AGO-Austria Phase-III Studie: HECTOR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phase II Study of Temozolomide and Thalidomide in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors J Clin Oncol Jan 20;24(3): Vs 劉俊煌 CR 周益聖 財團法人台灣癌症臨床研究發展基金會.
Advertisements

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
“Taking Care of Tomorrows Patient Better than Today”… the Future is Now Set A1 – Title Slide David O’Malley, M.D.
Gynecologic Oncology Group Gynecologic Oncology Group Uterine Corpus Trials: GCIG David Scott Miller, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., F.A.C.S. Director and Dallas Foundation.
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Novel AKT Inhibitor Afuresertib in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Demonstrates Favorable Safety Profile and Significant Clinical Activity.
Randomized Phase III Trials of Intravenous vs. Intraperitoneal Therapy in Optimal Ovarian Cancer Deborah K. Armstrong, M.D. Associate Professor of Oncology,
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Mary McCormack & Jonathan Ledermann NCRI Gynae Clinical Studies Group.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
GCIG Meeting 29th May 2009 The Implications of Primary Chemotherapy for Clinical Trials Iain McNeish Professor of Gynaecological Oncology Barts and the.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology.
AGO-OVAR DESKTOP III (Protocol AGO - OVAR OP.4)
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
ODAC SCHERING-PLOUGH RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 Temozolomide Oncology Drug Advisory Committee March 13, 2003 Craig L. Tendler, M.D. Vice President, Oncology.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Investigating the Role of Anti- Angiogenic Agents in Ovarian Cancer Carol Aghajanian, M.D. Chief, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Herceptin ® : leading the way in metastatic breast cancer care Steffen Kahlert.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
THE OUTBACK TRIAL A Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
OCEANS: A Randomized, Double- Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab (BEV) in Patients with Platinum-
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
CALYPSO Trial: Carboplatin & Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) versus Carboplatin & Paclitaxel in Relapsed, Platinum- Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Pujade-Lauraine.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
1 Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Discussant: M Ducreux, MD, PhD Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif France TH-302 plus Gemcitabine vs. Gemcitabine in Patients with Untreated Advanced Pancreatic.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel- Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab- Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
Weekly Paclitaxel Combined with Monthly Carboplatin versus Single-Agent Therapy in Patients Age 70 to 89: IFCT-0501 Randomized Phase III Study in Advanced.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
BCT Bortezomib Consolidation Trial
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
BIBF 1120 (Nintedanib) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer:
Phase II Study of Docetaxel (D) and Oxaliplatin (O) in Recurrent Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Davar D1, Appleman LA1, Friedland.
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Bevacizumab in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: OCEANS.
Participating groups:
CTCL: INNOVATIVE TREATMENTS GEMCITABINE
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Joan L. Walker, M.D. Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma
Presentation transcript:

AGO-Austria Phase-III Studie: HECTOR Topotecan plus Carboplatin (Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin oder Gemcitabin plus Carboplatin) Intergroup Study of NOGGO und Studiengruppe Ovar (NOGGO-R9, AGO Ovar 2.12) AGO-Austria, GEICO

RATIONALE: NOGGO-Phase-I/II-Study Könsgen et al Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008 Aug; 62(3): 393-400. Epub, 2006 This clinical trial was a prospective multi-institutional phase I/II study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (NOGGO) study group ovarian cancer. Patients were enrolled at seven German nstitutions (six hospitals and one outpatient facility). The Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of the Charité University Hospital, Berlin, was the coordinating centre. The study was performed in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the Declaration of Helsinki. Protocol approval was gained from the institutional review board or the local ethics committee of each participating institution. An independent monitoring institute was responsible for data control.

Topo/Carbo NOGGO- Phase-I/II-Study Könsgen et al, 2006 The primary objective of the study was to determine the toxicity profile, MTD and dose-limiting toxicity of the carboplatin/ topotecan combination. The remission rate (RR), overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were defined as secondary endpoints. Patients were stratified according to the platinum-free interval, defined as the period between completion of first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel and time of recurrence (6 to 12 months versus >12 months), to identify potential differences in tolerability between both cohorts

Topo/Carbo Phase-I/II-Study Könsgen et al, 2006 Inclusion criteria Women ≥ 18 years of age with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma or primary peritoneal cancer, relapsed at least six months after completion of primary standard therapy with surgery and first-line combination therapy with platinum and paclitaxel were eligible for study enrolment. Patients were required to have measurable or assessable lesions, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2, normal hematological, liver and renal function with laboratory parameters within the normal range, including a glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 ml/min, serum creatinine levels ≤ 1.5 mg/dl and an adequate bone marrow function (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] ≥ 1.5 x 109/l and platelets ≥ 100 x 109/l). Patients suffering from a secondary malignancy or serious concomitant systemic disorders or psychiatric disease were excluded from the study, as were subjects receiving other cytotoxic, immunological, hormonal or targeted therapy. All patients provided written informed consent.

