ACTIVE STICK & THROTTLE FOR F-35

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AUTOMATIC FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM (AFCS)
Advertisements

Lecture 20 Dimitar Stefanov. Microprocessor control of Powered Wheelchairs Flexible control; speed synchronization of both driving wheels, flexible control.
Propellers and Engine Instruments
Torque Reaction The fuselage’s reaction to the turning of the main rotor system is Torque Reaction Newton's third law of motion states that for every action,
The Affordable Solution - JSF ‘Joint Strike Fighter’,'JSF', and the JSF Logo are Trademarks of the United States Government. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A.
Cessna Citation II Flight Controls
COMP322/S2000/L41 Classification of Robot Arms:by Control Method The Control unit is the brain of the robot. It contains the instructions that direct the.
Safe Flight Instrument Corporation Pioneering Safety and Performance Products Since 1946 Proprietary Notice This document contains proprietary information.
ECE 480 Design Team 3 Doug’s Kitchen Robot Team Members - Thomas Manner - Ali Alsatarwah - Ka Kei Yeung - Daniel Phan Team Facilitator - Professor Lixin.
Development of Guidance and Control System for Parafoil-Payload System VVR Subbarao, Sc ‘C’ Flight Mechanics & Control Engineering ADE.
ECS and MINISTAB System Capt Johnson. Two vent controls are mechanically connected to flapper valves, which lock in different positions to vary the.
ECE 480 Design Team 3 Doug’s Kitchen Robot Team Members - Thomas Manner - Ali Alsatarwah - Ka Kei Yeung - Daniel Phan Team Facilitator - Professor Lixin.
1 Ames Research Center Karl Bilimoria 5 March 2008 Lunar Lander Handling Qualities – Terminal Descent to Touchdown Dr. Karl Bilimoria NASA Ames Research.
Soft Field Takeoff and Landing. Soft Field Takeoff w Before landing, will you be able to take off? w Complex and high performance aircraft often have.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 39 Dynamic Stability.
T. Bajd, M. Mihelj, J. Lenarčič, A. Stanovnik, M. Munih, Robotics, Springer, 2010 SAFETY IN INDUSTRIAL ROBOTICS R. Kamnik, T. Bajd and M. Mihelj.
Data Processing Equipment
12/7/2004 AME470 Ltd. - Team Pratham 1Open-Aid TEAM PRATHAM Team Leader: Matt Ryan Chief Engineer: Nick Martin Fabrication: Reed Langton CADCAM: Fraterno.
Flight Control Systems and Actuators
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
Airbus flight control system  The organisation of the Airbus A330/340 flight control system 1Airbus FCS Overview.
B757 Review Questions.
Airbus flight control system
Warm-Up – 1/16 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: Theoretically, why is the canard considered more.
Vertical Profile Navigation
Remote manipulations / diagnostics in radioactive areas and handling of radioactive material Workshop, Geneva, Switzerland 6 th May 2013 THE REPLACEMENT.
Propellers The engines are equipped with four bladed, full
Results of NASA/DARPA Automatic Probe and Drogue Refueling Flight Test Keith Schweikhard NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
A Shaft Sensorless Control for PMSM Using Direct Neural Network Adaptive Observer Authors: Guo Qingding Luo Ruifu Wang Limei IEEE IECON 22 nd International.
System & Control Control theory is an interdisciplinary branch of engineering and mathematics, that deals with the behavior of dynamical systems. The desired.
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
Functions of the Stabilator
Aerospace Fly-by-Wire History and Challenges 3 March, 2003 Don C. Winter Director – Research & Development Boeing Phantom Works.
B757 Review Questions. AutoFlight At what RA does flare mode engage? 45 feet RA.
C182T Nav III GFC 700 Automatic Flight Control System Module I
HARDWARE INTERFACE FOR A 3-DOF SURGICAL ROBOT ARM Ahmet Atasoy 1, Mehmed Ozkan 2, Duygun Erol Barkana 3 1 Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Bogazici.
System Engineering Experiences Harold Sasnowitz, IEEE Life Senior Member.
1-212 th Aviation Regiment th AVIATION REGIMENT COMBAT MANEUVERING FLIGHT And POWER MANAGEMENT.
Introduction to Control / Performance Flight.
Development of the Several Integrated Degree-of-Freedom Demonstrator (SIDFreD) CSME 2004 Nicholas Spooner B.Eng on behalf of:
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
Smart Icing Systems Review, June 19-20, Aircraft Autopilot Studies Petros Voulgaris Vikrant Sharma University of Illinois.
FUFO project Final report.
Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter June, 2009 NASA LaRC | NC State University | APTIMA.
OZ Human-Centered Flight Displays
Go For Lunar Conference
Electrical and Computer Engineering Preliminary Design Review Team 22: Driver Assist.
1 Use or disclosure of this information is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. Flight Symbology to Aid in Approach and Landing.
Initial Pilot Ground School
FUEL SYSTEM The fuel system is comprised of three interconnected crash resistant fuel cells. Two forward fuel cells are located under the aft facing passenger.
ROTARY WING AERODYNAMICS
The F-35 Cockpit: Enabling the Pilot as a Tactical Decision Maker
Integrated Hands-On Mechanical System Laboratories Arif Sirinterlikci, Ph.D., Professor of Engineering Tony Kerzmann, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Mechanical.
Automatic Flight Control System CW2 Ray Freeman.
SENSOTRONIC BRAKE CONTROL
KNU RTLAB A Real-Time Linux System For Autonomous Navigation And Flight Attitude Control Of An Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Charles E. Hall, Jr. Mechanical.
Air Line Pilots Association, International EMB 145 Oral Questions Center Pedestal Select “Slide Show” Use the space bar on your computer to advance the.
Feedback Systems and Driving Clinton Matney AT Workshop 2016.
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
Need for Powered Control System
FBW – Introduction The FBW architecture was developed in 1970’s
Engine Control Systems
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
QUANSER Flight Control Systems Design 2DOF Helicopter 3DOF Helicopter 3DOF Hover 3DOF Gyroscope Quanser Education Solutions Powered by.
Warm-Up – 2/23 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: Theoretically, what is the purpose of trim systems?
Flight Controller and Ground Station Software
Grab their Attention with Active Learning!
Agenda • Classroom • Lab –System Configuration – Flight scenario 1
Throttle, Yaw, Pitch, Roll
Presentation transcript:

