3-D Dynamic Base Shaking Model 2-D Static BNWF Pushover Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical analysis of the effect of preloading on the seismic risk of buildings on liquefaction-susceptible sites F. Lopez-Caballero, A. Modaressi and.
Advertisements

Liangcai He Committee in Charge: Professor Ahmed Elgamal, Chair
SUB-STRUCTURE foundations.
An-Najah National University
Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
Non-Linear Hyperbolic Model & Parameter Selection Short Course on Computational Geotechnics + Dynamics Boulder, Colorado January 5-8, 2004 Stein Sture.
Caltrans Guidelines on Foundation Loading Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading Tom Shantz, Caltrans 2010 PEER Annual Meeting.
Hyung-Suk Shin Pedro University of Washington Steven L. Kramer
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Geotechnical Seismic Simulation uAhmed Elgamal uUCSD PEER 2002 Annual Meeting Vision: Professor Steven Kramer (PEER Geotechnical.
Presented at the 2009 AK EPSCoR All-Hands Meeting, Anchorage, Alaska Zhaohui (Joey) Yang, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of Alaska Anchorage 14 May.
Name: Amanda Tondreau Liquefaction is an earthquake- related hazard that causes unstable land and poses risks to building infrastructure.
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Performance of Improved Ground u Elizabeth A. Hausler and Nicholas Sitar.
OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
Experimental & Analytical Studies of Drilled Shaft Bridge Columns Sandrine P. Lermitte, PhD Student Jonathan P. Stewart, Assistant Professor John W. Wallace,
Soil Pile Group Interaction in FB-MultiPier
Back to basics…… for Foundation design of Monopile Support Structures
Pile Testing and Evaluation for the Sand Creek Byway, Sandpoint, Idaho Presented by Dean E. Harris, P.E., CH2M HILL.
Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.
Tutorial 4: Two walls connected with struts Deep Excavation LLC DeepEX 2015 – Advanced course1.
Bearing Capacity Theory
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF DEEP FOUNDATION WEEK 9 FRICTION AND END BEARING PILES BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF PILES USING EMPIRICAL AND DYNAMIC FORMULAE.
CE 120 Introduction to Civil Engineering
Direct Shear Test CEP 701 PG Lab.
FOUNDATION.
Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.
Analysis of Laterally Loaded Drilled Shafts and Piles Using LPILE
C ONTACT STRESS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING. Introduction 1 Skyscrapers Bridges Dams How are these constructions supported? Why are all these large constructions.
Reference Manual Chapter 9
Static Pushover Analysis
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory Experimental and Micromechanical Computational Study of Pile Foundations Subjected to Liquefaction-Induced.
NEES Facilities Used: University of Nevada, Reno University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana INTRODUCTION Bridge columns are subjected to combinations of.
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.
Construction of Data-Base for High-capacity Micro-pile method Yoshinori Otani,P.E. j p Hirose & Co., Ltd. Prof. Masaru Hoshiya Musashi Institute of Technology.
Tsinghua University·Beijing Real-time dynamic hybrid testing coupled finite element and shaking table Jin-Ting Wang, Men-Xia Zhou & Feng Jin.
FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF SOIL DYNAMICS IN INDIA Vijay K Puri Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, ILLINOIS,
Team UCDSESM Yihai Bao, YeongAe Heo, Zhiyu Zong University of California, Davis April 4 th, 2008 Prediction for Progressive Collapse Resistance of a 2D.
Class A Centrifuge Prediction of future SG1 of Full Scale Test with Pile Foundation by Marcelo Gonzalez Tarek Abdoun Ricardo Dobry Rensselaer Polytechnic.
MICROPILES RESEARCH AT WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Dr. Adrián Rodríguez-Marek, Dr. Balasingam Muhunthan, and Dr. Rafik Itani Civil and Environmental Engineering.
OMAE 2009 Honolulu, HI - May 31 to June
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING. LAW OF HAMMURABI : İ.Ö.2130 EĞER BİR İNŞAATÇI BİR EV YAPAR, DOĞRU DAVRANMAYIP EVİN ÇÖKMESİNE SEBEBOLURSA O İNŞAATÇI YIKILAN.
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory SG-1: Lateral Spreading – Observations & Analysis Raghudeep B. & Thevanayagam S. 20 Aug 2007:
Seismic Analysis of Some Geotechnical Problems – Pseudo-dynamic Approach Seismic Analysis of Some Geotechnical Problems – Pseudo-dynamic Approach Dr. Priyanka.
Overview of the “Recommended LRFD Seismic Design Specifications for Highway Bridges” Ian M. Friedland, P.E. Bridge Technology Engineer Federal Highway.
Mahadevan (Lanka) Ilankatharan Adviser: Professor Bruce Kutter
1 Quake Summit 2010 October 9, 2010 Centrifuge Testing and Parallel Numerical Simulations of Lateral Pressures Measured Against a Rigid Caisson PI: Scott.
PANAMA CANAL THIRD SET OF LOCKS PROJECT Structural Design
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Fragility Functions for Bridges in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground Scott J. Brandenberg, Jian Zhang, Pirooz Kashighandi, Yili Huo, Minxing Zhao.
Bridge Hydraulics and Geotechnical. BRIDGE HYDRAULICS AND GEOTECHNICAL TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2 The Hydrological.
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
BEARING PILES: H-PILE. BEARING PILES  Structural element, a post or pile, which transfers the weight of a foundation to soil that can support it.  Ideal.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Leads Institute of Technology & Engineering Subject Code : Name Of Subject :Building Construction Name of Unit : Soil Foundation Topic : Bearing.
