Establishment of park and green areas for the residential development project Sang Don LEE and Sung Ok Kim Department of Environmental Science and Engineering,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Process – Resource Evaluation Design and perform a set of geographically based resource assessments Develop a methodology for prioritizing land according.
Advertisements

National Water Research Institute N.B. Department of Environment Private Citizens Royal District Planning Commission Southern N.B. Woodlot Owners Cooperative.
Urban Sprawl. What is Sprawl? Sprawl is dispersed, auto- dependent development outside of compact urban and village centers, along highways, and in rural.
2010 Budget Challenged with an economic climate that is impacting the City’s revenue streams, the approved budget focuses on continuing to fund programs.
Landscape Fragmentation in the Lake Champlain Basin Charlotte Low Matt Gustafson Walker Brown Photograph: Caldwell Clark 2010 (Mt. Philo)
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
TEMPUS Programme Problem oriented Ecology and Biodiversity Module B Forest Ecology Saint Petersburg State University Faculty of Biology and Soil Sciences.
ESRM 450 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation FOREST PATTERN Managing Stands, Landscapes, and Habitat.
Sustainable Water Infrastructure Ivy Anderson Andey Nunes.
An overview of a few of the methods used in landscape ecology studies.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
What is Urban Ecology? Notes. Social Factors Interactions between humans Interactions between humans and their environment Health of people Government.
The Urban World Chapter 10 The City as an Ecosystem Urbanization: urban areas vary by # of people. US Bureau of Census defines an urban area as “a location.
National Reserve System and non-marine aquatic ecosystems Presented by: Tim Bond Science Coordinator National Reserve System Section.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
Leisure, Livability and the Post-Modern City Karin Book, PhD Department of Sport Sciences, Malmo University Plan Urban, Lund Lena Eskilsson, PhD Department.
BELARUSIAN STATE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY R E P OR T A B O U T R E S E A R C H W O R K 2.5. Define necessary data set for monitoring and tracking the dynamic.
Львів територія довкола стадіон LVIV THE STADIUM AREA Implementation Lab 20 – 22 June 2011.
Montana Forest Stewardship “Empowerment of Forest Owners through Personal Involvement”
Urban Planning II. Jakub Vorel Petr Klápště The skills delivered by the course 1.To read and interpret the data used for spatial planning 2.To.
Municipal GIS Applications JOHN C. CHLARSON, P.E. UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL TECHNICAL ADVISORY SERVICE FURE.
Sustainable Communities and Lifestyles The Impacts of U.S. “Urban Sprawl” What is it? “The Suburbs” When did it begin and why? How is the environment changed?
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Greenways enhance the visual character and walkability of.
L E A M and use volution & Impact ssessment odel GIS 5935 Javier Leung.
Land Chapter 14. How we use land  Land usage- –Rangeland= used for grazing and wildlife –Forest land= used for harvesting wood, wildlife, fish, and other.
CREATING LIVABLE AND SUSTAINABLE CITIES
Stream Quality Metric Ted Graham RMS Meeting June 8, 2009.
© 2007 PMP. All rights reserved. Wednesday 18 th July South Northamptonshire Council Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study and Green Space Strategy.
Sustainable Cities: Urban Land Use and Management G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 13 th Edition Chapter 25 G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
Watershed Management Muhammad Dilshad Habib 2004-ag-1414
Urban Sprawl.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
2001SDTF SDTF Comments on Sensitive Areas and BMP Labeling Dave Valcore, Dow AgroSciences & SDTF Technical Committee Chair John Jachetta, SDTF Regulatory.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013), pp Development.
Metropolitan Planning Organization for Blair County (Altoona MSA) Regional Long Range Transportation Plan Draft Agency Coordination Meeting (ACM)
Landscape ecology methods
Urban Planning II. Jakub Vorel Petr Klápště The skills delivered by the course 1.To read and interpret the data used for spatial planning 2.To.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
So-Won Yoon (Seoul Facilities Corporation) Dong-Kun Lee (Seoul National University) Seung-hwan Oh (Seoul National University) Seong-wan Jang (Eco&Bio)
Myung-woo Lee, Jong-young Park, Mu- sup Beon Landscape Planning, Fish Biology, Landscape Ecology, Jeonbuk National University Post evaluation on the stream.
Remote Sensing and Avian Biodiversity Patterns in the United States Volker C. Radeloff 1, Anna M. Pidgeon 1, Curtis H. Flather 2, Patrick Culbert 1, Veronique.
Current and Future Roles of the USFS from a State Perspective Bill Stewart CDF Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP)
Community Forest and Open Space Program: An Oregon Project.
College of Natural Resources Focus on Research Three different departments means three sets of needs and capabilities. Forestry Parks, Recreation and Tourism.
Land, Public and Private. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change  Paving –
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
Module 5: Solutions – Sustainable Urban Communities MPP 655: Policy Making for Sustainable Urban Communities 1MPP Module 5.
Integrating biodiversity issues into strategic environmental planning A Case Study of the uMhlathuze Municipality, Richards Bay, South Africa Presented.
Land Use and Urbanization
Adapting to Climate Change: Using the Green to Beat the Blues Roberta Clowater Executive Director Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society - New Brunswick.
Urban Sprawl. Read Read the excerpt from the National Geographic magazine article about urban sprawl. National Geographic magazine article about urban.
A Rapid Introduction to SANGS Martin Ellis Local Headhunter Member of the Crowborough Chamber.
Land Use North Street Plan Downtown & Waterfront Plan Natural Environmen t Open Space Protection Plan Built Environmen t Transportatio n System Economic.
Required Restricted elective (400 level)
A Rapid Introduction to SANGS
Felix Müller, Ingo Zasada, Regine Berges (ZALF) Klaus Müller, Armin Werner, Verena Toussaint, Annette Piorr Linking European Land Use Change and Landscape.
Planning Commission November 4, 2010
Chapter 10 The Urban World.
Sustainable Cities: Urban Land Use and Management
Reclaimed Water Funding
How the environment supports the aims of the LEP
Land Use in Relation to Urban Sprawl
Arch 408 Landscape Design URBAN LANDSCAPE
Establishing a Conservation Area by
Sustainable Cities: Urban Land Use and Management
1 Habitat A Habitat C Habitat B Habitat D Region X Region Y.
Management Strategy for Natura 2000 sites in Finland
Landscape and regional conservation chapter 55
Landscape ecology methods
Presentation transcript:

Establishment of park and green areas for the residential development project Sang Don LEE and Sung Ok Kim Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Engineering Ewha Woman’s University, Seoul, KOREA

Table of Contents Introduction Method and Statistical analysis Results and Discussion –Project areas vs green areas –Project areas vs % green areas –Population vs green areas Concluding remarks

I. Introduction Residential Development Project –Providing housing for residents (esp. Urban) –Habitat fragmentation, destruction of important habitat (e.g., wetland, forests) followed –Securing green areas important such as biotope, parks, ecological reserves, etc –Green areas = open space (park, vegetated areas) –Recreation, wildlife habitat, economic gain

In Korea, parks and green areas required for urban development Urban parks (for children, sports –Green areas (transition zone, landscape) –Urban facilities (arena, stadium, water reservoir) –Parks (wetland, stream, etc)

II. Methods 115 preliminary Environment Impact Assessment –Year Analysis based on year, scale, target population, region, % greenness Statistical analysis –Simple linear regression (SPSS, P<0.05) Scale ranges (400,000m2-10,000,000 m2)

Results and Discussion Total development projects and average green area(m2) – Table 1 –50% in Seoul and Gyunggi province –Indication of high development pressure around big cities –Local areas are fewer projects –Local areas fewer green areas indicating forests are nearby Annual trend of green areas in the project (Fig 2) –2001 was the highest

Region no of sites total areas(m2) average areas(m2) population parks, green areas green area( m 2 ) m2m2 % Seoul118,159,505741,773154,3892,422, Gyunggi5077,702,3851,554,048 1,284,186 18,364, Gangwon612,395,1562,065,859188,6832,886, Chungnam65,952,894992,14985,7651,349, Gyungnam2021,846,2201,092,311366,0264,761, Gyungbuk1010,756,5071,075,651194,3852,308, Jeonnam32,280,191760,06444,217471, Chungbuk44,262,5101,065,62888,522743, Jeonbuk21,241,797620,89928,800198, Jeju32,120,694706,89833,958308, Total ,717,859 1,275,807 2,468,931 33,814, mean 246,8933,381, Table 1. Total number of residential project and average green areas

Fig 2. Annual trend of green areas from Green areas/person was the highest in % green areas Green areas/person

Results and Discussion(2) Regional analysis of green areas and individual green areas (Fig 3) –Project areas (over 1 million vs ≤ 1 million) –Less than one million => 80 projects/115= 69.5% –Green areas much higher in big project over one million m2 Large project => more green areas (Fig 4) –Large project more green areas/person (Fig 5)

Fig 3. Number of project (<one million m2) was over 69.5%(80) and 6.8(m2)/person green space; but projects (>one million) 19.0 m2/ person 19.0(m2)/person6.8(m2)/person % green areas Green areas/person

R2=0.973 P<0.000 Project areas Fig 4. Regression line and R2 for project areas vs. green space Green areas

R2=0.466 P<0.000 Project areas Fig 5. Project areas vs green areas(m2)/person Green areas/ person

Results and Discussion (3) Project areas vs % green areas (Fig 6) –strong correlation (R2=0.056, P=0.011) Total population vs % green areas (Fig 7) –R2=0.067, P=0.005 % green areas vs total green areas (Fig 8) –Total green areas increasing as %green areas increasing

R2=0.067 P=0.011 R2=0.005 P=0.056 Fig 6. Project areas vs % greenFig 7. Population vs % green % green areas Projected areas Projected population

R2=0.406 P=0.000 Fig 8. Total population size vs green areas/person Green areas/person Projected population

Concluding Remarks Residential projects in/around big cities are over 50% indicating development pressure for housing, roads, infrastructure needed –Seoul and Gyunggi province higher –Regional province (Cheonnam, Chungbuk, Jeju) Green areas(m2)/person much higher in big cities than in small cities –Demand for green areas greater in urban areas than in rural areas –Rural areas secure forests or wetlands much easier

Projected areas better securing green areas –Less than 1 million m2 areas (70%) –Areas ( Green areas/person only 6.8m2 (16.2%) whereas over one million sites => green areas 19.0m2 (25.2%) –Highly recommended to have a large scale residential project to secure more green space –In Korea most residential projects were small in scale, so it should be bigger in order to secure large amount of green areas –Small project sites usually do not meet the green areas

Population vs. individual green areas(m2) also show strong relationship indicating large project sites are better securing green space Green areas should exclusively refer ‘green’ habitat for animals and plants. Parks for children and other areas with facilities should be excluded So far, minimum green areas are only 6 m2/person and this should be increasing

Thank you for attention!!