Toward a Proof of Montonen-Olive Duality via Multiple M2-branes Koji Hashimoto (RIKEN) 25th Sep conference “Recent Developments in String/M.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Advertisements

Based on arXiv:1107.xxxx with G. Mandal (TIFR) What is the gravity dual of the confinement/deconfinement transportation in holographic QCD Takeshi Morita.

Analysis of QCD via Supergravity S. Sugimoto (YITP) based on hep-th/ (T. Ibaraki + S.S.) Windows to new paradigm in particle Sendai.

　Symmetries and vanishing couplings in string-derived low-energy effective field theory 　　　　　　　　　　　　 Tatsuo Kobayashi １．Introduction.

Toward M5-branes from ABJM action Based on going project with Seiji Terashima (YITP, Kyoto U. ） Futoshi Yagi (YITP, Kyoto U.)

On d=3 Yang-Mills-Chern- Simons theories with “fractional branes” and their gravity duals Ofer Aharony Weizmann Institute of Science 14 th Itzykson Meeting.

Dp-branes, NS5-branes and U-duality from nonabelian (2,0) theory with Lie 3-algebra Yoshinori Honma (SOKENDAI, KEK) in collaboration with M. Ogawa and.

Brane-World Inflation

Type IIB Supergravity, D3 branes and ALE manifolds

Summing planar diagrams

Construction of BPS Solitons via Tachyon Condensation So RIKEN based on the work with T. Asakawa and K. Ohta hep-th/0603***

Multiple M2 branes and Nambu bracket Yutaka Matsuo (U. Tokyo) Talk at YITP July 29 th, 2008.

Non-perturbative effects in string theory compactifications Sergey Alexandrov Laboratoire Charles Coulomb Université Montpellier 2 in collaboration with.

M-Theory & Matrix Models Sanefumi Moriyama (NagoyaU-KMI) [Fuji+Hirano+M 1106] [Hatsuda+M+Okuyama 1207, 1211, 1301] [HMO+Marino 1306] [HMO+Honda 1306] [Matsumoto+M.

String solitons in the M5-brane worldvolume with a Nambu-Poisson structure and Seiberg-Witten map Tomohisa Takimi (NTU) Ref ) Kazuyuki Furuuchi, T.T JHEP08(2009)050.

Massive type IIA string theory cannot be strongly coupled Daniel L. Jafferis Institute for Advanced Study 16 November, 2010 Rutgers University Based on.

11 3d CFT and Multi M2-brane Theory on M. Ali-Akbari School of physics, IPM, Iran [JHEP 0903:148,2009] Fifth Crete regional meeting in string theory Kolymbari,

Summing Up All Genus Free Energy of ABJM Matrix Model Sanefumi Moriyama (Nagoya U) JHEP [arXiv: ] with H.Fuji and S.Hirano.

Solitons in Matrix model and DBI action Seiji Terashima (YITP, Kyoto U.) at KEK March 14, 2007 Based on hep-th/ , and hep-th/ ,

Pietro Fré Dubna July 2003 ] exp[ / Solv H

S 3 /Z n partition function and Dualities Yosuke Imamura Tokyo Institute of Technology 15 Oct. YKIS2012 Based on arXiv: Y.I and Daisuke.

Gauge/Gravity Duality 2 Prof Nick Evans AdS/CFT Correspondence TODAY Quarks Deforming AdS Confinement Chiral Symmetry Breaking LATER Other brane games.

Anomaly cancellations on heterotic 5-branes ( 前編 ) 矢田雅哉.

D-Branes and Giant Gravitons in AdS4xCP3

Spiky Strings in the SL(2) Bethe Ansatz

Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010) Holographic Models for Planar QCD without AdS/CFT Correspondence Sergey Afonin Ruhr-University.

New Gauge Symmetries from String Theory Pei-Ming Ho Physics Department National Taiwan University Sep. 23,

The Squashed, Stretched and Warped Gets Perturbed The Squashed, Stretched and Warped Gets Perturbed Igor Klebanov PCTS and Department of Physics Talk at.

Extra Dimensional Models with Magnetic Fluxes Tatsuo Kobayashi １． Introduction 2. Magnetized extra dimensions 3. N-point couplings and flavor symmetries.

SL(2,Z) Action on AdS/BCFT and Hall conductivity Mitsutoshi Fujita Department of Physics, University of Washington Collaborators : M. Kaminski and A. Karch.

Constraining theories with higher spin symmetry Juan Maldacena Institute for Advanced Study Based on: and by J. M. and A. Zhiboedov.

Exact Results for perturbative partition functions of theories with SU(2|4) symmetry Shinji Shimasaki (Kyoto University) JHEP1302, 148 (2013) (arXiv: [hep-th])

String solitons in the M5-brane worldvolume with a Nambu-Poisson structure and Seiberg-Witten map Tomohisa Takimi (NTU) Ref ) Kazuyuki Furuuchi, T.T JHEP08(2009)050.

