Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals Population growth rate. Population growth rate should be positive until hampered by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Advertisements

Environmental data collection and information systems in the Baltic Sea Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre of SYKE EEA/EIONET Workshop Maritime.
HELCOM Seal management in the Baltic. HELCOM Contracting parties: Denmark EC Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Poland Russia Sweden.
What we are, what we do, what we can do together Marco Milardi – Project Researcher, HELCOM Baltic Sea FLAG Seminar, Helsinki, 3-4 April 2013.
The state of the Gulf of Finland- gaps in our present knowledge
Gianna Casazza European Commission DG Environment, Marine Unit La Direttiva Quadro sulla Strategia per l’Ambiente Marino (Direttiva 2008/56/CE) Marine.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
EC Habitats Directive (With focus on the marine environment) MARCOS Kick off meeting Åsa Andersson, February 2007.
Research priorities for HELCOM monitoring and assessment purposes Juha-Markku Leppänen, HELCOM (presented by Timo Vihma, FIMR)
The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Overview of existing marine assessments in Europe (North East Atlantic, Baltic Sea, Mediterranean and Black Seas) Frédéric Brochier UNESCO/IOC Consultant.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Female reproductive status of marine mammals -particular emphasis of seals The concept of using reproductive parameters of seals as core indicator for.
MSFD - POMS Consultation Descriptor 1 – Biodiversity Descriptor 4 – Food Webs Descriptor 6 – Sea-floor integrity Simon Greenstreet, Marine Scotland Science.
Nutritional status of seals The concept of using body condition of seals as core indicator for GES within Helcom is based on -Blubber thickness is a commonly.
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
Launching the core indicators! Samuli Korpinen HELCOM CORESET May 2013, Riga.
Anna Donald Marine Planning and Strategy Marine Scotland
HELCOM as an International Tool of Environmental Protection of the Baltic Sea Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Chairman, Helsinki.
(18 JUNE 2014) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
Cetacean by-catch M.B. Santos Workshop Marine Environment and fisheries.
Hans Frost Hans Lassen Søren Anker Pedersen EEA 6 March EURECA’s ‘Fish Behind the Net’ (FBtN) – Spotmeter.
MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.
All TMs are kindly asked to fill in the information asked for in the template and to present the information at the CORESET II 2/2014 workshop. TMLs are.
Marine assessment workshop th April 2015 EEA, Copenhagen Indicators – state of the art Natural Systems & Vulnerability, NSV4, EEA.
21 November 2014 EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) Meeting.
Should we integrate assessments of the state-based descriptors? YES – Considering that the MSFD is underpinned by ecosystem management approach, it is.
Riina Klais PhD student ( ) Tartu University (Estonia) Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences Department of Nature and Technology Supervisor:
Long term monitoring of nearshore habitats in the Gulf of Alaska: Why and How? James L. Bodkin USGS, Alaska Science Center USGS, Alaska Science Center.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan – progress on the eve of the 2013 Ministerial Meeting Monika Stankiewicz HELCOM Executive Secretary Baltic Marine Environment.
Rodney Forster Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Lowestoft, UK Products from the EMECO North Sea Observatory: an EU policy.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive “good environmental status” and the Water Framework Directive “good ecological/chemical status/potential” ECOSTAT.
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates.
26 February 2014 Views to practical support on management of HELCOM biodiversity data by an EU Service contract Hermanni Kaartokallio (SYKE) EEA workshop.
ML management within the MSFD framework: current status and recommendations Ognjen Škunca Conference on regional cooperation in Marine Litter.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Anne Laine North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment Centre FINLAND BOTHNIAN BAY LIFE.
WISE and WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe and Water Information System for Europe (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web- site near you)
Paris 24/04/2010, Connectivity between research, public and policy makers Gulf of Riga Kristina Veidemane Baltic Environmental Forum.
EMODnet Biology Kick-off Meeting – VLIZ, Oostende September 2013 EMODnet Biology Work Package 2 Mark Costello & Dan Lear
Marine Water Accounting & HOLAS II Soile Oinonen, SYKE, HOLAS II ESA Workshop,
HELCOM BALTIC SEA ACTION PLAN STAKEHOLDER CONFERENCE 2007
BalticBOOST Theme 3 WS, Copenhagen, 2-3 June 2016
Draft data model for MSFD reporting
Theme 3 – Physical loss and damage to the seafloor
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
Deltares, Delft, Netherland
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD CIS SCG meeting of 11 March 2009.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
The use of Article 17 assessments in SE (national biodiversity strategies, measuring progress, target setting etc.) ArtDatabanken.
Biodiversity monitoring for the MSFD: Requirements and Options
Monitoring and assessments of biodiversity in the Baltic Sea
Lead Country approach to indicator development
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Results of breakout group
Methodological standards for assessment, monitoring and environmental targets Methodological standards = all methods developed and agreed in the framework.
Lena Bergström, Project Coordinator
European Commission DG Environment
Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC
Morning session: discussion on spatial scales
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD WG Reporting - 31 March 2009.
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
A Sea for Life The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
HOLAS II: project to develop a 2nd Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea Ulla Li Zweifel, Professional Secretary.
Typology and classification of coastal waters in Estonia
HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas
WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin
Presentation transcript:

Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals Population growth rate. Population growth rate should be positive until hampered by natural limitations. Deviations during the phase of exponential increase are indicative of that the population is reaching its carrying capacity or is affected by human impacts. Near the carrying capacity, the population fluctuates but a continuous decline indicates that the population is not in good environmental status (GES). Abundance. Population abundances of the marine mammals are informative indicators of the state of the populations. Distribution. The abundance of populations in different parts of the Baltic Sea gives an indication of the distribution of the population.

Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals Stage of developmentIndicator type CoreState Primary importanceSecondary importance BSAP Segment and Objective Biodiversity - Healthy wildlife Biodiversity: - Thriving and balanced communities of plants and animals -Viable populations of species Hazardous Substances: - Concentrations of hazardous substances close to natural levels MSFD Descriptors and Criteria D1. Biodiversity D1.3. Population condition D1. Biodiversity D1.1 Species distribution (range, pattern, covered area) D1.2 Population size (abundance, biomass) D4. Food webs D4.1. Productivity of key species or trophic groups D4.3 Abundance/distribution of key trophic groups/species D8. Contaminants D8.2. Effects of contaminants Other relevant legislation: (WFD - Chemical quality, Habitat directive Legislative linkage:

Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals Concept/ design Coordinated monitoringAssessment Research needs for operationalization (in relation to needs stated under the coordinated monitoring and assessment columns) Data arrangements Monitoring strategy (method, frequency, spatial resolution) in relation to relevant indicator parametersTechnical guidelinesGeographic scale Assessment method GES / assessment criteria (currently all GES are provisional) A ) in place B) under development C ) not available, what needs - action level? A ) monitoring in place B ) monitoring needs revision C ) monitoring not available, what needs - action level? A ) in place B ) needs revision, what needs doing C ) not available, what needs - action level? HELCOM assessment units: A ) identified B) Identified not described C) not identified, what needs - action level? A ) available and described B ) available not described C ) not available, what needs - action level? A ) proposed and described B ) proposed but needs more supporting data C ) not available, what needs - action level? A ) in place B ) needs revision, what needs doing C ) not available, what needs - action level? B for seals but not for harbour porpoises B for seals C for harbour porpoises B for grey and seals but B for ringed seals in Estonia C for harbour porpoises. A for all speciesA for grey and harbour seals B for ringed seals in Estonia and GOF C for harbour porpoises. B for seals C forharbour porpoises B for seals but not for harbour porpoises A for seals C for harbour porpoises A for seals C for harbour porpoises A for grey and seals but B for ringed seals in Estonia C for harbour porpoises. A for all speciesA for grey and seals but B for ringed seals in Estonia C for harbour porpoises. A for seals C for harbour porpoises Ringed seals in Estonia: Investigate alternative methods since counts on ice are not applicable in a majority of years. Harbour porpoise: Investigate alternative methods A for seals C for harbour porpoises Example Fill in for current situation (action level = who needs to complete the task)

Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals GES: At the moment all the populations are assessed against their intrinsic growth rate during exponential growth: Grey seals and ringed seals: 10 % intrinsic growth rate. Harbour seals: 12 % intrinsic growth rate. Harbour porpoise: 4 % intrinsic growth rate. At Carrying capacity: No decline exceeding 5% over a period of six years No decline in distribution People involved: Tero Härkönen, Karin Hårding, Olle Karlsson, Anders Galatius, Markus Ahola.

Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals HELCOM Assessment Unit Level: 1 The indicator is applicable in: All of the Baltic for grey seals, the Bothnian Bay, the Gulf of Finland and the Estonian coastal waters for ringed seals. Southern Baltic and the Kattegat for Harbour seals. Currently data is available : Available for all seal species, but not for harbour porpoises

Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals List of issues that still need to be solved for the indicator Describe what is hindering solving the issue Ringed seal abundance and distribution in the Gulf of Finland and the Gulf of Riga Ice situation has changed such that surveys during moult on ice are not possible during most winters. Need to investigate if counts of seals hauled out during lautumn can be used instead. Abundance of harbour porpoises Survey method not applicable when abundance is very low. Need for developing other e.g. acoustic methods.

Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals -Temporal trends in weaning weights of grey seal pups. --Autumn weights of pups of the year in harbour seals FUTURE INDICATORS