The Ontario Human Rights Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dispute Resolution Under the Congressional Accountability Act
Advertisements

Sexual Harassment Seminar Mechanisms in Lingnan University to deal with sexual harassment Presented by Li Kam-kee, Director of Administration.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Resolving Disputes at Work The Role of Acas in UK Employment Relations Peter Monaghan Senior Adviser Acas Manchester.
Employment Equality Act 1998 Next slide. Purpose This act seeks to promote equality in the workplace for both full-time and part time-workers, in both.
Human Rights Ordinance Training. Purpose 1)Overview of Human Relations Ordinance 2)Intent of the Ordinance 3)Protected Classes 4)Stages of the Claims.
01/05/2015HRLSC1 Human Rights Legal Support Centre November 11, 2014.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
Human Rights Chapter 5. Human Rights Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment,
The Legal Series: Employment Law I. Objectives Upon the completion of training, you will be able to: Understand the implications of Title VI Know what.
Defending Complaints at the Lancaster County/ Pennsylvania HRC Presented by: David R. Keller Barley Snyder LLC 126 East King Street Lancaster, PA
The Ontario Human Rights Commission.
An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.
Chapter Implementing Equal Employment Opportunity 3.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMAT IVE ACTION All materials provided in this training, including the contents of linked pages, are provided for general.
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Civil Rights Training. Why? Civil Rights Regulations are intended to assure that benefits of Child Nutrition Programs are made available to all eligible.
Human Rights in Ontario.  It is a provincial law that gives everybody equal rights and opportunities without discrimination in specific areas like jobs,
HUMAN RIGHTS Administering Human Rights Legislation.
Human Rights in Ontario. Human Rights Activity- let’s do a Human Rights Quiz… Individuals should be treated fairly as human beings regardless of the age.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
Human Rights Complaints and Discrimination Prevention Canadian Human Rights Commission January 2005.
DEALING WITH HARASSMENT AND ABUSE COMPLAINTS Lt (NL) James Smith VANCOUVER ISLAND DIVISION.
April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission Introduction to the Enhanced Complaints Process (ECP) – Pilot.
Please note that these slides provide a basic overview of the issues discussed within our presentation provided to CIPD members on 5 June If you.
1 Effective Internal Workplace Investigations Best Practices.
Human Rights. Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment, and to have equal access.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES EXPEDITED CASE PROCESSING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT
Annual EEO Update Presentation to USDA ARS-Northern Plains Area October 18, 2012 Presented by John Jones and Steve Oppermann Senior Consultants Rushford.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
 One example is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights set out by the UN in 1945  See page 24 of your text.
1. In Australia national and local laws cover equal employment opportunity and anti-discrimination in the workplace. All employers are required by these.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
FILING AND DECIDING A HUMAN RIGHTS CASE PART A: DEFINITIONS PART A: DEFINITIONS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL PROCESS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL.
1 Dealing with Discrimination and Harassment in the Workplace AFOA BC – September 2015.
What is REDRESS? REDRESS® mediation is a transformative mediation program for Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) disputes at the informal stage of the.
1 GAEP Study Tour An Overview of the Ombudsman for Workplace Safety May 16, 2007.
Introduction Michelle Neels Investigative Paralegal for 25 years investigative - 15 years with Legal services and 10 years civil rights investigations.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Ontario Human Rights Commission.  The Ontario Human Rights Commission is the agency directly responsible for administering and enforcing the Human Rights.
SUPPORTS YOU CAN CALL ON & BODIES THAT ARE DEALING WITH EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION.
Resolving industrial conflict What is industrial relations? Industrial Relations Act 1990 Resolving industrial conflict Labour Court Employment Equality.
Presented by: Liz Hayes Take A Look Into: The Virginia Fair Housing Office.
+ Human Rights Complaints. + Filing a Complaint A lawyer is not needed to file a complaint. Complaints can be withdrawn at any point. Complainant – person.
1. 1. Welcome, Group Guidelines, Introduction 2. Your Human Rights in Ontario 3. Where to Get Help 4. Break 5. Case Studies 6. Questions 7. Evaluation.
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS CONFLICTS Unit 1 – Chapter 3.
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
MODULE 3 Policies, Procedures & Supervisor Responsibilities.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
Sexual Harassment Seminar
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Harassment and Discrimination
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Ontario Human Rights Commission
Human Rights.
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Employment Equality Act 1998
Human Rights Complaints and Discrimination Prevention Canadian Human Rights Commission January 2005.
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Human Rights.
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Administering Human Rights Legislation
The Halton District School Board expects that everyone associated with the Board has a right to be treated with respect and dignity and to teach, learn.
Harassment and Discrimination
Presentation transcript:

The Ontario Human Rights Commission

Overview: Ontario Human Rights Commission Ontario's Human Rights Code, the first in Canada, was enacted in Ontario's Human Rights Code, the first in Canada, was enacted in 1962.Human Rights CodeHuman Rights Code The Ontario Human Rights Commission was established in 1961 to administer the Code.The Ontario Human Rights Commission was established in 1961 to administer the Code. The Commission's mandate under the Code includes:The Commission's mandate under the Code includes: investigating complaints of discrimination and harassment;investigating complaints of discrimination and harassment; making efforts to settle complaints between parties;making efforts to settle complaints between parties; preventing discrimination through public education and public policy; andpreventing discrimination through public education and public policy; and looking into situations where discriminatory behaviour exists.looking into situations where discriminatory behaviour exists.

