Preparing for Compliance Monitoring Reviews Understanding CMS Protocols Used by Review Organizations January 14, 2009 Presented by: Margaret deHesse, RN,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Program design overview Pre-contract to post-program year Office on Volunteerism and Community Service.
MCO Participation in External Quality Review Mandatory Activities During the SMMC Transition October 30, 2013 Presenter: Mary Wiley, BSW, RN, M.Ed. Project.
EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005
1 Mystery Shopping SHIP Directors’ Conference June 11, 2007 Julie Leonard & Erika Melman BearingPoint, Inc.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
RMS – a collaborative approach Presentation Lyn Dare & Stephen Larmour Authorisation & Audit Comcare.
CIP Spot Check Process Gary Campbell Manager of Compliance Audits ReliabilityFirst Corporation August, 2009.
External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Tuesday, September 26, p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
1 The aim…. ‘to enable assessors to objectively assess a laboratory’s compliance with the new standards’
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
External Quality Review Process August 6, The Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence (CCME) A physician-sponsored, nonprofit health care quality.
External Quality Review Organization (EQRO) Kick-Off Meeting
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Encounter Data Validation: Review and Project Update
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
[Insert Exercise Name] Evaluator Briefing and Guidance.
HEDIS Audit – Appropriate Monitoring and Oversight of Vendors Presenter: Yolanda Strozier, MBA Project Manager, EQRO Services.
Hospital Patient Safety Initiatives: Discharge Planning
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Building a Compliance Risk Monitoring Program HCCA Compliance Institute New OrleansApril 19, 2005 Lois Dehls Cornell, Esq. Assistant Vice President, Deputy.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
1 HIPAA Security Overview Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Procurement Engineering and Review Team (PERT) PEER REVIEW PROGRAM Patrick Marmo 2/7/2012 Independent Peer Review Program for Contractor’s Purchasing Systems.
Establishing a Hospital Patient
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Performance Measures 101 Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group June 18, :15 p.m.–4:45.
WELCOME! External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Wednesday, June 18, :00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. WELCOME!
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Introduction to the new SHC Health Information Record Manual Presented by Rhonda Anderson, RHIA President Anderson Health Information Systems, Inc
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
Quality Strategy June 10, 2009 Presented by: Debby McNamara, LCSW, PMP Quality Coordinator, AHCA.
Upcoming EQR Activities Contract Year Two 1:45 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services.
Performance Measures 101 Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group March 28, :00.
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa. us Compliance Monitoring for Gifted Education COMPLIANCE MONITORING.
Validation of Performance Measures for PMHPs Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Host-Site Compliance Monitoring 2014 New York State AmeriCorps Program Director Training.
Corrective Action Programs. 2 HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program Provides a common exercise policy and program guidance that constitutes.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
DOL Employee Benefit Plan Audits & How to Prepare
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
Centennial Care 2.0 MCO Readiness
Performance Measures 101 March 30, 2012 Presenter:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for Compliance Monitoring Reviews Understanding CMS Protocols Used by Review Organizations January 14, 2009 Presented by: Margaret deHesse, RN, BSN Executive Director, State & Corporate Services Health Services Advisory Group, Inc.

Overview of CMS Protocols Two main sources of information –Document review  Assess compliance with regulatory provisions  Identify issues that will be pursued during interviews –Interviews  Interview participants provide clarification and confirm that documented practices are being followed  Data gathered from interviews should supplement and verify what is learned during document review

Overview of CMS Protocols Protocol activities 1.Planning for compliance monitoring activities 2.Obtaining background information from the State Medicaid agency (review organization’s responsibility) 3.Document review 4.Conducting interviews 5.Collecting any other accessory information (e.g., from site visits) 6.Analyzing and compiling findings (review organization’s responsibility) 7.Reporting results to the State Medicaid agency (review organization’s responsibility)

Activity 1: Planning for Compliance Monitoring Activities Establishing an agenda for the visit −In conjunction with the review organization. −An agenda will help the review organization to perform an efficient and effective on-site evaluation. −An agenda will help the MCO/PIHP to:  Plan for staff participation.  Gather documentation.  Address logistical issues, such as arranging locations for reviewers to conduct document review, system demonstrations, observations, and interviews.

Activity 1: Planning for Compliance Monitoring Activities (cont.) Establishing an agenda for the visit (cont.) −An agenda sets the tone, as well as the expectations, for the on-site visit so that both the MCO/PIHP and the reviewers understand the objectives and time frames for the review. −Review the agenda at the end of each review day to verify follow-up items and the next day’s events.

Activity 1: Planning for Compliance Monitoring Activities (cont.) Preparation instructions and guidance are provided to the MCO/PIHP by the review organization –An on-site evaluation process requires the cooperation of the MCO/PIHP being evaluated. –If the MCO/PIHP is prepared for the on-site visit, reviewers can remain focused on conducting and completing the evaluation in the allotted time frame.

