Design Review UL Vibration Test Apparatus May 13, 2013 1:30PM Est.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 STATICS ENGINEERS MECHANICS CHAPTER Lecture Notes:
Advertisements

BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 1 The Design of the Booster Collimators Larry Bartoszek BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 3/10/03.
Feasibility Study of Replacing an Industrial Hydraulic Lift System with an Electro-Mechanical Lift System Critical Design Review Thursday, 21 September.
Optical Manufacturing Solutions 1 Probe Assembly.
Mechanical Engineering
Case-New Holland Steer-by-Wire Detailed Design. Today’s Agenda  Who is CNH?  Background  Project Goal  System Level Concept  Design Components 
V-belt drive V-belt is mostly used in factories and workshops where a great amount of power is to be transmitted from one pulley to another when the two.
Conceptual Design Presentation ME 4182 Team: Guys Engineering Nathan Bessette, Rahul Bhatia, Andrew Cass, Zeeshan Saiyed, Glen Stewart YJ Chok.
Designing an Air-Propulsion System Presentation by – Jacob Griffin Advisor -Dr. Junkun Ma Senior Design Teacher -Dr. Cris Koutsougeras.
Course Name : DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS
Drive Train Ryan Barba Patrick Hickey Andrew Hill.
Hardinge Universal Turret Senior Design Project Project Sponsor: Hardinge Inc.
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
P11213: Modular Student Attachment to the Land Vehicle for Education Jared Wolff, Andrew Komendat, Oyetunde Jolaoye, Dylan Rider.
Fatigue Life Testing Platform for Electroformed Bellows EEEE Jadon Weinel Hector Vargas Customer: NiCoForm, Inc.Advisor: Dr. E. Debartolo EMEM Richard.
Critical Design Review 12/7/04 Team Uno Bunker Curnes Shawn Houlahan Stephanie Rohrs Steve Schwall Chuck Smith.
Senior Design: Tachometer Calibration Device Team 4: Jennifer Egolf, Matthew Hagon, Michael Lee, Christopher Pawson Sponsor: DuPont Advisor: Dr. Glancey.
R·I·T Kate Gleason College of Engineering Design of a Tensile Load Frame for a Scanning Electron Microscope Senior Design Project Project Manager.
Senior Design: Validation of Design December 15, 2008.
The objective of this project was to design a dynamic similarity test rig to replicate the operating conditions of the main crank bearing in the Dresser-Rand.
Background Cooper Crouse-Hinds Industries is a leader in the manufacturing of luminaires, an encased lighting system, for hazardous locations. These luminaires.
Design Review UL Vibration Test Apparatus May 13, :30PM Est.
Engineer Training Mechanical Overview. Engineer Training Confidential 2 XL1500 is both Roll-to-Roll and Roll-to-Sheet Printer MachineXL1500-2mXL1500-3mXL1500-5m.
Electrosurgical Life-test Fixture Team E.L.F. Design Review Mechanical Engineers Mary Hamann Brad Watson Naomi Sanders Electrical Engineers Tony Giedl.
Rolling element bearings A. Lozzi 09
P /30/14 System Level Design Review Reciprocating Friction Tester Tuesday, September 30th, 2014.
P14474: Hydrostatic Test Apparatus Jake Manley Anushka Kalicharan Mitchell Sedore Brian Benner Kyle Abbott.
Bridge Modules BKK and BKR
Systems Level Design Review UL Vibration Test Apparatus January 11, 2013 KGCOE Room # :00AM-12:00PM Est.
Objective Provide directional control. No specific specifications set by IAT. Must be rugged and easily maintained.
Design Review UL Vibration Test Apparatus February 21, :30AM Est.
Biomechanics: Kayak Exercise Stefan Cautino, Geoffrey Cohen, Jason Colella, Alex Wilson, & David Zankowsky.
LINEAR MEASUREMENT.
Timken Learn and Lead Customer Training 5/17/2007Radial Ball Product Overview1 Radial Ball Bearing Product Overview Part B Narrated by David Beach Motion.
Capstone Team  Andre Nylund  Chris Grewell  Craig Lechtenberg  Fadel Al Jutail  Matt Melius  Mufeed Yacoub Team Advisor  Dr. Raul Bayoán Cal Customer.
NCSX Modular Coil Turning Fixture FDR. Background Modular Coil winding forms are cast structures which provide the foundation on which the coils are constructed.
P14471 Vibration Testing Application. Team Introductions NameRoleMajor Brett BillingsTeam LeaderIndustrial Engineer Nick GrecoLead EngineerMechanical.
TEAM 14 John Armitage Douglas DeVoto Brian Polkowski Marykate Wioncek SOUTHCO Vibration Fatigue Tester.
Flat Saw Training. Flat Saw Sizes –Low Horsepower Blade diameters range from 8” (200mm) to 18” (450mm) Power ranges from 4 to 25 horsepower.
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF AN EXPERIMENTAL SETUP FOR SINGLE PLANE BALANCING Project Members- Nithin Seenivasan Nandaganesh M.R.Chitthaarth 8 th March, 2010.
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
Radial Ball Bearing Product Overview
Drop Testing Apparatus Team Members: Deatly Butler Mark Clouse Chris Dux Kris Honas Shaun Scott Drew Stephens Client: Itron, Inc. Brian Priest Technical.
January 11, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus1 Final Design.
CLIC Permanent Magnet Quadrupole Engineering Development of second family member Norbert Collomb, STFC Daresbury Laboratory 1N. Collomb 07/11/2012.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
P16453 Subsystem Design Loading, Measurement, Control, and Test of a Journal Bearing Test Platform Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony.
Lav meeting F. Raffaelli INFN – Sezione di Pisa C. Capoccia LNF, A. Cecchetti INFN – Sezione di Frascati CERN, Dec13 th, Feet friction studies. -Installation.
Texonics Proposal for Production Line Redesign and Retrofit.
Mechanical Workshop FIRST Mid Atlantic Region January 2016.
Luminaire Vibration Test Apparatus: P14471 Team MemberMajor Brett Billings, Team LeadIndustrial and Systems Engineering Nicholas Greco, Lead Mechanical.
P10511: Miniaturization of Xerography Derek Meinke (ME, PM) Matthew Liff (ME) Tony Zhang (EE) Zaw Htoo (ISE)
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Team 15503:Zach Foggetti (ME) Dalton Mead (ME) Bridget Kearney (EE) Ruishi Shen (ISE) Tom Wossner (ME)
14471 Vibration Test Apparatus: Systems Design Review Team Lead: Brett Billings Lead Engineer: Nicholas G Scribe: Ashley W EDGE: Claire Kobal Team Members:
P14471 Vibration Testing Apparatus II Subsystems Design Review 10/29/2013 Brett Billings Jacob Gardner Nick Greco Ron Jimbo Claire Kobal Ryan Selig Ashley.
BY B.JITHENDRA KUMAR Shaper Machine. Introduction The shaping machine is used to machine flat metal surfaces especially where a large amount of metal.
P14471 Vibration Testing Apparatus II Integration Demo 4/15/2014 Brett Billings Jacob Gardner Nick Greco Ron Jimbo Claire Kobal Ryan Selig Ashley Waldron.
P14471 Vibration Testing Application. Team Introductions NameRoleMajor Brett BillingsTeam LeaderIndustrial Engineer Nick GrecoLead EngineerMechanical.
ENM208 INTRODUCTION to MACHINING ANADOLU UNİVERSITY Industrial Engineering Department.
R16601: Glass Fab Wire Saw Integration/Roadmap. “Glass Fab, Inc. is currently looking to replace their wire glass cutting saw with a smaller, more efficient.
World-Class Manufacturer & Solution Provider in Custom and Commodity Bearings.
Dr. Subhash Technical Campus
Presentation on Hooke's joint
Present status of the flux return yoke design
POWER TRANSMISSION with BELTS & CHAINS
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Detailed Design
P08002-Automated Parallel Bars
P15661 Reciprocating Friction Tester Base Subsystem
Final Project Review -Senior Design 2
Wednesday, February 16, 4:00-6:00PM
Presentation transcript:

