Cataloguing codes Need of Cataloguing Codes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RDA : the Inside Story The Genesis OLA, February 2, 2008 Ingrid Parent Library and Archives Canada.
Advertisements

Resource description and access for the digital world Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde Scotland.
From content standards to RDF Gordon Dunsire Presented at AKM 15, Porec, 2011.
IME ICC5 Report Working Group 5: Multipart Items Working Group Leader: Irmela Buchholz Working Group Recorder: Susan Battison IME ICC5 August 15, 2007.
Resource Description and Access (RDA): a new standard for the digital world Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT.
Why RDA? Canadian Association of Law Libraries May 26th, 2008 CALL/ACBD Liaison to Canadian Committee on Cataloguing F. Tim Knight York University Law.
RDA: a new international standard for resource discovery and access Gordon Dunsire Based on a presentation created by the Joint Steering Committee for.
Nonprint Materials Cataloging Codes LSC550 Dr. Yan Ma.
AACR2's Strategic Plan and IFLA Work towards an International Cataloguing Code Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Library of Congress Representative to the Joint Steering.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History 2 University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Cambridge University Library RDA - Hugh Taylor, 7 Jan 09 RDA: Past, Present, Future Hugh Taylor CILIP Representative, Joint Steering Committee for Development.
AACR2 Chapter 12 (Not Just Monographs and Serials) and 2002 Amendments Presented by Cheryl Obong and Tschera Connell, ASA Dept., OSU Libraries November.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Presented by Dr. Barbara Tillett Chief, CPSO Library of Congress 2004.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
The Library Cataloging Tradition
SLIDE 1IS 245 – Spring 2009 Codes and Rules for Description: History University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Descriptive Cataloging of Monographs 1. Introduction DRAFT.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Update for the Continuing Resources Cataloging Committee Midwinter 2005 Jennifer Bowen, ALA Representative to the.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
1 CS 430: Information Discovery Lecture 5 Descriptive Metadata 1 Library Catalogs MARC.
Organization of Knowledge –ISTC 653 September 6, 2012.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
Music Library AssociationFeb. 18, 2005BCC Open Meeting Development of AACR3 Kathy Glennan University of Southern California.
Music Library Association SDC Open Meeting Feb. 18, 2005 AACR3: Summary of Part I Draft ( and a glimpse into Parts II and III) Kathy Glennan University.
Library Catalogs. What is a catalog? A set of records that provide information about the items that the catalog represents. Metadata: Information about.
7/14/09. Robert L. Maxwell RDA Lecture Series National Library of South Africa 22 July /14/09 Cataloging: Still a Professional Asset to Become Excited.
History of Bibliographic Control. Library and Information-type Work –Undertaken through much of human history. –Information packages of various types,
Jan. 29, 2004OLA SuperConference Changes to AACR2 Problems and Solutions Pat Riva (McGill University) Maureen Killeen (A-G Canada Ltd.)
LI 804.  What MARC is  How MARC was developed  How MARC is used  The future of MARC  Our evaluation of MARC.
The Library Cataloging Tradition Marty Kurth CS 431 February 9, 2005 [slides stolen from Diane Hillmann]
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.
Pioneers in Library Cataloguing
Resource Description and Access Since We Last Met… Marjorie E. Bloss RDA Project Manager 1.
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen RDA Forum ALA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 24,
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
Setting a new standard Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard 18 September 2006.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
Cataloguing Code and Cataloguing Process. What is a Catalog(ue)?  A list of library materials contained in a collection, a library, or a group of libraries.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
1 CS 430: Information Discovery Lecture 5 Descriptive Metadata 1 Libraries Catalogs Dublin Core.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
AACR 2 –Rules for Descriptive Cataloguing
FROM AACR2 to RDA (and a few things in between) The history and context of RDA development Jenny Stephens, National Library of Australia, October 2010.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: The Tools of our Trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC.
8/28/97Information Organization and Retrieval Introduction University of California, Berkeley School of Information Management and Systems SIMS 245: Organization.
WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? Dealing with serial title changes through the ages Ed Jones National University (San Diego)
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
FIND IT! USING LIBRARY CATALOGING CONCEPTS TO ORGANIZE AND MAKE RECORDS FINDABLE DIONNE L. MACK, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF QUALITY OF LIFE DEPARTMENTS.
Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Information Technology Michael Middleton 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description.
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Queensland University of Technology FIT School of Information Systems MM 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description Objectives –Comments.
DR. S L SANGAM PROFESSOR AND CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE, KARNATAK UNIVERSITY DHARWAD
1 Metadata: an overview Alan Hopkinson ILRS Middlesex University.
Theory, Tools, History: A Brief Introduction August 17, 2016.
From the old to the new… Towards better resource discoverability
FUNDAMENTALS OF CATALOGING
Erin Stalberg, North Carolina State University Libraries
LIBRARY CATALOGUE (meaning, definition, scope, purpose, & Objectives)
By Dr Hester Marais
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
Doing the Research Sylvia A Nita A Fifi A.
Historical Development of the Organization of Information
目錄的功能 finding list collocating(assembling) device 2019/12/2 毛慶禎.
Presentation transcript:

Cataloguing codes Need of Cataloguing Codes

Definition A Catalogue code is systematic arrangement of laws and statues so as to avoid inconsistency and duplication of catalogues

History of catalogues Sargone 3800 BC Ashur Banipal 668 BC Kitab khana Sikandaria (Batlimus 240 BC kalimaches) Nuh Bin Mansoor (964 A.H.) Al Fihrist Ibn-i- Nadim (a known catalogue)

Early English Language Cataloguing Codes

2A British Museum Rules The first major English-language cataloguing code was that developed by Sir Anthony Panizzi for the British Museum catalogue. Panizzi’s 91 rules were approved by the British Museum in 1839, and published in 1841. The British Museum rules were revised up until 1936. The library departments of the British Museum became part of the new British Library in 1973. Thomas Bodley oxford university, he wrote in 1674 Bodley code and introduces sir name entry element

Cutter’s Rules for a Dictionary Catalog The first edition of Charles Ammi Cutter’s Rules for a Dictionary Catalog was published in 1876. Cutter’s rules set out the first principles of cataloguing, and included a statement of the objectives of the catalogue. The code covered rules for dictionary catalogues including both entry (for authors, titles, subjects, and form headings), and description.

Anglo-American Code

Developments in the United States The American Library Association (ALA) cataloguing rules “Condensed Rules for an Author & Title Catalog” were first published in the Library Journal in 1883. In 1900 ALA appointed a committee led by J.C.M. Hanson of the Library of Congress to revise these rules. Of particular focus was agreement of the ALA rules and the rules of the Library of Congress due to the upcoming introduction of Library of Congress printed cataloguing cards. In 1902 an advance edition of the revised ALA rules was produced by the Library of Congress. Efforts were made to bring about uniformity between the ALA rules and the fourth edition of Cutter’s rules (published in 1904).

5 Developments in the United Kingdom In 1893 the “Cataloguing Rules” of the Library Association (LA) were published. In 1902 a Committee was formed to revise these rules, and in its work drew heavily on the British Museum rules, and the advance edition of the revised ALA rules. A draft revision of the LA rules was discussed at the 1904 meeting of the Library Association.

6 Co-operation In light of the similar work being done on both sides of the Atlantic, Melvil Dewey suggested that there should be co-operation to produce an Anglo-American code. The American Library Association and the Library Association formally agreed to co-operate in 1904. Consultation between the two bodies occurred by correspondence.  The first international cataloguing code was published in 1908 in an American edition (Catalog Rules, Author and Title Entries) and a British edition (Cataloguing Rules, Author and Title Entries)

6 Co-operation Both editions contained 174 rules covering both entry and heading for authors and titles, and description. Areas of disagreement between the two editions centred on authors and publications that changed names or titles. In both editions disagreements were explained either in a note or by printing two versions of the rule. Library of Congress supplementary rules were also included where necessary.

7 A.L.A. Cataloging Rules 1941 edition In the 1930s committees of American Library Association and the Library Association discussed revision of the 1908 rules. The two bodies co-operated until 1939 when the Second World War ended British involvement 1949 edition (Revision)

8 Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules AACR 1 & AACR 2

8A AACR 1967 In 1951 the American Library Association asked Seymour Lubetzky, of the Library of Congress, to analyse the 1949 ALA code. An approach was also made to the Library Association regarding co-ordination of revision of the 1949 code. Both texts of AACR contained three parts: Part I, Entry and Heading – Based on the Paris Principles, the 1949 ALA rules, and Lubetzky’s 1960 draft. Part II, Description – Consisted of revised rules from the 1949 Library of Congress rules. Part III, Non-book materials – Contained rules for both entry and description of

8B ISBD and AACR Revisions At the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts in Copenhagen in 1969, a program of International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) was developed. The objective was to identify components in a bibliographic description, their preferred order, and the necessary punctuation.

8 C AACR2 1978 In 1974 the Joint committees divided AACR2 into two parts: Part I, Description – Based on the ISBD (G) framework. – Included a general chapter (chapter 1), and chapters for individual formats, including new chapters for machine-readable data files (chapter 9) and three-dimensional artefacts and realia (chapter 10). – The rules for non-book materials were based on alternative codes that were published in the 1970s.

Part II, Entry and Heading – Rules were brought more closely into line with the Paris Principles. 8 D AACR2 1988 Revision The 1988 Revision of AACR2 incorporated the 1982, 1983, and 1985 revisions plus subsequent unpublished revisions 2002 Revision The 2002 Revision of AACR2 incorporated the 1999 and 2001 amendments, and changes approved in 2001,