Risk Management Practices in Solvency II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solvency ii: an overview Lloyds May © LloydsSolvency II May Contents Solvency II: key features Legislative process Solvency II implementation.
Advertisements

THE ROLE OF THE ACTUARY IN THE ECONOMY
Own Risk & Solvency Assessment (ORSA): The heart of Risk & Capital Management John Spencer Director, Ultimate Risk Solutions.
Risk Management and Internal Controls ASSAL 20 November 2014 Annick Teubner Chair, IAIS Governance Working Group.
1 ICP 18 to 23 Presented in One day Workshop on Financial Sector Assessment Program N. Srinivasa Rao & S. P. Chakraborty Hyderabad, 29 th December, 2010.
1 The critical challenge facing banks and regulators under Basel II: improving risk management through implementation of Pillar 2 Simon Topping Hong Kong.
The Development of Enterprise Risk Management and Supervision for Insurance Companies in Taiwan Dr. Huang, Tien-Mu Director General, Insurance Bureau Financial.
Dan Barron FSA MAAA FIlAA CERA November Objectives To explore the impact of SII on actuaries To raise questions about the direction of the actuarial.
Basel III.
Investments Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (IIRM) Hyderabad, India 15 November 2005 Arup Chatterjee – Advisor International Association of.
Paola Lucantoni Financial Market Law and Regulation.
Solvency II Reporting and Disclosure
1 The insurance industry and the financial crisis London Insurance Institute London, 17 March 2010 Prof. Karel VAN HULLE Head of Insurance and Pensions.
Role of actuarial function supporting the FLAOR leading to the ORSA Ian Morris June 2014.
Overview of Solvency II Moscow, 25 March CEA’s Member Associations Source CEA 33 national member associations: 27 EU Member States + 6 Non-EU Markets.
Actuarial function in Solvency II World IX Baltic Actuarial Summer Days 2009, Kintai, Lithuania Rokas Gylys, Lietuvos Aktuarijų Draugija.
Solvency II Alberto Corinti
1 Solvency II Part 1: Background Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
An Overview of Risk Management based on a Disclosure from an Annual Report Jon Wu, November 19, 2014.
Internal Control and Internal Audit
CORPORATE RISK MANAGEMENT & INSURANCE BY R P BLAH D.G.M. INCHARGE THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REGIONAL OFFICE BHUBANESWAR.
GOOD PRACTICE IN REGULATING ANNUITY PROVIDERS Chris Daykin UK Government Actuary.
IAIS guidance paper on investment risk management Insurance Training Seminar IAIS - ASSAL Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1-4 November 2005 Makoto Okubo – Member.
Consumer Protection Working Party Meeting Sponsor.
Solvency II and the Swiss Solvency Test
Control environment and control activities. Day II Session III and IV.
1 Solvency II Part 3: Other pillars Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
Financial Services Board INSURANCE LAWS AMENDMENT BILL Jonathan Dixon Deputy Executive Officer: Insurance Financial Services Board Page 1.
Governance of the Treasury Function CIPFA Scottish Treasury Management Forum Alan George, Regional Director 23rd February 2012.
OECD Guidelines on Insurer Governance
Solvency II Framework IUMI Conference Copenhagen, 10 September 2007 Cosimo Turi Swiss Reinsurance Company.
INSTRUCTIONS Guidance on formatting the beam is available in the notes pages of this document. 21March, 2012 Solvency II Main requirements.
Risk Management Office ECO-IDB Workshop on Risk Management 4 March 2012.
Session 9: Panel on Assets Jeffery Yong IAIS Secretariat Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL San Salvador, 24 November 2010.
Solvency Regulation in Iceland – Future Environment credit market securities market pension- market insurance market Willis Re’s Nordic Seminar 20th June.
Our Changing Future Unit Linked Fund Governance George McCutcheon FIA MSc– Director, Financial Risk Solutions 18 Sep 2013.
System of Governance Articles 41 to 49 of Directive 2009/138/EC 11 th May 2010 Eamonn Henry.
Panel 6 IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar 24 November 2009, Lima Peru Jason Park – Principal Administrator International.
Compliance with IOSCO requirements AMEDA Leadership Forum Alexandria Egypt Monday 27 th April 2009 by Dr. Ashraf EL Sharkawy Senior Advisor to the CMA.
Corporate Governance Yoshi Kawai Secretary General, IAIS IAIS-ASSAL Regional Seminar Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 2011 PUBLIC.
Solvency II Open Forum 4 th March 2008 Michael Aitchison.
SUERF Annual Lecture Risk Management – A supervisor’s approach Gabriel Bernardino EIOPA Chairman Helsinki, 22 September 2011.
Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission
Solvency II & Captives. Solvency II Speakers: Jonathan Groves, Senior Vice President, Marsh UK Limited Shelby Weldon, Director, Insurance Licensing and.
Credit risk vs. Market risk Credit risk is the risk that a borrower or counterparty may fail to fulfill an obligation whereas market risk is the risk to.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
Pillar 2 and Pillar 3 of Solvency II Kathryn Morgan The Association of Financial Mutuals 4 April 2011.
Solvency II Andrew Mawdsley. Overview The challenges in preparing for Solvency II Adequate financial resources Supervisory Review Process Disclosure Timeline.
Credit risk in banks - importance of appraisal and monitoring PRESENTED BY : KRATI VERMA (09bshyd0390)
Developing an Investment Governance Framework
December 29, 2010 Satyan Jambunathan Prudential requirements A Life industry perspective.
© Copyright Allianz IIS Redefining the industry: Regulation, Risk & Global Strategy July 9, 2007 Berlin Helmut Perlet, Allianz SE The Emergence of Solvency.
The Use of Actuaries as Part of a Supervisory Model Michael Hafeman – Consultant World Bank May 2004.
Page 1 Overview of the Internal Control Requirements for the Maltese Insurance Industry Dr. Marisa Attard Malta, 8 April 2010.
Page 1 Own Solvency and Risk Assessment Jarl Kure Malta 9 April 2010.
Ukraine (nr 46514): Expert Mission on Supervision of Investment Funds` Activities - TAIEX Risk management under UCITS IV. Organizational requirements.
Consultation on Guidance for (Re)Insurance undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role (CP 103) Presentation to Society of Actuaries in Ireland.
1 Use test Izabela Sabała Insurance and Pension Inspection Department KNF O ffi ce TAIEX Workshop on Solvency II Requirements Baku, December 17 ‒ 18, 2013.
ERM Seminar – Institute of Actuaries of India Mart 2017
Solvency II challenges in the area of Governance
SOLVENCY II - PILLAR I Grey areas
Panel 6 IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation
Solvency II The first year of implementation José Almaça
Quantitive Impact Studies
Energy Risk Management Credit Rating Perspective
Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
4. Solvency II – Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
Solvency 2 The final countdown
“Solvency II - final agreement
“Solvency II - final agreement
Presentation transcript:

Risk Management Practices in Solvency II Dr. Onur ACAR Risk Manager Mapfre Genel Insurance

What is Solvency II? It is the proposed new EU legislation which will govern the capital requirements of insurance companies. Disadvantages of Solvency I which entered into force in 1970s: Capital is not adequately directed to risks Rules conflict with good risk management A lack of harmonisation across the EU Solvency II is an opportunity for a better and more appropriate risk based solvency regime 2

Solvency II : 3 Pillars It is not only a capital calculation system but it is based on 3 Pillars: Pillar I, which focuses on quantitative requirements Pillar II, which focuses on qualitative requirements and supervisory activities Pillar III, which addresses supervisory and public disclosure of financial and other information 3

Solvency II: 3 Pillar Approach 4

Aims of Solvency II Strong, effective policyholder protection with optimal capital allocation Proportionate, risk-based approach to supervision with appropriate treatment both for small and large companies To incentivise more sophisticated risk management tools To increase competition within the EU insurance markets and the global competitiveness of the EU insurers 5

Where do we stand in the Solvency II process? 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Directive Development (Commission) Directive Adoption (Council & Parliament) Level 2 & 3 (EC & CEIOPS) CEIOPS work on Pillar I CEIOPS advice on Proportionality & Groups CEIOPS advice on Implementing Measures CEIOPS work on L3 CEIOPS work on Pillars II and III QIS 1 QIS 2 QIS 3 QIS 4 QIS5 Industry gets prepared Transposition 1 Jan 2014 ?