Design Review UL Vibration Test Apparatus May 13, :30PM Est.

Project & Team Information Project: UL Vibration Test Apparatus Project Number: Customer: Eaton Corporation (previously Cooper Crouse-Hinds Industries) Customer Contacts: Joe Manahan Ed Leubner RIT Faculty Guide: Dr. Benjamin Varela Project Team:Walter Bergstrom Sean Coots Spencer Crandell Mark Ellison February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus2

Presentation Overview 1)Detailed Design Review Overview Appendix: UL Test Stand and Project Background February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus3

Detailed Design Review Discussed Design: – Adjustment Mechanism – Crank Arm Key Action Items: – Adjustment Mechanism Strength – Crank Arm Actions Taken: – Crank Arm to be a single piece February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus4

Final Design February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus5

Variations from Design February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus6

Setup February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus7

Testing Displacement testing completed on the system As motor implementation is not within the scope of this project, frequency was not validated Test frame rigidly fastened to testing table – Angle steel welded into frame shape – Aluminum cantilever with flange connection Dial indicators used in two locations to verify the displacement across the system – Contacting linear slider box – Contacting collar at connection to vertical conduit February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus8

Testing February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus9 Dial Indicator Contacting Slider Box Dial Indicator Contacting Conduit Collar

Test 1: Verify zero-displacement – Centering dowels mated between adjustment mechanism and rotating disk to signify zero-displacement – Dial indicators showed zero displacement for the system Test 2: Verify 3 displacement values – 0.016”: found that dial indicators give very low value for displacement ( ”) – 0.100”: again found that measured values were lower than expected ( ”) – 0.250”: met expected displacement value within ± 0.010” Test 3: Verify torque – Torque wrench used not ideal; not precise enough to measure low torque range – Did verify that the required torque to drive the steady-state system is below ~2 lbf-ft February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus10 Cantilever Flange Connection Vertical Conduit Conduit Collar Testing Table Test Frame