ACTIVE STICK & THROTTLE FOR F-35 Joseph Krumenacker NAVAIR Flight Controls / JSF Vehicle Systems 16 October 2008

Intro Joe Krumenacker holds a BS in Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame, and previously worked for Grumman in aerodynamics, flight controls and flight test on the X-29 and F-14 programs. He joined the NAVAIR Flight Controls Branch in 1996 and has worked on the Joint Strike Fighter since 1999. He currently leads the JSF Program Office’s Vehicle Control Integration team.

ACTIVE STICK & THROTTLE FOR F-35 Joseph Krumenacker NAVAIR Flight Controls / JSF Vehicle Systems 16 October 2008

JSF Active Inceptor System (AIS) Presentation Overview Why & What of Active Inceptors: JSF Inceptor Overview & Architecture Reconfiguration for AIS Degraded Modes AIS Specification Issues How have Active Inceptors been put to use: Current Uses of Active Capability Jetborne Advanced Modes Using Active Capability Lessons Learned Conclusions

Active Inceptor Overview As a system the AIS is partitioned into the following major elements Electronics Processor modules, motor drives, interfaces to FCC / grips Mechanics Gimbal assemblies, bearings, housings, seals & mountings Electromechanical Servo Actuator Units (SAUs), sensors Mechanics Electronics Electromechanical

Why Were Active Inceptors Chosen? Design Flexibility for STOVL Advanced Control Law JSF specification prohibits the use of a third inceptor and requires a pilot interface that minimizes both pilot workload and cognitive error potential. Throttle Back-drive Capability PA Approach Power Compensation (Auto-Throttle) UA Speed Hold Modes STOVL Performance Protection & Auto-Deceleration Modes Commonality Between CTOL, STOVL and CV Variants Active Stick & Throttle Had Already Been Proven on X-35 Demonstrator X-35 active throttle had a separate nozzle control lever

AIS Installation Overview SideStick (ASSCA) Inceptor Control Unit (ICU) FWD All JSF variants (CTOL, STOVL & CV) use identical AIS hardware & software. AIS is provided as a complete system by BAE, Rochester UK Stick & Throttle grips not procured as part of AIS. Throttle (ATQA)

F-35 AA-1 Cockpit Active Side-Stick Active Throttle (approx. ±6 deg deflection) Active Throttle (9-inch linear deflection)

Inceptor Characteristics Three Axes of Control: Stick Pitch, Stick Roll, Throttle Each Axis contains duplex 28V electric motor drives connected to grip interface by mechanical linkages Each Axis contains triplex force and position sensors Stick Axes contain mechanical springs for backup mode Grips (and various HOTAS switches) are supplied by separate vendor, but are qualified for flight together with the stick & throttle.

VMC & Inceptor Architecture AIS ICU SideStick VMC A Chan A (duplex motor interface) Pitch Axis (IEEE1394 network) VMC B Chan B Roll Axis VMC C Chan C Throttle Fore/Aft Each Vehicle Management Computer (VMC) Contains: CLAW Application which determines inceptor force gradients and other features FCRM Application to manage ICU health & failure reports and to select triplex inceptor position & forces for CLAW input Inceptor Control Unit (ICU) performs: Motor Drive Loop Closure & Control Failure Management Mode Control Initiated Built-In Test (triplex grip force & position feedbacks)

