RECAP Addressing Exposure to Multiple Constituents that Elicit Noncarcinogenic Effects on the Same Target Organ/System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connecticut Brownfield Sites
Advertisements

Society for Risk Analysis Workshop 3: Application of Web-based Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) Leslie Galloway, University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge.
Bill Janes and Earl Crapps Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Spill Prevention and Response Contaminated Sites Program.
Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
21 st Annual Conference. Soil and Groundwater Screening Levels Developing Soil and Groundwater Screening Levels for International Service Station Sites.
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Qays J. Saud 1,2 and Syed E. Hasan 2 Department of Geosciences 1 Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research –Iraq 2 University of Missouri-Kansas.
Risk Assessment.
1 Risk assessment: overview and principles –Risk principles –Steps in risk assessment –Risk calculation –Toxicology.
Environmental Indexes by Amit Joshi. Purpose Assess the potential risks posed by releases from industrial sources Conduct preliminary impact assessment.
Risk Assessment.
National Inventory of Potential Sources of Soil Contamination in Cyprus Part 2 Risk-Based Approach to Assessment of Cypriot Contaminated Sites Eleonora.
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (RECAP) October 20, 2003.
ESTIMATION OF LIFETIME CANCER RISK AMONG RESIDENTIAL ADULTS AND CHILDREN NEAR OKHLA LANDFILL, NEW DELHI VIA INGESTION (ORAL ROUTE) DUE TO ARSENIC AND BENZENE.
LDEQ’s RECAP Domenico and Summer’s Models. DOMENICO MODEL.
LDEQ’s RECAP Soil Protective of Groundwater - Soil GW Soil Saturation - Soil sat.
RECAP From RECAP 2000 To RECAP LDEQ’s RECAP n RECAP revision schedule – FEIS Draft and Fiscal Office Draft11/20/02 – NOI to State Register12/10/02.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
Toluene By Thu Ha Bio 2B Dr. Blumberg May 18, 2005.
Risk Assessment II Dec 9, Is there a “safe” dose ? For effects other than cancer:
Human Health Effects of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid BTEX Components in Drinking Water Ashley Andersen, Nicole Fenton, Alex Friedman, Kevin Jackson, Alec.
29 th International conference SEGH, 8-12 July Toulouse, FRANCE 2013 Health risk estimate for groundwater and soil contamination in the.
What We Know (and Don’t Know) about the Effects of Oil and Gas Development on Water Quality Martz Conference, June 5-6, 2014 Prof. Joe Ryan University.
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
Environmental Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis of Contaminated Sites: Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment F. Quercia, ANPA Workshop ICS/UNIDO - Fundacion Mamonal Environmental.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to human health.
Philip Bedient, Ph.D. Rice University
Introduction to Atlantic RBCA Version 3 Webinar May 4, 2013.
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
(IAQ). What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures.
Michael J. Sullivan, Ph.D., CIH, REA
 Drinking-Water Standards  History  Key Definitions  How Standards are Developed  Current Issues Confronting Developers of Standards.
Approaches for Evaluating the Relevance of Multiroute Exposures in Establishing Guideline Values for Drinking Water Contaminants Kannan Krishnan, Université.
LDEQ RECAP Miscellaneous Topics. Exposure Assessment n Site-specific under MO-3 only n Construction worker scenario n Greatly reduced ET, EF, and/or ED.
Examples of Health Risk Assessment Applications for Contaminated Sites in the Upper Silesia, Poland Eleonora Wcislo Institute for Ecology of Industrial.
Production of Nitric Acid Environmental Impact Assessment Erik TolonenNick Poulin Environmental Engineering Environmental Planning and Decision Making.
1 RBCA Tool Kit Exercise. 2 Groundwater protection : Tier 1 compliance point Point of compliance=Point of exposure (on site) compliance point (receptor)
A New Risk-Based Approach to Establish Clean-up Levels for TPH David Nakles and Stephen Geiger ThermoRetec Consulting and Engineering Sara McMillen and.
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting January 24, 2013.
VI Draft Guidance: Overview of Comments to November, 2002 OSWER VI Guidance Michael Sowinski DPRA, Inc.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Risk Assessment 1 Thanks to Paul R. Harp, Ph.D., NH Department of Health & Human Services, US EPA Air Quality Planning & Standards Division, and the DOE.
INTRODUCTION TO RECAP WORKSHOP. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program October 20, 2003.
Determining Risks to Background Arsenic Using a Margin – of – Exposure Approach Presentation at Society of Risk Analysis, New England Chapter Barbara D.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
RECAP Implementation Issues Implementation Issues.
Common VAP Risk Assessment Issues Certified Professional Annual Training October 2015 Mike Allen.
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety Stephanie Simstad The Ohio State University Extension Clermont County AFCEE, 2002.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
Air Pollution Research Group Analysis of 1999 TRI Data to Identify High Environmental Risk Areas of Ohio by Amit Joshi.
LDEQ RECAP.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Environmental Risk Assessment and Risk Management Kevin L. Long ENVIRON International Corporation Academy Park High School May 12, 2010.
Science of Toxicology The science of toxicology (tossicologia) is based on the principle that there is a relationship between a toxic reaction (the response)
Key Concepts on Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (RECAP) October 20, 2003.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
1 Risk Assessment for Air Toxics: The 4 Basic Steps NESCAUM Health Effects Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
Risk, Perception, Assessment, and Management Pertemuan 3
Methanol to Aromatics Gabrianna Ruskowsky Mentor: David Bell
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
Qays Jasim Saud Syed E. Hasan Department of Geosciences
Presentation transcript:

