L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry KULeuven Department of Chemistry Laboratory for Physical and Analytical Chemistry (LPAC) Celestijnenlaan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ME 200 L19: ME 200 L19:Conservation Laws: Cycles HW 7 Due Wednesday before 4 pm HW 8 Posted Start early Kim See’s Office ME Gatewood Wing Room
Advertisements

1 Ann Van Lysebetten CO 2 cooling experience in the LHCb Vertex Locator Vertex 2007 Lake Placid 24/09/2007.
KINETIC COMBUSTION OF WHEAT STRAW BALES
Software and hardware complex of experimental plant for pulp and paper production Master student of MMA department : Anton Kaverin Perm National Research.
Why Use Ozone  To improve water quality (disinfection)  To improve swimmer comfort  To reduce maintenance costs  To reduce chemical costs  To improve.
Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.
Chapter 3.2: Heat Exchanger Analysis Using -NTU method
Topic 17 Equilibrium Liquid-vapour equilibrium The equilibrium law.
July 29, Bench Top Tests for Surfactant Selection Ayantayo Ajani The University of Tulsa.
Part II: Mass Transfer of O 3 in Water: Fundamentals & Applications L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry REWARD H. Vankerckhoven.
AQUATEST a.s. TECHNICAL SUPPORT DIVISION Modular units for mine water disposal A set of technical equipment designed for mine water disposal is.
Capture of Heat Energy From Diesel Engine After Cooler Circuit (2006 Annual Report) Mark Teitzel Alaska Village Energy Corporation
CEE 453 Research Project Chris Garnic Nolan Rogers Creating Ideal Floc for Instant Startup of a Conical Flocculator.
LPAC Compatibility of MP membranes and O 3 Membranes as O 3 contactors Materials under study Experimental Procedure Compatible or not compatible ? Conclusions.
L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry KULeuven Department of Chemistry Laboratory for Physical and Analytical Chemistry (LPAC) Celestijnenlaan.
Update on Various Target Issues Presented by Ron Petzoldt D. Goodin, E. Valmianski, N. Alexander, J. Hoffer Livermore HAPL meeting June 20-21, 2005.
Pharmaceutical Water Systems Alain Kupferman Manufacture of sterile medicines – Advanced workshop for SFDA GMP inspectors, Nanjing, November 2009.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Kevin A Cavender EPA-Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards Precursor Gas Monitoring NO y Monitoring Training.
airQrate line of calibrators
PSB H 0 -H - Injection: Sectorisation Analysis C.Pasquino, J. Hansen, P.Chiggiato LIU - PSB Ho-H- Injection Meeting 1.
Vacuum system in the main Linacs C. Garion CERN/TE/VSC CLIC09 workshop, October.
Mounting Direction Water Cooler Best solution OK Risk of air bubbles in the system Heatsink Water channels Inlet Outlet.
Adsorption Refrigeration System. INTRODUCTION  Adsorption refrigeration system uses adsorbent beds to adsorb and desorb a refrigerant to obtain cooling.
Heat transfer in turbulent flow CL Aim To determine the overall heat transfer coefficient & the individual film transfer coefficient and verify.
In Engineering --- Designing a Pneumatic Pump Introduction System characterization Model development –Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Model analysis –Time domain.
Gas Transfer in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems
LOGO Feasibility Test of Applying Complex Remediation Technology for Diesel Contamination in Soil and Groundwater 2012 International Conference on Environmental.
REWARD 1 st Technical-Meeting 15 – 16 Dec 2004 REWARD.
Module 1, Part 3: Process validation Slide 1 of 22 © WHO – EDM – 12/2001 Validation Part 3: Process validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing.
History of Chromatography n Early LC carried out in glass columns n diameters: 1-5 cm n lengths: cm n Size of solid stationary phase n diameters:
A SEMINAR ON NOx REDUCTION BY FUEL WATER EMULSION INJECTION
1 So far… We’ve developed a general energy balance We’ve developed a general material balance We’ve only actually looked at systems that are under steady.
Remediation System Design & Implementation Presented by.
1 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPALS OF In Situ THERMAL TREATMENT Professor Kent S. Udell Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental.
Accuracy Based Generation of Thermodynamic Properties for Light Water in RELAP5-3D 2010 IRUG Meeting Cliff Davis.
Gas Chromatography Lecture 38.
Alex Gee Jon Locke Joe Cooper Kylie Rhoades Clara Echavarria Ice Energy Extraction.
CMS FPIX Cooling System Studies Joe Howell, Fermilab for the FPIX Upgrade Mechanical Working Group CMS Upgrade Workshop April 27,
Some notes about liquid Hydrogen target 1.How it operates 2.Modification Target length, empty mode 4.Status.
Experimental and numerical studies on the bonfire test of high- pressure hydrogen storage vessels Prof. Jinyang Zheng Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang.
MICROMEGAS General Meeting GAS DISTRIBUTION SHCEMES FOR THE MICROMEGAS DETECTORS OF THE NSW OF ATLAS NTUA T. Alexopoulos, S. Maltezos, S.
REDUCING SCALE DEPOSITION BY PHYSICAL TREATMENT Sungmin Youn and Professor X. Si, Calvin College REDUCING SCALE DEPOSITION BY PHYSICAL TREATMENT Sungmin.
LSU Petroleum Engineering Research and Technology Transfer Laboratory “The Well Facility”
Kinetics of Disinfection Ideally:All cells equally mixed with disinfectant All cells equally susceptible to disinfectant. Disinfectant concentration unchanged.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 Experimental and computational studies of the coolability of heap-like and cylindrical debris beds E. Takasuo,
WP4: Instrumentation Tânia Melo Mendonça. 2 ISOLDE target unit Present target unit base at ISOLDE with 7 inlets (including ion source gas leak, heating.
An Examination of Chlorine Demand of the Catskill and Delaware Supplies of the NYC Water Supply System Charles R. Cutietta-Olson, Deputy Chief.
Miss : SALSABEEL H. AL JOUJOU
Luke or MTS Q anode. MOBY DICK  Purpose of Moby Dick:  Can we even get to ~10 ppb O 2 and H 2 O?  What other things in Moby will cause loss of LAr.
MULTI-COMPONENT FUEL VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK C. E. Polymeropoulos Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University.
Feasibility Analysis of a Two Phase Solar Thermal Water Heater Solar Thermal Solutions (M15) Project Supervisor: Dr. Y. Muzychka April 3 rd, 2014 Marcus.
Experiment 6: Rankine Cycle Yvette Triay Reporter Group 3.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 7 External flow.
Heat Exchangers Results Josué Ortiz #57703 Prof: Eduardo Cabrera Me
APMP TCFF Country Report CMS/ITRI, Chinese Taipei Chun-Min Su, Ph.D. Dec. 5, 2011 Kobe, Japan.
7 February 2012 Annekathrin Frankenberger (HEPHY Vienna) Open CO 2 Cooling System at the beam test Belle II SVD-PXD Meeting.
Packed Column Experiment
CERN Cryolab CO 2 cooling for pixel detectors Investigation of heat transfer Christopher Franke, Torsten Köttig, Jihao Wu, Friedrich Haug TE-CRG-CI.
Introduction Results & Discussion At present, disinfection of wells and drinking water pipelines is carried out by treating with chlorine- containing reagents.
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Heat Exchangers and Condensers
超臨界CO2在增強型地熱系統儲集層中取熱之研究-子計畫三 CO2在增強型地熱系統取熱模型之建構及效能分析
HIGH PERFORMANCE LEVEL CONTROL.
Treatment – Chlorine Disinfection
Bioreactors Engineering
Hazard identification
Effects of Free and Forced Convection on the Convection Coefficient and Time to Steady State for Various Objects Christian Roys, Jon Zywusko, and Julie.
Instructions: Adding refrigerant fluid to system
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Complete chart for 18 minutes
Presentation transcript:

L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry KULeuven Department of Chemistry Laboratory for Physical and Analytical Chemistry (LPAC) Celestijnenlaan 200 F 3001 Leuven Belgium Tel: Fax: Technical Meeting, Offenburg, 22/09/2005

WP 1.4. : O 3 generation testbed (constructed by Copperline and Seaking) L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Ozone generation testbed:  Installed at LPAC-laboratory on 6 and 7 july 2005 Prof. Thomas Rose (FH Münster; Reward-coördinator) Klaus Padtberg (Hobart) Reiner Preuss(Copperline) Arthur Gregor(Copperline) Prof. Chris Vinckier(K.U.Leuven, LPAC) Frank De Smedt(K.U.Leuven, LPAC) Hans Vankerckhoven(K.U.Leuven, LPAC)  First tests on the installation days  Afterwards further testing by LPAC

WP 1.4. : O 3 generation testbed L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry O 3 generator box nr 1 Storage tank Water jet (Venturi-system) FRONT VIEW External control of O 3 boxes by means of ETR-CL software MAXO Box nr 2 Water pump (stainless steel)

O 3 generation testbed: 2 modules L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry MODULE 1: Two ozone generation boxes, designed by Copperline and constructed by CL and Seaking Air inlet and introduction into the Venturi injector MODULE 2: Venturi injector (mixing of gas and water) Water pump (external water loop) Storage tank (designed and constructed by Copperline and Seaking)

O 3 generation testbed L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry MODULE 1

O 3 generation testbed (Module 1) L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Two ozone boxes Gardena Tubing connecting Box 1 and 2

O 3 generation testbed (Module 1) L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry

O 3 generation testbed (Module 1): preliminary experiments (july 2005) L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Maximum gas phase concentration achieved with the CL ozone boxes = 2 g/m 3 O 3 ≈ 0.1 v/v % O 3 (target: 0.5 – 1.0 % v/v) Ozone boxes : pressure drop between inlet and introduction into Venturi: leaks ! (Gardena Tubing ? Sealing of the boxes ?...) Ozone in the water: maximum = 20 µg/l O 3 (20 ppb): target ≈ 1 mg/l O 3 for disinfection (dose = time x concentration). Modifications to design of the boxes Note: technology should work, cfr. O 3 Congress Strasbourg august 2005

