ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alternative lot sizing schemes
Advertisements

ISEN 315 Spring 2011 Dr. Gary Gaukler. Hierarchy of Planning Forecast of aggregate demand over time horizon Aggregate Production Plan: determine aggregate.
INDEPENDENT - DEPENDENT DEMAND INVENTORY Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM.
ISEN 315 Spring 2011 Dr. Gary Gaukler. 1.Master production schedule 2.Bill of material (BOM) 3.Inventory availability 4.Purchase orders outstanding 5.Lead.
1 Prof. Yuan-Shyi Peter Chiu Feb Material Management Class Note # 1-A MRP – Capacity Constraints.
Inventory Modeling Concepts
Types of scheduling problems Project scheduling - Chapter 4 Job shop - Chapter 5 (shifting bottle neck) Flow shop - Chapter 5 Flexible assembly - Chapter.
1 Inventory Control for Systems with Multiple Echelons.
EYYUP ORAK Material requirements planning (MRP) is a computer-based inventory management system designed to assist production managers in.
Inventory Management for Independent Demand Chapter 12, Part 2.
Chapter 17 Inventory Control 2.
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 1 MS 401 Production and Service Systems Operations Spring Inventory Control – IV Multiperiod Probabilistic Demand:
Inventory Control IME 451, Lecture 3.
Types of Inventory Transit stock or pipeline inventory Cycle stock
Chapter 11, Part A Inventory Models: Deterministic Demand
Dependent Inventory: Material Requirements Planning BA 339 Mellie Pullman.
MRP and Related Concepts
LESSON 22: MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS PLANNING: LOT SIZING
1 By: Prof. Y. Peter Chiu MRP & JIT ~ HOMEWORK SOLUTION ~
Lecture 5 Project Management Chapter 17.
1 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory The Newsvendor ProblemArdavan Asef-Vaziri, Oct 2011 The Magnitude of Shortages (Out of Stock)
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
1 Prof. Yuan-Shyi Peter Chiu Feb Material Management Class Note # 1-A MRP – Capacity Constraints.
1 Analysis of Inventory Models Special topic # 1 ~ Multiple products EPQ analysis ~
Material Requirements Planning (MRP)
Push Vs. Pull Part Two – Focus on MRP IE 3265 POM R. R. Lindeke, Ph. D.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
21–1. 21–2 Chapter Twenty-One Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 7: Schedule Management1 Solutions to Chapter 7 Exercises.
Lot sizing and scheduling
Inventory control models
1 Inventory Control: Part 2 - Lot-Size Inventories.
Lot Sizing. Inventory Types of inventory Types of inventory –Raw materials/purchase parts –Work-in-process –Finished goods Holding of inventory is expensive.
Chair Seat Legs (2) Cross bar Side Rails (2) Cross bar Back Supports (3) Leg Assembly Back Assembly Level Product Structure Tree.
1 1 Slide © 2001 South-Western College Publishing/Thomson Learning Anderson Sweeney Williams Anderson Sweeney Williams Slides Prepared by JOHN LOUCKS QUANTITATIVE.
Operations Management
2017/4/22 Chapter 7 ~ HOMEWORK ~ By: Prof. Y. Peter Chiu.
BA 301 Operations Management Spring 2003 Inventory Management Chapter 12 Continued.
Production and Service Systems Operations
Operations Management Material Requirements Planning
OM4-1Aggregate Planning Chapter 14. OM4-2Aggregate Planning Planning Horizon Aggregate planning: Intermediate-range capacity planning, usually covering.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998 Material Requirements Planning (MRP) Chapter 15 11/7/05 Overview Position of MRP in Operation.
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 1 MS 401 Production and Service Systems Operations Spring Lot Sizing Slide Set #11.
Economic Order Quantity The economic order quantity (EOQ) is the fixed order quantity (Q) that minimizes the total annual costs of placing orders and holding.
Inventory Management MD707 Operations Management Professor Joy Field.
Hierarchy of Production Decisions
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
To Accompany Ritzman & Krajewski Foundations of Operations Management, © 2003 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 12 Resource Planning.
1 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Operations Management Session 23: Newsvendor Model.
Inventory Models in SC Environment By Debadyuti Das.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 18 Material Requirements Planning.
FACILITIES PLANNING ISE310L SESSION 7 September 15, 2015 Geza P. Bottlik Page 1 Outline Questions? Inventory experiences? Background quiz results Questionnaire.
35E00100 Service Operations and Strategy #6 Fall 2015
1 Inventory Control with Time-Varying Demand. 2  Week 1Introduction to Production Planning and Inventory Control  Week 2Inventory Control – Deterministic.
Resource Planning Chapter 15.
ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES
1 By: Prof. Y. Peter Chiu MRP & JIT ~ HOMEWORK SOLUTION ~
CHAPTER 7 Push and Pull Production Control Systems McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
FORECAST 2 Exponential smoothing. 3a. Exponential Smoothing Assumes the most recent observations have the highest predictive value – gives more weight.
Chapter: 15 Inventory management(MSC 301)
Dynamic Lot Size Models
Lecture 14 CS5661 Neighbor Joining Generates unrooted tree, allowing for unequal branches Given: Distance matrix for sequences Steps: Repeat 1-3 till all.
Chapter 13 MRP and ERP.
Lecture 34 MRP and ERP Operations Management, Eighth Edition, by William J. Stevenson Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
MRP.
Introduction to Materials Management
FUNCTIONS & RELATIONSHIPS 1
OUTLINE Questions? Quiz Go over Quiz Newspaper problem Uneven demand
Example Make x the subject of the formula
Presentation transcript:

ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES

Alternatives Lot-Sizing Schemes The silver-meal heuristic Least Unit Cost Past Period Balancing

The Silver-Meal Heuristic Forward method that requires determining the average cost per period as a function of the number of periods the current order to span. Minimize the cost per period Formula : C(j) = (K + hr2 + 2hr3 + … + (j-1)hrj) / j C(j)  average holding cost and setup cost per period k  order cost or setup cost h  holding cost r  demand

Method Start the calculation from period 1 to next period C(1) = K C(2) = (K + hr2) / 2 C(3) = (K + hr2 + 2hr3) / 3 Stop the calculation when C(j) > C(j-1) Set y1 = r1 + r2 + … + rj-1 Start over at period j, repeat step (I) – (III)

Example A machine shop uses the Silver-Meal heuristic to schedule production lot sizes for computer casings. Over the next five weeks the demands for the casing are r = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20). The holding cost is $2 per case per week, and the production setup cost is $80. Find the recommended lot sizing.

Step I, II & III = 70 = 102.67 = 48 r = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20) k = $80 h = $2 Starting in period 1 C(1) = 80 C(2) = [80 + (2)(30)] / 2 = 70 C(3) = [80 + (2)(30) + (2)(2)(42)] / 3 = 102.67 Stop the calculation as the C(3) > C(2) y1 = r1 + r2 = 18 +30 = 48

= 42 + 5 Step IV = 47 = 45 = 56.67. Stop Starting in period 3 C(1) = 80 C(2) = [80 + (2)(5)] / 2 = 45 C(3) = [80 + (2)(5) + (2)(2)(20)] / 3 = 56.67. Stop y3 = r3 + r4 = 42 + 5 = 47

Since period 5 is the final period, thus no need to start the process again. Set y5 = r5 = 20 Thus y = (48, 0, 47, 0, 20)

Least Unit Cost Similar to Silver-Meal method Minimize cost per unit of demand Formula : C(j) = (K + hr2 + 2hr3 + … + (j-1)hrj) / (r1 + r2 + … + rj C(j)  average holding cost and setup cost per period k  order cost or setup cost h  holding cost r  demand

Method Start the calculation from period 1 to next period C(1) = K / r1 C(2) = (K + hr2) / (r1 + r2) C(3) = (K + hr2 + 2hr3) / (r1 + r2 + r3 ) Stop the calculation when C(j) > C(j-1) Set y1 = r1 + r2 + … + rj-1 Start over at period j, repeat step (I) – (III)

Step I, II & III = 2.92 = 3.42 = 48 r = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20) k = $80 h = $2 Starting in period 1 C(1) = 80 / 18 = 4.44 C(2) = [80 + (2)(30)] / (18 + 30) = 2.92 C(3) = [80 + (2)(30) + (2)(2)(42)] / (18+30+42) = 3.42 Stop the calculation as the C(3) > C(2) y1 = r1 + r2 = 18 +30 = 48

= 42 Step IV = 1.92 Stop Starting in period 3 C(1) = 80 / 42 = 1.9 y3 = r3 = 42

= 5 + 20 Step IV = 25 = 4.8 Starting in period 4 C(1) = 80 / 5 = 16 y4 = r4 + r5 = 5 + 20 = 25 Thus y = (48, 0, 42, 25, 0)

Part Period Balancing Set the order horizon equal to the number of periods that most closely matches the total holding cost with the setup cost over that period.

Example Order horizon Total holding cost r = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20) Holding cost = $2 per case per week Setup cost = $80 Starting in period 1 Because 228 exceeds the setup cost of 80, we stop. As 80 is closer to 60 than to 228, the first order horizon is two periods, y1 = r1 +r2 = 18 + 30 = 48 Order horizon Total holding cost 1 2 2(30) = 60 3 2(30) + 2(2)(42) = 228 closest

Order horizon Total holding cost Starting in period 3 We have exceeded the setup cost of 80, so we stop. Because 90 is closer to 80 than 10, the order horizon is three periods. y3 = r3 + r4 + r5 = 42 + 5 + 20 = 67 y = (48, 0, 67, 0, 0) Order horizon Total holding cost 1 2 2(5) = 10 3 2(5) + 2(2)(20) = 90 closest

Comparison of Results Silver – Meal Least Unit Cost Part Period Balancing Demand r = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20) Solution y = (48, 0, 47, 0, 20) y = (48, 0, 42, 25, 0) y = (48, 0, 67, 0, 0) Holding inventory 30+5=35 30+20=50 30+5+(2)(20)=75 Holding cost 35(2)=70 50(2)=100 75(2)=150 Setup cost 3(80)=240 2(80)=160 Total Cost 310 340   The Silver Meal and Part Period Balancing heuristics resulted in the same least expensive costs.

Exercise 14 – pg 381 A single inventory item is ordered from an outside supplier. The anticipated demand for this item over the next 12 months is 6, 12, 4, 8, 15, 25, 20, 5, 10, 20, 5, 12. Current inventory of this item is 4, and ending inventory should be 8. Assume a holding cost of $1 per period and a setup cost of $40. Determine the order policy for this item based on Silver-Meal Least unit cost Part period balancing Which lot-sizing method resulted in the lowest cost for the 12 periods?

Exercise 17 – pg 381 The time-phased net requirements for the base assembly in a table lamp over the next six weeks are The setup cost for the construction of the base assembly is $200, and the holding cost is $0.30 per assembly per week Determine the lot sizes using the Silver-Meal heuristic Determine the lot sizes using the least unit cost heuristic Determine the lot sizes using part period balancing Which lot-sizing method resulted in the lowest cost for the 6 periods? Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 Requirements 335 200 140 440 300