2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Drivers Ed. Chapter 12 Review.
Advertisements

Dynapac presents a series of new pneumatic tyred rollers
CHAPTER 12 DRIVING IN ADVERSE CONDITIONS 12.1 REDUCED VISIBILITY
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Justin Johnson.
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Morgan City Rentals Diesel Jet Pump 6 x 6 Peerless Safe Operating Practices and Procedures.
Analysis of Spark Ignition Engine Management System
Engine Electronic Controlled. Ignition systems THE CONSTANT ENERGY IGNITION SYSTEM DIGITAL (PROGRAMMED) IGNITION SYSTEM DISTRIBUTORLESS IGNITION SYSTEM.
NDSU Clean Snowmobile Presented by: Michael Niehoff Jared Quinlan Advisor: Dr. Robert Pieri.
© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only Publisher The Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Tinley Park, Illinois.
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Club Iowa State University 2015 SAE International Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2014 Polaris Indy ® 800 SP.
University of New Hampshire Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2006.
1 Presenters: Ozzie Goodman Zak Parker. Design Objectives  Create Efficient Snowmobile Fueled by 16%-32% Isobutanol  Emissions Reductions  Noise 
Engine Size and Measurements
ABS(Antilock braking system)
ELECTRONIC FUEL INJECTION COMPONENTS
Design Intent  Improve upon the Best Available Technology (BAT) standard of the power sports industry to enhance fuel efficiency while reducing emissions.
North Dakota State University Ross Larson Justin Omdalen.
Automotive systems By: Salvador Madrigal. Electrical System 1.Ignition systems 2.Starting systems 3.Charging systems 4.Lighting systems.
Group 9A: Jerry Dutreuil Joshua Guerra Matt Grywalski William Mehnert.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
The results of IMPCO’s GM 3.0 liter certified engine program
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President.
Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.
University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
 The Gator HPX 4x4 Gas The Gator HPX 4x4 Gas  The Gator HPX 4x4 Diesel The Gator HPX 4x4 Diesel  Gator Optional Equipment Gator Optional Equipment.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier.
Electric Motorcycle Proposal John J. Romano Carleton B. Simpson Advisor: Dr. Allen Drake 28 September 2011.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Dylan Dahlheimer Ryan Schefers Brenden Bungert Mark Boeckmann UMD University.
Adverse Driving Conditions Section 10 Reduced Visibility Windows Most important rule is Keep Your Windows Clean!
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Port Fuel Injection VS. Direct Fuel Injection The Basics of DFI The main focus of DFI is to effectively and precisely control the fuel-to-air ratio. To.
RETARDERS.
Minnesota State University Mankato Dylan Brandt, Nick Perkins, Abdulsalam Hamud, Wayne Minnichsoffer, Andrew Pickle.
Electrical systems, Engine systems, Chassis systems, Miscellaneous systems.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Chapter 12 Worksheets.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
North Dakota State Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Steve Miller Danika Gieske Advisor: Dr. Robert Pieri.
2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning.
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Club Iowa State University 2016 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Engine Technology Gasoline Engine Work moving of an object against an opposing force by a push, pull or lift measured in terms of distance and force, or.
The Ride of the Future! Allows RVers to smoothly take the scenic route
Anti-Lock Braking Systems
Jeff Robinson Eric Gleich
Introduction to the Clean Snowmobile Competition
Innovations in Zero Emissions Snowmobile Technology
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Team Members Jacob Schofield - President Nels Eide – Driveline / Testing Mark Boeckmann - Engine Keith Propson – Sound / Exhaust.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2017 Clean Snowmobile Team
The Airplane Chapter 5 Engine.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
Presented By Ian Sullivan
St. Cloud State University Slick Cylinders
Iowa State Clean Snowmobile Challenge
2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
High Octane Low Carbon Solution for tomorrow… today
Overview Project Management Base Sled Selection Engine Management
University of Wisconsin-Platteville Clean Snowmobile
2017 University of Waterloo E62 Clean Snowmobile
Electronic Stability Control Systems
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Presented by Dan Hourigan Vice President, Dynojet Research
Presentation transcript:

2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge Northern Illinois University 2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge

Snowmobile Selection 2011 Polaris Rush 600 What we set out to improve: Exhaust Emissions 2-Stroke Engine Capabilities Fuel Efficiency Ability to run on Isobutanol blend NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Rush Performance Enhancements Engine-Cooling-Drivetrain Dynojet Power Commander V Electric Start O2 sensor/ Air fuel ratio gauge. Handling Woody’s Trail Blazer Carbides Woody’s Carbide Studs Hayes Trail Trac 1.0 NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Power Commander V Fuel Injection Module Allows for fuel map adjustment, while retaining factory ECU calibration Mode Switch can be added to switch between two fuel maps. Ex: Economy or Performance mode Easily returned to factory settings NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Factory Advertised Specs: 120 Hp Dynamometer Testing Peak Power: 100.3 Hp @ 6251 RPM Peak Torque: 84.76 Ft Lbs Factory Advertised Specs: 120 Hp NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Handling Woody’s Carbides Woody’s Carbides Studs Reduces darting Allows for more steering grip in turns Woody’s Carbides Studs Improves traction in most icy/snow conditions Decreases skidding while braking NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Handling Cont. Hayes Trail Trac 1.0 ABS style braking system Reduces skidding while braking Helps keep the rear end in a straight line while braking NIU CSC 2/27/2014

HAYES Trail Track Testing Conditions: little snow cover with layer of ice underneath. Unpicked track Tests measured both stopping distance and time Tests were also done with picks installed. NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Sound Emissions Sound test was performed using SAE J192 Standard test The machine accelerates for 150 feet after 150 feet of constant speed Sound measurement is taken 50 feet perpendicular to the path of travel. Sound levels were found to be 76.9 dB, also a full throttle full speed pass performed, which produced a 81 dB sound reading Conditions of the test day Temperature: 19 Degrees Fahrenheit Wind: 0 M.P.H. Pressure: 30.23 inHg NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Isobutanol Conversion Power Commander V Allows for complete adjustment of fuel table off of AFR readings O2 Sensor Reads air-fuel ratio (AFR) Dynojet Autotune Allows for AFR data logging while the vehicle is being ridden (only when enabled) NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Emissions Testing Emissions measurements were taken using a Nova 5 Gas Analyzer. Values are averages taken from the collection period. Engine was running 91 octane pump gasoline. NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Dealer Benefits This sled offers many desirable features and performance levels compared to equally priced and equipped snowmobiles The current comparable model to our sled is a 2014 Polaris Rush 600 Pro-r The MSRP for the Polaris Rush 600 Pro-r is $10,799, our sled’s MSRP is $12,956 The addition of these parts does not call for any additional maintenance, difficult installations and are readily available for any consumer as over the counter parts NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Consumer Appeal The snowmobile offers both performance and efficient adjustable modes The 2-stroke motor is cheaper and easier to work on than 4-stroke motors The chassis is highly adjustable to meet many types of riders and riding styles Replacement parts are readily available over the counter NIU CSC 2/27/2014

Questions? NIU CSC 2/27/2014