Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Practical Impact of Recent PCT Changes on US Practice Maria Eliseeva Houston Eliseeva LLP American Intellectual Property Law Association October 15,
Advertisements

Amendments to the PCT Regulations, Administrative Instructions and other practice changes as from 1 July 2008.
AIA Final Rules Power of Attorney March 20, 2013.
P ROFESSOR R UTH O KEDIJI First to File Patent Systems How the New U.S. System Compares to other Systems Around the World.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
DRAFTING A BILL OF LAW Resource: Maritza Torres-Rivera Francisco J. Domenech, Esq. Director.
William Boshnick Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
Rule 47 Petitions Beverly Flanagan Supervisory Petitions Examiner (703)
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
Incorporation by Reference
FITF Overview and Tips on Responding to Prior Art Rejections Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting United States Patent and.
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
Patent Strategy Under the AIA Washington in the West January 29, 2013.
Anatomy of a Patent Application Presented by: Jeong Oh Director, Office of Technology Transfer & Industrial Development Syracuse University April 30, 2009.
Joint Meeting of PIPLA and NJIPLA February 7, 2012 Kenneth N. Nigon RatnerPrestia 1.
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association UPDATE ON THE AIA And Other Legislation AIPLA IP Practice in Japan April 8, 2014 Alan.
Practical Effects of America Invents Act
April 24, 2012 Benoît Castel Young & Thompson U.S. Patent Law Reform Summary of H.R. 1249, “Leahy-Smith America Invents Act”
Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.
Implementing First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the AIA By: Scott D. Malpede, Seth Boeshore and Chitra Kalyanaraman USPTO Rules Effective March 16, 2013.
Presented by Jennifer Coughlin Eugene, Oregon April 10, 2013.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
America Invents Act (AIA) Changes in Patent Law That Impact Companies May Mowzoon: Mowzoon Law Office, PLLC 1.
Comments of American Intellectual Property Law Association Public meeting January 13, 2009 Patent Cooperation Treaty Presenter: Carl Oppedahl Oppedahl.
CHAGAL - OATH AND POWER OF ATTORNEY 1 The inventor must provide an oath (swearing) or a declaration (acknowledging the penalties of perjury: see.
1 Implementation of the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999 (Public Law ) and the Patent Business Goals Hiram H. Bernstein Senior Legal Advisor.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Filing a Patent Application: Procedures and Tips
The International Patent System Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 July 2015.
The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Proposed Rules to Implement Title I of the Patent Law Treaty The Hague Agreement.
The America Invents Act: Eighteen Months Post-Enactment Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator March 27, 2013.
Information Disclosure Statements
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office PETITIONS PRACTICE USPTO Office of Patent Legal Administration PETITIONS PRACTICE COMMON ERRORS.
0 Charles R. Macedo, Esq. Partner. 1 Brief Overview of Priority Under AIA Implications for Public Disclosures and Private Disclosures Role of Provisional.
Anthony Venturino MILANO 10 February 2012 SELECTED PROVISIONS OF THE LEAHY Smith AMERICA INVENTS ACT OF 2011 AIPPI - AIPLA 1 © AIPLA
Contents of US Patent Applications & Filing Requirements
Patents- Practical Aspects of International Patent Procurement/Prosecution June 2015 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Practice Overview.
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Who can file? Inventor Assignee of Inventor Legal Representative of Inventor or Assignee.
Corrections/Amendments and Priority/Benefit Claims in International and National Stage Applications
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
© 2012 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox P.L.L.C. All Rights Reserved. NPRM Changes to Implement the Inventor’s Oath or Declaration Provisions of the Leahy-Smith.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
New Ex Parte Appeal Rules Patent and Trademark Practice Group Meeting January 26, 2012.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment 1 © AIPLA 2015.
January 25, Notice of Proposed Rule Making Proposed Changes to Practice for Continuing Applications, Requests for Continued Examination Practice,
Declaring Beneficial Use in Water Use Groups R
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
The Impact of Patent Reform on Independent Inventors and Start-up Companies Mark Nowotarski (Patent Agent)
1 PETITIONS PRACTICE Thurman K. Page Supervisory Petitions Examiner Office of Petitions Office of the Deputy Commissioner For Patent Examination Policy.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
Who can file? Inventor Assignee of Inventor
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Best practices in the PCT international phase Session 2
The Role of the Voter Registrar
Third Party Pre-Issuance Submissions Under AIA
Filing of a U.S. Patent Application
Presentation transcript:

Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Effects on PCT and U.S. National Phase Practice Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration

Applicants for U.S. Patent Applications 35 U.S.C. 118 as amended by the AIA expands who may be an applicant Inventors are no longer the only possible applicants Applicants may be persons: To whom the inventor has assigned; To whom the inventor is under an obligation to assign; and Who otherwise shows proprietary interest in the matter. Applies to patent applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111 or 363 on or after September 16, 2012 October 2012

Applicants for PCT Applications - International Phase (1) For international applications filed on/after September 16, 2012, an applicant for the purposes of the United States may be: Inventor Legal representative of deceased or legally incapacitated inventor Assignee Obligated assignee Person who otherwise shows proprietary interest Proof of proprietary interest will be required in the national phase Example: Inventor X assigns all rights in the invention to Assignee Y. Assignee Y may be indicated on the PCT Request form (Box II) as an applicant for “all designated States” and Inventor X indicated (in Box III) as “inventor only” October 2012

