Prospective Motion Correction: Is it better? J. Andrew Derbyshire Functional MRI Core NIMH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fund BioImag : Echo formation and spatial encoding 1.What makes the magnetic resonance signal spatially dependent ? 2.How is the position of.
Advertisements

Assessment of tumoural ADC’s in rectal Tumours using Burst: New methodological Developments SJ Doran 1, ASK Dzik-Jurasz 2, J Wolber 2, C Domenig 1, MO.
Medical Image Reconstruction Topic 4: Motion Artifacts
Fund BioImag : Echo formation and spatial encoding 1.What makes the magnetic resonance signal spatially dependent ? 2.How is the position of.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Sequences part I
MRI Phillip W Patton, Ph.D..
In Chan Song, Ph.D. Seoul National University Hospital
Richard Wise FMRI Director +44(0)
M R I Pulse Sequences Jerry Allison Ph.D..
BE 581 Lecture 3- Intro to MRI.
NON-EXPONENTIAL T 2 * DECAY IN WHITE MATTER P. van Gelderen 1, J. A. de Zwart 1, J. Lee 1,3, P. Sati 1, D. S. Reich 1, and J. H. Duyn 1. 1 Advanced MRI.
PHYSICS OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
MR Sequences and Techniques
MR TRACKING METHODS Dr. Dan Gamliel, Dept. of Medical Physics,
Statistical Parametric Mapping
Figure 2. Signal level (left) degrades with slice offset and slice thickness when Z2 SEM is used in GradLoc imaging (ROI = FOV/2). To recover the full.
Parameters and Trade-offs
Topics spatial encoding - part 2. Slice Selection  z y x 0 imaging plane    z gradient.
Principles of MRI: Image Formation
The Basics of MRI The Basics of MRI. Current MRI technology displays images as multiple sets of gray tone images. Visualization and interpretation of.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Steady-state free precession and other 3D methods for high-resolution FMRI Steady-state free precession and other 3D methods for high-resolution FMRI Karla.
EPI – Echo Planar Imaging Joakim Rydell
Basics of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Real-Time Motion Correction for High-Resolution Imaging of the Larynx: Implementation and Initial Results Presentation: 2pm # 5036 Electrical.
Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 Fourier transforms1 –1D: square wave –2D: k x and k y Spatial encoding with gradients Common artifacts Phase map of pineapple slice.
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 7: Gradients and k-space FFT examples –Sampling and aliasing Gradient Gradient echo K-space
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 8: Pulse sequences, Take 2 Gradient echo review K-space review Slice selection K-space navigation.
Compressed Sensing for Chemical Shift-Based Water-Fat Separation Doneva M., Bornert P., Eggers H., Mertins A., Pauly J., and Lustig M., Magnetic Resonance.
MRI Image Formation Karla Miller FMRIB Physics Group.
Medical Imaging Systems: MRI Image Formation
Principles of MRI Physics and Engineering
Declaration of Conflict of Interest or Relationship David Atkinson: I have no conflicts of interest to disclose with regard to the subject matter of this.
Imaging Sequences part II
Gradients (Continued), Signal Acquisition and K-Space Sampling
Medical Imaging Systems: MRI Image Formation
Basics of MRI.
Prospective Motion Correction: Is it better? J. Andrew Derbyshire Functional MRI Core NIMH.
Contrast Mechanism and Pulse Sequences Allen W. Song Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Duke University.
In Burst experiments, the read gradient is much larger then the other imaging gradients, hence, only translation along this gradient direction will cause.
G Practical MRI 1 Gradients.
Allen W. Song, PhD Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Duke University MRI: Image Formation.
Contrast Mechanism and Pulse Sequences
1 W. Rooney May 20, 2004 Imaging the Awake Animal MRI Efforts Overview.
Image Reconstruction using Dynamic EPI Phase Correction Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies using echo planar imaging (EPI) employ data acquisition.
FMRI – Week 4 – Contrast Scott Huettel, Duke University MR Contrast FMRI Graduate Course (NBIO 381, PSY 362) Dr. Scott Huettel, Course Director.
Protons (hydrogen nuclei act like little magnets) MRI Collective Magnetic Moment of Protons (M 0 ) Each pixel is a glass of protons B 0 = 3T (not to scale)
Declaration of Relevant Financial Interests or Relationships David Atkinson: I have no relevant financial interest or relationship to disclose with regard.
MRI Physics: Spatial Encoding Anna Beaumont FRCR Part I Physics.
Declaration of Relevant Financial Interests or Relationships David Atkinson: I have no relevant financial interest or relationship to disclose with regard.
MRI: Contrast Mechanisms and Pulse Sequences
Magnetic Resonance Learning Objectives
Principles of MRI Physics and Engineering Allen W. Song Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Duke University.
Principles of MRI Physics and Engineering Allen W. Song Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Duke University.
Real time shimming (RTS) for compensation of respiratory induced field changes P van Gelderen, JA de Zwart, P Starewicz, RS Hinks, JH Duyn Introduction.
Chapter 5 Mark D. Herbst, M.D., Ph.D.. The MR Imaging Process Two major functions –Acquisition of RF signals –Reconstruction of images.
Parameters which can be “optimized” Functional Contrast Image signal to noise Hemodynamic Specificity Image quality (warping, dropout) Speed Resolution.
BOLD functional MRI Magnetic properties of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin L. Pauling and C. Coryell, PNAS USA 22: (1936) BOLD effects in vivo.
Imaging of Small Vessels in the Brain using MRI
FMRI data acquisition.
Sunday Case of the Day Physics
MRI Physics in a Nutshell Christian Schwarzbauer
Monday Case of the Day Physics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles
An Optimal Design Method for MRI Teardrop Gradient Waveforms
MRI Pulse Sequences: IR, EPI, PC, 2D and 3D
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI ARTEFACTS PG Student : Dr Aditi Shah PG Guide: Dr Rajendra Chavan
The echo time (TE) The echo time (TE) refers to the time between the application of the radiofrequency excitation pulse and the peak of the signal induced.
Presentation transcript:

Prospective Motion Correction: Is it better? J. Andrew Derbyshire Functional MRI Core NIMH

Motivation MRI is a slow imaging technique – Vulnerable to motion during acquisition – Motion of 50% pixel size can yield significant artifacts

Motivation MRI is a slow imaging technique – Vulnerable to motion during acquisition – Motion of 50% pixel size can yield significant artifacts (Oliver Speck says it is more like 20%) Why will motion tracking be important? Higher resolution scanning – Increased scan time Increase resolution by 2x requires 64x scan time! Increased likelihood of subject motion – Smaller motions become significant

Sources of motion Physiological – Cardiac motion – Respiratory – Blood flow – CSF Flow – Swallowing – Coughing – Sneezing – Blinking – Peristalsis Tremors Children

Sources of motion Motion types: – Fast versus slow – Periodic – Continuous/sporadic – In/through plane – Local / global – Translation – Rotation – Expansion/contraction Physiological – Cardiac motion – Respiratory – Blood flow – CSF Flow – Swallowing – Coughing – Sneezing – Blinking – Peristalsis Tremors Children

Sources of motion Motion types: – Fast versus slow – Periodic – Continuous/sporadic – In/through plane – Local / global – Translation – Rotation – Expansion/contraction Do we need motion correction?... YES! Physiological – Cardiac motion – Respiratory – Blood flow – CSF Flow – Swallowing – Coughing – Sneezing – Blinking – Peristalsis Tremors Children

Effects of motion in MRI Useful to revisit the MR image acquisition process – MR image formation is based on the equation: ω = γB – In the main magnetic field, B 0, we have: ω 0 = γB 0 – Superimpose a spatial magnetic field gradient, G = (G x, G z, G z ) T then: ω = γ(B 0 + G x x + G z y + G z z) Magnetic field gradient, G x ω

Effects of motion in MRI Useful to revisit the MR image acquisition process – MR image formation is based on the equation: ω = γB – In the main magnetic field, B 0, we have: ω 0 = γB 0 – Superimpose a spatial magnetic field gradient, G = (G x, G z, G z ) T then: ω = γG x x + G z y + G z z = G.r Magnetic field gradient, G x ω

Effects of motion in MRI Consider the green blob of tissue So, the signal from the whole slice is: Write: To obtain the MRI signal equations Magnetic field gradient, G x ω

Effects of motion in MRI MR image acquisition revisited MR image formation assumes that spins are not moving. Frequency encodingPhase encoding

Effects of motion in MRI MRI scans typically comprise multiple repetitions – Each repetition of the basic pulse sequence is separated by TR – Phase encode steps (or similar) Useful to distinguish between motion time-scales: – intra-TR : i.e. motion within each measurement – inter-TR : i.e. motion across / between measurements

Intra-TR motion and Gradients MR image formation is based on the equation: ω = γB In the main magnetic field, B 0, we have: ω 0 = γB 0 Superimpose a spatial magnetic field gradient, G = (G x, G z, G z ) T then: ω = γG x x + G z y + G z z = G.r Magnetic field gradient, G x ω

Intra-TR motion and Gradients Moving spins: Accumulated phase in presence of gradient: In particular, for uniform motion: r(t) = r 0 + v 0 t, we have additional phase: Φ = m 0.r 0 + m 1.v 0 where m 1 is the first moment of the gradient waveform.