Risk-based economic model A risk-based economic model implies an increased accuracy of the solvency assessment, closer to the true risk profile of the insurance company. The main principles of a true economic risk-based model are: A Total Balance Sheet approach: market consistent valuation of all assets and liabilities in the balance sheet Addressing risk diversification effects: within the same risk, between risks, between companies, between geographical areas Addressing risk mitigation effects: reinsurance and ART 7

Solvency II: Capital Requirement Levels Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) Target Capital that an entity should aim to meet under normal operating conditions Dropping below SCR does not necessarily require immediate supervisory intervention Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) Reflects a level of capital below which ultimate supervisory action could be triggered Ladder of Intervention An appropriate ladder of intervention if the available capital falls below SCR Internal Model Level of SCR Ladder of Intervention Standard Approach Level of MCR Market -consistent Value of Liabilities 8

SCR CALCULATION SCR Adj. BSCR SCRop SCRmarket SCRhealth SCRdef SCRlife SCRnon-life SCRintang Mktfx LifeMort Health SLT Health NonSLT Health CAT LifeMort NLPrem&Res Mktprop LifeLong HealthMort NLLapse Health Prem&Res Health CAT Mktint LifeDis/Morb HealthLong NLCAT Health NSLTLapse Mkteq LifeLapse Health DisMorb Mktsp LifeExp = adjustment for the risk mitigating effect of future profit sharing Health SLTLapse Mktconc LifeRev HealthExp Mktilliq LifeCat HealthRev

System of Governance in Solvency II Date 11/04/2017 System of Governance in Solvency II Internal Audit Internal audit function Internal Control Compliance function Actuarial Function Management body System of Governance Fit and proper requirements Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Risk Management Risk management function The functions included in the system of governance are considered to be key functions and consequently also important and critical functions. 10 10

System of Governance in Solvency II The system of governance should: be proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the operations of the insurer include an adequate transparent organisational structure with a clear allocation and appropriate segregation of responsibilities and an effective system for ensuring the transmission of information be subject to regular internal review Governance is crucial because: Solvency II is a flexible system There are risks that cannot be properly quantified There are internal models

Governance – Management Body Date Governance – Management Body Management Body Management body has the ultimate responsability to establish an effective system of governance which provide for sound and prudent management of the business. Fit and Proper Requirements Internal Control Internal Audit Actuarial Function Risk Management

Governance – Fit and Proper Requirements Date Governance – Fit and Proper Requirements Management Body All persons who effectively run the undertaking or have other key functions should be fit and proper. Their professional qualifications, knowledge and experience should be adequate to enable sound and prudent management (fit) They should be of good repute (proper) Fit and Proper Requirements Internal Control Internal Audit Actuarial Function Risk Management

Governance – Internal Control Date Governance – Internal Control Management Body Companies should have an effective internal control function that should include: administrative and accounting procedures appropriate reporting arrangements at all levels of the company a compliance function Compliance function should include: advising the management body on compliance with laws, regulations and administrative provisions an assessment of the possible impact of any changes in the legal environment on the operations of the company Fit and Proper Requirements Internal Control Internal Audit Actuarial Function Risk Management

Governance – Internal Audit Date Governance – Internal Audit Management Body Companies should have an effective internal audit function that should: include an evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control system and other elements of the system of governance. be objective and independent from the operational functions. Any findings and recommendations of the internal audit should be reported to the management body which should determine what actions are to be taken. Fit and Proper Requirements Internal Control Internal Audit Actuarial Function Risk Management

