Jochen Grandell Convection Working Group Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIMATE MONITORING FROM SPACE -- challenges, actions & perspectives Yang Jun China Meteorological Administration WMO Cg-XVI Side Event An architecture.
Advertisements

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 A Cloud Object Based Volcanic.
SPoRT Activities in Support of the GOES-R and JPSS Proving Grounds Andrew L. Molthan, Kevin K. Fuell, and Geoffrey T. Stano NASA Short-term Prediction.
Sentinel-4 and -5 Status and Level-2 Products
MTG Lightning Imager Proxy Data Zagreb, Croatia 9 April 2014 Jochen Grandell Presentation to the Convection Working Group.
Preliminary Study of Lunar Calibration for Geostationary Imagers Japanese Multi-functional Transport SATellite-2 (MTSAT-2) incorporates the special device.
Lightning Imager and its Level 2 products Jochen Grandell Remote Sensing and Products Division.
A Microwave Retrieval Algorithm of Above-Cloud Electric Fields Michael J. Peterson The University of Utah Chuntao Liu Texas A & M University – Corpus Christi.
1 6th GOES Users' Conference, Madison, Wisconsin, Nov 3-5 WMO Activities and Plans for Geostationary and Highly Elliptical Orbit Satellites Jérôme Lafeuille.
CEOS-CGMS Working Group Climate, Darmstadt, Germany, 5-7 March 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS COORDINATION GROUP FOR METEOROLOGICAL.
Meteorological Service of Canada – Update Meteorological Service of Canada – Update NOAA Satellite Proving Ground/User-Readiness June 2, 2014 David Bradley.
Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
Global Lightning Observations. Streamers, sprites, leaders, lightning: from micro- to macroscales Remote detection of lightning - information provided.
10/05/041 Utilisation of satellite data in the verification of HIRLAM cloud forecasts Christoph Zingerle and Pertti Nurmi.
VENUS (Vegetation and Environment New µ-Spacecraft) A demonstration space mission dedicated to land surface environment (Vegetation and Environment New.
Xin Kong, Lizzie Noyes, Gary Corlett, John Remedios, Simon Good and David Llewellyn-Jones Earth Observation Science, Space Research Centre, University.
Brief Overview of CM-SAF & Possible use of the Data for NCMPs.
Millimeter and sub-millimeter observations for Earth cloud hunting Catherine Prigent, LERMA, Observatoire de Paris.
EUM/ Issue EUM/MTG/VWG/11/0515 September 2011 GLM Science Team, Huntsville Jochen Grandell, Marcel Dobber, Rolf Stuhlmann GLM Science Team September.
Proxy Data and VHF/Optical Comparisons Monte Bateman GLM Proxy Data Designer.
CAPACITY Final Presentation, 2 June 2005, ESTEC Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions (“CAPACITY”) Final Presentation ESA-ESTEC, Noordwijk.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Monitoring weather and climate from space
McIDAS Users' Group Meeting, May 2012Slide 1 EUMETSAT Satellite Programmes Use of McIDAS at EUMETSAT Marianne König Peter Miu.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Potential June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
GOES-R Risk Reduction New Initiative: Storm Severity Index Wayne M. MacKenzie John R. Mecikalski John R. Walker University of Alabama in Huntsville.
PLANS FOR THE GOES-R SERIES AND COMPARING THE ADVANCED BASELINE IMAGER (ABI) TO METEOSAT-8 UW-Madison James J Gurka, Gerald J Dittberner NOAA/NESDIS/OSD.
SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF GOES-R GEOSTATIONARY LIGHTNING MAPPER (GLM) DETECTION ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE Loren Sadewa Clark, Tom Dixon, Pete Armstrong, Ruth.
GIST RMIB, Brussels; 8-10 November 2004 Page 1 Plans for EUMETSAT’s Third Generation Meteosat (MTG) Geostationary Satellite Program G. Fowler and.
USING OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION HIGH RESOLUTION VISIBLE DATA FOR THE IMPOVEMENT OF THE RAPID DEVELOPPING THUNDERSTORM PRODUCT Oleksiy Kryvobok Ukrainian.
Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-R platform. The sensor.
Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.
Bryan Jackson General Forecaster WFO LWX. Introduction Utilizing Total Lightning data from the DC- Lightning Mapping Array (DC-LMA) to create a preview.
EUM/ Issue EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0865 GLM Science team meeting Sep 2012, Huntsville, Alabama Jochen Grandell, Marcel Dobber, Hartmut Höller and Rolf Stuhlmann.
Investigating the use of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) to monitor on-orbit performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) using Lightning Imaging.
The WMO Space Programme
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
1 Tom Dixon 1, Steven Goodman 2, Earl Aamodt 3, Hugh Christian 4 1 NASA /GSFC, 2 NOAA/NESDIS, 3 LMATC, 4 Ryco
EUMETSAT Geostationary Programmes
Lessons on Satellite Meteorology Part I : General Introduction Short history Geo versus polar satellite Visible images Infrared images Water vapour images.
Geoffrey Stano – ENSCO / SPoRT David Hotz and Anthony Cavalluci– WFO Morristown, TN Tony Reavley – Director of Emergency Services & Homeland Security of.
GLM Lightning Val Plans Monte Bateman, Doug Mach, Rich Blakeslee, Bill Koshak & Steve Goodman.
EUMETSAT 2004, March 24 th Earth Observation Dep.t Automatic Fire Detection and Characterization by MSG/SEVIRI A. Bartoloni, E. Cisbani, E. Zappitelli.
Transitioning research data to the operational weather community Overview of GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the Short-term Prediction Research and.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
Satellite based instability indices for very short range forecasting of convection Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Contributions from Marianne.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
Satellite Precipitation Estimation and Nowcasting Plans for the GOES-R Era Robert J. Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research.
METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION FROM FIRST TO SECOND GENERATION METEOSAT
Fifty years of innovation and cooperation in satellite meteorology Jérôme Lafeuille World Meteorological Organization.
EUM/ Issue Jochen Grandell 25 September 2013 Presentation to the GLM Science Team (webex) Meteosat Third Generation Lightning Imager (MTG-LI) --- Status.
Second GOES Users Conference, Boulder October 1-3, Issue B Page 1 ACTIVITIES TOWARDS USER REQUIREMENTS FOR POST-MSG by R. Stuhlmann GOES Users.
Interactions: atmosphere EG2234 Earth Observation.
Volker Gärtner, EUMETSAT VLab Co-Chair EUMETSAT Status Report VLMG-5, Beijing, 12 – 14 July 2010.
EUMETSAT 2 nd MTG User Consultation Workshop Locarno, April Introduction Observation Payload Imagery Missions (HRFI and FDHSI) Infra-Red Sounding.
Summary of the 4th Lightning Imager Science Team (LIST) Meeting November, 2010 EUMETSAT Headquarters, Darmstadt, Germany 3rd Annual GOES-R GLM Science.
5th GOES Users’ Conference, New Orleans, January 2008 Geostationary satellites in a WMO perspective Jérôme Lafeuille WMO Space Programme World Meteorological.
Presentation R&D in Optical Remote Sensing, Radiative Transfer
Future SWE Missions Workshop ESA SSA/SWE State-of-Play
Meteosat Third Generation (MTG)
GOES visible (or “sun-lit”) image
Who We Are SSEC (Space Science and Engineering Center) is part of the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW). SSEC hosts CIMSS (Cooperative.
Regional characteristics of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) observed by the Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) for July and August Dennis Buechler.
GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) Requirements
Geostationary Sounders
Instrument Considerations
AIRS/GEO Infrared Intercalibration
ICWG and Link to Other CGMS Working Groups
Earth Radiation Budget: Insights from GERB and future perspectives
Presentation transcript:

