Models of structural theories of motor abilities and performance Petr Blahuš Charles University Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Department of Kinanthropology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research at Faculty of Sports Studies of Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic Jan Novotný Jitka Kopřivová
Advertisements

Year 10 Pathway C Mr. D. Patterson 1. Describe the concepts of distance, displacement, speed and velocity Use the formula v=s/t to calculate the unknown.
Research Questions Darleen Opfer.
StatisticalDesign&ModelsValidation. Introduction.
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Niina Kotamäki.
On-line learning and Boosting
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Sakesan Tongkhambanchong, Ph.D.(Applied Behavioral Science Research) Faculty of Education, Burapha University.
1 General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week #2 Class #2.
Chapter 4 Validity.
Psychology 202b Advanced Psychological Statistics, II April 7, 2011.
Computer Science Department Jeff Johns Autonomous Learning Laboratory A Dynamic Mixture Model to Detect Student Motivation and Proficiency Beverly Woolf.
Software modeling for embedded systems: static and dynamic behavior.
The functional connectivity of cortical areas Or how to produce many numbers.
Gifts in the treasure chest of Methodology: A personal view Rolf Steyer Friedrich Schiller University Jena Institute of Psychology Department of Methodology.
GRA 6020 Multivariate Statistics Factor Analysis Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
AMOS TAKING YOUR RESEARCH TO THE NEXT LEVEL Mara Timofe Research Intern.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
SPSS Statistical Package for Social Sciences Multiple Regression Department of Psychology California State University Northridge
Multivariate Statistics Principal Components/Factor Analysis Structural Equation Modeling.
An Introduction to HLM and SEM
Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.
Structural Equation Modeling Made Easy A Tutorial Based on a Behavioral Study of Communication in Virtual Teams Using WarpPLS Ned Kock.
CHAPTER NINE Correlational Research Designs. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.Chapter 9 | 2 Study Questions What are correlational.
Suwimon Vongsingthong Department of Information Technology and Management, Krirk University, Thailand
Slide 10.1 Structural Equation Models MathematicalMarketing Chapter 10 Structural Equation Models In This Chapter We Will Cover The theme of this chapter.
On kinesiology / kinanthropology as a science: modeling motor abilities as theoretical concepts and components of performance Petr Blahuš Charles University.
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
1 Exploratory & Confirmatory Factor Analysis Alan C. Acock OSU Summer Institute, 2009.
Unit 4- Fitness Training and Programming Components of fitness
G Lecture 11 G Session 12 Analyses with missing data What should be reported?  Hoyle and Panter  McDonald and Moon-Ho (2002)
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Thursday AM  Presentation of yesterday’s results  Factor analysis  A conceptual introduction to: Structural equation models Structural equation models.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Construct Validity: MTMM ● Assessed via convergent and divergent evidence ● Convergent – Measures of the.
Full Structural Models Kline Chapter 10 Brown Chapter 5 ( )
Aron, Aron, & Coups, Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course (3e), © 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter 12 Making Sense of Advanced Statistical.
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Major application of SEM is to test complex relationships simultaneously Somewhat similar to performing several regression.
CFA: Basics Beaujean Chapter 3. Other readings Kline 9 – a good reference, but lumps this entire section into one chapter.
School-level Correlates of Achievement: Linking NAEP, State Assessments, and SASS NAEP State Analysis Project Sami Kitmitto CCSSO National Conference on.
The Theory of Sport Training Basic Principles
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Module III Multivariate Analysis Techniques- Framework, Factor Analysis, Cluster Analysis and Conjoint Analysis Research Report.
Advanced Correlation D/RS 1013 Research Questions and Associated Techniques.
Introduction to structural equation modeling
Dan Kašpar, Klára Hulíková Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Demography and Geodemography
Full Structural Models Byrne Chapter 6 Kline Chapter 10 (stop 288, but the reporting section at the end is good to mark for later)
3-5 More on Solving Equations
Introduction to Path Analysis
Assessing the Quality of Instructional Materials: Item Response Theory
Using Item Response Theory to Track Longitudinal Course Changes
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
Aerobic and Anaerobic Exercise
Solving Two-Step Equations
Shudong Wang NWEA Liru Zhang Delaware Department of Education
Making Sense of Advanced Statistical Procedures in Research Articles
1 Step Equation Practice + - x ÷
IS6000 – Class 10 Introduction to SmartPLS (&SPSS)
Queuing Systems Don Sutton.
عنوان عنوان فرعی.
Chapter 15 Developing Physical Fitness Kinesiology Books Publisher 1.
Intro to SEM P. Soukup.
Structural Equation Modeling
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
5th International Conference on Engineering and Natural Science
A two-step equation worked out
Cases. Simple Regression Linear Multiple Regression.
SEM evaluation and rules
Structural Equation Modeling
IETF102 – Montreal Pierre Peloso, Laurent Ciavaglia
Presentation transcript:

Models of structural theories of motor abilities and performance Petr Blahuš Charles University Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Department of Kinanthropology Division of Methodology Prague, The Czech Republic

There are several “secret - latent - hidden” precious stones, formal methods items in the methodological treasure of behavioral sciences incl. kinanthropology, viz. latent variables models: - CFA - confirmatory common factor analysis - IRT models -Item Response Theory models - SEM - structural equations and path analysis models

Theories of motor performance - incl. athletic performance, are structural theories i.e. combination theories of a composition of motor abilities for example cf. the following naively intuitive model: performance = 30% endurance + 40% power + 20% speed

One-level ?

Coordination Hierarchical ?

Structural Equation Models (SEM) with latent variables and theories of athletic performance 1. Static simultaneous combination of manifest indicators of training: multiple regression model 2. Static simultaneous combination of motor abilities and concepts: common latent factor model 3. Static but sequential combination ordering of motor abilities and concepts: path analysis with latent variables 4. Dynamic sequence and combination: VARMA for longitudinal analysis of longitudinal training documentation

Training indicator 1 Practice / training indicator 2 Practice / training indicator 3 Practice / training indicator 1 Control test 1 Control test 2 Performance This composition of training should produce That performance Composite manifest prediction multiple regression

Endurance F1 Power F2 Speed ability F3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 Test 5 Test 6 Performance Y Combination of theoretical concepts / abilities latent common factors model w1 F1 + w2 F2 + w3 F3 = Y Weighted combination Performance of abilities / concepts produces

Sequential ordering and combination Level of ability F4 Practice method 4 Test 4,1 Test 4,2 Starting level of ability F1 Level of ability F3 Level of ability F2 Level of ability F5 Practice method 3 Test 3,1 Test 3,2 Test 5,1 Test 5,2 Test 2,1 Test 2,2 Performance Practice method 2 Practice method 5 Test 1, 1 Test 1,2 path analysis

F1F1 T est 1 Practice method 1 T est 2 Practice method 2 Final performance Practice method 3 F2F2 F1F1 F2F2 F2F2 F1F1 F1F1 F2F2 T est 4 T est 3 T est 1 T est 2 T est 3 T est 4 Performance T I M E Vector Autoregressive Moving Averages VARMA model