European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chasing after debtors The Review of Brussels I Regulation and transparency of debtors assets Chris Pitt-Lewis December 2011.
Advertisements

European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
The European Small Claims Procedure and other EU Instruments: Why is it useful to choose the European Small Claims Procedure? Elena DAlessandro University.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Foreign Court Judgments in Ukraine Oksana Yeremeyeva Senior Counsel Bar Council of England and Wales seminar.
European Order for Payment Procedure April 22nd, 2008 Mgr. Petra Novotna.
Interim measures in Russian courts in support of international arbitration: principles, procedure and the range of remedies available BRLA seminar 25 January.
Arbitration in Poland Practical issues Monika Hartung Legal Adviser, Partner Warsaw 16 June 2011.
Bankruptcy of the purchaser and enforceability of retention of title vis-à-vis its receivership International Insolvency Law Conference Nottingham Law.
The Brussels II Regulation The jurisdiction of courts.
Unit 8: The European order for payment procedure and the European small claims procedure Dr. Matthias Frey Head of the Municipal Court.
A narrow pathway between fences Seminar on free movement of same sex families in Europe European Parliament, 3 May 2011 Pál Szirányi – Permanent representation.
International Treaty in EU PIL
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
The Court of Justice European Law in the Making. Terminology Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Venue Venue Standing Standing Chambers Chambers Plenary Session.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
Ildikó Németh, Ministry of Justice of Hungary This presentation is Co-funded by the Civil Justice Programme of the European Union Project JUST/2013/JCIV/AG/4691.
The Law of the European Union Information and Communication.
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Circulation of authentic instruments under Regulation 650/2012 speaker – Ivaylo Ivanov – Bulgarian Notary Chamber.
16. POLISH INTERNATIONAL INSOLVENCY LAW PROVISIONS APPLICABLE IN NON-EU CASES DR MAREK PORZYCKI International Insolvency Law.
Dr Marek Porzycki.  Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (1968) – Member States of the.
UNITS 1 and 2: THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS. THE JUDGE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA Joaquín Delgado.
Petr Lavický  Appeal  Revision  Cassation.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
Introduction to EU Civil Judicial Cooperation Dr. Francesco Pesce Assistant Professor in International Law Università degli Studi di Genova (IT)
DG Enterprise and Industry Unit C4 - Internal Market and Simplification 1 Directive 2000/35/EC: combating late payment in commercial transactions General.
REGULATION (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure S. Laganovskis.
Residential Eviction Quick Guide Due Process and Summary Procedure.
Service of documents within European Union Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service.
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters.
The Brussels I Regulation Jurisdiction in matters of insurance, consumers contracts and individual contracts of employment.
Seminar on EC case-law Bedanna Bapuly Brno, 2007 October 15th.
RECOGNITION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS DR MAREK PORZYCKI European Insolvency Regulation.
Court of Justice of the European Union
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
European Model(s) of Protective Measures in Cross-Border Maintenance Debt Recovery Mirela Župan Professor at Faculty of Law University of Osijek Croatia.
1. common courts military courts administrative courts tribunals The Supreme Court The Supreme Administrative Court The Constitutional Tribunal and The.
Limitation of claims Prescription Vs Expiration. Obligation Creditor – claims Debtor – obligations Due claims – due time Chargeable claims enforceability.
European Union 8 Judicial Protection
"Human Rights and the European Union Regulations on Private International Law : the needs to protect the right of family members " Elisabetta Bergamini.
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAW SEMINAR 2015 Recent Developments in Maritime Law Around the World – POLAND Bills’ of lading law and jurisdiction clauses from.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
European enforcement order for uncontested claims Regulation n. 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April
Are Judicial Procedures in the European Union Really Simple? The European Order for Payment (EB Nr.1896/2006) and the European Small Claim (EB Nr. 861/2007)
ARBITRATION ACT. Challenge of arbitrator The appointment of an arbitrator may be challenged on the issues of – (i) impartiality, – (ii) independence,
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II Tutorials Karima Amellal.
Procedure and application.  Before the enactment of the consumer Protection Act,1986 a person aggrieved by the defective goods or deficiency in service.
European Small Claim and European Payment Order Procedures: Advantages and Drawbacks Lawyer Dr. Laura Gumuliauskienė.
The Mediation Centre of Chamber of Notaries in Gdańsk
ARBITRATION IN INDONESIA
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
European Union Law Law 326.
Prescription Vs Expiration
Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
EUROPEAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW: CASE C-283/16
European actions.
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Legal Environment for Business in Nepal 26 February 2017
Prof. Elena D’Alessandro University of Turin
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments
The WTO-Agreement on Import Licensing
(Francesca Cuomo Ulloa, Italy)
Legal regulation of mediation and the institutions involved: Latvia
Stakeholders sensitization PRESENTED BY ANTHONY GACHAI PTA
Presentation transcript:

European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – applying it in the Polish court practice Grzegorz Karaś Judge of District Court for Wrocław-Fabryczna

Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims I. The subject matters of the Regulation are: 1. definition of cases, where the claim is uncontested within the meaning of the Regulation, 2. creating a norm aiming to certify a judgement as a European Enforcement Order, 3. provisions concerning the minimum standards of proceedings having as a subject the uncontested claims, 4. Some aspects of proceedings aiming at enforcement of the EEO in the Member State of enforcement as well as, 5. Definition of requirements, which have to be met, in order for court settlements or authentic instruments to be certified as EEO.

II. Scope of application According to art. 3.1 this Regulation does only apply to judgments, court settlements and authentic instruments on uncontested claims: Claims are to be regarded as uncontested if: 1. the debtor has expressly agreed to it by admission or by means of a settlement, which has been approved by a court or concluded before a court in the course of proceedings; or 2. the debtor has never objected to it, in compliance with the relevant procedural requirements under the law of the Member State of origin, in the course of the court proceedings; or 3. the debtor has not appeared or been represented at a court hearing regarding that claim after having initially objected to the claim in the course of the court proceedings, provided that such conduct amounts to a tacit admission of the claim or of the facts alleged by the creditor under the law of the Member State of origin; or 4. the debtor has expressly agreed to it in an authentic instrument.

III. In the light of the Polish law it should be considered that judgments including the uncontested claims and authentic instruments in which the debtor has recognised the claim within the meaning of the Regulation are: judgements concerning recognized claims (art. 213 § 2 & art. 333 § 1.2 Code of Civil Procedure = k.p.c), judicial decisions by default (art. 339 Code of Civil Procedure and art. 333 § 1 pkt 2 Code of Civil Procedure), settlements concluded in the course of the judicial settlement proceedings (art. 223 Code of Civil Procedure), settlements concluded within the settlement proceedings conducted prior to the institution of the disputable proceedings (art. 184 Code of Civil Procedure), settlements concluded through mediation and subsequently approved by the court, writs of payment issued in order proceedings (art. 485 Code of Civil Procedure), writs of payment issued in warning proceedings (art. 498 Code of Civil Procedure), notarial deeds, in which the debtor submitted himself to enforcement, banking execution titles.

IV. Procedure of issuing an EEO Certificate for Polish judgments In connection to the Regulation No805/2004 new provisions implementing the above regulation have been introduced into the Polish Code of the Civil Procedure. The Act of 17 February 2006 (Dz.U z 2006r., No 66, Pos. 466) has amended the Code of the Civil Procedure. The new provisions entered into force on 5 May 2006. Provisions of the Polish Code of the Civil Procedure concerning procedure of issuing an EEO Certificate introduced by the Act of 17 February 2006: art. 206 § 2 k.p.c. art. 795 1 – 759 5 k.p.c. art. 820 1 and 820 2 k.p.c. art. 825 point 5 k.p.c. art. 840 3 k.p.c. art. 1153 1 and 1153 2 k.p.c.

Premises of issuing EEO Certificate Art. 7951 Art. 7951. § 1. Where the execution title in form of a judicial decision, settlement concluded before the court or approved by the court meets the requirements specified in separate provisions, the court, which has delivered the decision or before which the settlement was concluded or which has approved the settlement, shall upon the application of the creditor deliver a certificate that they are an EEO further referred to as “certificate as an EEO”. § 2.Where the application upon issue of a certificate as an EEO relates to another execution title then referred to in par. 1, the district court, in whose circuit the title was issued shall decide upon this application.