Integrability of N=6 Super Chern-Simons Theories Dongsu Bak University of Seoul with S. J. Rey and D. Kang (KIAS, 9/24/2008) TexPoint fonts used in EMF.

Measuring The Elliptic Genus Gregory Moore Rutgers AndyFest, Harvard, July 31, 2015.

Cosmological Backgrounds of String Theory, Solvable Algebras and Oxidation A fully algebraic machinery to generate, classify and interpret Supergravity.

AdS 4 £ CP 3 superspace Dmitri Sorokin INFN, Sezione di Padova ArXiv: Jaume Gomis, Linus Wulff and D.S. SQS’09, Dubna, 30 July 2009 ArXiv:

Heterotic orbifold models on E 6 Lie root lattice Fuji-yoshida Based on arXiv: (ver.2). Kei-Jiro Takahashi (Kyoto Univ.)

Solvable Lie Algebras in Supergravity and Superstrings Pietro Fré Bonn February 2002 An algebraic characterization of superstring dualities.

Gauging Supergravity in Three Dimensions Eric Bergshoeff based on collaborations with M. de Roo, O. Hohm, D. Roest, H. Samtleben and E. Sezgin Vienna,

1 AdS/CFT correspondence and generation of space-time in Matrix models March at KEK Hikaru Kawai arXiv: , , with T. Suyama arXiv: ,

Quark Mass Matrix from Dimensional Deconstruction Academia Sinica Andrea Soddu Taipei November 17, 2004 National Taiwan University P.Q Hung, A.S., N.-K.

Laboratoire Charles Coulomb

2 Time Physics and Field theory

2011 年 4 月 27 日 1 吉田豊 Y. Yoshida arXiv: [hep-th]

Gauge/Gravity Duality Prof Nick Evans Big picture – slides Key computations - board TODAY Introduction Strings & Branes AdS/CFT Correspondence QCD-like.

On String Theory Duals of Lifshitz-like Fixed Point Tatsuo Azeyanagi (Kyoto University) Based on work arXiv: (to appear in JHEP) with Wei Li (IPMU)

The nonperturbative analyses for lower dimensional non-linear sigma models Etsuko Itou (Osaka University) 1.Introduction 2.The WRG equation for NLσM 3.Fixed.

With H. Awata, K. Nii (Nagoya U) & M. Shigemori (YITP) ( & to appear soon) KIAS Pre-Strings 2013 Shinji Hirano (University of the Witwatersrand)

Boundary conditions for SU(2) Yang-Mills on AdS 4 Jae-Hyuk Oh at 2012 workshop for string theory and cosmology, Pusan, Korea. Dileep P. Jatkar and Jae-Hyuk.

P-Term Cosmology A.C. Davis (with C. Burrage) ,

Ramond-Ramond Couplings of D-branes Collaborators: Koji Hashimoto (Osaka Univ.) Seiji Terashima (YITP Kyoto) Sotaro Sugishita (Kyoto Univ.) JHEP1503(2015)077.

Gauge/gravity duality in Einstein-dilaton theory Chanyong Park Workshop on String theory and cosmology (Pusan, ) Ref. S. Kulkarni,

ArXiv: (hep-th) Toshiaki Fujimori (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Minoru Eto, Sven Bjarke Gudnason, Kenichi Konishi, Muneto Nitta, Keisuke Ohashi.

Electic-Magnetic Duality On A Half-Space Edward Witten March 9, 2008.

Multiple Brane Dynamics: D-Branes to M-Branes Neil Lambert King’s College London Annual UK Theory Meeting Durham 18 December 2008 Up from String Theory.

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and the

Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)

Three family GUT-like models from heterotic string

Integrable Open Spin Chains from Flavored ABJM Theory

STRING THEORY AND M-THEORY: A Modern Introduction

Magnetic supersymmetry breaking

String coupling and interactions in type IIB matrix model arXiv:0812

Energy Transfer in Multi-field Inflation and Cosmological Signatures

Gravity from Entanglement and RG Flow

3d CFT and Multi M2-brane Theory on

Hysteresis Curves from 11 dimensions

Masakazu Sano Hokkaido University

grand gauge-Higgs unification

Top meets Topology C.T. Hill, Fermilab.

Presentation transcript:

Toward a Proof of Montonen-Olive Duality via Multiple M2-branes Koji Hashimoto (RIKEN) 25th Sep conference “Recent Developments in String/M Theory” arXiv/ (hep-th) w/ T.S.Tai, S.Terashima

1.Why BLG/ABJM ?