AIS Modes & Fault Accommodation Each Inceptor has three primary control modes: Active: sensed grip force is used to actively position the inceptor according to the programmed force vs. position characteristics Flight Control Laws use inceptor position as pilot command Passive: motor drives disengaged, stick springs provide fixed linear force gradient, throttle has fixed friction & no detents Used upon unrecoverable error with motor drives Flight Control Laws use stick forces and throttle position as pilot command Both stick axes will maintain like mode (if one axis downgrades passive mode, other axis will be place passive mode) Jammed: inceptor position is fixed automatically detected by software Flight Control Laws use inceptor force as pilot command jammed throttle requires some Control Law reconfiguration

Active Inceptor Requirements & Specification Issues Programmable Inceptor Active Mode Characteristics: force gradients/ramps forward & aft end stops variable damping force gates & soft-stops (e.g AB) pilot-adjustable friction force (throttle) force detents (STOVL) position back-drive (auto-throttle modes) Inceptor Specification Issues: force capability (static and dynamic) force accuracy/variability velocity capability motor drive redundancy electronics redundancy force sensor null drift & sensor noise characteristics passive mode centering (stick) passive mode breakout and force gradients (stick) Blue shaded items are less configuration-dependent than others and could benefit from industry-wide specifications or guidance.

How Is Active Capability Currently Used? Throttle: Variable aft & forward end-stops (e.g. STOVL mode is different from CTOL mode) AB gate (when STOVL system is not deployed) Launch gate (CV only) STOVL center detent (zero commanded acceleration) STOVL on-ground power braking force gradient Back-drive Auto-Throttle Approach (all variants) STOVL Decel-to-Hover

How Is Active Capability Currently Used? Stick: Tailored STOVL pitch force characteristics wingborne vs. jetborne variations forward soft-stop(s) for vertical landing sink speed Pitch force feedback at higher AOA Roll force tailoring: left vs. right Roll force tailoring: CTOL vs. STOVL Increased force breakout for CV launch (pitch & roll)

Background: F-35B Jetborne Control Strategy Longitudinal Right-Hand Inceptor (RHI) provides height rate control (zero force commands altitude hold) Left-Hand Inceptor (LHI) provides fore/aft acceleration control (with speed hold function on center detent) Lateral Right-Hand Inceptor (RHI) provides bank angle control to give lateral acceleration Full matrix of STOVL tasks can be flown by using only the two primary inceptors in a consistent manner throughout the flight envelope. Nozzle / thrust vector control not required in flight Cognitive error potential minimized by consistent inceptor functionality HOTAS functions can be added to provide additional hover control options

Further Advancements Using Active Inceptors: TRC Mode TRC = Translational Rate Command LHI (Throttle) Characteristics Lateral RHI (Stick) Characteristics LHI Force (lbs) RHI Force (lbs) Disengage Stop Disengage Stop Disengage Stop Disengage Stop 20 20 10 10 Decel Cmd Accel Cmd Bank Cmd Bank Cmd RIGHT AFT 1 LHI Displacement (inches) 1 LEFT 5 4 FWD RHI Displacement (deg) 4 5 10 Velocity Command (kts) 10 10 Velocity Command (kts) 10 Engage / Disengage via HOTAS Switch Velocity Trim via Speedbrake switch Disengage via Force Breakout Disengage via Paddle Switch

Potential Option for Longitudinal Stick: Height “Gripper” Proposed Change to Jetborne Height Axis: Pitch Stick would command altitude acceleration instead of the baseline altitude rate. releasing the stick would no longer command zero sink rate (altitude-hold), so some other means of low-workload height hold was required solution was a pilot-engageable “gripper” mode, in which an altitude-hold augmentation could be quickly engaged and disengaged with gripper engaged, longitudinal stick breakout force is significantly increased to prevent inadvertent disengagement Altitude Rosette is Boxed on Engagement Manual Disengage to start descent rate Pros Hover stick force is “significantly higher” and provides pilot direct tactile feedback and confirmation that the flight control system is in control of height axes Push through or paddle off to begin vertical landing Cons Remembering to select height hold More buttons required Boxed Altitude Engaged with S-5 switch Altitude Gripper Breakout: +/- 20 lbs - or - NWS Button

AIS Lessons Learned Level 1 flying qualities for precise STOVL tasks are possible using a small, limited-displacement stick, due to the ability to set jetborne-specific stick characteristics without compromising wingborne flying qualities. Passive and jammed modes can be accommodated with only minor flying qualities degradations throttle control in jammed mode perhaps the greatest challenge Inceptor back-drive capability can be used to provide critical insight and training to the pilot in a very intuitive manner power approach auto-throttle as a training aid STOVL auto-decel and performance deficit protection (potential) high AOA cueing

Conclusions JSF is committed to use of active inceptor system (AIS) for all three aircraft variants – production-representative AIS has been flying on AA-1 aircraft since December 2006. AIS has provided a valuable level of design flexibility both for the existing vehicle control laws and for the resolution of any yet unknown flying qualities shortcomings. AIS team has been challenged by environmental requirements for force sensors, and has worked hard to ensure force feel characteristics and redundancy management meet vehicle needs.

Questions?