Activity 1: Planning for Compliance Monitoring Activities (cont.) Preparation instructions and guidance are provided to the MCO/PIHP by the review organization (cont.) –Review organization instructions may include the following:  Providing the health plan with the on-site review tool, which describes the scope of the evaluation to be performed  Describing how the evaluation will be conducted, including instructions  Providing a list of documents that should be available

Activity 1: Planning for Compliance Monitoring Activities (cont.) Preparation instructions and guidance are provided to the MCO/PIHP by the review organization (cont.) –Health plan responsibilities may include the following:  Preparing a roadmap (description of how documents, systems, and processes meet the standard).  Organizing the files to be reviewed.  Verifying that the correct files are prepared (compare to sample list, check names, documents in files, mock file review).

Activity 1: Planning for Compliance Monitoring Activities (cont.) Preparation instructions and guidance are provided to the MCO/PIHP by the review organization (cont.) –Health plan responsibilities may include the following:  Completing any forms or other data-gathering instruments (e.g., an Information Systems Capability Assessment).  Arranging expected participant interviews.  Making administrative arrangements.  Confirming other expectations or responsibilities.

Examples of Successful Preparation Activities Create a work team with significant involvement of operational areas being reviewed –Member services, information services, quality, compliance, utilization management, case management, provider relations, etc. Create a formal work plan based on the review schedule established in conjunction with the State Conduct a mock review using the review tool to identify gaps prior to the on-site review Prepare information files or binders coinciding with each area under review

Activity 2: Document Review Consider all sources of compliance requirements –Assessment of compliance with regulatory provisions  Medicaid regulatory provisions (BBA)  State contract requirements  Internal policies and procedures

Activity 2: Document Review (cont.) Consider all sources of compliance requirements (cont.) –Identified issues that will be pursued during interviews  Disagreement between internal policies and procedures and State and federal requirements

Activity 3: Interviews Consider the topic and policy/procedure when scheduling participants –Data gathered from interviews should supplement and verify what is learned during document review. –Interview participants provide clarification and confirm that documented practices are being followed.  Interviews should be conducted with groups. Rarely is one individual solely responsible for a particular function.  Cross-functional/service/department interviews are beneficial.  What one area does not know, another may, and the interview then becomes a learning opportunity for the MCO’s/PIHP’s staff as well.

Example: Grievance Process Review Activity 1: Planning Review organization instructions may include the following: –The scope of the evaluation to be performed  All grievances in a time frame (between 1/1/2008 and 12/31/2008) –How the evaluation may be conducted  Review of documentation and reports (pre-on-site and on-site)  System demonstration o Databases—including codes/types of grievances o Manual—paper-based system  Interviews o Staff members who are interviewed should be prepared to describe their role in the grievance process, including intake, routing, and oversight.  Observations  File review of selected sample of grievances

Example: Grievance Process Review Activity 2: Document review Review organization instructions may include the following: −Documents that may be requested for review prior to on- site review or while on-site  Grievance and appeals policies and procedures  Internal monitoring reports o Reports used to monitor timeliness o Reports used to trend types and subtypes of grievances  External regulatory reports  Sample acknowledgement letters  Sample resolution letters

Example: Grievance Process Review Activity 2: Document review (cont.) Review organization instructions may include the following: –Grievance file review by review organization  Random sample of grievance files to review  Size of sample determined by review organization  The health plan will then compile documentation with each grievance in a separate labeled file folder –Completion of any forms or other data-gathering instruments  Health plan description of the system used to handle grievances  Systems may include database and manual/paper process.  How information is provided to other departments or committees

Example: Grievance Process Review Activity 3: Interviews Review organization instructions may include the following: −Administrative arrangements  Need for review team meeting room including interviews −Expected interview participants  Supervisory staff members responsible for oversight of staff handling incoming grievances  Member services observation  Quality or compliance staff members responsible for oversight of process

Example: Grievance Process Review (cont.) Activity 3: Interviews (cont.) Sample interview questions –Which staff members are responsible for helping Medicaid members use the organization’s complaint or grievance system, including completing forms, or taking other steps to resolve an appeal or grievance? –What kind of assistance is made available to Medicaid members? –Describe your role in the process, including documentation you prepare. –Who is responsible for routing grievances to the appropriate department or staff member for resolution?

Example: Grievance Process Review Activity 3: Interviews (cont.) Sample interview questions –Do you get feedback regarding ways you could improve your process? –Is there a process in place to monitor either the appeal and grievance process or the areas of concern identified by member appeals and grievances? –Describe reports used for monitoring.

Activity 4: Collecting any other accessory information (e.g., from site visits) Other expectations or responsibilities –Additional information may need to be copied to validate health plan activities –Observations and walk-through for key operations areas such as member services call center Example: Grievance Process Review

Wrap Up Questions?