2015-20 Regulatory Proposal December 2014. We provide distribution services to 1.4 million residential and business customers We deliver electricity to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Early Lessons Learned from DOE-EPRI Framework Experience Melissa Chan MA DPU.
Advertisements

Management Challenge an exploration of business This computer simulation give you and the others: an opportunity to manage a “real” business for several.
Regulation of network services Recent experience in the Australian National Electricity Market FSR Executive Seminar - 11 June Florence David Swift Executive.
Protecting consumers, promoting value, safeguarding the future1 Media briefing – final determinations 26 November 2009.
Draft decision – initial views Rob McMillan December 2014.
TARIFF REGULATION IN THE NIGERIAN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY INDUSTRY
South Carolina Finance Workshop for Small Water Systems June 4, 2013 Water Partnerships: Financial Advantages and Challenges SC Case Study: Lowcountry.
Australian Energy Regulator AER Preliminary decisions for Energex and Ergon Energy 2015−20 Conference 12 May 2015.
What is the 10-year plan ? Provides an overview of the projects proposed for the next 10 years. Explains the strategies used to make financial.
VCOSS Congress Will the response to the climate debate turn the heat on low income households? Gavin Dufty: Manager Policy and Research Unit St Vincent.
Take A Load Off, Texas SM is provided by Oncor Electric Delivery LLC as part of the company’s commitment to reduce energy consumption and demand. Frontier.
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
Incentive Regulation Topics Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
Exploring Energy Opportunities In India NABC Conference June 29, 2006.
The Australian Energy Regulator SA Electricity distribution determination 2015–2020 Consumer/stakeholder forum 3 September 2014.
Protecting consumers, promoting value and safeguarding the future Regulating Privatised Water: Lessons from England and Wales Regina Finn Chief Executive.
The Australian Energy Regulator. Today’s agenda Presentations from : ◦AER — Chris Pattas, General Manager - Networks ◦Consumer Challenge Panel — Hugh.
An Overview of Our Regulatory Proposal
Plug-In Vehicles are Here, More are Coming major auto manufacturers with 10 production models over 20 production models Consensus - 3.
Distributed Generation Programs, Incentives and Interconnections Ian Loughran, P.Eng. DSM Program Leader Renewable Energy Programs
National Investment in Water and Waste Water Infrastructure, Funding & Pricing Mid-West Regional Authority Annual Conference 2009.
…While Investing To Achieve Excellence In Reliability 30% Transmission capital investment 03-06; $ millions Distribution capital investment 03-06; $ millions.
© 2007 PPL Electric Utilities Energy Outlook: 2008 and Beyond Small Business Development Center Lehigh University November 7, 2007 Tom Stathos PPL Electric.
Confidential The Budget Presentation to the JCC By Eddie Teare MHK, Treasury Minister 18 February 2015.
Presentation by AER’s Consumer Challenge Panel (CCP) sub-panel 7 David Prins and Robyn Robinson.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Presentation to Energy & Technology/Planning & Development Committees Considerations on Establishing Municipal Utilities Joint Informational Forum Legislative.
Australian Water Summit Sydney March 2006 Is privatisation of water infrastructure and services the answer? Phillip Mills Director of Water Services, Water.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
The Australian Energy Regulator QLD Electricity distribution determination 2015–2020 Meeting with FNQ consumers/stakeholders 15 January 2014.
Australian Energy Regulator AER Preliminary decision for SA Power Networks 2015−20 Conference 13 May 2015.
The Australian Energy Regulator. Today’s agenda Presentations from : ◦AER – Sebastian Roberts, General Manager Networks ◦Consumer challenge panel – Robyn.
Public Meeting on ERCOT’s Proposed 2004 Budget September 3, 2003 Preliminary - Subject to ERCOT Board Approval.
Energy Storage Applications at AEP Emeka Okafor American Electric Power Presentation to SouthWest Electric Distribution Exchange May 7, 2009.
The Australian Energy Regulator SA electricity distribution determination 2015–2020 Framework and approach Presentation to the Energy Consumers’ Council.
NSW Public Forum Essential Energy’s Regulatory Proposal 10 July 2014 Gary Humphreys, Chief Operating Officer.
Engaging Customers in Challenging Times Greg Dudkin, PPL Electric Utilities MEC Conference Los Angeles, CA October 3, 2011.
AER Consumers Forum Brisbane 18 December 2014 Thoughts on DM in the QLD network businesses’ regulatory proposals.
Technical Advisory Group Tuesday 6 October 2009 Tony Pearson Network Planning Manager.
Life cycle services for automation products
Getting Ready! Potential issues for consumers Ergon Distribution Network Regulatory Proposal Bev Hughson, Consumer Challenge Panel (CCP) 2 September 2014.
Quarterly Performance Report For the period October – December 2014.
Outline The key findings What the SGA Summit did Smart City Amsterdam Some more detail on the disrupters – Ecosystem of the Grid – Distributed Generation.
Our Key Objectives A free service to Members Help members reduce their running costs through buying together Help members reduce their Energy Consumption.
A Framework for Organizing Current and Future Electric Utility Regulatory and Business Models Andrew Satchwell and Peter Cappers Lawrence Berkeley National.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
Commission Meeting November 18, 2015 WSSC Customer Use and Pricing.
Getting Ready! Potential issues for consumers Queensland Distribution Network Regulatory Proposals Bev Hughson, Consumer Challenge Panel (CCP) 8 August.
Public Forum 10 December 2014 SAPN Regulatory Proposal Bev Hughson Consumer Challenge Panel Member.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, Contents  2003 Summary  Q4 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials 
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
June 17, 2015 (Regina) June 18, 2015 (Saskatoon) SaskEnergy 2015 Rate Application.
City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Changes FY 2013 Facility Managers’ Meeting August 16, 2012 Ipek Connolly, Senior Resource Planner.
Solving the Energy Puzzle Understanding the Rules of Energy Delivery Electricity Natural Gas Tariffs Solar Combined Heat and Power Generation Distribution.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
Economic Benchmarking vs Financial Incentives – an alternative to incentivising performance in the gas industry? Ashley Muldrew, Gas Speak 2015.
Council Improvement Plan Council Meeting 1 June
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
City of Sarasota Franchise Agreement Rae Dowling, Buck Martinez and Ken Rubin June 16, 2010.
The Australian Energy Regulator SA electricity distribution determination 2015–2020 Framework and approach 20 November 2013.
1 Electricity Distribution Price Review Metering Workshop 14 July 2005.
California Product Offerings
Andrew Reeves, Chairman Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate: Energy Regulatory and Market Development Forum 4 November 2010.
2016 Cost of Service Rate Application
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee
Capital Improvement Plans
Presentation transcript:

Regulatory Proposal December 2014

We provide distribution services to 1.4 million residential and business customers We deliver electricity to a population base of 3.2 million people in the region Service an area of 25,000 km 2 from Gympie in the north to Withcott in the west, Stradbroke Island in the east and Coolangatta in the south Own and operate almost $12 billion in high performing network equipment We employ over 3,000 staff About us

Our proposal means that residential customers will experience real price reductions in the network component of their electricity retail bill to June 2020 We will deliver network price stability to reduce costs to customers and deliver a price decrease should the Queensland Government Solar Bonus Scheme be removed from our network prices. We will continue to deliver a safe and reliable electricity supply to homes and businesses and plan our network to meet future needs and technologies. We will continue to deliver services to our customers including demand management programs, easy to use communication channels, tree trimming, community safety as well as storm and emergency response. We commit to providing customers with a safe and reliable electricity supply as well as high standards of service. Revenue $8.4 billion* reduce upward price pressures deliver long-term network price stability for our customers. *Excluding approximately $1.4 billion in payments made under the Queensland Government Solar Bonus Scheme Capital expenditure $3.2 billion reduce capital expenditure maintain the current high levels of reliability improve reliability in network areas that are experiencing the most frequent power outages. Operating expenditure $1.7 billion maintain operating expenditure enhance engagement with our customers. Regulatory Proposal summary

Our ‘Connecting with you’ program was established in early 2013 to ensure customer views and expectations are incorporated in key business decisions we are making. Through our Customer Engagement Research Program and our five year future plan consultation, over 6,700 customers influenced key decisions for our submission. ‘Connecting with you’ program

For the period, we will be seeking approval for $8.4 billion of revenue (excluding payments made under the Solar Bonus Scheme payments). The slight increase we are asking for during the period is due to growth in our asset base as we have invested in improvements to the electricity network during the period. Revenue Energex proposed Weighted Average Cost of Capital 7.75% A return on debt of 5.91 per cent A return on equity of 10.5 per cent Gearing of 60 per cent Gamma0.25

The green line represents the efficient revenue we need to run our business and the blue line represents the efficient revenue including the Queensland Government Solar Bonus Scheme. Revenue and yearly revenue

Network Tariff Code / Name Price unit Expected network prices excluding Queensland Government Solar Bonus Scheme payments 8400 Residential Flat (default residential tariff) c/kWh Change from prior year-9.7%0.3%-1.4%-1.5%-1.4% $/customer Expected network prices including Queensland Government Solar Bonus Scheme payments 8400 Residential Flat (default residential tariff) c/kWh Change from prior year2.2%2.3%0.5%0.4%0.5% $/customer These prices exclude the cost of metering and GST Expected pricing outcomes Our proposal means that residential customers will experience real price reductions in the network component of their electricity retail bill to June Our network prices are based on our view of the efficient level of revenue we need to run our business which excludes Queensland Government Solar Bonus Scheme payments. If Solar Bonus Scheme payments were included, residential network prices would increase by around 2 per cent each year across the period.

