1st Level Analysis Contrasts and Inferences Nico Bunzeck Katya Woollett.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Design Sara Bengtsson With thanks to: Christian Ruff
Advertisements

Experimental Design Sara Bengtsson With thanks to: Christian Ruff
Experimental Design Christian Ruff With thanks to: Rik Henson Daniel Glaser Christian Ruff With thanks to: Rik Henson Daniel Glaser.
Experimental Design Christian Ruff With slides from: Rik Henson Daniel Glaser Christian Ruff With slides from: Rik Henson Daniel Glaser.
Hierarchical Models and
2nd level analysis – design matrix, contrasts and inference
1 st Level Analysis: design matrix, contrasts, GLM Clare Palmer & Misun Kim Methods for Dummies
Blindsight Seeing without Awareness. What is Blindsight ‘Blindsight’ (Weiskrantz): residual visual function after V1 damage in the lack of any visual.
Experimental Design Rik Henson With thanks to: Karl Friston, Andrew Holmes Experimental Design Rik Henson With thanks to: Karl Friston, Andrew Holmes.
Outline What is ‘1st level analysis’? The Design matrix
Design matrix, contrasts and inference
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis in neuroeconomics November 2010 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural.
Introduction Impairments in development dyslexia are not confined to reading and literacy skills. Additional behavioural deficits include phonological.
Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context Snedeker and Trueswell (2003) Psych 526 Eun-Kyung Lee.
Opportunity to Participate
Opportunity to Participate EEG study of auditory attention – takes about 2 hours Sign up on sheet or
Group analyses Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London Will Penny.
Experimental Design Christian Ruff With thanks to: Rik Henson Daniel Glaser Christian Ruff With thanks to: Rik Henson Daniel Glaser.
Experimental design of fMRI studies Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 12 November 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 28 April 2009 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 26 November 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
Mind, Brain & Behavior Wednesday February 5, 2003.
Principles of MRI Some terms: – Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) quantum property of protons energy absorbed when precession frequency.
Measuring Blood Oxygenation in the Brain. Functional Imaging Functional Imaging must provide a spatial depiction of some process that is at least indirectly.
Parametric modulation, temporal basis functions and correlated regressors Mkael Symmonds Antoinette Nicolle Methods for Dummies 21 st January 2008.
Christian Ruff Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research Department of Economics University of Zurich Institute of Neurology University College.
Experimental Design Tali Sharot & Christian Kaul With slides taken from presentations by: Tor Wager Christian Ruff.
1st Level Analysis Design Matrix, Contrasts & Inference
GUIDE to The… D U M M I E S’ DCM Velia Cardin. Functional Specialization is a question of Where? Where in the brain is a certain cognitive/perceptual.
Dynamic Causal Modelling THEORY SPM Course FIL, London October 2009 Hanneke den Ouden Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University.
Measuring Functional Integration: Connectivity Analyses
Studying Visual Attention with the Visual Search Paradigm Marc Pomplun Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts at Boston
Chapter 11: Cognition and neuroanatomy. Three general questions 1.How is the brain anatomically organized? 2.How is the mind functionally organized? 3.How.
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM): Theory Demis Hassabis & Hanneke den Ouden Thanks to Klaas Enno Stephan Functional Imaging Lab Wellcome Dept. of Imaging.
Contrasts (a revision of t and F contrasts by a very dummyish Martha) & Basis Functions (by a much less dummyish Iroise!)
Brain Mapping Unit The General Linear Model A Basic Introduction Roger Tait
7/16/2014Wednesday Yingying Wang
Analysis of fMRI data with linear models Typical fMRI processing steps Image reconstruction Slice time correction Motion correction Temporal filtering.
Neural systems supporting the preparatory control of emotional responses Tor D. Wager, Brent L. Hughes, Matthew L. Davidson, Melissa Brandon, and Kevin.
Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Himn Sabir 1. Topics 1 st level analysis 2 nd level analysis Space-Time SPMs Time-frequency analysis Conclusion 2.
Chapter 8: Perceiving Motion
Experimental design of fMRI studies Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 01 November 2013 Klaas Enno Stephan Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU)
Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention de Fockert, Rees, Frith, Lavie (2001)
Pattern Classification of Attentional Control States S. G. Robison, D. N. Osherson, K. A. Norman, & J. D. Cohen Dept. of Psychology, Princeton University,
Experimental design of fMRI studies Methods & models for fMRI data analysis November 2012 Sandra Iglesias Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU) Institute.
Spatial Smoothing and Multiple Comparisons Correction for Dummies Alexa Morcom, Matthew Brett Acknowledgements.
Orienting Attention to Semantic Categories T Cristescu, JT Devlin, AC Nobre Dept. Experimental Psychology and FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford,
Introduction Ruth Adam & Uta Noppeney Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen Scientific Aim Experimental.
1 st level analysis: Design matrix, contrasts, and inference Stephane De Brito & Fiona McNabe.
FMRI in Detection of Deception. What is functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A magnetic field is passed through the organ of interest, the brain, during.
Chapter 11 Language. Some Questions to Consider How do we understand individual words, and how are words combined to create sentences? How can we understand.
Jordan H., Fallah M., & Stoner G.R. Adaptation of gender derived from biological motion.
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Study design & EFFICIENCY
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course London, October 2016
Contrast and Inferences
Effective Connectivity: Basics
Effective Connectivity
Department of Psychology University of Washington
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Experimental Design in Functional Neuroimaging
Dynamic Causal Modelling
Experimental Design Christian Ruff With thanks to: Rik Henson
Experimental design Mona Garvert
Introduction to Connectivity Analyses
Hierarchical Models and
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Effective Connectivity
Experimental Design Christian Ruff With slides from: Rik Henson
WellcomeTrust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
Presentation transcript:

1st Level Analysis Contrasts and Inferences Nico Bunzeck Katya Woollett

What do we use fMRI for? Functional specialisation: –Identification of regionally specific effects that can be attributed to changing stimuli or task conditions Functional integration: –Identification of interactions among specialised cortical areas and how these interactions depend upon context

Planning the experiment we should have a clear… Hypothesis / Question Design that help me to answer my question How I am going to build my SPM model How I am going to analyse my data What contrasts and inferences are made is dependent on choice of experimental design

Design overview Cognitive subtraction Conjunctions Factorial

Definition: the difference between two tasks can be formulated as a separable cognitive or sensorimotor component Then, regionally specific differences in haemodynamic response, evoked by the two tasks, identify the corresponding functionally specialised area Many subtraction designs rely on the assumption of pure insertion Cognitive subtraction

Pure insertion Pure insertion: A new cognitive (A) component can be purely inserted without affecting the expression of the previous ones (e.g., B). If this were not the case the difference between tasks that did, and did not, include component B would depend on the presence of component A. Pure insertion discounts both functional and psychological interactions and therefore represents a very restricted precondition for cognitive subtraction

1. The experimental task and baseline/ control task must be identical in every way except for the process of interest Assumptions of cognitive subtraction Activation task involving process of interest Baseline/control task identical to A except for process of interest Region(s) involved in the cognitive/ sensorimotor process of interest A B

For example… Violates assumption 1 : task A and B identical but the process of interest Many processes in addition to presence of biological motion in A including visual motion and eye movements Question: brain regions are responsible for biological motion? Activation task Point light display movie Baseline / control task Point light display static image Regions involved in biological motion? Task A Task B MT / V5 STS Frontal eye fields Cerebellum Parietal cortex

For example… A better baseline to answer this question. Question: areas for biological motion? Activation task Point light display moves Baseline / control task Random dots moves Regions involved in biological motion? Task A Task B MT / V5 STS Frontal eye fields Cerebellum Parietal cortex

2. There must be no implicit processing of the component of interest in the baseline/control task Assumptions of cognitive subtraction Activation task involving process of interest Baseline/control task identical to A except for process of interest Region(s) involved in the cognitive/ sensorimotor process of interest A B

For example… Activation task read words aloud Baseline / control task look at words Regions involved in semantic processing? Task A Task B Violates assumption 2: Note implicit processing of the component of interest in the baseline task Question: is inferotemporal cortex involved in the semantic processing?

1. The experimental task and baseline/ control task must be identical in every way except for the process of interest 2. There must be no implicit processing of the component of interest in the baseline task Summary

Cognitive conjunctions combine a series of subtractions with the aim of isolating a process that is common to two (or more) task pairs The assumption of pure insertion can be avoided by extracting the presence of a main effect in the absence of an interaction Conjunctions have the advantage of testing the effect independently of the task context, thereby controlling for influences of the effect on the context. Conjunctions

For example… - A1 Activation task Read words B1 Baseline task Say “Yes” A2 Activation task Name picture B2 Baseline task Say “Yes” - Badgelotus Phonological retrieval Form processing Lexical orthography Sublexical orthography Form and colour processing Object structure

The only restriction is that differences between the task pairs both contain the component of interest The analysis results in any commonality in activation differences between the task pairs The resulting region should be uniquely associated with the process of interest, not any interactions specific to each subtraction Using Conjunctions- Summary

Factorial Design In factorial designs there are two or more factors The main effects of each factor identify brain areas that respond to that particular factor of interest The interaction between factors identifies brain areas where the effect of one factor varies depending on the presence or absence of the other factor This allows to measure the effect of one factor on the expression of the other factor

Factorial design 2x2 Factor B Factor A B1 A1 B2 A Sugiura et al, 2005

Factorial design 2x2 MAIN EFFECTS -Difference between columns -Difference between rows INTERACTIONS -Difference between columns depending on status of rows (or vice versa)

Main effects Main effect of factor A1 (1+3)-(2+4) Factor B Factor A B1 A1 B2 A BOLD signal in voxel Y Factor A1 Factor A2 B1B2

Main effects Main effect of factor B1 (1+2)-(3+4) BOLD signal in voxel Y Factor A1 Factor A2 B1B2 Factor B Factor A B1 A1 B2 A

Interactions … Interaction between the factors (1-2)-(3-4) BOLD signal in voxel Y B1B2 Factor A1 Factor A2 Factor B Factor A B1 A1 B2 A

Crossover interaction Interaction between the factors A1 B1 and A2 B2: (1-2)-(3-4) Factor A1 Factor A2 B1B2 Factor B Factor A B1 A1 B2 A BOLD signal in voxel Y

How do I do it in SPM Now we have clear what comparisons we want to make… to answer our question