NOGGO-Phase-I/II-Study Treatment plan Patients received six cycles of topotecan 1.0 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 plus carboplatin equating an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 3 after infusion of topotecan, repeated every 21 days. Both study drugs were infused over 30 min in 250 ml of 0.9% saline solution. A 5-HT3-antagonist was given intravenously 15 min prior to each courses of chemotherapy. Two dose-levels were defined: 1) - dose level 0: Topotecan 1.00 mg/m ²/d1-3 + Carboplatin AUC5/d3, q21d 2) - dose level -1: Topotecan 0.75 mg/m ²/d1-3 + Carboplatin AUC5/d3, q21d

Topo/Carbo Phase-I/II-Study In the phase I of this study, nine patients in each stratum (treatment-free interval 6-12 months and >12 months) were planned to receive treatment according to dose level 0. In case of no dose-limiting toxicity during the first four cycles of treatment, further nine patients in each stratum were planned to be included in the study to receive treatment according to dose level 0. Dose reduction to dose level -1 was required in case of occurrence of a dose-limiting toxicity during the first four cycles of treatment. Treatment for all patients in this stratum was continued in dose level -1. Further dose-escalation was not allowed. No primary prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was allowed. Darbepoetin alfa (2.25 μg/kg weekly or 6.75 μg/kg three-weekly) was applied in case of anaemia with hemoglobin concentrations ≤11.0 g/d. It was at the investigator’s discretion to continue treatment until disease progression

Multicentric, prospective phase-I/II-study alle 6-12 Mo, > 12 Mo, n 26 13 13 Age 61,5 60 63 FIGO, n (%): I/II 5 (19,2) 1 (7,7) 4 (30,8) III/IV 21 (80,8) 12 (92,3) 9 (69,2) Ascites, n (%): no 15 (57,7) 7 (53,8) 8 (61,5) yes 11 (42,3) 6 (46,2) 5 (38,5)

Multicentric, prospective phase-I/II-study all 6-12 mo, > 12 mo, Median number of cycle 6 6 6 n dose level 0: 16 13 3 dose level -1: 10 0 10 Median dosis Topotecan (mg/m²) 1,0 1,0 0,75 Carboplatin AUC 5 AUC 5 AUC 5 DLTs: Dose level 0 3 2 1 Leukopenia

Multicentric, prospective phase-I/II-study Dose level 0: Topotecan 1,0 mg/m ² d1-3 Carboplatin AUC 5 d3 q21d Dose level -1: Topotecan 0,75 mg/m ² d1-3 2 cohorts: A: 6-12 months B: >12 months DLT: Thrombocytopenia and Leukopenia Könsgen et al, Cancer Chem Phar, 2007

Multicentric, prospective phase-I/II-study toxicity hematological toxicities (grade 3/4) 6-12 Mo, >12 Mo, Anemia 2 1 Patients Leukopenia 10 5 Neutropenia 7 8 Thrombocytopenia 4 4 Neutrop, fever 3 0 Non-hematologic toxicity( grade 3/4) PNP 0 0 Patients Diarrhea 0 4 Nausea 2 2 Emesis 3 2 Könsgen et al, ASCO 2006, Abstr, 5089

Response in different dose level 88,89% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0,75 1,00 Dosislevel Response Rate (CR + PR), 95% CI 54,55% p=0,351 Könsgen et al, Cancer Chem Phar, 2007

Multicentric, prospective phase-I/II-study Combination of Topotecan and Carboplatin is feasible and shows promising activity, Tolerability is independent from platinum-free. Recommended dose for phase-III trial: Topotecan 0,75 mg/m² d 1-3 Carboplatin AUC 5 d 3 q21d Könsgen et al, ASCO 2006, Abstr, 5089

Multizentrische, prospektive Phase-I/II-Studie Könsgen et al, 2006 In summary, the present data demonstrate that a combination therapy with topotecan and carboplatin is a tolerable and an effective chemotherapy regimen. Therefore this combination warrants further investigation in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Based on these encouraging data we now have designed a randomized phase III trial comparing topotecan 0.75 mg/m² plus carboplatin AUC 5 to the current standard of care. In this concept patients will receive carboplatin (AUC 5) plus paclitaxel (175mg/m²/q21d) or carboplatin (AUC 5) plus gemcitabine (1000mg/m²d1,d8/q21d according to the individual patient’s preference in order to more accurately reflect clinical reality (HECTOR-trial). Progression-free survival is defined as primary objective; and quality of life, response rate and overall survival are secondary objectives.

HECTOR Phase-III-Studie AGO-AUSTRIA R A N D O M I S T experimental arm Topotecan 0,75 mg/m² d 1-3 Carboplatin AUC 5 d 3 q21d control arm Paclitaxel 175 mg/m² Carboplatin AUC 5 q21d or Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² d 1+8 Carboplatin AUC 4 q21d *Carboplatin + peg. lip. doxorubicin Is amended for the control arm boc

HeCTOR Design Prospective, randomized multicentric phase III-trial Patients 550 patients Objectives Primary PFS Secundary: OS, ORR, Toxicity, QoL

HeCTOR Studiensekretariat: PD Dr, J, Sehouli Study office of the NOGGO Department of Gynecology Augustenburger Platz 1 13355 Berlin, Germany Tel. 0049- 30-450564042 International PI: Jalid Sehouli, MD, Professor Berlin Austria: C. Marth, MD, Professor Insbruck Spain: Gonzales, MD Madrid HeCTOR Studiensekretariat: PD Dr, J, Sehouli Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Charité / Campus Virchow-Klinikum Augustenburger Platz 1 13355 Berlin