RECAP Addressing Exposure to Multiple Constituents that Elicit Noncarcinogenic Effects on the Same Target Organ/System

Assumption of Dose Additivity: Carcinogens 1. Multiple chemicals: Risk T =  Risk i 2. Multiple exposure pathways: Total Exposure Cancer Risk = Risk pathway1 + Risk pathway2 + … + Risk pathwayi RAGS-A EPA 1989

Carcinogens and the RBCA Approach A target risk level of for individual chemicals and pathways generally will lead to a cumulative risk within the to range (SSG 1996) Total Exposure Cancer Risk should be < to Risk = EC 1 /RS 1 + EC 2 /RS 2 + … + EC i /Rs i X TR

Assumption of Dose Additivity: Noncarcinogens 1. Multiple chemicals: Hazard Index = E 1 /RfD 1 + E 2 /RfD 2 + … + E i /RfD i 2. Multiple exposure pathways: Total Hazard Index = HI pathway1 + HI pathway2 + … + HI pathwayi RAGS-A EPA 1989

Assumption of Dose Additivity: Noncarcinogens Simultaneous subthreshold exposures to multiple noncarcinogenic chemicals could result in an adverse health effect Only applicable to noncarcinogenic chemicals that affect the same target organ/critical effect (RfD) RAGS-A EPA 1989

Noncarcinogens and the RBCA Approach No acceptable risk “range” When multiple chemicals and/or pathways are present, target HQ should be adjusted so that the Total HI < 1.0 Total HI = EC 1 /RS 1 + EC 2 /RS 2 + … + EC i /RS i

MO-1 and MO-2 RS Represent an acceptable exposure level for exposure to a single chemical via a single medium Do not address additivity due to exposure to multiple chemicals or multiple exposure media RS do address exposure via multiple pathways

MO-1 and MO-2 RS Risk-based RS must be adjusted to account for potential additive effects »Soil ni, Soil i, Soil es »GW 1, GW 2, GW es Not applicable to Soil GW, Soil sat, GW 3, Water sol, background levels, quantitation limits, MCLs, ceiling values

MO-1: Accounting for Additivity Modification of risk-based MO-1 RS: » group noncarcinogenic chemicals by target organ/critical effect

MO-1: Accounting for Additivity 1. Identify the target organ/critical effect for each noncarcinogenic chemical (RfD) » 2. Group the chemicals by target organ/critical effect 3. Divide the RS by the number of chemicals affecting the same target organ

MO-1: Accounting for Additivity Example ChemicalTarget OrganRSAdjusted RS Akidney24 8 Bkidney, liver15 5 C CNS10 Dkidney60 20 èDivide the RS for A, B, and D by 3 (kidney) (Same as calculating a RS using a THQ of 0.33)

Additivity - MO-1 nIf many noncarcinogenic COC are present:  Adjust NC RS to account for additivity  Compare adjusted NC RS to C RS and choose the lower of the two  NC RS presented in Appendix I Worksheets

MO-2: Methods for Accounting for Additivity Modification of risk-based MO-2 RS: » group by target organ/critical effect » site-specific apportionment of RS or THQ » calculation of a total HI for each target organ

MO-2: Additivity Example: Site-specific apportionment COC Target THQ  RS THQ  RS THQ  RS A kidney B kidney C kidney Total HI

MO-2 Additivity Example: Calculation of a THI for Each Target Organ THI kidney = EC A /RS A + EC B /RS B + EC c /RS c where: EC = exposure concentration RS = RECAP Standard THI kidney = 1/ /9 + 3/12 = 0.93 P THI must be < 1.0

MO-3B: Accounting for Additivity Modification of risk-based MO-3 RS: » site-specific apportionment of RS or THQ » calculation of a total HI for each target organ/effect » group by target organ/critical effect

Additivity Exposure to Multiple Media If there is exposure to chemicals via more than one medium, then RS must be modified to account for additivity Applicable only to MO-2 and MO-3 MO-2 Example: a receptor is being exposed to chemicals via drinking water (GW 1 or GW 2 ) and soil

Additivity: TPH Fractions nAliphatics C >6 -C 8 nAliphatics C >8 -C 16 (C >8 -C 10, C >10 -C 12, C >12 -C 16 ) nAliphatics C >16 -C 35 nAromatics C >8 -C 16 (C >8 -C 10, C >10 -C 12, C >12 -C 16 ) nAromatics C >16 -C 35

