequences. · 20 Title I schools are in Tier 3 consequences. · 40 Title I schools are in Tier 4 consequences. · 1 Title I school is in first-year Tier 5 consequences. · 5 Title I schools are in second-year Tier 5 consequences.

Consequences for the tiers increase each consecutive year that a school does not make AYP:

School districts also are held to the requirements of AYP under NCLB. Of Kentucky's 175 school districts in , 86 – 49.1 percent -- met 100 percent of their target goals. Overall, 166 of 175 districts met 80 percent or more of their goals. For NCLB requirements, school districts are gauged on the total student population. This can mean that, even if every school within a district makes AYP, the district may not because of the total size of student populations and their performance. School districts also are subject to consequences, which can include rewriting district plans and receiving state assistance.

The 2007 NCLB data indicates, for districts: 21 Title I districts are in Tier 1 consequences. 27 Title I districts are in Tier 2 consequences. 13 Title I districts are in Tier 3 first-year consequences. 36 Title I districts are in Tier 3 second-year consequences.

Because of changes in implementation of NCLB for districts and schools, comparisons from 2006 to 2007 should be made with caution. An impact study will be done to determine the degree of genuine school improvement from 2006 to 2007 versus increases due to changes in NCLB policy.

DISTRICT

Jenkins Elementary

Jenkins Middle

Jenkins Middle High

Each SBDM will use the data in the process of updating their school improvement plan JMHS will visit the CATS data at the next common planning. The teachers have been reminded to document “Math in the Content Area” and are sending their documentation in the lesson plans to Mrs. Bentley.. The math department will meet and strategize how to best address the AYP target goals for next year. JMHS began offering Pre-Algebra to 9th Grade students that were struggling in Math as an 8th Grader. NCLB results and the new state requirement will be addressed. Beginning next year, of the 4 HS math classes – 3 credits must be Algebra I, Geometry, & Algebra II.

Other District Results DISTRICTMade AYPConsequences Letcher CountyYesTIER 3 Pike CountyYes Perry CountyYes Floyd CountyYes Pikeville IndependentYesTIER 3 Hazard IndependentYes

Local Schools Made AYPConsequences Arlie BoggsYes Beckham BatesYes CowanYes Fleming NeonYes Kingdom ComeYes LetcherYes Martha Jane PotterYes West WhitesburgYes Whitesburg MiddleNo Letcher CentralNo Belfry HighYes East Ridge HighNo Pike CentralYes Shelby ValleyYes BuckhornYes Perry CentralYes

The public release date for information related to the Commonwealth Accountability Testing System (CATS) has been rescheduled for Tuesday, October 2. The rescheduling will provide district and school officials with additional time to review the data and perform quality control measures prior to the public release.

Once a Cavalier Always a C AVALIER !!!