Intra-TR motion Motion within a TR – undesired velocity-proportional phase accumulation – Φ = m 0.r 0 + m 1.v 0 For complex / dispersive motions – e.g. complex flows, rotational flow, high shear, turbulence – multiple velocities present within a single voxel – phase cancellation – signal dropout

Inter-TR motion Motion that varies between TRs will – cause phase changes from one TR to the next (gradient m1 effect) – possibly cause amplitude changes (e.g.) through plane motion This causes modulations of the expected MRI signal in the phase encoding direction, resulting in motion artifacts. Artifacts are always in the phase encode direction! – independent of the actual direction of motion Periodic / pulsatile motions (e.g. blood flow) causes ghosting artifacts

Flow Ghosting Provides an elegant geometric description of the flow ghost formation MRM 19:422:1993

Motion Correction Strategies Non-motion tracking – Immobilization – Signal averaging – Saturation bands – Gradient moment nulling – short TE – k-space trajectory radial spiral Motion tracked – ECG / respiratory gating – View re-ordering (e.g. ROPE) – Navigator acquisitions – self-navigated – propeller – Slice tracking – MR based – Optical – Other In practice, available methods and choices are application dependent

Periodic motion Cardiac motion – ECG/Plethysmograph/Acoustic cardiac signal – Triggering : Wait for trigger, then scan – Gating : scan until trigger

Prospective Motion Correction Track scan-plane with patient motion –track scan-plane with subject motion –reduced motion artifacts Two steps: –Detecting and measuring the motion –Real-time scan plane updating Imaging Parameters MRI Scan Measure Motion Free Images

Prospective Motion Correction Multiple approaches to position measurement are possible – MR based navigator echoes – MR based external tracking – Optical based tracking – Other methods Imaging scan-plane feedback: similar for all approaches – Typically model motion as rigid body – Global motion model for whole image

Motion Correction: what is possible? MR scanning is performed in k-space Translation Rotation Stretching Shearing Phase roll modulation Rotation Compression Orthogonal shearing

Motion Correction: what is possible? MR scanning is performed in k-space Rigid body motion – Global motion model for whole subject – 6 parameters 3 rotational 3 translational Translation Rotation Stretching Shearing Phase roll modulation Rotation Compression Orthogonal shearing

Rigid body scan plane update For a Cartesian (phase encoded) sequence, the scan plane update [ R, (r, p, s) ] is applied as changes to: Update to image plane rotation matrix: – Defines read, phase and slice directions in terms of magnet X, Y, Z Slice/slab selective RF pulse frequency: – Translates scan-plane to the new image center in the new slice direction – ω slice = Υg slice s Readout frequency: – Effects FOV shift to the new image center in the new readout direction – ω readout = Υg readout r Readout phase: – Effects FOV shift to the new image center in the new PE direction – θ = 2π (p / FOV phase ) PE step

Rigid body scan plane update For a Cartesian (phase encoded) sequence, the scan plane update [ R, (r, p, s) ] is applied as changes to: Update to image plane rotation matrix: – Defines read, phase and slice directions in terms of magnet X, Y, Z Slice/slab selective RF pulse frequency: – Translates scan-plane to the new image center in the new slice direction – ω slice = Υg slice s Readout frequency: – Effects FOV shift to the new image center in the new readout direction – ω readout = Υg readout r Readout phase: – Effects FOV shift to the new image center in the new PE direction – θ = 2π (p / FOV phase ) PE step Note that no changes to gradient waveforms are required!

MR based image tracking 3 orthogonal 2D navigators with Kalman filter based motion estimation MRM 63:91:2010

PROMO Spiral nav images:10mm x 10mm x10mm 3x14ms total AQ time for tracking sequences 100ms for AQ, recon & tracking calculations etc.

PROMO VR has developed multi-echo implementation at NIH – Seems to work well – See e.g. their ISMRM Motion Workshop poster Requires time for Navigator AQ, reconstruction and tracking calculations Works well with MP-RAGE type scan – Fits in the inversion time Spin history effects – must use low flip angle Can be compared to other MR super-navigators methods – EPI based instead of spiral – Orbital navigators – Cloverleaf, etc.