Geostationary lightning monitoring with the Meteosat Third Generation Lightning Imager (MTG LI) Jochen Grandell Convection Working Group Meeting 27 – 30 March 2012, Prague EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Topics of Presentation Lightning Detection from Space – from LEO to GEO observations EUMETSAT Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) – Lightning Imager Concept Product processing Challenges User Readiness Summary EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Topics of Presentation Lightning Detection from Space – from LEO to GEO observations EUMETSAT Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) – Lightning Imager Concept Product processing Challenges User Readiness Summary EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Lightning Detection from Space – from LEO to GEO Feasibility of lightning detection from space by optical sensors has been proven by NASA instruments since 1995 on low earth orbits (LEO) OTD (1995-2000) Results from LIS/OTD: Global lightning distribution Annual flash density LIS (1997-present)

Lightning Detection from Space – from LEO to GEO GEO lightning missions in preparation by several agencies (in USA, Europe, China) for this decade... ...all of these are building on LIS/OTD heritage Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) on GOES-R (USA) Geostationary Lightning Imager (GLI) on FY-4 (China) Lightning Imager (LI) on MTG (Europe) 2015  2018  2014 ? EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Main benefit from GEO observations: The MTG Lightning Imager (LI) The LI on MTG measures Total Lightning: Cloud-to-Cloud Lightning (IC) and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning (CG) Main benefit from GEO observations: homogeneous and continuous observations delivering information on location and strength of lightning flashes to the users with a timeliness of 30 seconds Main objectives are to detect, monitor, and extrapolate in time: Development (Intensity/Movement) of active convective areas Monitoring of storm lifecycle Lightning climatology & Chemistry (NOx production) GEO observation of lightning is complementary to ground-based networks, some of which are for local applications very good LIS/OTD flash density in the MTG LI field of view

...Air Traffic is one area of application, and not just around major airports...

Topics of Presentation Lightning Detection from Space – from LEO to GEO observations EUMETSAT Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) – Lightning Imager Concept Product processing Challenges User Readiness Summary EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Detection of a Lightning Optical Signal Lightning with a background signal changing with time: Lightning on top of a bright background is not recognised by its bright radiance, but by its transient short pulse character For detection of lightning, a variable adapting threshold has to be used for each pixel which takes into account the change in the background radiance (in LIS: background calculated as a moving average) Lightning signal Background Time Radiation energy Night Day EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

From a Lightning Optical Signal to MTG LI Events Detection of events in a nutshell: Output (=events) of the Lightning Imager at L0 is two-fold: Background scene tracking and removal Thresholding Event detection False event filtering needed in L0-L1 processing True lightning events (triggered by a lightning optical signal) False events (not related to lightning) EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Spatial Pattern of Lightning from Space Characteristics: Size scales with cloud thickness above source Mean area of lightning pulses corresponds well to a 10 km x 10 km footprint “MTG LI Events” Background scene tracking and removal Thresholding Event detection etc... Optical pattern of lightning on cloud surface (observed from space shuttle) Possible schema of detected lightning pulses EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Topics of Presentation Lightning Detection from Space – from LEO to GEO observations EUMETSAT Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) – Lightning Imager Concept Product processing Challenges User Readiness Summary EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

MTG LI Product Processing – L1b and L2 products Product processing in a nutshell Example L2 Sequence: The following products are resulting from the L1b processing: Events with geolocation, UTC time stamp and calibrated radiance background images, mainly supporting navigation The baseline L2 product, which is a result of clustering of events in time and space, consists of: Groups (representing lightning strokes) Flashes (1st priority for many users) “Events” “Groups” “Flashes” EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

From events/groups/flashes towards DENSITY (1) For a quick-look, a forecaster or other operational user might prefer a density product. Can be based on: Events groups flashes ...and with a variety of temporal windows Events density simulation based on converted LINET data from 2 July 2009 (15 minutes density) EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