Governance – Actuarial Function Date Governance – Actuarial Function Management Body Companies should have an effective actuarial function to: ensure the appropriateness of the methodologies and models used in the calculation of technical provisions inform the management body regarding the reliability and adequacy of the calculation of technical provisions express an opinion on the overall underwriting and reinsurance policy contribute to the effective implementation of the risk management system Fit and Proper Requirements Internal Control Internal Audit Actuarial Function Risk Management

Governance – Risk Management Date Governance – Risk Management Management Body Companies should have an effective risk management system comprising strategies, processes and procedures necessary to identify, measure, monitor, manage and report the risks they face. It needs to be integrated into the decision making process of the company. The management body should have the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that the implemented risk management system is suitable, effective and proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the risks. Fit and Proper Requirements Internal Control Internal Audit Actuarial Function Risk Management

Tasks of the Risk Management Function Assisting the management body in the effective operation of the risk management system Monitoring the risk management system Maintaining an organisation-wide and aggregated view on the risk profile of the company Reporting details on risk exposures and advising the management body with regard to risk management matters Identifying and assessing emerging risks

Risks To Be Covered by Risk Management Underwriting Risk The risk of loss in the value of insurance liabilities, due to inadequate pricing and provisioning assumptions Market Risk The risk of loss in the financial situation resulting from fluctuations in the level and in the volatility of market prices of assets, liabilities and financial instruments Credit Risk The risk of loss in the financial situation, resulting from fluctuations in the credit standing of counterparties or issuers of securities Operational Risk The risk of loss arising from inadequate or failed internal processes, personnel or systems, or from external events Liquidity Risk The risk that the company is unable to realise investments and other assets in order to settle its financial obligations when they fall due Concentration Risk All risk exposures with a loss potential which is large enough to threaten the financial position of the company

Effective Risk Management System Date Effective Risk Management System Clearly defined and well documented Risk management strategy should include: risk management objectives key risk management principles general risk appetite assignment of risk management responsibilities across all the activities of the company It should be consistent with the company’s overall business strategy. Adequate written policies Appropriate processes and procedures Appropriate procedures and feedback loops Appropriate management reporting

Effective Risk Management System Date Effective Risk Management System Clearly defined and well documented Written risk management policies should include: definition and categorisation of the material risks faced by the company definition of acceptable risk limits implementation of risk strategy and control mechanisms Written policies should at least cover: underwriting and reserving asset–liability management (ALM) investments liquidity and concentration risk management operational risk management reinsurance Adequate written policies Appropriate processes and procedures Appropriate procedures and feedback loops Appropriate management reporting

Effective Risk Management System Date Effective Risk Management System Clearly defined and well documented Main risk management strategies and policies should be approved by the management body. Processes and procedures should include: risk identification risk assessment risk measurement risk monitoring risk reporting Adequate written policies Appropriate processes and procedures Appropriate procedures and feedback loops Appropriate management reporting

Effective Risk Management System Date Effective Risk Management System Clearly defined and well documented Information on the risk management system should be actively and continuously monitored and managed by the management body and by all relevant staff Adequate written policies Appropriate processes and procedures Appropriate reporting and feedback loops Appropriate management reporting

Effective Risk Management System Date Effective Risk Management System Clearly defined and well documented Material risks faced by the company and the effectiveness of the risk management system should be reported to the management body Adequate written policies Appropriate processes and procedures Appropriate procedures and feedback loops Appropriate reporting to the management

Supervision of the Risk Management System The company is required to demonstrate to the supervisor that it has an effective risk management system which is: capable of identifying, monitoring and mitigating both current and future risks in line with its risk tolerance levels. Stress testing and scenario analysis can be used to determine the effect of these risks. an integral part of its business strategy subject to regular internal review by the management body proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of its business

Supervision of the Risk Management System The disclosure to the supervisor could include: material risks and their potential effects any perceived emerging risks to the company’s solvency position the scope and nature of risk and capital measurement systems the structure and organisation of the relevant risk and capital management systems details of organisational structure and staff responsible for the risk management system qualitative measures for risks which are not quantifiable, such as liquidity risk and operational risk

Thank you … Onur Acar, Ph.D. Mapfre Genel Sigorta Risk Manager