Testing Conclusions Zero-displacement point is validated Displacement measurements do not agree at low eccentric values, but they do at higher distances – Postulated that the dial indicators are not precise enough to accurately measure low eccentric distances Torque measurement has a high degree of uncertainty due to the low level of precision associated with the torque wrench used during testing Recommended: – Purchase more precise dial indicator (re-test) – Purchase more precise torque wrench (re-test) February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus11

Frame Design February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus12 44” 34”

Frame Design February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus13 Advantages: Allows for a single technician to mount the luminaire Extra support of U-channel decrease vibration of system Rubber pads in-between supporting beams help in dampening the system More space efficient than current design *Approximately 44” X 34” footprint Footprint may become larger due to resonate frequency of design (to be tackled by next senior design group)

Motor Selection February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus14

February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus15

Recommended Motor February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus16

February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus17 ParameterGoverning EquationValue Max Bearing Load Upper bearing force2450lbf3150lbf Lower bearing force1225lbf3150lbf SeSe 1.10e4psi- F.O.S. Shaft10- F.O.S. Key39- Where k a, k b and k c are Marin factors for surface condition, size, and loading conditions, respectively. l 1 =2, l 2 =4, σ min, σ max, Sy, Sut can be found in Appendix

Lubrication Drive Shaft Bearings: Double sealed flange mount bearings with easy access grease zerk fittings. Linear Bearings: Double sealed closed bearings with easy access grease zerk fittings. Crank Arm Bearings: Double Sealed roller bearings pre-packed with grease. Easy access for lubrication by taking off Polycarbonate cover. February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus18

Budget February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus19

Questions For Customer February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus20

Open Discussion Any questions? Design concerns not discussed? February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus21

Appendix UL Test Standard and Project Background

Project Background To pass safety requirements for certification the luminaires must meet a series of Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Standards. A Vibration Test Stand is currently being used by Cooper Crouse-Hinds to test pendant mount luminaires according to section 33 of the UL844 Standard. The Current Vibration Test Stand is outdated, has multiple design flaws, and design documentation and drawings are non-existent. Cooper Crouse-Hinds would like a new modernized Vibration Test Stand to be developed that addresses some of the design flaws of the current system while maintaining UL844 Test Standards. This new Design must also have a LabView interface and control capability integrated into the system. February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus23

Design Goals over Winter/Spring MSD Note: It has been decided that this apparatus will be developed in multiple Senior Design Sequences. Provide customer with two design concepts for vibration mechanism Develop a final design of the vibration mechanism. Design a steel test frame that will support the vibration mechanism and the vertical conduit. Design but do not develop steel frame for entire vibration test machine. Develop a full set of engineering drawings. Calculate and select the required drive train system components. Purchase materials, machine components, and assemble the vibration mechanism and test frame. Test the mechanism to ensure that it meets 1 / 32 ” deflection requirement February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus24

Summary of UL844 Vibration Test Standard LUMINAIRES FOR USE IN HAZARDOUS (CLASSIFIED) LOCATIONS – UL 844 Section 33 – Vibration Test Standards Luminaire is to be subjected to 35 hours of vibration testing. Luminaire assembly is to be attached to a / 2 ” long conduit via NPT threading. The other end of the NPT threaded pipe is to be secured to the hub of a rigid mounting frame so that the conduit hangs vertically. The conduit should correspond to the smallest size of threaded conduit hub that is designed to attach to the Luminaire being tested. The horizontal force to be applied to the system in order to obtain the deflection must me located 4” above the location of the conduit where the Luminaire attaches. The deflection must be 1 / 32 ” with 1 / 16 ” total deflection per cycle. The system must run at 2000 cycles/min. February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus25

UL844 Vibration Test Standard February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus26

Design Flaws Associated with Original Design February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus27 Difficult for one technician to set up test Lubricant not contained Machine components exposed to contaminants Belts used (slipping) Uses single speed motor with a speed reducer Frequency adjustment dial held in place with rope No displacement adjustment Attachment collar may experience minor buckling Does not accounted for part wear and tolerance stack up

Customer Design Needs Need #Importance High 3 – 2 – 1 Low Design CriteriaMeasure of Effectiveness CN13Obtain vibration frequency of 2000 cycles/minStroboscope CN23Create displacement of 1/32” at 22.5” bellow pipe flangeDial Gauge CN32Adjustment of attachment collar position for perpendicularity___ CN42240 V electrical input___ CN52System envelope size is maintained or decreased from original system___ CN61Mounts to current anchor points in floor___ CN73Capability to adjust for different pipe sizes___ CN81Use current flange mounting for pipes___ CN92Design in an easily removable collar___ CN103Will support multiple types of Luminaires___ CN112Easy to mount the Luminaires1 Technician can run entire test CN121Ease of lubrication___ CN132Containment of LubricantLook for leaking of Lubricant CN143System to not run near resonate frequencyDoes not shake itself apart CN151Minimize noise of systemUnder 85 decibels (OCIA standard for requiring ear protection) February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus28

PUGH Matrix: Rotational to Linear Motion Mechanism February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus29

PUGH Matrix: Slider Mechanism February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus30

PUGH Matrix: Displacement Adjustment Mechanism February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus31

February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus32 Risk Assessment

February 21, 2013UL Vibration Test Apparatus33