Introduction Treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is effective, but can be associated with debilitating side.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contemporary practice of radiotherapy post radical prostatectomy at a tertiary referral centre in Australia Introduction  Adverse features on histopathology.
Advertisements

Pulmonary Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy:
PROSTATE CANCER Dr Samad Zare Assistant Proffesor of Urology Shaheed Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences.
Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer Management Michael E. Karellas Assistant Professor of Urologic Oncology May 15, 2010.
British Association of Urological Surgeons Metastatic Prostate Cancer Guidelines.
Continuous versus Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Robert Dreicer, M.D., M.S., FACP, FASCO Chair Dept of Solid Tumor Oncology.
The PRIAS Study In Australia One Institution’s Experience Introduction PRIAS (Prostate cancer Research International: Active Surveillance – NTR1718) is.
Radiotherapy in prostate cancer Dr.Mina Tajvidi Radiation oncologist.
Radiofrequency Ablation of Lung Cancer
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT): The optimal indication for operable tumors in inoperable patients D.Katsochi 1, S.Kosmidis 1, A.Fotopoulou.
Radiation and Prostate Cancer Past, Present and Future Dr
Prostate Cancer Int. 洪 毓 謙. Prostate cancer is the Second leading cause of death from cancer in the United States American male, the lifetime risk of:
Controversies in the management of PSA-only recurrent disease Stephen J. Freedland, MD Associate Professor of Urology and Pathology Durham VA Medical Center.
Radiotherapy for Kidney cancer
Treatment options for locally recurrent Prostate Cancer Giuseppe Simone Mediterranean School of Oncology Roma
Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression
A phase I study on the combination of neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus pazopanib in patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.
Howard M. Sandler, MD University of Michigan Medical School
Surrogate End point for Prostate Cancer- Specific Mortality After RP or EBRT A D’Amico J Nat Ca Inst 95,
Low dose chemotherapy with insulin (Insulin Potentiation Therapy) in combination with hormone therapy for treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): Results from a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial Hussain M et.
Dan Spratt, MD Department of Radiation Oncology Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: FDG-PET and Targeted Molecular Imaging.
A 74 year old man underwent open prostatectomy due to moderate to severe urinary symptoms unresponsive to medical therapy. Preoperative PSA was 4.1 Postoperatively.
Mark L. Merlin, M.D. Radiotherapy Clinics of Georgia 7/14/2010 The Role of Radiation Therapy in the Management of Prostate Cancer.
Design of Clinical Trials for Select Patients With a Rising PSA following Primary Therapy Anthony V. D’Amico, MD, PhD Professor of Radiation Oncology Harvard.
Decreased Risk of Radiation Pneumonitis With Coincident Concurrent Use Of Angiotensin- Converting Enzyme Inhibitors In Patients Receiving Lung Stereotactic.
Prostate Support Group Dr Duncan McLaren Consultant Oncologist.
Updated 5-year Biochemical Relapse-Free Survival after Prostate Brachytherapy Jenny P. Nobes St. Luke’s Cancer Centre, The Royal Surrey County Hospital,
Ten Year Outcomes In Men Under 60 Treated With Iodine-125 Permanent Brachytherapy As Monotherapy GU - Prostate Cancer: Novel Imaging (MRI,PET) & Brachytherapy.
Validity of more than 30Gy radiation therapy for long-surviving patients with painful bone metastases E.Katayama 1,2, H.Okada 1, I.Asakawa 2, T.Tamamoto.
CASE 1 65-year-old man No other diseases or previous surgeries July 2005: PSA 11.5 ng/ml; F/T: 9% After prostate biopsy revealing adenocarcinoma: RETROPUBIC.
Protocols for Advanced Prostate Cancer and/or Local Failure After Radical Prostatectomy Isaac Powell, MD.
Predicting Subsequent Response to Hormone Therapy Following First-line Androgen Deprivation in Advanced Prostate Cancer S. Turner H. Gurney V. Gebski M.