Use of ABJM? Forget importance of M-theory. Is BLG / ABJM useful for any other purpose? Ans: Surely it is very useful, for non-Abelian duliaty Let’s remind Abelian duality for elemag system 3 dimensions: Scalar – vector duality  Integration of  4 dimensions: Elemag duality  Integration of 

Non-Abelianization? Q : Can we non-Abelianize these “classical” dualities? 3 dimensions : Yes Nonabelian Scalar-Chern-Simons  3d YM [Mukhi-Papageorgakis] [Distler-Mukhi-Papageorgakis-VanRaamsdonk] 4 dimensions : Montonen-Olive duality Renowned conjecture, no proof yet…. Real help of string/M theory for field theory duality ! Our target : Proof of MO duality via ABJM

Montonen-Olive duality conjecture 4d U(N) super Yang-Mills has a non-local symmetry of the theory, Proof wanted !!!

Non-Abelian dualities  String/M-theory M-theory S 1 w/ IIA string w/ IIA string on S 1 S 1 w/ T-dual IIB string on S 1 S 1 w/ IIB string w/ M  IIA relations : M  IIB relations : M2D2 D3 M2  D2 : Scalar-Vector duality D3  D3 : MO duality = “9-11 flip” in M-theory Decompactified IIB = M on shrinking torus

Strategy for a field theory proof of MO ABJM = theory of multiple M2-branes Realize a torus compactification of transverse space for ABJM Shrinking torus limit 4d YM = = MO duality Question 1 : Torus in ABJM ? Question 2 : Choice of the torus cycles ? Ans : Quiver generalization of ABJM + 2 vevs Ans : Different pairings of CS gauge fields  Sec.3  Sec.4 “9-11 flip” = =...

Plan 1. Why BLG/ABJM? 2. M2  D2 : Review 3. M2  D3 4. MO duality 3 slides 6 slides 3 slides 4 slides

2. M2  D2 : Review [Mukhi-Papageorgakis] [Distler-Mukhi-Papageorgakis-VanRaamsdonk]

ABJM theory [Aharony,Bergman,Jafferis,Maldacena] U(N) x U(N) ABJM theory = N M2s on C 4 / Z k U(1) gauge transf. Boundary term remains, devides the C 4  Moduli space : C 4 / Z k

ABJM and circle compactification [Distler-Mukhi-Papageorgakis-VanRaamsdonk] Orbifold C 4 / Z k M2 : fixed M2 S 1 compactification Quiver diagram of ABJM Linear combination : Vev gives the mass term for

ABJM  3d YM [Mukhi-Papageorgakis] [Distler-Mukhi-Papageorgakis-VanRaamsdonk] CS kinetic term is written as The massive is an auxiliary field, integrated out 3d YM : fixed ABJM in the limit = D2 action (3d U(N) YM) Scalar kinetic term for dissapears.

3. M2  D3

Another circle ? We need a torus …… Another orbifold is necessary Orbifolded U(N) n x U(N) n ABJM ABJM Douglas-Moore [Bena,Klebanov,Klose,Smedback] [Terashima,Yagi] [Imamura,Kimura] [Hosomichi, Lee 3,Park]

Torus compactification Moduli space : [Terashima,Yagi] [Imamura,Kimura] It’s already a double orbifold, so we take Turn on two vevs : M2 on a shrinking torus

2 steps for getting 4d YM Orbifolded ABJM Infinite # of 3d massive YMs 4d YM (i)(ii) Introduce two scalar vevs Integrate out Make a linear combination Think of them as KK modes of a 4d YM Diagonalize gauge fields

1st step For simplicity in this talk I will explain the case Linear combination : 123 2n Integrating out the auxiliary fields

2nd step  Diagonalize. In the limit, KK radius equivalent 4d YM

Final 4d action Theta term appears. For generic, cross terms remain  theta “3d  4d” is …. Deconstruction. Taylor’s T-duality. [Arkani-Hamed,Cohen,Georgi] [Hill,Pokorski,Wang] [Taylor] We obtain 4d YM action from the orbifolded ABJM,

4. MO duality

Choice of the combination 123 2n Prime case Second case Third case

Emergence of SL(2,Z) These couplings are related by SL(2,Z) transformation! Generators : Prime  Second Prime  Third SL(2,Z) transformation Choice of combination of CS gauge fields =

MO duality proven ? We find Our S transf. = Parity transf. Is this a proof of MO duality ?!?! Not really….. Identified Our coupling is a one-parameter family

5. Summary

Summary : importance Torus compactification of M2 transverse space is realized. Orbifolded ABJM + 2 vevs, with a new scaling limit Infinitely many 4d YM are derived. New geometric interpretation of quiver diagrams 4d YM on N D3s is derived from 3d ABJM. Deconstruction (T-duality) with theta term Montonen-Olive duality is proven? No. Our S is a parity, due to our special values of. However, field theory realization of T transf. is nontrivial We got half the way to the goal.

M-theory interpretation 2 vevs  2 1-cycles specified by vectors Torus modurus Due to M-IIB duality, this should become axio-dilaton. Our field theory result is identical with this

Discussions Toward a Proof ?  Different quivers necessary? Other vevs don’t help for our quiver….. IIB physics  M physics? Interpolation of AdS 5  AdS 4 ?