Applicants for PCT Applications - International Phase (2) Change to Sec. 118 allowed the PCT Request Form to be simplified October 2012

Applicants for PCT Applications - International Phase (3) October 2012

Inventorship in §371 National Phase Applications (1) Inventorship in a §371 application having an international filing date on or after 9/16/2012 (§1.41(e)): If a signed ADS is included with the initial §371 submission, inventorship will be taken from the ADS Otherwise, the inventorship will be that set forth in the international phase (including any change effected under PCT Rule 92bis) October 2012

Inventorship in §371 National Phase Applications (2) Procedure for correcting inventorship and/or an inventor’s name has been simplified: All corrections fall under §1.48 §1.497(d) is removed for § 371s having an international filing date on or after 9/16/2012 Request under §1.48 need only include an ADS + processing fee (37 CFR 1.17(i)) An inventor’s oath or declaration will be required for each actual inventor who has not yet executed such oath or declaration October 2012

Applicants for §371 National Phase Applications (1) Applicants for §371 applications having an international filing date on or after 9/16/2012: Unless changed in the national phase, the applicants identified in the international phase as applicants for the U.S. will be considered to be the applicants for the §371 application (§ 1.46(b)) For a person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter, the applicant must submit a petition including The fee set forth in § 1.17(g) ($200); A showing that such person has sufficient proprietary interest; and A statement that making the application is appropriate to preserve the rights of the parties (§ 1.46(b)(2)). October 2012

Applicants in §371 National Phase Applications (2) Correcting or updating the name of the applicant, or changing an applicant (§ 1.46(c)): Must include an ADS specifying the change in the applicant information section (§1.76(b)(7)), and for changes in the applicant comply with §§3.71 and 3.73 October 2012

Inventor’s Oath or Declaration (1) 35 U.S.C. 115 as amended by the AIA Still requires that the inventors execute an oath or declaration Except as otherwise provided Changes the required statements Now requires Statement that application was made by or authorized to be made by the affiant or declarant Statement that the individual believes himself or herself to be the original inventor or an original joint inventor of a claimed invention No longer requires Statement of citizenship Statement that the inventor believes himself or herself to be the “first” inventor of the subject matter AIA-compliant inventor’s oath or declaration forms are available at http://www.uspto.gov/forms/aia_forms.jsp October 2012

Inventor’s Oath or Declaration (2) Substitute statements (§ 1.64) Can be submitted where the inventor is deceased, legally incapacitated, cannot be found or reached after diligent effort, or refuses to execute No petition is required to execute the substitute statement Office has created a new PTO form for this purpose (PTO/AIA/02) Assignment may serve as the inventor’s oath or declaration if: Executed by inventor and contains information/statements required by § 1.63, and A copy of the assignment is recorded in the Office’s assignment database October 2012

Timing of Inventor’s Oath or Declaration May postpone submission of inventor’s oath or declaration until the application is in condition for allowance if an ADS is filed identifying (§1.495(c)): Each inventor by his or her legal name A mailing address where the inventor customarily receives mail, and residence, if the inventor lives at a location different than the mailing address, for each inventor A surcharge (§1.492(h)) is required for filing the inventor’s oath or declaration after commencement The inventor’s oath or declaration must be filed no later than the time period set in the “Notice of Allowability” to avoid abandonment “Filing or 371(c)” date on the Filing Receipt will no longer be based on date of receipt of oath/declaration October 2012

Domestic Benefit Claims in §371 Applications Benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120, 365(c) and 119(e) must be in the ADS Inclusion of such benefit claims in the first sentence(s) of the specification will not comply with the new rules. October 2012

Important Practice Tips (1) If naming a non-inventor applicant as applicant for “all designated States” Review residence and nationality of the non-inventor applicant because it may affect Competency of RO/US Competency of U.S. practitioner to represent applicant Ability to file international application under the PCT Do not delay the filing of the oath or declaration in a 35 U.S.C. 371 application The 14 month clock for patent term adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A) does not start until the requirements under section 371 have been fulfilled Include a signed ADS with the initial 371 submission if inventorship has changed and to express domestic benefit claims Early commencement still requires submission of an oath or declaration The international filing date, NOT the date the 371 submission is filed, determines applicability of the AIA October 2012

Important Practice Tips (2) For international applications filed before September 16, 2012 Consider filing a bypass continuation if Status under 37 CFR 1.42 (deceased inventor) is needed and there are complications identifying the legal representative or obtaining their signature Status under 37 CFR 1.47 is needed because an inventor refuses to sign or cannot be located after diligent effort Substitute statement practice is available in an application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) on or after September 16, 2012 Assignee or joint inventors may execute a substitute statement October 2012

Patent Law Treaty Status – Senate passed S.3486 in September 2012 Major provisions Simplification of filing date requirements Reference filing Restoration of priority right Single standard for revival, restoration of priority right, delayed payment of issue fee, etc. Unintentionality October 2012

Thanks! michael.neas@uspto.gov October 2012