Court Panel Art. 7952 The decision upon the issue of a certificate as an EEO shall be conducted by the court sitting with a panel of one judge.

Service, appealing against decision Art. 7953 § 1. The decision upon refusal of issue a certificate as an EEO shall be served on the creditor only. § 2. The decision on refusal of issue of the certificate as an EEO shall be subject to an interlocutory appeal by the creditor.

Procedure of reversal of the EEO certificate Art. 7954 § 1. In the event of finding, that there is in specific provisions a ground for reversal of the certificate as an EEO, the court, which has issued it, shall reverse such certificate upon the application of the debtor. § 2. The application shall be presented within one month of the day of the service of the copy of the decision on issue of the certificate. § 3. Where the application was not made out on a form as set out in specific provisions, it shall meet the requirements for a pleading and specify the circumstances justifying the application. § 4. Prior to reversal of the certificate the court shall hear the creditor. § 5. The ruling of the court on the reversal of the certificate as an EEO shall be subject to an interlocutory appeal.

Loss and limitation of EEO certificate Art. 7955 § 1. The provisions of Art. 7951 and 7952 shall apply accordingly to issue of separate certificates of loss or limitation of enforceability of an enforcement order certified as an EEO. The application on issue of such certificate may lodge also the debtor. § 2. The ruling of the court on issue of the certificate provided for in par. 1 shall be subject to an interlocutory appeal.

V. Enforcement proceedings in Poland upon judgments taken in other Member States and certified as an EEO in a Member State of origin The Regulation 805/2004 establishes two fundamental principles of enforcement in the state in which enforcement is sought: 1. abolition of exequatur – Art. 5 “A judgment which has been certified as a European Enforcement Order in the Member State of origin shall be recognised and enforced in the other Member States without the need for a declaration of enforceability and without any possibility of opposing its recognition.” 2. a judgment that has been certified as a European Enforcement Order by the court of origin should, for enforcement purposes, be treated as if it had been delivered in the Member State in which enforcement is sought – Art. 20.2 and point 8 of preamble to the Regulation.

VI. Necessity of obtaining enforceability clause In Poland according to Article 776 k.p.c. an execution document shall be the basis for the execution. The execution document is an enforceable title complete with the execution formula. Giving the enforceability clause is necessary for the possibility of enforcement procedure in Poland. The executive body is in Poland a court executive officer who can start the enforcement upon the application of a creditor after submitting the enforcement title with enforceability clause by the creditor. Procedure of giving enforceability clause to enforceable titles with EEO certificate from the state of origin is specified in Article 11531 and 11532 k.p.c.

Art. 11531 k.p.c. Court judgments from EU Member States, settlements concluded before these courts or approved by these courts and authentic instruments made in EU Member States, provided in these countries with EEO certificate, are execution titles and are subject to enforcement in Poland after giving enforceability clause. Art. 11532 Enforceability clause is given to the execution titles from art. 11531 k.p.c. by a District Court of debtor’s general jurisdiction and if this jurisdiction cannot be determined – a District Court in which circuit the enforcement must start.

Procedure of giving enforceability clause Enforceability clause is given by a District Court sitting with a panel of one judge. The application on giving enforceability clause is adjudicated immediately, not later than 3 days from the date of lodging it – art. 7811 k.p.c. The application on giving enforceability clause is subject to the court charge of 50 zloty. If an execution title is expressed in foreign currencies (eg. Euro) the court executive officer converts it into Polish zloty according to the average rate of National Bank of Poland. Giving enforceability clause has a form of the court decision and the creditor is being served with it. The debtor is being served with this decision by the court executive officer during the first executive activity.

Appeal against a court decision of giving enforceability clause Article 795. k.p.c. – Giving the enforceability clause shall be subject to a complaint. The time limit to file a complaint is 7 days and it runs as follows: for the creditor - from the date of serving him with a copy of the decision on giving the enforceability clause for the debtor - from the date of serving him with the notification of starting execution. The complaint on a decision of giving enforceability clause is being adjudicated by the Circuit Court as a court of the second instance.