Abstract Objective: Intensive insulin management (IIM) improves glycemic control, and lowers the risks of long-term microvascular complications. In children,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: Current and Future Directions
Advertisements

Importance of early glycemic control in management of type 2 diabetes
Diabetes in Young Women Francine R. Kaufman, M.D. Professor of Pediatrics The Keck School of Medicine of USC Head, Center for Diabetes and Endocrinology.
Children Aged 5 to
Diabetes Update Matt Bouchonville, MD Endocrinology Division University of New Mexico ACP New Mexico Chapter Scientific Meeting November 7, 2014
Managing T2DM during Ramadan Dr. Asrar Said Hashem Specialist in Internal Medicine (Al-Amiri Hospital) Fellow of KIMS Endocrine, Diabetes and Metabolism.
Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy In Sepsis นายแพทย์ เฉลิมไทย เอก ศิลป์ สถาบันสุขภาพเด็กแห่งชาติ มหาราชินี
Aggressive Hyperglycemia Management. Significant hospital hyperglycemia requires close follow-up Previously diagnosed diabetes and elevated A1C Without.
Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines Targets for Glycemic Control Chapter 8 S. Ali Imran, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Stuart Ross.
CURING T1D IS A GLOBAL, COORDINATED EFFORT 555 ACTIVE RESEARCH PROJECTS Note: JDRF research portfolio review September 2014.
Both Dietary Protein and Fat Increase Postprandial Glucose Excursions in Children With Type 1 Diabetes, and the Effect Is Additive Featured Article: Carmel.
INSULIN THERAPY IN TYPE 1 DIABETES
Sugar control in Critical care unit Senior clinical pharmacist : Lihua Fang Koo Foundation Cancer Center.
Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications in Hispanic Americans.
Diabetes: The Modern Epidemic Roy Buchinsky, MD Director of Wellness.
1 NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health.
Take Five to Understand! 1. Eat Healthier Eating fewer calories and cutting down on saturated fat and carbohydrates can help lower weight, blood glucose.
ORIGIN Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) Trial Overview Large international randomized controlled trial in patients with.
Internet-based pilot study comparing low fat with high fat evening snacks in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring.
Use of The FreeStyle Navigator TM Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children on Glargine- based Multiple Daily Injection Therapy Stuart Weinzimer.
Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Versus Conservative Glucose Control in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: GLUCOCABG Trial.
Dr Stanley Ngare.  Pharmacology of Types of insulin available  Various routes of delivery & factors that affect absorption  Patient and provider barriers.
JULY 8 TH 2010 Good Morning!. Risk Factors Obesity Positive Family History Specific Ethnic Groups Gender Conditions with Insulin Resistance  Puberty.
Important susceptibility loci for type 1 diabetes Denis Daneman, Lancet 2006;367:847 –58.
Primary Care Prescribing for Type 2 Diabetes Dr. David Jenkins Worcestershire Royal Hospital.
Achieving Optimal Glycaemic Control: Can Insulin Deliver?
Diabetes Journal Club Carina Signori 1/19/2012
Volume 352, Issue 9131, Pages (September 1998)
Insulin Delivery Systems Atlanta Diabetes Associates
Recommendation In people with clinical cardiovascular disease in whom glycemic targets are not met, a SGLT2 inhibitor with demonstrated cardiovascular.
From: Pharmacologic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Fig. 5. Wave intensity analysis and concept of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). Upper panel shows example of wave intensity analysis. Different types.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics.
Diabetes and Risk of CV Outcomes
Macrovascular Complications Microvascular Complications
Using the AGP to Standardize Glucose Reporting
سياسات التوزيع الفصل السادس عشر.
Modern Strategies for Basal Insulin Use in T2D
برنامج البحث المستقل ( ب ب م ) Independent Investigation Method ( IIM ) مع أ / جمال الهميلي.
366 میلیون نفر در جهان مبتلا به دیابت هستند.
The following slides highlight an educational report based on a Satellite Symposium presentation at the 2008 Canadian Cardiovascular Congress in Toronto.
Examining CV Effects of Basal Insulin Therapy
Emerging CVOT Data and Clinical Application
Incidence of CV Events in Subjects With T2D vs the Nondiabetic CAD Population
Program Goals. What Will the Emerging Basal Insulin Products Mean for My Diabetes Practice?
Age- and size-appropriate restraint use in the rear seat provides the best protection for all children in motor vehicle crashes. Children properly restrained.
بعض النقاط التي تؤخذ في الحسبان عند تقييم الاستثمارات الزراعية
Need to Know! Screening and Diagnosis of Kidney Disease in Diabetes
SGLT2 inhibitors, Now Part of the Cardiology Toolkit for Comprehensive CV Risk Management.
Integrated Diabetes Care: How Can We Make the Best Use of New Technology?
UKPDS 35: Impact of Increasing A1c on Cardiovascular Disease in T2DM
The Cardiologist's Mindset in the Management of Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease: Today and Tomorrow.
Incidence of CV Events in Subjects With T2D vs the Nondiabetic CAD Population
T2DM, CV Risk, and Modulating Risk With Glucose-Lowering Strategies
Pharmacotherapy for Diabetic Coronary Disease:
Insulin in Diabetes Management: Effective Patient Selection Is Key
Liraglutide Shows CV Benefit: Clinical Perspectives on the LEADER Trial
A schematic representation of the effects of early intensive glycemic control in preventing initial microvascular complications and then macrovascular.
Prevalence of microvascular and macrovascular complications compared between cohort 1 and cohort 2 for subjects with type 2 (A, upper panel) and type 1.
Are All Novel Insulins Proven to Be Equally Safe?
Type 1 Diabetes: Expanding Options for Adjunctive Oral Therapy With SGLT Inhibitors.
IGlarLixi SoloSTAR pen device and dose delivery of insulin glargine (units) and lixisenatide (µg) ranging from 15 units insulin glargine/5 µg lixisenatide.
Sensitivity analysis: random-effects model of the risk of lower extremity amputation (LEA) in people with diabetes associated with depression compared.
Relative effects of glucose-control strategy on microvascular disease.
Patient flowchart of recruitment and treatment failure and success with glyburide vs. metformin. Patient flowchart of recruitment and treatment failure.
Fixed-Ratio Combination Therapy in T2DM
Introduction You will be shown 8 scenarios involving children.
Postoperative blood glucose levels and total insulin requirement.
Hyperglycemic Targets & Hypoglycemia
Presentation transcript:

Abstract Objective: Intensive insulin management (IIM) improves glycemic control, and lowers the risks of long-term microvascular complications. In children, the use of insulin Glargine for IIM has been limited by the shorter period of action (<24h), and the need for additional insulin injections. We determined the short term effects of mixing insulin Glargine with short acting insulin (SAI), and dividing the dose into twice daily, on glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Methods: Subjects with T1DM who were receiving glargine were studied on three different occasions. At baseline (Study B), subjects administered one dose of glargine and received 3 SAI injections. Subjects were then randomized to Study Mix and Study Separate (Sep). Study Mix:10 days of administration of a divided dose of Glargine into two halves given mixed with SAI twice daily and a lunch SAI. Study Sep was similar to Study Mix, except Glargine and SAI were given as separate injections. Glycemic control was evaluated using the CGMS® on final 3 days of each regimen. Results: 13 subjects (6M/7F, 13.5  0.5 y, 22.4  1.0 kg/m2, hemoglobinA1c of 7.7  0.2% and T1DM duration 44  8 mo) were studied. Mean 24h glucose was 9.3  1.3 mmol/l, 8.3  1.1 mmol/l and 9.3  1.3 mmol/l for study B, Mix, and Sep respectively (p <0.6). Conclusion: Mixing insulin Glargine with SAI does not affect glucose excursions. This will simplify the use of Glargine, decrease additional injections of insulin, and make IIM therapy in children more realistic.

Background Insulin Glargine is: A long acting, and “peakless” insulin. Cannot be mixed with other insulin analogs. Widely used in insulin intensive management (IIM). Major drawbacks to its use in pediatric patients are: Duration of effect < 24h. Requirement for multiple injections.

Background Mixing insulin Glargine with Regular insulin in healthy dogs did not affect the glucose lowering activity1. The effect of mixing insulin Glargine with short acting insulin analogs has not been evaluated in humans.

Objective Evaluate the effect of mixing insulin Glargine with short acting insulin analogs on glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Compare the glycemic control of insulin Glargine given twice a day versus once daily.

HYPOTHESIS In adolescents with T1D, mixing insulin Glargine with short acting insulin analogs, or dividing the dose to twice a day does not worsen glycemic control

Inclusion Criteria: 10-17 yr. Type I diabetes > 1yr. A1C < 9.0% Already on IIM therapy. No other chronic illnesses. No other medications.

Study Design Subjects were studied 1. At baseline, on their current insulin regimen (once a day Glargine). 2. Then in random order on: Mixing injection: insulin Glargine dose was divided into two halves and given before breakfast and before dinner, mixed in the same syringe with the short acting insulin. Separate injections: same as the mixing, except that Glargine and short acting insulin were administered separately. Glucose concentrations measured for 72h using the CGMS Medtronic MiniMed®.

STUDY DESIGN Enrollment Mixed injection Mixed injection 3 days 7 days Randomize Cross over Baseline Separate injection Separate injection Baseline : Glargine once daily, and (Lispro or Aspart) with meals. Mix & Separate : Glargine dose is divided into 2 equal doses, given before breakfast and before dinner, either mixed with the short acting insulin (Mix), or in separate syringes with separate injections (Separate).

DATA ANALYSIS Repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine the effects of treatment order of treatment and their interaction

Results: Subjects characteristics N 13 Age (yr)* 13.5 ± 1.6 Gender (M/F) 7/6 BMI (kg/m² )* 22.4 ± 1 Duration of DM (mo.)* 44 ± 28 A1C (%)* 7.7 ± 0.7 * (Mean ± SD)

Glucose concentrations* every 20 minutes Base Separate Mix 100 200 300 Glucose mg/dl P<0.6 24:00 06:00 12:00 18:00 24:00 * Mean ± SEM

Glucose concentration* for 24h and 72h P<0.6 200 200 150 150 mg/dl 100 100 50 50 72h 200 200 P<0.3 150 150 mg/dl 100 100 50 50 Base Separate Mix * Mean ± SEM

Pre-prandial and post-prandial glucose* Pre meals 100 200 mg/dl Base Mix Separate Post meals 100 200 Breakfast Lunch Dinner mg/dl * Mean ± SEM

Percentage of Hypoglycemic Episodes Baseline - 5% Mixing- 9% Separate injections-2% (p<0.8)

SUMMARY There was no difference among the three studies regarding: 24h or 72h average glucose concentrations. Number of hypoglycemic episodes. Pre-prandial or post-prandial glucose concentrations.

CONCLUSION Mixing insulin Glargine with short acting insulin analogs in adolescents with T1D: Does no compromise glycemic control Does not increase hypoglycemic episodes. Simplifies IIM therapy, which could result in improve compliance and control.

Reference 1: Werner U, Gerlach M, Hofmann M, et al. Mixture of regular human insulin and insulin glargine injected subcutaneously in healthy dogs does not increase risk of hypoglycemia. Diabetes 2002; 51(suppl 2):A296