PROTECTED AREAS The Code protects people in Ontario against discrimination in: employmentemployment accommodationaccommodation goodsgoods services and facilitiesservices and facilities membership in vocational associations and trade unionsmembership in vocational associations and trade unions

There are sixteen grounds of discrimination under the Code: GROUNDS FOR ACTION racerace ancestryancestry place of originplace of origin colourcolour ethnic originethnic origin citizenshipcitizenship creed (religion)creed (religion) sex (including pregnancy)sex (including pregnancy) sexual orientationsexual orientation handicaphandicap age (18 to 65 in employment, and 16 and over in occupancy of accommodation)age (18 to 65 in employment, and 16 and over in occupancy of accommodation) marital statusmarital status family statusfamily status same-sex partnership statussame-sex partnership status receipt of public assistance (in accommodation only)receipt of public assistance (in accommodation only) record of offences (in employment only)record of offences (in employment only)

Discrimination: Any practice that would deny an individual rights or opportunities available to other members of society, inspired solely by the fact that the individual is a member of a protected group. Discrimination may arise as a result of direct differential treatment or it may result from the unequal effect of treating individuals and groups in the same way. Discrimination vs. Harassment Harassment: Any practice that would expose or subject an individual to unwelcome and undesirable behaviour (to which other members of society are not usually exposed), inspired solely by the fact that the individual is a member of a protected group. Formal Equality: Treating people in the exact same manner, regardless of any differences that might exist between them. Substantive Equality: Treating people differently so as to provide them equality of opportunity.

The Commission investigates and tries to resolve complaints.The Commission investigates and tries to resolve complaints. RESTORING RIGHTS A customer or employee of any organization covered by the Ontario Human Rights Code can file a complaint with the Commission. The aim is to restore the complainant's rights.A customer or employee of any organization covered by the Ontario Human Rights Code can file a complaint with the Commission. The aim is to restore the complainant's rights. If the complaint falls within the Commission's responsibility, an investigator will be given the task of gathering the necessary information and making a full report to the Commission.If the complaint falls within the Commission's responsibility, an investigator will be given the task of gathering the necessary information and making a full report to the Commission.

Who Are the Commissioners? There is a full-time Chief CommissionerThere is a full-time Chief Commissioner There are 12 part-time Commissioners.There are 12 part-time Commissioners. Commissioners are appointed by Order-in- Council. Staff of the Commission is appointed under the Public Service Act.Commissioners are appointed by Order-in- Council. Staff of the Commission is appointed under the Public Service Act.

Note: At each stage an attempt is made to settle the complaint. If not resolved, then it moves to the next stage. A complaint may also be dismissed at any stage. However, either party can appeal to a Board of Inquiry or a higher court. COMPLAINT PROCESS There are eleven stages to the complaint process: 1.Contact 2.Filing Complaint 3.Serving the Responant 4.Section 34 Application 5.Mediation 6.Investigation 7.Conciliation 8.Analyses 9.Decision 10.Reconsideration 11.Tribunal

1. Contacting Inquiry Services Any person in Ontario who wishes to make a Code-related complaint about discrimination or harassment to the Commission has the right to do so. Code discrimination or harassmentCode discrimination or harassment (If a person believes he or she has been discriminated against, that person may contact the Commission’s general inquiry line toll free at any of the telephone numbers here from Monday to Friday between the hours of 8:30 and 5:00 Eastern Time.) Toll Free TTY In Toronto TTD A Commission staff person will tell the person whether the issue is covered by the Code. Commission staff will send out a Human Rights Complaint Form. (Along with a sample complaint and Guidelines for completing the form.)

2. Making the Complaint In most cases, the person making the complaint will complete the form listing all facts relevant to the complaint, sign it and return it to the Commission. If he or she has difficulty drafting the complaint or is unable to draft the complaint because of a literacy, cultural or language barrier or because of a disability, the Commission will provide assistance or will draft it for the person. For persons with disabilities, all materials will be available in electronic text, large print or audio format upon request. The Commission may also refer the person to a community agency, such as a legal clinic or a cultural or ethnic community organization, that may be able to provide other assistance.