O 3 generation testbed L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry MODULE 2

O 3 generation testbed (Module 2): construction scheme L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Storage tank Water jet (Venturi-system) Water pump (stainless steel) Start of the external water loop

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Venturi injector

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Upper part water loop

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Gas phase  Phase separation (no mixing)

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Introduction in storage tank

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Characterisation of the air (Q air ) & water (Q water ) flows Determination of the mass transfer coefficient k L a Monitoring of pH, temperature, ORP and conductivity Conclusions Further implementations, improvements,.... OUTLINE

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Characterisation of the air (Q air ) & water (Q water ) flows Q water Q air Regulators: No real fine-tuning

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Characterisation of the air (Q air ) & water (Q water ) flows Q air depends on Q water and on the number of turns of the air regulator Reproducibility only within 10 % (regulators)

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Determination of the mass transfer coefficient k L a  Ozone from the LPAC-setup Experimental procedure

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Determination of the mass transfer coefficient k L a The ozone concentration in the water of the storage tank as a function of time (the first 5 hours were used for equilibrating the system and are not displayed) at (38.8 ± 0.5)°C, Q O2/O3 = 60 dm 3 /hour and pH (5.60 ± 0.1). A) and B) Q water = 3.1 l/min and [O 3 ] gas = 22.6, respectively 25.4 g/m 3, C) Qwater = 2.0 l/min and [O 3 ] gas = 28.3 g/m 3 (more details: Table 1).

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Determination of the mass transfer coefficient k L a

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Determination of the mass transfer coefficient k L a  k L a depending on Q O2/O3 at low Q water, no dependence at higher Q water  k L a depending on Q water  k L a = 13 hour -1 (60 dm 3 /hour gas flow): literature values 10 x higher for Venturi ! (mixing problems ?)  t sat,90 = 12 min (Q water = 3.1 l/min) and 20 min (2.0 l/min)  t degas = 25 minutes

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry temperature and ORP Fast increase at ozone buildup Slow decrease at O 3 degassing  Feasibility as monitor for O 3 concentration ? (perhaps qualitative) Temperature increase (initially) till 36 – 39°C (pump ?)

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry pH and conductivity pH follows the on-off cycle of the O 3 generator (introduction of organic species and/or NO x ?) Conductivity increase a.f.o. time : more increase when O 3 is produced (cumulative).

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Summary of the results Q air depends on the air flow regulator and Q water due to the non-accurate regulators & meters, reproducibility is only within 10% the gas flow initially requires 3 to 4 hours to stabilize the temperature of the storage tank water stabilizes at about 39°C after 3 to 4 hours (due to the water pump heating) the mass transfer coefficient k L a, a measure for transfer rate of ozone from gas to liquid phase, is determined for the Venturi system installed and found to be dependent on Q water, i.e. an increase of about 30% is observed when Q water is changed from 2 to 3.1 l/min k L a is about 13 hour -1 when Q water =3.1 l/min and Q O2/O3 = 60 dm 3 /hour the external water loop contains a tubing part where the gas and liquid phase are separated, so no mixing occurs in this zone (especially between Venturi and tank) t sat,90 equals approximately 12 minutes at Q water = 3.1 l/min and 20 minutes at Q water = 2.0 l/min

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry Summary of the results the time needed to degas (de-ozonize) the water completely is 25 minutes when the ozone concentration in the water increases, the ORP-signal sharply increases. When the storage tank water is de-ozonized the ORP-signal drops more slowly than does the ozone concentration in the water. An increase of the conductivity is observed during recirculation and during ozonation. In the latter case the increase of the conductivity is much more pronounced, probably caused by the introduction of organic species or NO x into the water. The effect on conductivity of the various on-off cycles is cumulative. The pH evolution during ozonation and degassing needs to be further investigated and perhaps related to the conductivity changes. The pH follows the on-off cycles of the ozone generator. At Q water = 3.1 l/min and Q O2/O3 = 60 dm 3 /hour the ozone concentration in the liquid equals 8.4 mg/l for 22.6 g/m 3 O 3 (± 1.0 % v/v O 3 ) at pH 5.6 and 39°C. Pressure and/or temperature effects due to the Venturi system are possibly influencing the ozone concentration in the liquid, namely increasing the ozone solubility. These effects will be investigated more thoroughly.

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry General conclusions  Design needs to be improved ! (e.g. phase separation in the upper part of the tubing, inlet of gas/water in the storage tank, …) Venturi systems in literature 10 x times higher k L a values than currently reached (higher gas flows ?)  ORP not feasible as ozone monitor (quantitative: NO ; qualitative: perhaps)  Ozone liquid steady state concentration Apparently an enhanced solubility (more experiments)

O 3 generation testbed: experiments L aboratory of P hysical and A nalytical C hemistry future  Design adjustments  Ozone steady state concentration: more research  Higher gas flows: k L a determination  Ozone generation modules after adaptions by CL and Seaking: evaluation of [O 3 ] gas a.f.o. ……… Note: cfr Report 1: at high pH and temperature: difficult to achieve ozone concentrations in the water (k L a and [O 3 ] gas ).