GAP Kids or Gray-area Kids ? Defining who they are under No Child Left Behind (NCLB)? Why this group of students exists? What are the consequences of being.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Every Principal Needs to Know About Special Education
Advertisements

Federal NCLB Regulations
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Six: Determining the Most Appropriate Assessment Option Standards-based IEP State-Directed Project.
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Lynda Lupp Richard Maraschiello Amy Morton Adam Schott John Weiss.
ALTERNATE PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT The Rubric for End of Course Assessments
New Law changes outcomes for certain students with disabilities Act 833 of 2014 Alternative Pathways for Grade Promotion and Graduation.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
ALTERNATE/ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENTS VGLA AND VMAST UPDATES VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST Regional Administrators Update Training.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Louisiana High School Redesign Commission Jo Lynne DeMary Director of the Center for School Improvement December 15, 2006.
Modified High School Assessment (Mod-HSA) Maryland State Board of Education August 26, 2008.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
National Center on Educational Outcomes June, 2004 How do we keep kids from being stuck in our gap? A frame, a series of discussion questions, and some.
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Accessing the General Curriculum. A look back… “in 1970, U.S. schools educated only one in five children with disabilities, and many states had laws excluding.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
1 Strategic Plan Baseline Data September 2004 Prince William County School Board October 6, 2004.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Group # 1 Ken Arnold and Mike Littleton EDEL 635 Fall 2009 Radford University.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
The 1% Rule: Alternate Assessment Participation November 20, 2007.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Fall 2010 Mathematics Standards of Learning Assessment Update - 1 -
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
PSSA-M January 19, 2012 LEA meeting January 19, 2012 LEA meeting.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
The Every Student Succeeds Act Highlights of Key Changes for States, Districts, and Schools.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Proficiency Assessments for Wyoming Students
American Institutes for Research
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
NCLB/State Assessments
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Is Your Child’s IEP Individualized?
Standards-based Individualized Education Program: Module Eight: Additional Components Specific to Secondary IEPs SBIEP Module Eight: Additional Components.
How to stay under the 1% December 12, 2018.
AYP and Report Card.
Education and Accountability
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

GAP Kids or Gray-area Kids ? Defining who they are under No Child Left Behind (NCLB)? Why this group of students exists? What are the consequences of being a Gap kid or Gray-area kid in Virginia if you are in High School?

Overview of Presentation In the latest round of interpretation of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), schools/ districts are allowed to include the proficient scores of 1% of the students with the most significant cognitive disabilities who participate in alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards. There now exist another group of students with disabilities – a larger, harder to define population who are known as the “gap kids” or “gray-area kids” This presentation will attempt to: Defining who they are under No Child Left Behind (NCLB)? Why this group of students exists? What are the consequences of being a gap kid or Gray-area kid in Virginia if you are in grades 9-11 ?

Defining who they are under No Child Left Behind (NCLB)? Students with disabilities who are not significantly cognitively disabled but who may be severely learning disabled or mildly mentally retarded. Students perform at a higher level than those with severe cognitive disabilities – too high to be assessed based on alternate achievement standards. Learning well below grade level. Students often function 3 to 5 years below grade level. Students do not meet the criteria of the Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP).

Why this group of students exists? The No Child left Behind Act of 2001, P.L , requires that at least 95% of students with disabilities participate in assessments that measure adequate yearly progress of schools, school divisions, and the Commonwealth of Virginia. Currently there may be a small number (?) of students with IEP’s in grades who will not be enrolled in any courses for which there is an end-of-course Standards of Learning assessment, will not be working towards an advanced studies diploma, standard diploma, or modified standard diploma, and will not meet the criteria of the Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP). The current trend of school district is to simply instruct the IEP team to use this options for any student (you are not sure will test well on the SOL tests). If this option is used the student is not allow to enroll in the courses and take the test required to earn an advance studies diploma, standard diploma, or modified standard diploma and also are not counted towards the schools Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Currently the Virginia Department of Education does not keep any data on the number of “gap kids or gray-area kids” there are in each school district.

What are the consequences of being a Gap kid or Gray-area kid in Virginia if you are in High School? Students in grades 9-11 are not enrolled in courses that have an end-of –course Standard of Learning assessments. Therefore the student does not earn a standard unit of credit or a verified credit required to graduate with a Standard or Advanced Studies Diploma. Students do not qualify for remediation or tutoring since they are not enrolled in any of the courses that have an end-of –course Standard of Learning assessments.

For more information: Center on Education Policy (CEP) website Clash of the Titans: No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities, Dr. Alexa (Pochowski) Posny, Kansas Department of Education Assistant Commissioner; “The Intersection of the No Child Left Behind Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act or Can You Fit a Round Peg into A Square Hole?” Nancy D. Reder, Esq., Deputy Executive Director, The National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE) presented at the Forum on Ideas to Improve the No Child Left Behind Act - September 14,2004 VDOE Procedures for Participation of Students with Disabilities in the Assessment Component of Virginia Accountability System 10/02 (pages 9- 10) Diploma Options for Students with Disabilities in Virginia, VCSD Legal Advocacy Center website at