3. Serving the Respondent Once the complaint has been signed and returned to the Commission, Commission staff will review it to make sure it meets Commission standards and may contact the complainant for further information. The Commission will then register and “serve” the complaint by sending it to the person(s) or representative(s) of the organization that the complaint is about (the respondent(s)). The complaint is usually sent by Priority Post or courier, delivered in person or, in some cases, by ordinary mail or by any means that will reach the respondent(s). The respondent is requested to provide a response in writing within 21 calendar days. The response should reply to the allegations set out in the complaint and may include documents that are relevant to the complaint. The response (and any attachments) will be shared with the complainant.

4. Some complaints are not dealt with (Section 34) The Code does not require the Commission to deal with all complaints. Section 34 of the Code provides the Commission with the discretion, in limited circumstances, to not deal with a complaint. The Commission could decide to not deal with the complaint if it is of the opinion that it: could be more appropriately dealt with under another piece of legislation;could be more appropriately dealt with under another piece of legislation; is trivial, frivolous, vexatious or made in bad faith;is trivial, frivolous, vexatious or made in bad faith; is not within the Commission’s jurisdiction; or,is not within the Commission’s jurisdiction; or, is based on occurrences that are more than six months old.is based on occurrences that are more than six months old. The person making the complaint can ask the Commissioners to reconsider this decision by filing an application for reconsideration within 15 calendar days.

5. Mediation The Commission is impartial and does not take sides in the complaint. Commission staff will work with both parties to try to settle the dispute if possible. Voluntary and confidential mediation services by highly trained Commission mediators are offered to both parties. mediation servicesmediation services If mediation leads to a settlement, both parties will be required to sign a written agreement and to abide by the terms of the agreement. Once the agreement is signed and approved by the Commission, the matter will be closed. If mediation is unsuccessful, if one party chooses not to participate in mediation, or the matter does not appear to be appropriate for mediation, it will be referred for investigation where an officer will be assigned to investigate the complaint. Any offers, discussion or information revealed during mediation is confidential will not be shared with the investigating officer.

6. Investigation The purpose of investigating a complaint is to try to get as clear a picture as possible of what happened. The investigation officer conducts an impartial investigation including interviewing witnesses and gathering documentary evidence. The findings of the investigation are shared verbally with both sides who are then invited to attend a conciliation meeting where the officer will try to get the parties to come to a settlement. Both sides to the complaint may consult with a lawyer or representative at any stage of the complaint process. However, the Commission will not provide lawyers or pay for any party’s legal costs other than its own.

7. Conciliation Conciliation is a process of discussing a settlement with parties after the investigation has been completed and the findings disclosed to the parties. If the parties come to a settlement, both will be required to sign a written agreement and to abide by the terms of the agreement. Once the agreement is signed and approved by the Commission, the matter will be closed. If the complainant refuses to accept a reasonable offer during conciliation, the Commission may decide not to send the matter to the Human Rights Tribunal. Information or documentation, including offers and other discussion during conciliation may be included in the final Case Analysis.

8. Case Analysis If conciliation is not successful, the findings of the investigation are prepared in writing and disclosed to both sides. The findings contain an analysis of the evidence and a recommendation by staff to refer or not to refer the matter to the Human Rights Tribunal. Both parties are invited to submit a response to the findings. 9. Commission Decision The Commissioners make the decision to send or not to send the complaint to the Human Rights Tribunal. A copy of the Commissioners’ decision in writing is forwarded to both the complainant and respondent. 10. Reconsideration The complainant can ask the Commissioners to reconsider within 15 calendar days. The Commission will consider the request, but at this point is final and there is no right to appeal by either party.

11. The Human Rights Tribunal The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (previously known as a “Board of Inquiry) hears evidence and decides whether or not discrimination occurred and what needs to be done to remedy the situation and prevent further discrimination. The Tribunal is independent from the Commission. (The Commission, the respondent and the complainant are each separate parties before the Tribunal.) The Commission is responsible for presenting evidence about the complaint to the Tribunal, although the complainant has the right to make separate submissions. The Commission does not represent the complainant or the respondent at the Tribunal. The respondent and the complainant may each retain their own legal counsel. Any party to a complaint may seek to appeal a decision of the Tribunal to a higher court.

The goal of the tribunal is generally the restoration of human rights. Thus, if a complaint is settled or if a tribunal rules that discrimination has taken place, those responsible may be required to: Possible Remedies end the discrimination;end the discrimination; establish programs to correct unfairness;establish programs to correct unfairness; produce a plan to correct discriminatory practices;produce a plan to correct discriminatory practices; compensate for lost wages or hurt feelings;compensate for lost wages or hurt feelings; pay other costs of settling the complaint.pay other costs of settling the complaint. Under the Commission's new service delivery model, it is projected that approximately 35% of the case openings each year will be referred to investigation. Approximately 4% of the total number of cases closed each year are referred to the Board of Inquiry.