From events/groups/flashes towards DENSITY (2) Animation of EVENT DENSITY simulation - Based on converted LINET data from 2 July 2009 (15 minutes density)

Topics of Presentation Lightning Detection from Space – from LEO to GEO observations EUMETSAT Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) – Lightning Imager Concept Product processing Challenges User Readiness Summary EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Challenge for processing: “False Events” False events are typically caused by: High energy particle collisions Noise (instrument, spacecraft etc) Solar glint Spacecraft motion (“jitter”) Specific filters are required for each case:  Radiation filter  Shot noise/coherency filter  Solar glint filter Contrast filter Rough order of severity (based on GLM analysis): Spacecraft motion, Photon/electronics noise, Solar glint, Radiation EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Topics of Presentation Lightning Detection from Space – from LEO to GEO observations EUMETSAT Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) – Lightning Imager Concept Product processing Challenges User Readiness Summary EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

User Readiness (1) User readiness, as discussed here is to be understood as activities similar to what NOAA is attempting with the "GOES-R Proving Ground" framework of activities. Within this framework, an approach of creating "pseudo-GLM" data based on averaging and resampling ground-based Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) lightning density data has been developed: http://www.goes-r.gov/users/pg-activities.html This “pseudo-GLM” data has been provided to forecasters in real-time along with other data to support their daily work. EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

User Readiness (2) The idea is to make the forecaster end-user aware, and used to, the kind of product that would be available from the GLM. This is not perfect proxy data: It merely gives an "impression" of how the real GLM product could look like. EUMETSAT is planning a similar activity by using the existing proxy data methodology with the ground-based LINET data in Europe A near-real time application of the proxy data will be needed Data to be disseminated to selected Meteorological Services for evaluation and feedback EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Topics of Presentation Lightning Detection from Space – from LEO to GEO observations EUMETSAT Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) – Lightning Imager Concept Product processing Challenges User Readiness Summary EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Summary One of the new instruments on the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) is the Lightning Imager (LI), geostationary services from 2017 onwards continuous lightning observation (CG+CC) over almost the full disk (at 0 deg). Algorithm and processor development for baseline L2 products (event/group/flash –tree) currently ongoing Supported by a MTG Lightning Imager Science Team (LIST) set up in 2009 Interacting with potential users (such as CWG) an important topic in coming years EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

MTG Lightning Imager Science Team (LIST) The MTG LI Science Team currently consists of the following members: N.N. (MetOffice – UK) Daniele Biron (USAM – Italy) Eric Defer (LERMA – France) Ullrich Finke (U. Hannover – Germany) Hartmut Höller (DLR – Germany) Philippe Lopez (ECMWF) Douglas Mach (NASA – USA) Antti Mäkelä (FMI – Finland) Serge Soula (Laboratoire d'Aerologie – France) EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

Thank you! EUM/MTG/VWG/12/0278 March 2012 Prague, Czech Republic

How noise looks like on a 0.5s period FER = 1 000 /s FER = 30 000 /s FER = 200 000 /s How noise looks like on a 0.5s period All noise events in 500 milliseconds! FER = 5 000 /s FER = 40 000 /s FER = 300 000 /s FER = 10 000 /s FER = 100 000 /s FER = 400 000 /s

Background radiance: Solar reflection on clouds and ground surfaces Background radiation from clouds determines the signal to noise ratio for detection of transient lightning signals Challenges: Day-night contrast in FOV Microvibrations (fast changing background) Sun glint 0 UTC 12 UTC 22 UTC

Background radiance: Solar reflection on clouds and ground surfaces Background radiation from clouds determines the signal to noise ratio for detection of transient lightning signals Challenges: Day-night contrast in FOV Microvibrations (fast changing background) Sun glint 0 UTC 12 UTC 22 UTC

Background radiance: Solar reflection on clouds and ground surfaces Background radiation from clouds determines the signal to noise ratio for detection of transient lightning signals Challenges: Day-night contrast in FOV Microvibrations (fast changing background) Sun glint 0 UTC 12 UTC 22 UTC

