2-Stage procedure: special attention to the 1st stage, how to build a successful proposal Caterina Buonocore Health National contact Point for Italy “

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Commission DG Research Co-operative Research Training Session on Ifigeneia Pottaki Research & SMEs DG Research - European Commission Training.
Advertisements

European R&D Support Programme ACCESSING EUROPEAN FUNDING FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
Proposal Structure.
SMEs in the. SMEs in FP7 - why? SMEs are at the core of European industry and key players in the innovation system. SMEs have to respond increasingly.
Structure of the Application Evaluation Criteria Oskar Otsus January 2013 Moldova.
Research and Innovation Summary of MS questions on the Commission's proposal for DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation Rules for Participation.
University of Trieste PHD school in Nanotechnology Writing a proposal … with particular attention to FP7 Maurizio Fermeglia.
DR MACIEJ JUNKIERT PRACOWNIA BADAŃ NAD TRADYCJĄ EUROPEJSKĄ Guide for Applicants.
Training & research for academic newcomers A project of the King Baudouin Foundation © 2013 Gabriella Calderari1.
European Parliament 22 September 2005 Ramon Marimon1 Lessons to be learned from the 6 th FP Ramon Marimon Universitat Pompeu Fabra EPP-ED Hearing on 7th.
R.König / FFG, European and International Programmes (EIP)Page 1/18 Submission and Evaluation of Proposals Ralf König FFG - Austrian Research Promotion.
How to prepare a good application for EU research funds
INDUSTRYLINK Workshop Poznan, 23 May 2005 Ingrid Ciabatti TECNOTESSILE Perfect development of “Relevance to the objectives of the NMP priority” and “Potential.
Capitalising the full potential of online-collaboration for SME innovation support Horizon 2020 call Innosup (Participant Portal code: H2020-INNOSUP )
The copyright © is owned by the author of this document. Please do not duplicate. Disclaimer: the „Fit for Health project partners.
Provisional draft The ICT Theme in FP7 Submission and Evaluation (preliminary information) ICT-NCP Information Day 19 th October 2006.
NIS-NEST Information days on FP7 2 - How to prepare a competitive EU research proposal NIS-NEST Information days on FP7 2 - How to prepare a competitive.
KA2 – Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of good practices Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education (CBHE) Application and selection.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 May 2012 How to apply: Application Form and Eligibility A Decade of Territorial.
©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 1 How to participate in the 6th EU Framework Programme Manfred Horvat BIT - Bureau for International Research and Technology.
Proposal evaluation process in FP7 Moldova – Research Horizon 29 January 2013 Kristin Kraav.
How to write a successful proposal
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
ENV-NCP-TOGETHER Specific Programme Cooperation in FP7 - Evaluation criteria for a proposal - Dr. Shilpi SAXENA Partner im EU-Project "Environment NCP.
APRE Agency for the Promotion of European Research Lifecycle of an FP 7 project Caterina Buonocore Riga, 13th September, 2007.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Title Slide – Technology Name Presenter’s Information and Title Title of Industry Contacts and University Contacts (as applicable) **IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS:
IGEM Project Technology Name Presenter’s Information and Title Title of Industry Contacts and University Contacts.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
How to write a successful EU funded project proposal? Fred de Vries Brussels 21 April 2004 Seminar Networking eLearning Practitioners.
Reporting Guidelines (FP5) Karen Fabbri Scientific Officer Natural & Technological Hazards DG Research European Commission Brussels
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
IST programme 1 IST KA3: The Evaluation Introduction & Contents Principles Outline procedures Criteria and Assessment What this means for proposers.
Practical aspects Dr. Ir Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison “Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir.
1 NOT LEGALLY BINDING Energy Info day FP7-ENERGY-2008-RUSSIA 13th December 2007 International Co-operation FP7 Energy Theme Energy EU-Russia Call European.
The FP7 Inputs for building a project proposal AN INFORMATION POINT FOR FP7 IN PALESTINE: Training Seminar of experts Nicosia, Cyprus November.
Josefina Lindblom European Commission DG Research - Unit T4: SMEs SMEs in the.
“Thematic Priority 3” Draft Evaluation of IP + NoE.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Citizens and Governance in a Knowledge-based Society Guidelines on Proposals Presented by Henry Scott, EKT.
Case study of a successful proposal Rob Davies. Parts of a proposal Part A - Proposal Administrative Overview - forms Part B- Description of objectives.
Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”
Stepping up Economic and Technological Intelligence Brussels, 18 December 2002 Germán Valcárcel European Commission DG Research - Research and SMEs.
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
Guidelines for drafting a research project (theory and laboratory) Carlo Polidori Aurélie Pancera.
Writing the Proposal: Scientific and technological objectives PHOENIX Training Course Laulasmaa, Estonia
Malta Council for Science and Technology Practicalities Health and Food, Agriculture, Fisheries & Biotechnology – Information Session 25 th September 2008.
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH Research DG European Commission Expressions of interest / Dedicated call mechanism.
Warszawa 18 luty th Framework Programme NMP - 2nd Calls Integrated Projects for SMEs Hervé Péro, Christophe Lesniak DG Research.
Preparing the Phase 0 Proposal What in the world are the proposal reviewers looking for?
© Services GmbH Proposal writing: Part B 2/1/ St. Petersburg, May 18, 2011 Dr. Andrey Girenko
FP6UK Roadmap to Participation Cliff Funnell UK National Contact Point for Waterborne Transport OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FP6UK SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Evaluation of proposals Alan Cross European Commission.
Jörg Niehoff European Commission DG Research - Unit T4: SMEs SMEs in the.
Practical Aspects of Preparation FP 6 projects Senter/EG-Liaison Nationaal Contact Punt voor het 6de Kaderprogramma Sandra de Wild 11 december 2002.
Concept Note Preparation CYPRIOT CIVIL SOCIETY IN ACTION IV.
Training Event, Sofia – Feb 22 nd, 23 rd 2007 Recommendations for building successful proposals in FP7* Dipl.-Ing. Pierre.
Experience from H2020 Proposals (a personal assessment)
“Preparing competitive grant proposals that match policy objectives - project proposal evaluators' viewpoint ” Despina Sanoudou, PhD FACMG Assistant Professor.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Industrial & ACC participation in NMP Stage IPs DG RTD/G-1/IA NCP Meeting - Ad Hoc group’s results Slide 1 Results of the AD HOC Group.
ARTEMIS Industry Association Title Presentation - 1 e.g. SCALOPES e.g. SCAlable LOw Power Embedded PlatformS.
Guidelines and Template for project oral presentation
Guidelines and Template for project oral presentation
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Astrid Kaemena European Commission
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
The Evaluation Phase Juras Ulbikas.
Presentation transcript:

2-Stage procedure: special attention to the 1st stage, how to build a successful proposal Caterina Buonocore Health National contact Point for Italy “ presentation developed with FFG “

FP7 Health Participation

Why two-stage procedure? History: two-stage calls introduced in 3 rd Call FP7-Health- 2009, since then increasing numbers of two-stage topics, since 6 th Call ONLY two-stage call New “strategy“ of EC towards the end of FP7 less topics open per call several projects funded per topic broader topics decrease „writing burden“ for applicants in 1 st stage increase success rates for full stage proposals

How to write two-stage proposals (I) Example Guide for Applicants 6 th Call 6 th Call FP7-HEALTH-2012 – two subcalls 1.FP7-Health-Innovation-1 2.FP7-Health-Innovation-2 “SMEs for Innovation“: special subcall, shorter procedures, only for European partners, max. 5 partners Stage 1- Administrative issues : Only the coordinator completes the A-forms (A1, A2 and A3) In form A3, only a single set of budget figures and the corresponding requested EU funding is required for the whole project. Do not complete additional A2 and A3 forms for the other partners

How to write two-stage proposals (II) Example Guide for Applicants 6 th Call Cover Page stage 1 Proposal full title: Proposal acronym: Type of funding scheme: Work programme topics addressed: Name of the coordinating person: List of participants:

How to write two-stage proposals (III) Example Guide for Applicants 6 th Call List of participants: List all the expected members of your consortium. Participant no. Participant legal name CountryOrganisation type* Describe briefly the role(s) in the consortium, name of the scientific person in charge, expertise, capacity and resources to achieve the objectives 1 (Coordinator) 2 3..

How to write two-stage proposals (IV) Example Guide for Applicants 6 th Call Please indicate the estimated budget for the proposed work as accurately as possible. Estimated budget Participant no. RTD activities DemonstrationManagementOther activitiesTotal costsEU contribution Total eligible costs Requested EU contribution Requested EU contribution for SMEs in % of the total requested, if applicable Requested EU contribution for industry in % of the total requested, if applicable

How to write two-stage proposals (V) Example Guide for Applicants 6 th Call Stage 1 proposal content (maximum 6 pages for section 1 and 2 together) 1: Scientific and/or technical quality, relevant to the topics addressed by the call 1.1 Concept and objectives Explain the concept of your project. What are the main ideas that led you to propose this work? Describe in detail the S&T objectives. Show how they relate to the topics addressed by the call, which you should explicitly identify. The objectives should be those achievable within the project, not through subsequent development. They should be stated in a measurable and verifiable form, including through the milestones that will be indicated under section 1.3 below.