Additivity: TPH nAdditivity - TPH RS based on 10,000 cap  Do not adjust 10,000 cap  Identify risk-based value in Appendix I worksheets or calculate  Adjust risk-based RS to account for additive effects  If adjusted risk-based RS < 10,000, use risk-based RS  If adjusted risk-based RS > 10,000, use 10,000 cap

Additivity: TPH Fractions Example nSoil: ethylbenzene, aliphatics C >8 -C 10, C >10 -C 12, C >12 -C 16 nId of targets: ethylbenzene: liver, kidney, developmental aliphatics C >8 -C 10 : liver, hematological system aliphatics C >10 -C 12 : liver, hematological system aliphatics C >12 -C 16 : liver, hematological system nAdditivity - Liver: ethylbenzene and aliphatics C >8 -C 16 nAdjustment factor: 2 NOT 4 C >8 -C 16

Additivity: TPH Fractions Example (cont’d) nAdjustment of MO-1 Soil ni : ethylbenzene: 1500/2 = 750 mg/kg aliphatics C >8 -C 10 : 1100/2 = 550 mg/kg aliphatics C >10 -C 12 : 2100/2 = 1050 mg/kg aliphatics C >12 -C 16 : 3100/2 = 1550 mg/kg

MO-1 Additivity Example for Soil Table 2 - Gasoline release COC MO-1 Soil ni Target Organ/Effect benzene ethylbenzene1500 liver, kidney, develop. toluene690 liver, kid., CNS, nas.epi. xylene12,000  activity,  bw,  mort. aliphatics C kidney aliphatics C liver, hematol. sys. aliphatics C liver, hematol. sys. aromatics C  bw aromatics C  bw

MO-1 Additivity Example for Soil Table 2 - Gasoline release Summarize by target organ: (3) liver: ethylbenzene, toluene, aliphatics C8-12 (3) kidney: ethylbenzene, toluene, aliphatics C6-8 (1) developmental: ethylbenzene (1) CNS: toluene (1) nasal epithelium: toluene (1) hyperactivity: xylene (2)  bw: xylene, aromatics C8-12 (1)  mortality: xylene (1) hematological system: aliphatics C8-12

MO-1 Additivity Example for Soil Table 2 - Gasoline release COC Adjusted MO-1 Soil ni benzene --- ethylbenzene 1500  3 = 500 (liver) toluene 690  3 = 230 (liver) xylene 12,000  2 = 6,000 (  bw) aliphatics C aliphatics C  3 = 367 (liver) aliphatics C  3 = 700 (liver) aromatics C  2 = 305 (  bw) aromatics C  2 = 500 (  bw)

MO-1 Additivity Example for Soil Table 2 - Gasoline release Identification of the limiting soil RS: COC Soil ni Soil GWDW * Soil sat benzene ethylbenzene500 29, toluene230 52, xylene , aliphatics C6-810,00010,000NA aliphatics C ,000 NA aliphatics C ,000 NA aromatics C ,000 NA aromatics C ,000NA *based on a DF3 of 440

MO-1 Additivity Example for GW Table 3 - Gasoline release COC MO-1 GW 1 Target Organ/Effect benzene ethylbenzene --- liver, kidney, develop. toluene --- liver, kid., CNS, nas.epi. xylene ---  activity,  bw,  mortality aliphatics C6-832 kidney aliphatics C liver, hematol. sys. aliphatics C liver, hematol. sys. aromatics C  bw aromatics C  bw

MO-1 Additivity Example for GW Table 3 - Gasoline release Summarize by target organ: (3) liver: ethylbenzene, toluene, aliphatics C8-12 (3) kidney: ethylbenzene, toluene, aliphatics C6-8 (1) developmental: ethylbenzene (1) CNS: toluene (1) nasal epithelium: toluene (1) hyperactivity: xylene (2)  bw: xylene, aromatics C8-12 (1)  mortality: xylene (1) hematological system: aliphatics C8-12

MO-1 Additivity Example for GW Table 3 - Gasoline release COC Adjusted MO-1 GW 1 benzene --- ethylbenzene --- toluene --- xylene--- aliphatics C6-832  3 = 11 (kidney) aliphatics C  3 = 0.43 (liver) aliphatics C  3 = 0.47 (liver) aromatics C  2 = 0.17 (  bw) aromatics C  2 = 0.17 (  bw)

MO-1 Additivity Example for GW Table 3 - Gasoline release Identification of the limiting GW RS: COC GW 1 Water sol benzene ethylbenzene toluene xylene aliphatics C NA aliphatics C NA aliphatics C NA aromatics C NA aromatics C NA

Additivity: GW 1 and GW 2 nInclude all NC COC when identifying targets nIf no current exposure:  Adjust GW 1 or GW 2 RS based on NC effects  Do not adjust GW 1 or GW 2 RS based on MCL

Additivity: GW 1 and GW 2 n If exposure is occurring:  Adjust GW 1 or GW 2 RS based on NC effects  For GW 1 or GW 2 RS based on MCL: 1. Calculate GW 1 or GW 2 RS for NC effects (Appendix I or J) 2. Adjust RS to account for additivity