Prospective tracking using MR markers JMRI 8:924, 1998 Patent: US Track scan-plane with patient motion –Keep ROI in scan-plane –track scan-plane with surgical instrument –reduced motion artifacts

MR-based position tracking Small RF locator coil for identifying position – 2mm i.d. solenoidal tuned MR coil – Internal spherical sample (doped water) MR signal with frequency,  Magnetic field gradient, G B1 profile x Locator coil position Dumoulin et al. MRM 29:411:1993

Position Measurement Gradient echo – excite sample and read out signal from RF coil – signal at characteristic frequency,  Signal analysis – centre frequency provides position:  =  Gx Repeat process – for G in x, y and z directions to find 3D position of locator coil RF G read signal 1D Position measurement analysis G dephase

Position Measurement Local B0 inhomogeneities: – offset frequency:  ’  Acquire 4 gradient echoes directed tetrahedrally Hadamard encoding scheme:   x =  ’ D1 +  ’ D2 -  ’ D3 -  ’ D4   y =  ’ D1 -  ’ D2 +  ’ D3 -  ’ D4   z =  ’ D1 -  ’ D2 -  ’ D3 +  ’ D4 Eliminates spurious  term X Y Z D1 = ( 1, 1, 1) D2 = ( 1, -1, -1) D3 = (-1, 1, -1) D4 = (-1, -1, 1) Dumoulin et al. MRM 29:411:1993

Scan-plane tracking Three or more position markers (e.g. triangle) fixed to subject – At least three non-colinear markers are required identify rigid body motion Define local co-ordinate system relative to triangle Define position & orientation of scan-plane in local co-ordinate system Scan-plane tracking: – Update rotation matrix – Update slice frequency and phase – Update readout frequency and phase – Update phase encode (per PE line) frequency and phase x y z MR scan-plane Reference triangle

Results Phantom study photouncorrectedcorrected Images of standard phantom Object moved between successive imaging scans Tracking system provides images from the same section of the object

Results Human head photouncorrectedcorrected Transverse images of brain of human volunteer Subject requested to move between scans Tracking system provides images from the same section of the subject

Prospective tracking using MR markers Intra-image scan-plane updates – once per full image scan – Slow-tracking for GRE type scans, OK for EPI Inter-image scan-plane updates – OK for small motions – B0 non-uniformity – changes phase mid scan – B1 non-uniformity – changes phase mid scan Precision – Position measurements ~ 0.1mm – Rotation/Tilting Slice distance from reference markers – Angular amplification of errors. Need triangle to be close to scan-plane of interest Time required for MR position measurement (15-20ms)

Prospective tracking using stereo optical system MRM 62:924:2009 Additional calibration of camera with MR system required Not required for MR based tracking

Prospective tracking using stereo optical system 7T GE system 0.2mm x 0.2mm x 3mm Sudden stepwise motion Gradual motion

Prospective tracking using stereo optical system Additional calibration of camera with MR system required – Not required for MR based tracking Camera mounted on coil – table motion Accuracy: – 0.1mm translation – 0.15° rotation Tracking rate: 10Hz

Kineticor system Evaluating system on FMRIF 3TD (Siemens) Camera mounted on top side of bore MR system calibration patch mounted on bottom of bore Marker for Moiré phase tracking

Kineticor system Evaluating system on FMRIF 3TD (Siemens) 3 minute MP-RAGE scan Motion correction onMotion correction off

Discussion Rigid body motion model – difficult to generalize to more complex motions types – local motion (e.g. tongue, eyes, etc.) Requires specially modified pulse sequence – to handle real-time imaging parameter feedback – vendors may develop an API to support these concepts Verification – by definition we change the acquisition – difficult to know how much improvement was made Fixation of external markers for MR or optical tracking – markers on skin can move – limited visual FOV of camera with 32-channel head coil etc. Optical systems need additional camera/MR calibration MR tracking systems usually reduce scanning efficiency

Prospective Motion Correction Is it better? I think so – at least for applications where it is reasonable to assume rigid body motion Given the demands of high (i.e better than 0.5mm isotropic) resolution, we will probably need to use all the available tricks in out MR toolbox. A very active area of research at the moment: – MRM review article 2012 – MRM virtual issue – ISMRM workshop, 2014 (most articles from )

Thanks for your attention