How to write two-stage proposals (VI) Example Guide for Applicants 6 th Call Stage 1 proposal content (maximum 6 pages for section 1 and 2 together) 1.2 Progress beyond the state-of-the-art Describe the state-of-the-art in the area concerned, and the advance that the proposed project would bring about. If applicable, refer to the results of any patent search you might have carried out. 1.3 S/T methodology and associated work plan Present an overview. ???

How to write two-stage proposals (VII) Example Guide for Applicants 6 th Call Stage 1 proposal content (maximum 6 pages for section 1 and 2 together) 2. Impact 2.1 Expected impacts Provide an overview on how your project will contribute towards the expected impacts listed in the work programme in relation to the topic or topics in question. Mention the steps that will be needed to bring about these impacts. Mention any assumptions and external factors that may determine whether the impacts will be achieved. When appropriate (relevant for the topic): With regard to the innovation dimension, describe the potential areas and markets of application of the project results and the potential advantages of the resulting technologies/ solutions compared to those that are available today.

How to write two-stage proposals (VIII) Example Guide for Applicants 6 th Call The maximum combined length for sections 1and 2 is six pages. Note: The cover page, the participant list, the budget table and the table of contents (see below) do not count toward the page limits specified for stage 1. The minimum font size allowed is 11 points. The page size is A4, and all margins (top, bottom, left, right) should be at least 15 mm (not including any footers or headers). Ensure that the font type chosen leads to clearly readable text (eg. Arial or Times New Roman). As an indication, such a layout should lead to a maximum of between 5000 and 6000 possible characters per page (including spaces). The Commission/agency will instruct the experts to disregard any excess pages.

How to really do it! use Arial Narrow as font type! none or minimal literature references in 1 st stage 1.1: Concept and objectives - around pages describe overall idea and concept, list objectives with e.g. bullet points (first overall objective(s), then detailed specific objectives) try to answer the following questions in the 1 st paragraphs…. Why bother? What problem are you trying to solve? Is it a European priority or could it be solved at national level? Is the solution already available? Why now? What would happen if we did not do this now? Why you? Are you the best people to do this work?

How to really do it! 1.2. Progress beyond the state-of-the-art => around 0.5 to 1 page Clearly oppose STATE OF THE ART vs PROGRESS BEYOND/ INNOVATION 1.3. S/T methodology and associated work plan => pages this is the core part of the application! and should include short workpackage descriptions, and milestones, a small diagramm to illustrate WP connections (Pert Chart), etc.

How to really do it! 2.1. Expected impacts => around 1 page What impact will your results generate, how and by whom will the results be used? – Which results are expected? Applications? Commercial, social or scientific? – Who is the Lead User of these results? – How relevant are the results for the Lead User? – How do the results get to the lead user? Dissemination and Exploitation? Which partners are involved? – How will the exploitation/dissemination be done? Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) – Production, Marketing, Licenses, Patents, etc.

How to really do it – Summary and Tips has to be excellent, innovative idea that fits 100% to the call topic readers has to be “captured” by idea after the first paragraph the 1 st stage is a “mini full proposal” – not just a vague idea, but a fully structured proposal with specific objectives, workpackages, milestones etc. clear impact section – if SMEs involved, describe impact for each SME and for the market can be divided into scientific impact – clinical impact – economic impact – societal impact…. even if not asked for, try to include your consortium skills in some sentences throughout the proposal – you are the best! projects with clinical trials: some essential trial data need to be described in 1 st stage already (patient numbers, in- and exclusion criteria…)

Stage 2- Full Stage

Evaluation (I) Innovation-1: Stage 1 proposals will be evaluated remotely by independent external experts, then discussed in consensus meetings all proposals passing all thresholds will be retained at stage 1

Put yourself in the shoes of an evaluator! 1. Let’s divide into 5 groups ( 7/8 each); 2. Read the proposal individually; (15 min) 3. Note down how you evaluate it for S&T and Impact. (5 min) 4. Start the discussion with your team and draft together your evaluation on a ppt if possible (15 min) 5. Present your evaluation to the other groups ( 4 min) Does it go through to second stage?