NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Advertisements

Quality Learning for Every Student, Everyday Tonight’s Theme: Know your Rights!
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
Parent Advisory Council Seven Hills Classical Academy May 10, 2012.
Standards help teachers ensure their students have the skills and knowledge they need by providing clear goals for student learning. Common standards.
Response to Intervention (RtI) How can we make it work in Wisconsin?
National Center on Educational Outcomes June, 2004 How do we keep kids from being stuck in our gap? A frame, a series of discussion questions, and some.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Each Power Point presentation can be viewed as.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
FotherGile School District Mission, Vision and Graduation Proposal.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
 Christine Hartland, Grade 5 S/C  Julie Perks, Grade 4 S/C  Jenny Dow, Grade 3 S/C  Kristy Whigham, Grade 2 S/C.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Overview of Indiana’s Alternate Assessment October 2014 Karen Stein, IDOE.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.
Annual Title One Meeting A. Philip Randolph Elementary LaToya Miley, Principal Victoria Grubbs, Assistant Principal Kathleen Stamper, Curriculum.
Response to Intervention (RtI) How can we make it work in Wisconsin?
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
Connecting the IEP to Arizona College and Career Ready Standards Kyrene School District Special Education Advisory Council (KSEPAC) Presentation November.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
NCLB. Introduction Increased federal mandates and requirements on states Increased federal funding to states by almost 25% from the previous year Movement.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
Overview of the IEP as a tool in order to access, participate, and make progress in the general curriculum 1.
Spring 2012 Ohio’s Academic Content Standards - Extended for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Increasing grade-level standard accessibility.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Serving Students with Disabilities in Indiana
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Standards-based Grading and Reporting Information for Parents.
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
American Institutes for Research
Tuba City Primary School
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge
MIDDLETOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
Clayton County Public Schools
Standards-aligned IEPs
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota

NCLB & IDEA NCLB seeks to improve the education of all children IDEA focuses on providing specialized individual services to each child with disabilities so that they can access the general curriculum The last IDEA reauthorization aligned it more closely with NCLB

NCLB Based on 4 Principles Accountability for results Emphasis on doing what works based on scientific research Expanded parental involvement Expanded local control and flexibility

Goals of NCLB Raise academic achievement of all students Close the achievement gap between groups of students that historically perform poorly and their higher performing peers

What All States Must Do Develop challenging academic standards that are the same for every student Develop annual academic assessments for all students Ensure that here is a highly qualified teacher in every classroom Define the amount of academic progress schools must achieve each year to reach proficiency goal by 2014

What States Must Do (continued) Ensure the availability of reasonable adaptations and accommodations for students with disabilities Produce an annual statewide “Report Card” of performance and make the report available to the public

The NCLB Bottom Line Schools are graded on how well all students are learning the knowledge and skills defined by the content standards Schools’ grades are based on how well subgroups of students are learning – Economically disadvantaged students – Students with disabilities – Students of color – English language learners

NCLB and IDEA Working Together Academic content and achievement standards Annual assessments & accountability Qualified general education teachers IEPs & access to general curriculum Participation in all state and school assessments Qualified special education teachers

Two Types of Standards Content standards Achievement standards

Two Types of Standards Content standards – Reading – Math – Science Achievement standards

Two Types of Standards Content standards Achievement standards – Performance levels Advanced (e.g., 85% to 100% correct) Proficient (e.g., 60% to 84% correct) Basic (e.g., 0% to 29% correct)

Two Types of Standards Content standards Achievement standards – Performance levels – Performance descriptors

Example Performance Descriptor Grade 4 Proficient When reading 4 th grade text, the student demonstrates an understanding of the main idea and key points of the text supported by literal and inferential information. The student draws clear connections between information and the text and inferences and conclusions.

Two Types of Standards Content standards Achievement standards – Performance levels – Performance descriptors – Exemplars—sample student work at each level of achievement

Testing Requirements Language arts & math – Annual testing – Grades 3,4,5,6,7 & 8 – Sometime during grades 10 – 12 Science – Once annually during – Grades 3-5 – Grades 6-9 – Grades 10-12

What Makes It Work? Stakeholder agreement on standards Alignment of standards, curriculum, instruction, and assessment Use of evidence based strategies and programs Highly qualified teachers Public accountability

Pending EDA Reauthorization Adopt a state’s accountability system – Content standards – Achievement standards – Assessments Make “report card” of results available to the public