The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Airservices Australia The NOSS Experience Airservices Australia The NOSS Experience Marcus Knauer – NOSS Project Manager.
Advertisements

ICAO European Regional Runway Safety Seminar Amsterdam, The Netherlands 8 March 2012 ir. Job Brüggen, LVNL safety manager The global voice of ATM.
A brief history In line with the LRST Recommendation contained in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions, ENAV laid.
International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations Runway Safety Technical solutions From the Design and Manufacturing Sector By Fabrice.
International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations Preventing Runway Excursions Technical solutions From the Design and Manufacturing.
The Role of the Regulator Session 5 Presentation 2.
Issues specific to general aviation and business jets Session 6 Presentation 3.
The airport operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 3.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.
OPSG 1 JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures Capt. Claude Godel OST 05-4.
Incident Review Meeting Guidance Material & Presentation Template
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Runway Incursion Avoidance
Runway Incursion’s Affect on FAA Approved Pilot Training and Pilot and Flight Instructor Certification and Part 121 Pilot Checking – Andy Edwards – Manager.
The airport operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
Confidential This document contains trade secrets, financial, commercial, scientific, technical or other confidential information, the further disclosure.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 3.
Runway Excursions. Runway Excursion 2000 Worldwide, runway excursions are the highest single occurrence category of all accidents for commercial & general.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Flight Operations and Training © 2000, 2001 Flight Safety Foundation.
Runway Incursion Avoidance
Stabilized Constant Descent Angle NPA’s
Presented to: Orlando Florida Flying Community By: The FAASTeam - Dennis H. Whitley Date: December 9, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAASTeam Orlando.
Preventing Runway Accidents
1 Runway Incursion Causal Analysis Section 3. 2 PILOTS and VEHICLE OPERATORS must taxi and maneuver their aircraft/vehicles on taxiways and runways in.
Airport Markings & Signs
Missed-Approach or Go-around: A Maneuver conducted by pilot when instrument or visual approach cannot be completed to a landing..
SMS, Human Factors and FRMS – A Perspective Capt. Dan Maurino RAeS HF Group Conference on Building Fatigue into Safety Systems Crawley, 30 October 2012.
CAR 139 An Operator’s Responsibility. Whilst the topic under discussion is runway incursions, we must all accept that an incursion can occur anywhere.
Office of Aviation Safety Flight Crew Performance: Human Factors Evan Byrne, Ph.D. Human Performance Group Chairman.
Flight Safety Foundation Runway Safety Initiative Update October 25, 2007 Thomas Romig Manager, Safety ACI World Headquarters.
Lecture 2: AIRSIDE PART 2 By: Zuliana Ismail.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida FSDO Runway Safety Program- Pilot Deviations Runway Incursions Instructor and Student.
Runway Safety in Japan Katsuyuki Nakatsubo Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Japan.
THOMAS COOK CRM STANDARDS ASSESSMENT Captain Karen Varney CRM Manager Thomas Cook Airlines UK.
“ A location on an aerodrome movement area with a history or potential risk of collision or runway incursion, and where heightened attention by pilots/drivers.
Airservices Australia Runway Safety Group Meeting Canberra Friday 8 October 2010.
Lecture 11: Flight Management System (FMS)
ICAO-ANB FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference (Atlantic City, April 2010) Yong Wang Chief, AGA/ANB International Civil Aviation Organization.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Capt. Mattias Pak VP Aviation Safety
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Bi-Monthly Safety Briefing October 11, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
The airport operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 2.
NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES
The airport operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
DJ de Nysschen Wonderboom Air Traffic Control
Issues specific to general aviation and business jets
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Issues specific to general aviation and business jets
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
The airport operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 3.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 2.
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
Pilot considerations and pilot solutions
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 3.
Issues specific to general aviation and business jets
Runway Excursions.
The airport operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 2.
The airport operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
The airport operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Presentation transcript:

The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1

Communications

Communication hazards and mitigation The failure to provide timely, accurate and relevant information between: Crew members  Implement effective crew resource management ATC and crew  Educate ATC on crew needs and priorities The misinterpretation of the given message:  Use standard phraseology  Listen before speaking  Speak slowly  When in doubt, seek clarification

Non essential communication  Adopt sterile cockpit concept Communication impediments in multi-crew cockpit  Define the role of each pilot  CRM training on communication techniques  Manage the cockpit workload Communication hazards and mitigation

Operations

Operational hazards and mitigations Identify operational issues that can be addressed through training  Establish applicable training programs Fatigue: performance decrease – impaired decision making  Establish an effective CRM system  Establish SOPs that  define operating parameters  incorporate FRMS options Lack of approach aids (e.g. ILS, VASI, PAPI)  Adjust scheduling to compensate for known operating condition (e.g. night or weather)  Use available technology to establish stable approach configuration (e.g. DME vs. Height) Using a runway based on noise abatement requirements or ATC preferences at the expense of operational considerations increases risk levels:  Select runways based on operational suitability  longest runway,  into wind,  least cross-wind,  least turbulence, etc

Operational Hazards (cont.) Unstabilized approaches  Establish FDA Program  Establish a route guide (intelligence manual)  Establish SOPs No fault go around policy Use precision approaches / visual approaches /circling approaches Select the most operationally suitable runway Establish stable approach criteria Establish missed approach criteria Establish criteria for reduced flap settings and idle reverse thrust on landing Cross-check significant actions Non-grooved runway operations Operations in topical weather environments Operations in winter conditions Landing distance requirements calculations

Inaccurate performance calculations  Cross check all entries  Input data while aircraft stationary Lack of runway clearing/cleaning  Report observations using incident reporting system  Educate airport operator on operational requirements Lack of effective incident reporting system  Implement an effective incident reporting system  Incorporate a no fault reporting system Operational hazards and mitigations

Operational Hazards (cont.) Veer-offs  Pilot training for:  Wind conditions  Down wind  Cross wind  Unstable approach  Touchdown speed control  Missed approach technique  Use of reduced flap settings and idle reverse thrust  Use of non precision approaches/visual approaches/circling Confusion  SOPs for runway confirmation  Use of precision approach  Use of FMC input

Inadequately managed aircraft performance changes Accepting last minute runway change Change of available runway length Task overload potential Navigation FMC missed approach  Establish SOPs for last minute runway change  FMC update  Landing distance calculations  Approach briefing Technical problems  SOPs to manage:  Technical problem  Performance aspects Airport environment charts lacking: RESA Arresting beds  Report deficiencies to the CAA

Visibility

Visibility Hazards Reduced visibility increases potential for loss of situational awareness Not only due to fog or other “low visibility” phenomena Visibility may be an issue in clear weather due to glare or reflection (surface contamination) Not knowing the remaining landing distance available  Use all available technologies to maintain situational awareness on the runway  Realistic training for all low visibility operations

Visibility Mitigation Lost of direction control due to a decrease of external cues  Establish procedures  Provide realistic training  Adhere to take-off/landing minima

Airport Design

Airport Design Hazards Lack of adequate identification of runways and taxiways when airborne: landing on a wrong runway or on a taxiway  Conduct an airport briefing before every operation  Use all available navigation aids to confirm position  Use aircraft technology to verify taxiways and runways

Airport Design Mitigation Airport familiarity Use aerodrome charts, at all airports where available The charts need to show Hot Spots, RESA information, etc.

Signage and markings

Signage Hazards and Mitigation Signage may be inadequate (e.g. distance to go marks)  Report signs that are not usable Lack of or unserviceable markings  Report unserviceable markings Inadequate illumination/lighting  Report lighting not in accordance with ICAO standards

THANK YOU