Background radiance: Solar reflection on clouds and ground surfaces Background radiation from clouds determines the signal to noise ratio for detection of transient lightning signals Challenges: Day-night contrast in FOV Microvibrations (fast changing background) Sun glint 0 UTC 12 UTC 22 UTC

Background radiance: Solar reflection on clouds and ground surfaces Background radiation from clouds determines the signal to noise ratio for detection of transient lightning signals Challenges: Day-night contrast in FOV Microvibrations (fast changing background) Sun glint 0 UTC 12 UTC 22 UTC

Background radiance: Solar reflection on clouds and ground surfaces Background radiation from clouds determines the signal to noise ratio for detection of transient lightning signals Challenges: Day-night contrast in FOV Microvibrations (fast changing background) Sun glint 0 UTC 12 UTC 22 UTC

Effect of Microvibrations (“jitter”) on Lightning Detection Assuming that this is what the Lightning Imager is looking at... Background energy Cloud Distance Darker (ocean) background Cloud Darker (ocean) background

Effect of Microvibrations (“jitter”) on Lightning Detection What if the instrument (satellite) moves slightly between integration frames...? Cloud Darker (ocean) background Background energy Distance Frame #1 Background removal (Frame #2 – Frame #1) Distance But this is not lightning! Frame #2

Meteosat Third Generation (MTG): Continuity and Evolution of EUMETSAT Services 1977 2002 2017 and 2019 MOP/MTP MSG MOP/MTP MSG MTG-I and MTG-S Observation missions: - Flex.Comb. Imager: 16 channels - Infra-Red Sounder Lightning Imager UVN 3-axis stabilised satellites Twin Sat configuration Class 2,5 - 3 ton Observation missions: - SEVIRI: 12 channels GERB Spinning satellite Class 2-ton Observation mission: MVIRI: 3 channels Spinning satellite Class 800 kg Implementation of the EUMETSAT Mandate for the Geostationary Programme Atmospheric Chemistry Mission (UVN-S4): via GMES Sentinel 4

MTG in Orbit Deployment Scenario MSG-4 MTG-I1 Dec. 2016 MTG-I2 Dec. 2022 MTG-I3 Jan. 2025 MTG-I4 Dec. 2029 2017 – 2038: 20 years of Operational Service – Imaging Missions MTG-S1 June 2018 MTG-S2 June 2026 2019 – 2035: 15.5 years of Operational Service – Sounding Mission

MTG Lightning Imager Science Team (LIST) EUMETSAT has identified the need to establish a scientific baseline for the operational processor of the MTG mission. In support of these scientific developments, a science team has been established – MTG LI Science Team (LIST). The main objectives of the team is to: Assist EUMETSAT with the implementation of the MTG LI L2 scientific baseline processor. Prepare an Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document (ATBD). It includes also a description of the proxy dataset, to be used for algorithm development and processor development. The ATBD will be subject for review at the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) concluding the MTG system Phase B activities  

EUMETSAT, MTG LI and LINET EUMETSAT has now several years of experience in cooperating with Nowcast and DLR in using LINET data: Especially in developing proxy data... ...Latest activity has been in contributing to the CHUVA campaign in Brazil with the mobile LINET unit (DLR), which should after evaluation of the joint measurements with LMA and LIS allow a further enhancement of the proxy data Based on these experiences, it looks like LINET data could play an important role in “user readiness” activities as well as validation/monitoring of the operational product(s) from the MTG LI

MTG LI – Main Mission Requirements Wavelength 777.4 nm Sensitivity pulses as small as 100 km2 with energies down to 4 µJ/(m2sr) should be detected Spatial sampling Less or equal to 10 km at 45oN for the sub-satellite longitude Detection Efficiency 70% in average, 90% over central Europe, 40% as a minimum over EUMETSAT member states False Alarm Rate 2.5 false flashes/s Background images every 60 seconds