Robert Dreicer, M.D., M.S., FACP Chair Dept of Solid Tumor Oncology
A prospective randomized trial
Radiotherapy versus carboplatin for stage I seminoma: Updated analysis of the MRC/EORTC randomized trial Authors: Oliver et al,
Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Non small cell lung cancer
Conflict of Interest Declaration: Nothing to Disclose Presenter: Sophie Lamoureux Title of Presentation: A Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.
High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost for Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Two Different Fractionation Schemes Tania Kaprealian 1, Vivian Weinberg 3, Joycelyn.
The Role of Cyberknife Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer Jay L. Friedland, MD.
Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer Anna Bill-Axelson, M.D., Lars Holmberg, M.D., Ph.D., Mirja Ruutu, M.D., Ph.D., Michael.
Debra Freeman, MD – Naples Christopher King, MD, PhD - Stanford.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ABLATIVE HYPOFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR STEREOTACTIC TREATMENTS IN THE BRAIN AND BODY: OBSERVATIONS ON EFFICACY AND TOXICITY IN.
LOCAL TREATMENT OF OLIGOMETASTATIC DISEASE IN PROSTATE CANCER: LYMPHADENECTOMY Alberto Briganti, MD, fEBU Department of Urology Chair, Prostate Cancer.
Charlie Comins 10/11/15. Bristol Experience Treated first patient in Feb 2014 Aim to treat 12 patients in first year Treated 25 patients in first 12 months.
Matthew Raymond Smith, MD, PhD Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Program Director, Genitourinary Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer.
Brain imaging prior to lung cancer resection
This program will include a discussion of investigational agents not approved by the FDA for use in the United States, and data that were presented in.
SABR Update Breast SSG June 2017.
Radiation therapy for Early Stage Prostate Cancer
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Results of Definitive Radiotherapy in Anal Canal Carcinoma
STAMPEDE: Docetaxel Significantly Improves Survival in Men With Hormone-Naive Prostate Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual.
Bladder Cancer and Prostatic Cancer
Compassionate People World Class Care
Treatment With Continuous, Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Weston Park Hospital Experience.
The Role of Cyberknife Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer Jay L. Friedland, MD.
Local Consolidative Therapy in Oligometastatic NSCLC With No Progression on First-line Systemic Treatment CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016.
Colorectal SSG: SABR and Oligometastatic Disease
Evaluation of biologically equivalent dose escalation, clinical outcome, and toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy: A meta-analysis of 12,000 patients.
Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals,
Dr T P E Wells 13 July 2018 Breast SSG Bath
Intermittent Hormone Therapy: What Is Its Place in Clinical Practice?
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
External Beam Radiotherapy as Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer
Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
Intermittent Hormone Therapy: What Is Its Place in Clinical Practice?
Rarer Bone Tumors Thomas F. DeLaney, M.D. Co-Director: Sarcoma Program
CORE: A randomised trial of COnventional care versus Radioablation (stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)) in Extracranial oligometastases (CRUK/14/038)
History: 71 yo male post radical prostatectomy 4 years ago for Gleason 4+5 prostate cancer Pre-op staging CT and MDP bone scan were negative for metastatic.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is effective, but can be associated with debilitating side effects. Oligometastasis describes a state of limited metastatic capacity (Weichselbaum 2011). This may represent an intermediate disease state that is amenable to aggressive local therapy, allowing deferral of ADT. In practice oligometastasis usually refers to five or fewer metastases. These early metastatic lesions may seed further metastases. Therefore, eradication of oligometastases may alter the progression of disease and potentially offer cure in select cases. Surgery or radiation therapy are the two treatment options in this setting. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is relatively non-invasive. It delivers an ablative dose of radiotherapy to target tissues, minimising scatter to adjacent structures. Early evidence in other cancers suggests SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for oligometastatic disease (Tree 2013). Conclusions This promising early data suggests that SBRT has the potential to safely control oligometastatic prostate cancer in the short term, and may delay the need for ADT and its associated side effects. Longer follow-up and prospective controlled trials are warranted. Results Methods A retrospective review was undertaken of all men with oligometastatic prostate cancer (≤5 sites of metastasis), treated with SBRT by one clinician (PB) from Dec 2007 to Dec Outcomes included effectiveness and safety of SBRT. Efficacy was measured by ADT use and biochemical response (PSA). Biochemical failure was defined as two consecutive PSA rises, a single PSA rise >50% of pre-SBRT level, or no absolute reduction in PSA. Cases studies were also undertaken of two men with complete biochemical response to SBRT. Results reported are median and range unless otherwise stated. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of SBRT in oligometastatic prostate cancer. References Tree, A. et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastases. Lancet Oncology 2013; 14, e28–e37 Weichselbaum, R.R. & Hellman, S. Oligometastases revisited. Nature reviews. Clinical oncology 2011; 8(6), 378–382 Fairleigh Reeves 1, Patrick Bowden 2, Anthony Costello 1,2 1 The Royal Melbourne Hospital; 2 Epworth Hospital Richmond, Australia Stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer: early results Results Patient Characteristics Primary Cancer PSA ug/L9.1 ( ) Gleason8 (6-9) Stage T1c T2a T2c T3a T3b 6% 17% 34% 37% Primary Rx RP RP + RT RT 32% 46% 22% SBRT Age69y (50- 80) Time to SBRT from 1° Rx 39months (6wk-13y) ADT status Naïve *Use(d) CRPC 62% 14% 24% Symptomatic15% Lesion type Bone Node Both 59% 37% 5% Number sites r 5 71% 22% 7% Treatment details LesionGrayFraction Overall36.84 (12-70)10 (1-35) Lymph Node35.5 (18-70)5 (3-35) Bone40 (12-50)10 (1-20) Case 1 – 62yo March 2010 RARP (Gleason 8, PSA 6.5, staging negative) Post-op PSA <0.01ug/L  increased to 0.21 (Oct 2011) December 2011 Salvage prostate bed radiotherapy Feb 2013 Ongoing PSA rise to 7.1 with back pain Bone scan  solitary lumbar vertebral metastasis March 2013 SBRT to lumbar metastasis Follow-up PSA 0.35 (6wk), (8months) Remains ADT free Case 2 – 58yo August 2007 RARP (Gleason 7, PSA 39, staging negative) Oct 2007 Post-op PSA 43.3ug/L, back pain Bone scan  solitary lumbar vertebral metastasis December 2007 High dose RT to lumbar lesion + ADT August 2008 PSA <0.01  Intermittent ADT April 2012 PSA rise to 8.5 (HORMONE REFRACTORY) Bone scan  new acetabular metastasis no uptake in previously treated lesion May 2012 High dose RTto acetabular metastasis Feb 2013 ADT ceased Aug 2013 PSA off ADT (S.Testosterone 7.4nmol/L) 41 treatments in 37 men Median follow-up 5 months (6wkto 4.3y) Metastases were detected on Bone Scan, CT, PET or MRI *Use(d) = current/previous ADT excluding CRPC and neoadjuvant/adjuvant ADT only Initial PSA follow-up in all patients ADT statusPre-SBRT6/52 review Overall7 (<0.01 – 81.51)4.9 (<0.01 – 60) Naïve6.65 (0.75 – 43)4.8 (0.217 – 60) *Use(d)18.7 (<0.01 – 81.51)6.74 (<0.01 – 59.1) CRPC10 (4 – 72)4.5 (0.02 – 27.5) Clinical Outcomes All patients with >1 follow-up PSA (n=31) 42% Biochemical response 13% Biochemical failure not requiring treatment 45% Biochemical failure requiring SBRT, ADT or chemotherapy ADT naïve patients (n=23) 16 PSA response  remain ADT free 4 started ADT (6wk – 6m post SBRT) 3 required further SBRT 1 started ADT (6m post SBRT) 2 remain ADT free Overall 78% remain ADT free at 5 months (median) Symptomatic patients (n=6): 83% had resolution of their pain Acute toxicity (all patients) 61% no toxicity 31.7% minor side effects not requiring treatment (Grade1) 7.3% nausea or diarrhoea requiring medication (Grade2) Case Case Case