Deep Replacement Presented by: M. Taromi
Soil mechanics and foundation engineering-III (CE-434)
Direct Shear Test.
ASCE G-I Case History Night, April 28, 2016
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
Presented By: Sanku Konai
Alpine Fault Scenario EQ
Plate movement Earthquake = sudden release of energy in the Earth’s crust that creates seismic waves. They are measured by the Richter Scale,
BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
Evaluation of RC building strengthened with column jacketing method with consideration of soft-story Hendrik Wijaya Department of Civil and Construction.
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
Presentation transcript:

3-D Dynamic Base Shaking Model 2-D Static BNWF Pushover Model Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Liquefiable Soils with a Frozen Crust Xiaoyu Zhang1, Zhaohui (Joey)Yang, Ph.D.1 1. Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska Abstract 3-D Dynamic Base Shaking Model Conclusion Liquefaction and associated ground failures are common in major earthquakes in Alaska and have caused extensive infrastructure damage. To model ground failures in cold regions and their effects on infrastructure, it is necessary to account for frozen ground crusts, which have drastically different physical properties (including stiffness, shear strength and permeability) than unfrozen ground. How can we predict the impact to a bridge pile foundation when there is a frozen ground crust that is resting on top of the liquefied soil? Numerical simulations were used to address this issue. A simplified method to account for frozen crust was developed and evaluated. The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation platform (OpenSees) was used to conduct pile-soil interaction analyses. Based on general Alaska soil conditions, an idealized soil profile with an embedded pile and a surface inclination angle of 3° was used. A reinforced concrete-filled steel-pipe pile, commonly used in constructing Alaskan highway bridge foundations, was chosen for study. These figures are comparisons of pile performance evaluated from both models. The graphs on the left were obtained from 3-D modeling, the ones on the right from a BNWF process (the final step in a Pushover analysis.) As can be seen, the simplified method provides accurate data and has the potential to be used in design practices. Depth (m) Soil Type Status Mass density (kg/m3) Shear wave velocity, VS (m/s) Permeability (m/s) Friction Angle (deg) Cohesion (kPa) 0-0.2 Silt Frozen 1.8x103 500 1.0 x10-8 27 100 Unfrozen 200 1.0 x10-7 33 0.2-1.8 1,000 1.0 x10-9 1.8-2.0 2.0-8.0 Loose Sand 1.9x103 180 6.6 x10-5 29 8.0-14.0 Medium Dense Sand 37 14.0-24.0 Dense 2.1x103 250 40 Time histories recorded during the 2002 Denali earthquake at Trans-Alaska Pipeline System Pump Station #10 were input at the base in X direction. The record has an 82 second duration and peak acceleration of 0.3g. Introduction In March 1964, Alaska experienced one of the largest earthquakes in recorded history. In November 2002, the Denali Earthquake struck Interior Alaska. These two winter earthquakes caused extensive ground failure and structural damage, including substantial damage to bridges. Alaska’s population has increased from 226,167 in 1960 to 710,231 in 2010 (2010 Census), making the topic of potential earthquake damage more important than ever. 2-D Static BNWF Pushover Model Summary: A 3-D Finite Element simulation of a single bridge pile embedded in liquefiable soils overlain by a frozen crust was carried out using OpenSees. The BNWF Pushover method was used to evaluate the pile performance with a newly developed frozen soil p-y curve. The simplified BNWF model generated accurate results and can be used to develop guidelines for engineers. The BNWF (Beam on Nonlinear Winker Foundation) Pushover method is a simplified approach to analyzing piles in laterally spreading ground, which has the potential to serve as a practical tool for engineers. Using BNWF, a model for frozen soil were developed and implemented into OpenSees. P-y, t-z and q-z springs were used to represent soil lateral behavior, friction in soil-pile interface, and end-bearing capacity, respectively. Displacement was imposed on a frozen crust spring. (Brandenberg et al. 2007; OpenSees Example Page) Represented Theme:: This poster is entered in the Water/Environment, as it deals with naturally occurrence elements and processes (i.e. frozen soil and earthquakes.) To approximate liquefaction effects on p-y behavior one must apply a p- multiplier to drained p-y resistance. A p-y curve for frozen silt was proposed based on the p-y curve model for weak rock (Reese, 1997) and clay (Matlock, 1970) and calibrated by field test data (Li, 2011). This was used in a 2-D Static BNWF Pushover Model. for y<= yu Acknowledgement: This research was supported from Alaska EPSCoR NSF award #EPS-07011898. for y>yu References for 0 ≤ xr≤2b for xr>12b Brandenberg S J. and Boulanger R W. (2007). "Static Pushover Analyses of Pile Groups in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground in Centrifuge Tests." Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 133: 9. OpenSees Example Page, http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Laterally-Loaded_Pile_Foundation, Retrieved on 2011-05-01. Reese, L. C. (1997). "Analysis of laterally loaded piles in weak rock." Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 123: 1010-1017. Matlock, H. (1970). "Correlations of design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay." Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. 1: 577–594. “Resident Population Data – 2010 Census” (2010.) http://www.census.gov. Retrieved on 2011-05-29. A frozen soil p-y model was proposed based on an experiment conducted in Fairbanks, Alaska. Damage from the 1964 Alaska Earthquake 22nd National NSF EPSCoR Conference, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho October 24-27, 2011. Theme: Water/Environment.