a) AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding Explain in detail Use technical terms (and explain them) Include quotations Link back to the question Make sure your.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOW TO WRITE A DISCURSIVE ESSAY
Advertisements

AS Sociology Exam Technique.
Critical and Analytical Thinking
Recent versions of the Design Argument So far we have considered the classical arguments of Aquinas and Paley. However, the design argument has attracted.
Criticisms of the Cosmological Argument
The Design Argument Richard Dawkins – ( ) Richard Dawkins, FRS, FRSL (born 26 March 1941) is a British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and popular.
Chapter 12: Is There a God?.
A2 Ethics How to assess arguments and theories. Aims  To discuss various methods of assessing arguments and theories  To apply these methods to some.
Whilst you come in …… ◦ Think of one thing you know you have to do for part B’s and one thing you know not to do ◦ I will be checking this with you in.
Evaluation style question Marking LevelsCriteriaMarks 0Unsupported opinion or no relevant evaluation0 marks 1An opinion supported by simple reason1 mark.
Philosophy 251: Introduction to Philosophy Dr. Stephen H. Daniel Get a syllabus before or after class Get a textbook Locate your graduate instructor Ty.
A Questions AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding – one side. Explain in lots of detail 20 mins Approx 2 sides Link back to the question Make links between.
Structuring an essay. Structuring an Essay: Steps 1. Understand the task 2.Plan and prepare 3.Write the first draft 4.Review the first draft – and if.
L ECTURE 17: T HE T ELEOLOGICAL A RGUMENT AND C AUSALITY.
A Questions AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding – one side. Explain in lots of detail 20 mins Approx 2 sides Link back to the question Make links between.
The Teleological Argument October 7 th The Teleological Argument Learning Objective: To analyse the argument from Design, considering its strengths.
The Cosmological Argument (Causation or ‘first cause’ theory)
Good Morning!!!! 1.NVC 2.Wrap-Up Appeasement 3.DBQ Writing Workshop Essential Question #1: Did Appeasement contribute to the cause of WWII? Essential Question.
Assessment.  Introduction… “Billions of people around the world are religious, following faiths such as Islam, Christianity and Buddhism…” “Why is it.
WEEK 3 THE TERM PAPER. WHAT IS A TERM PAPER? An academic essay that is rather lengthy, prepared by an academic writer Written in a concise and well documented.
©2015 Paul Read 5.5 Writing Opinion Essays in Part Two /sizes/z/in/photostream/
Revision Questions on Believing in God Work your way through the questions planning what you would write Check your answer against a suggested answer Mrs.
Belief & Science. Exam Preparation (1) 1. Explain what Christians mean by “Revelation”. (4) 2. Outline the strengths and limitations of “revelation” as.
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
The origins of the universe- Are science and religion in conflict?
UNIT 3 PHILOSOPHY SAC 2 CRITICAL COMPARISON Pointers for essay structure.
David Hume By Richard Jones and Dan Tedham. Biographical Details Born in 1711 in Scotland. Major work: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) Contains.
1.The argument makes it likely that there are lots of worldmakers. Strength: Man made things often require many creators. For example a house needs many.
Darwin’s View on the Teleological Argument Versions of the Teleological Argument.
LO: I will evaluate Hume’s argument against Miracles. Hmk – Prepare presentations for Tuesday’s lesson.
Critical Essay Writing
Good Afternoon!!!! 1.NVC 2.Complete Fascism Activity 3.Fascism Critical Thinking Assessment Essential Question: What are the core beliefs of Fascism and.
LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION
Arguments for the existence of GodProblems/reasons to be against COSMOLOGICAL (FIRST CAUSE) DESIGN/TELEOLOGICAL MIRACLES RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE MORALITY.
Science and Religion The origins of the world and universe Religious stories of creation The big bang Darwin’s theory of evolution Fundamentalist views.
Philosophy of Religion Arguments For and Against the Existence of God.
GCSE RE: Philosophy Thursday 20 th November 11.30am.
How to structure good history writing Always put an introduction which explains what you are going to talk about. Always put a conclusion which summarises.
A Streetcar Named Desire.  Write a CARL which will answer the question, "In his drama, A Streetcar Named Desire, what idea does playwright Tennessee.
This section of the examination specification requires you to look at: Reasons why some people believe in God Reasons why some people do not believe in.
EXAM SKILLS: PAPER ONE: QUESTIONS. CARTOON See cartoon questions in paper two section.
Give definitions Give an opinion and justify that opinion Explain religious attitudes Respond to a statement – 2 sides.
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
Religious Studies RELIGIOUS STUDIES OCR Specification 4. Challenges to Religious Belief.
A Level Philosophy, Religious Studies and 2017
Religious Studies Part 1 : Download a Specification A Level
Extent to which Challenges to Religious Experience are Valid, including CF Davis
Evaluation Questions Whether inductive arguments for God’s existence are persuasive. The extent to which the Kalam cosmological argument is convincing.
Explaining the universe
Starter for 5! Name the two types of general revelation.
AO2 Questions Evaluating the Teleological Argument
Reading material Articles: Tillich on symbols & Aquinas on analogy questions 1. What is art? 2. Does it open up new levels of reality for you? 3. Does.
Aim: To understand the criticisms against the design argument.
Think pair share What type of argument is the cosmological argument?
Religious Responses to Atheism.
‘Assess the credibility of the design argument for the existence of God’ (12 marks) The design argument for the existence of God is largely based upon.
Relgious experience AO2 Exam focus lesson
Miracles (Part 4): Answers to Hume And Biblical Concepts of Miracles
GCSE Philosophy and Ethics structure strips
What is good / bad about this answer?
Or Can you?.
MEL-Con Paragraphs Introduction
The Thematic Essay Questions set will require coverage of the whole period, which will be of at least 100 years. The whole period will not need to be covered.
Challenges against Inductive arguments
Exam technique.
Miracles – A Comparative Study of Two Key Scholars
Argument for the existence of God
@studentRESPONSE What have you done to improve your work?
MEL-Con Paragraphs Introduction
The Problem of Evil & Suffering
Presentation transcript:

a) AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding Explain in detail Use technical terms (and explain them) Include quotations Link back to the question Make sure your answer doesn’t sound like a list Vary the beginnings of your paragraphs DO NOT ARGUE IN THE A QUESTION.

Explain the Argument from Design as put forward by Aquinas. Explain the Design Argument as put forward by Paley. Explain how David Hume / Philosophy criticises the Design Argument. Explain how science / Dawkins criticises the Argument from Design. Explain Swinburne’s version of the Design Argument. Explain how the Design Argument attempts to prove the existence of God. Explain the key features of the Argument from Design.

b) AO2 - Evaluation State your point of view in your introduction. E.g. The Design Argument cannot stand up against the criticisms of science... Include both sides of the argument. Include critical analysis. E.g. Paley makes a strong argument here because..... E.g. The Design Argument cannot stand up against this criticism because Make your point of view clear throughout your essay and in your conclusion Include 3 – 4 well argued points.

“Science has caused the Design Argument to fail.” How far do you agree with this statement? Assess the view that the criticisms from Philosophy mean that the Design Argument is no longer valid. “Richard Swinburne has successfully protected the Design Argument from the criticisms of science.” How far do you agree with this statement? Assess the view that Richard Swinburne has successfully defended the Design Argument from the criticisms of Philosophy. Assess the view that the Design Argument makes it reasonable to believe in God.

a) Religion on the origin of the universe, the origin of life and the relationship between God and the created world Explain religious beliefs about the creation of the world. Explain religious beliefs about the origin of human beings Explain religious beliefs about the relationship between God and the created world.

a) Science on the origin and end of the universe and the origin of life. Explain scientific ideas about the origin and end of the universe. Explain scientific ideas about the origin of life.

a) Science and religion Explain one religious and one scientific view on the origin of the universe Explain one religious and one scientific view on the origin of life. Explain how scientific views challenge religious views on the origin of the universe Explain how scientific views challenge religious views on the origin of life. Explain how religion answers the challenges posed by science relating to the origin of the universe / origin of life.

b) conflicting, complimentary or irrelevant? “Science and religion are in conflict on the issue of the origin of life.” How far do you agree with this question? Assess the view that religious and scientific views on the origin of the universe are incompatible. “Religious and scientific views on the origin of the universe and of life are complimentary.” How far do you agree with this question? Assess the view that religious and scientific ideas on the origin of life are irrelevant to each other.

b) Other questions “Intelligent design is a scientific ideas.” How far do you agree with this question? Assess the view that God is simply an answer to unanswered questions and an explanation for the unexplained. “The religious responses to the challenge of science on the origin of life is weak.” How far do you agree with this question?