Nadya Dimitrova Marieta Petkova. 13 Regional cancer registries BNCR: -Established in 1952; - 35 000 cases a year; - 7.5 million population;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 TCR TUMOUR MATCHING ALGORITHM The structure of the algorithm- Heather Bourne Using the algorithm - Jason Hiscox.
Advertisements

Yasir Rudha, MD; Amr Aref, MD; Paul Chuba, MD; Kevin O’Brien, MD
Instructions and Reporting Requirements Module 3 Electronic Reporting For Facilities March 2014 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry State Center for.
Instructions and Reporting Requirements Module 11 Electronic Reporting For Urology Physician Practices May 2013 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry.
Instructions and Reporting Requirements Module 2 Electronic Reporting For Facilities March 2014 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry State Center for.
Radiologic Imaging Defines the local extent of a tumor Can be used to stage malignant disease Aids in the diagnosis Monitoring tumor changes after treatment.
1 Januari 2014 Via Beeld| Koptekst en voettekst kunt u deze tekst wijzigenVia Beeld| Koptekst en voettekst kunt u deze tekst wijzigen 1 Workflow of the.
March 2002 Outcomes in thyroid cancer: what factors are important? Information Projects Team Outcomes in thyroid cancer: what factors are important? NYCRIS.
Cancer Registry Coding Changes for 2014 Presented by the Kentucky Cancer Registry February, 2014.
Mississippi Cancer Registry Deirdre B. Rogers, MS Director Mississippi Cancer Registry.
TRAM Educational Conference September 19, 2014 Meritus Medical Center 1.
Documentation for Acute Care
Testicular cancer: current views Dr. M. Mangala MD (Kin); FRCS (Ireland); MMed (Wits); FCS (SA) Urology 38 th BMA CONGRESS.
Automated Cancer Registration N.Ireland Experience Colin Fox (IT Manager) Richard Middleton (Data Manager)
Colorectal cancer Khayal AlKhayal MD,FRCSC
Radiotherapy for Kidney cancer
Research-driven data standards CIMI 11 th April 2013.
Dr. Kenneth Lim Urology – MSU-COM POH McLaren Medical Center
Analysis of tumour stage and treatment 26 REGISTRIES IN TOTAL –2: BREAST ONLY –2: CHILDREN ONLY DATE OF INCIDENCE RANGE: YEARS OF DATA RANGE:
1 LUNG. 2 Equivalent Terms, Def, Charts, Tables, Illustrations.
Update on 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose/Positron Emission Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography Imaging of Squamous Head and Neck.
Consent for Research Study A study for patients with a diagnosis of liver cancer who are on the waiting list for a liver transplant Comparison of advanced.
Health Provider Teams: How you can support cancer survivors after treatment Washington CARES about Cancer Partnership: Survivorship Taskforce June 2012.
RARECARENet project High-resolution study in the Finnish Cancer Registry Maarit Leinonen Chief Medical Officer Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki.
DAHANCA 16 Planned post-radiation neck dissection vs salvage neck dissection in patients with N2-3 SCC of the head and neck treated with primary radiotherapy.
Casefinding & Follow-Up Dolores E. McCord, RHIT, CTR Piedmont Hospital Atlanta, Georgia.
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Sparing Radiation to the Pathologic N0 Side of the Neck in Squamous Cell.
NATIONAL CANCER REGISTRY IRELAND. Basic registration dataset Patient dataCancer dataTreatment and follow up registration numbertumour idtreatment id year.
Data management in the field Ari Haukijärvi 2nd EHES training seminar.
Principles of Surgical Oncology Salah R. Elfaqih.
EVALUATION OF LYMPH NODES & PATHOLOGIC EXAMINATION FOR BREAST CASES Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR Kentucky Cancer Registry.
