NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Muncipal Agreement Program
Advertisements

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. ECOLOGICAL TRAINING INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION SURVEY SURVEY LITERATURE REVIEW LITERATURE REVIEW FIELD SURVEY METHODS.
R EVISED C ATEGORICAL E XCLUSION P ROGRAMMATIC A GREEMENT Environmental Update Meeting 16 September 2010.
Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:
Update on FHWA/FTA Proposed Rulemaking. MAP-21 Requirements Section 1318(a)(3) o Solicit requests from state DOTs, transit authorities, and MPOs, for.
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Updates questions to:
Environmental Commitments Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation Categorical Exclusions.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Ecological Survey Reports The level of ESR Report is determined by the type of project and its probable level of impacts.
Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
ODOT – FHWA Environmental Performance Measures February 2012.
NEPA and Property Acquisition May 19, 2014 Elizabeth Patel Environmental Protection Specialist FTA Office of Planning and Environment.
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Tribal Issues & Project Delivery Case Studies & Lessons Learned Federal Highway Administration Washington Division FHWA Environmental Meeting, June 29,
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) – ROW Impacts Dianna Nausley, HQ RES Assistant Program Administrator Washington State Department.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class Presented by the Office of Environmental Services April 15-16, 2015.
Update on Historic Bridges MaryAnn Naber Federal Highway Administration June 17, 2008.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
Presented to: Hershey Aviation Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, Charlie Campbell & Suki Gill Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Environmental.
Section 4(f) Updates questions to:
Environmental Justice: Principles, Policies, Guidance, and Effective Practices FTA Region VI Civil Rights Colloquium March 29, 2006.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
Ohio DOT’s Online CE System Presented by Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor Office of Environmental Services.
Federal Highway Administration Emergency Relief (ER) Program Brian Hogge Field Operations Team Leader July 2013.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Welcome to Oregon’s Programmatic ESA.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
Categorical Exclusions Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
At the last Steering Team meeting… Goals (Rule-level) EPS (Measurable and Reportable) Natural Resources Human/Cultural Environment Administrative Avoid,
Local Government Section Welcome Marty Andersen ODOT Local Government Section 355 Capitol Street NE, Rm. 326 Salem, Oregon Ph:
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: FROM PLANNING TO PROJECT Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
WRITING A BETTER PURPOSE AND NEED A COMMON SENSE APPROACH Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor ODOT-OES.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
1 Accommodating Utilities in Highway Rights-of-Way Federal Agency Update IRWA/AI Conference Las Vegas, NV January 13, 2009.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
MAP-21 and the New CE Process October 7, Ralph Ellis - ADOT Environmental Planning.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class Presented by the Office of Environmental Services May 4-5, 2016.
PURPOSE & NEED Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Lions, Tigers, Coast Guard Permits – Oh My!
Programmatic Agreements
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Construction Management & Inspection
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November QUESTIONS TO:

Revised CE Programmatic Agreement:  Will incorporate changes in MAP-21  New CEs  Renamed CE categories  Exempt through CE 4  C1-D3 PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT

Revised CE Programmatic Agreement:  New look  Reorganized agreement  Moved project types and impact thresholds to Appendices  Simplify signature process at districts  Focus on impacts PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT

NEW CE PA—DOCUMENTATION LEVELS  C-list  C1—current C-list and ODOT’s “Exempt” list  C2—New CEs  D-list: based on impacts  D1  D2  D3 *Note: the New CE PA is still draft and information in this presentation is subject to change

CE LEVELS—C1  No documentation or further NEPA approval required in accordance with 23 CFR (c)  No significant impacts  Impact thresholds included in agreement  A certain amount of due diligence is required to ensure no environmental impacts  Standard stand-alone transportation activities (generally maintenance)  New agreement will eliminate “Exempt” and replace with C1—no change in documentation required—still a one page electronic form with check-boxes

CE LEVELS—C1  Similar to old “Exempt” list but tied more to regulatory language.  Included old list under headings from 23 CFR (c)  Also added “Other project types” based on our experience