Expected pricing outcomes - metering We intend to change the approach to metering and apply specific charges based on individual customer circumstances. This means the charges are being un-bundled from the cost that forms part of our overall revenue, paid for by everyone. Separating metering costs from other electricity charges allows customers to see what they are paying for. This also means there are opportunities for market competition in the future, meaning customers can choose a meter provider other than Energex to provide metering services. We have decided to charge a daily fee on a per tariff basis as this generally aligns to each individual customer’s metering needs.

Expected pricing outcomes For comparison purposes we have included the cost of metering in the above chart form onwards Residential Customers Average network charges – network tariff code 8400

For the period we will be seeking approval for $3.2 billion in capital expenditure which is a significant reduction of $1.2 billion compared to what we spent during the period. During the period, the majority of our efforts will be to replace network equipment that is at the end of its useful life. This will deliver ongoing community safety and high standards of network reliability. Capital expenditure – network investment

8% Buildings, IT, vehicles, tools & equipment Desktop and laptop computers used by the business / Cars, trucks, tools and equipment used to work on the network 15% Connecting new customers New supplies to large new developments such as the Bus and Train Tunnel, Moreton Rail Extension and other community infrastructure 22% Building new network New substations and circuits to supply growth areas / Flood defences at vulnerable substations / Improving reliability in worst performing supply areas / Resolving power quality issues caused by solar PV 55% Replacing ageing plant & equipment Replacing or repairing network equipment that is in poor condition or may be a safety risk / Replacing obsolete equipment such as the hardware and software used to operate and control the network Capital expenditure – network investment Breakdown of capital expenditure proposed for the period

Comparing with We are expecting a continued decrease in our capital expenditure Capital expenditure – network investment

Operating expenditure – our day to day services For the period we will be seeking approval for $1.7 billion in operating expenditure which is less than what we spent for the period. Operating expenditure will deliver the daily services our customers need and value. This includes the routine, ongoing activities of running an electricity network, emergency response, fixing faults, maintaining network equipment and demand management initiatives.

19% Tree trimming Trimming trees near powerlines to maintain high levels of reliability and community safety 5.5% Demand management Incentives to customers to reduce demand during peak times / Use of small generation as an alternative to building new network 12% Corrective repair Repairing or making safe equipment that fails in service 29% Maintenance Inspections / Planned maintenance 6.5% Customer services Customer Contact Centre / Network billing to electricity retailers / Hot water complaints 8.5% Operating the network Response to power outages / 24-hour control centre, including after hours emergency and loss of supply support 16% Other operating costs Levies / Debt raising costs / Self-insurance / Audit / Legal / Finance / Regulatory groups / Safety Programs / Community support and safety communications 3.5% Storms Emergency response and repairs to the network after a severe weather event Operating expenditure – our day to day services Breakdown of operating expenditure proposed for the period

Comparing with We are expecting a continued decrease in our operating expenditure Operating expenditure – our day to day services

Our proposal means that residential customers will experience real price reductions in the network component of their electricity retail bill to June 2020 We will deliver network price stability to reduce costs to customers and deliver a price decrease should the Queensland Government Solar Bonus Scheme be removed from our network prices. We will continue to deliver a safe and reliable electricity supply to homes and businesses and plan our network to meet future needs and technologies. We will continue to deliver services to our customers including demand management programs, easy to use communication channels, tree trimming, community safety as well as storm and emergency response. We commit to providing customers with a safe and reliable electricity supply as well as high standards of service. Revenue $8.4 billion* reduce upward price pressures deliver long-term network price stability for our customers. *Excluding approximately $1.4 billion in payments made under the Queensland Government Solar Bonus Scheme Capital expenditure $3.2 billion reduce capital expenditure maintain the current high levels of reliability improve reliability in network areas that are experiencing the most frequent power outages. Operating expenditure $1.7 billion maintain operating expenditure enhance engagement with our customers. Regulatory Proposal summary