Statistics about unknown primary tumors Riccardo Capocaccia National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion Istituto Superiore di Sanità,
1 CAP Audio Conference on the CMS 2009 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative Jonathan Myles, MD, FCAP College of American Pathologists December 17, 2008.
ACRIN 6685 Overview ACRIN 6685 A Multi-center Trial of FDG-PET/CT Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and its Impact on the N0 Neck Surgical Treatment in Head.
CASEFINDING Debra W. Christie, MBA, RHIA, CTR, CCRP Director, Cancer Research & Data Center University of Mississippi Medical Center.
2014 Cancer Program Performance Outcomes. Introduction Saint Agnes Medical Center has proudly maintained a American College of Surgeons’ Commission on.
Changes in Breast Cancer Reports After Second Opinion Dr. Vicente Marco Department of Pathology Hospital Quiron Barcelona. Spain.
2015 CHANGES IN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND CANCER CODING INSTRUCTIONS KENTUCKY CANCER REGISTRY SPRING TRAINING 2015 PRESENTED BY FRANCES ROSS.
Principles of Surgical Oncology Done by : 428 surgery team surgery team.
The Health Roundtable Improving data collection rates, while improving quality Presenter: Sandra Avery Liverpool Innovation Poster Session HRT1215 – Innovation.
Testicular tumours Urology Case presentation HistoryHistory 2525 C/o hemoptysis, abdominal discomfort;C/o hemoptysis, abdominal discomfort; History.
Consent for Research Study A study for patients newly diagnosed with advanced glioblastoma (brain cancer): Learning whether a PET scan with F-fluoromisonidazole.
Grading And Staging Grading is based on the microscopic features of the cells which compose a tumor and is specific for the tumor type. Staging is based.
HIT FINAL EXAM REVIEW HI120.
THE EFFECT OF AGE ON OUTCOME OF SYNOVIAL SARCOMA PATIENTS A DUTCH POPULATION BASED STUDY Myrella Vlenterie, SEJ Kaal, VKY Ho, R Vlenterie, WTA van der.
NET Registry in Greece Dr Kalliopi Pazaitou-Panayiotou, MD, PhD Departement of Endocrinology-Endocrine Oncology Theagenion Cancer Hospital Thessaloniki,
Collaborative Staging for Colon Site Specific Factors Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR QA Manager Abstracting and Coding Kentucky Cancer Registry.
*Be brief, yet thorough enough to allow recoding of the data fields from the text only! * Use accepted abbreviations from Abstractor’s Manual Appendix.
The Cancer Registry of Norway Jan F Nygård Head of the IT-department.
BY FRANCES ROSS, CTR PRESENTED AT THE NAACCR ANNUAL CONFERENCE JUNE, 2008 Record Consolidation Test with the 2007 Multiple Primary/Histology Rules.
Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer Anna Bill-Axelson, M.D., Lars Holmberg, M.D., Ph.D., Mirja Ruutu, M.D., Ph.D., Michael.
Presented at the NAACCR Annual Conference Quebec City June 22, 2010.
Mark Browning, M.D. ‘77 IUSME
R3 정상완. Introduction  EGC : Tumor invasion is limited to the mucosa or submucosa, regardless of lymph node involvement.  Accumulated histopathological.
Using CDC Edits Metafile in the Registry to Support Clinical Trials Recruitment Alan R. Houser, MA, MPH C/NET Solutions Dennis Deapen, DrPH Los Angeles.
The Role of the HCC Cancer Registry in Facilitating Cancer Research Linda Cope, CTR HCC Registry Coordinator
SYMPTOMS | DIAGNOSIS | TREATMENT
Esophagectomy for cancer:
HANA Audit Update for SSG
Creating the perfect text…
Principles of Surgical Oncology
DENİZ KAVGACI HALİME HELİN YILMAZ
Osteosarcoma Jessica Davis.
Somerset Cancer Register
معيارهاي ارزشيابي برنامه ثبت سرطان دانشگاهي ارسال به موقع اطلاعات (هر سه ماه)(2) گردآوري از لحاظ پيدا كردن موارد جديد سرطاني از منابع ذيل: - ثبت.
What’s New for 8th Edition
Cancer 101: A Cancer Education and Training Program for [Target Population] Date Location Presented by: Presenter 1 Presenter 2 1.
Presentation transcript:

Nadya Dimitrova Marieta Petkova

13 Regional cancer registries BNCR: -Established in 1952; cases a year; million population;

 Regional cancer registries:  Collect data from hospitals and medical centers in their region using all available data sources;  Extract, code and record information in the regional databases;  Regularly (4 – 5 times a year) send regional databases to the National Cancer Registry.  National Cancer Registry:  Maintains the national database;  Performs different checks for accuracy, completeness and validity of data; requests additional information if needed.  Prepare analyses and publications.

 Hospital discharge records (HDR):  Mostly on paper, but some in electronic form;  For almost all patient’s admissions in hospital for different treatments.  Notification forms:  Still in use, but very short description of the case.  Pathology reports:  Usually the description by the pathologists is included in the HDRs.  Mostly on paper, handwritten or available only from laboratory journals, recording all examinations;  Laboratory results, images:  Usually included in the HDRs;  Sometimes – on a separate paper form;  Hospital information systems:  Summary records for patient’s admissions in hospital;  Pathology records – only from several hospitals.  Death certificates

 BNCR collects routinely:  Information for the patient – name, PIN, address, marital status, social group, occupation, date of diagnosis, death date, etc.;  Characteristics of the tumor – topography, morphology, TNM, stage, grade, etc.;  Description of the treatment – surgery, radio-, chemo-, hormonal and other therapy.  Progression of the disease (since 2011) – metastases, recurrence, treatments.

 For additional information, requested for different ad- hoc studies:  Develop a module, connected to the cancer information system, containing additional fields to record the requested data, according to the study protocol; Use the built in checks for consistency of variables.  Install the module in the NCR and all RCR, participating in the study.  Organize training and prepare instruction materials;  RCRs review the paper medical documents, stored at their archives, extract, code and record the necessary data in the module.  NCR collects all files with the records, checks and analyses the data.

 General difficulties:  Morphology ICD10 vs. ICD-O-3: ICD-O-3 is not translated in BG and it is not integrated in CancerRegBG  Possible solution – to add a field for ICD-O-3 morphology code in the module for data collection

General difficulties:  Hospital  Real id number of the hospital or the one used at the registry? We have both.  T, N, M  if no information – empty fields or else?  If the description of tumor, lymph nodes and metastases in the medical documents doesn’t correspond to assigned values for T, N, M – recode according to the description or else?  If there is no description of the tumor, lymph nodes and metastases, but T, N and M are recorded in the medical documents, without specification of “p” or “c”?  Resection status  If it is not recorded as R0/1/2, should we extract it from the description of the pathologist and surgeon?  Treatment  If not sure 0 or 2 – which code to choose?  If it is not performed, how to code date and hospital – empty fields or else?

 Morphology  “well differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (atypical carcinoid) of head of pancreas”: (atypical carcinoid G2) vs (NEC, G1)  “NET, carcinoid of head of pancreas, G2” (carcinoid G1) vs (G2 NET)  (carcinoid) vs (in case grade is not mentioned carcinoid G?)  Reoperation  Definition – any second operation after how long time?  Treatment  How to code treatment with Sandostatin?

 Morphology  “mixoid pleomorphic cell sarcoma, G3” (pleomorphic cell sarcoma) vs (myxosarcoma)  ask Grade  How to code “well differentiated liposarcoma”? G1?  Liposarcoma G1, not specified the classification?  Biopsy  How to code “biopsy sample taken” for surgically treated patients – does it mean “biopsy sample taken before surgery”?  Biopsy revision – how to code if not sure 0 or 2?

 Morphology  “germ cell tumor – embryonal carcinoma of testis” (germ cell tumor, NOS) or (embryonal carcinoma, NOS)  “seminoma and embryonal carcinoma of testis” (seminoma) or (embryonal carcinoma, NOS)  Serum tumor markers  If not obtained immediately after orchiectomy?  If measurement units not available: LDH 116, AFP 1.13, bHCG How to code S if serum marker studies are performed, but the results are not possible to interpret? How to code if “tumor markers – within normal limits”, without the results shown?  Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection  How to code if performed not during the first surgery, but six months later?  Active surveillance took place  Code=0 when stage I patient received chemo after surgery?

 Primary tumour site  “tumour engaging left lateral floor of mouth, oropharynx and hypopharynx” (from CT) and “tumour engaging left tonsillar pillar was removed” (from surgery report): C 14.8 or C10.9 or C04.1 or C09.1?  Information on technique used for surgery  How to code “extirpation” – 1 (radical resection) or 2 (local excision)?  If laser surgery of larynx was followed by resection, which one to record? Post surgery pathology report with the core items  Code=0 - If no surgery, but only biopsy? Information on type of radiotherapy  How to code “telegamatherapy”, “Cobalt 60”, “radiotherapiam deffinitiva”?