CE LEVELS—C1 IMPACT THRESHOLDS Cannot Involve:  New right-of-way  National Scenic River corridor impacts  Waterway Permits  Impacts to state or federally threatened or endangered species

CE LEVELS—C1 IMPACT THRESHOLDS Cannot Involve:  Impacts to wetlands  Impacts to historic properties or historic districts  Section 4(f)/6(f) impacts  Substantial traffic disruption  Minor public controversy when all issues have been addressed

CE LEVELS—C2  New CE PA will add C2 (new CEs under MAP-21)  Focus on specific environmental areas  No need for full CE form if meet criteria  Environmental Verification Form

CE LEVELS—C2  New CEs from MAP-21  Emergency projects (C9)  Projects within operational right-of-way (C22)  Projects with limited federal funding (C23)  Localized geotech for preliminary design (C24)  Environmental restoration and pollution abatement (C25)

CE LEVELS—C2  New CEs from MAP-21  Purchase, etc. of ferry vessels (C29)  Rehab/reconstruction of ferry facilities (C30)  Modernization of highway (C26) (moved from D-list)  Highway safety or traffic operations improvement (C27) (moved from D-list)  Bridge rehabilitation, etc. and grade separations (C28) (moved from D-list)

CE LEVEL—C2 IMPACT THRESHOLDS Cannot involve:  Acquisition of more than minor amount of right-of-way. No relocations.  Coast Guard bridge permit  Individual Corps permit.  Adverse effect on Historic Properties  Section 4(f) use higher than de minimis  “May affect, likely to adversely affect” finding for T&E species or critical habitat.

CE LEVEL—C2 IMPACT THRESHOLDS Cannot involve:  Construction of temporary access or closure that would result in major traffic disruption or substantial environmental impacts.  Change in access control.  Floodplain encroachment other than for functionally dependent uses or actions that facilitate open space use  Construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a National Scenic River.  Any other environmental impacts that could elevate the level of coordination

CE LEVEL—C2 IMPACT THRESHOLDS  Complete Public Involvement and Environmental Justice analysis per ODOT’s guidance

 D-list meets the intent of 23 CFR (d)  No project types  Level is based on impacts  New CE PA will eliminate CE 1-4 and replace with D1-3 (D-list)  Require CE form CE LEVELS—D

CE LEVEL—D1 IMPACT THRESHOLDS  Only minor right-of-way acquisition involving a maximum of two relocations  Waterways:  Individual permit is acceptable but…  Wetland impacts must be limited to:  less than 3 acres of Category 1 and 2 wetlands and/or  up to 0.5 acres of Category 3 wetlands

CE LEVEL—D1 IMPACT THRESHOLDS  No Section 106 impacts warranting Archaeological Data Recovery recommendations  No Individual Section 4(f)  No public or agency controversies on environmental grounds (no opposition from organized groups or agencies and no unresolved environmental coordination).  No impacts to federally-listed T&E species/critical habitat resulting in a Biological Opinion

CE LEVEL—D1 IMPACT THRESHOLDS  No disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to environmental justice  No substantial floodplain impacts  Contact ODOT-OES for additional guidance if a Coast Guard Permit is required

CE LEVEL—D2 IMPACT THRESHOLDS  No disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to environmental justice  No Quantitative PM 2.5 Hotspot Analysis required  No Quantitative MSAT Analysis required  No unresolved substantial public or agency controversy on environmental grounds

CE LEVEL—D3 THRESHOLDS If FHWA has an interest in the project for environmental reasons or if the project exceeds the thresholds listed in this agreement but still meets the intent of 23 CFR (d), the CE will require the review and approval by FHWA.

DOCUMENTATION RECAP  C1 Projects:  One page form on Online CE System  C2 Projects:  Environmental Verification Form (will be incorporated into Online CE System)  D1-3 Projects:  Full CE form on Online CE System

ODOT’S ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS IN THE (MAP) 21 ST CENTURY Questions ?

CONTACT INFORMATION Erica L. Schneider Assistant Environmental Administrator Policy and Cultural Resources