WHY DIDN’T THE HORSE DIE? Monday / July 30, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing a New Accreditation Program in the U.S.
Advertisements

NACLA – NAVY PARTNERSHIP
FHWA Qualification Requirements for Laboratories NACLA Forum February 11, 2009 Mike Rafalowski Materials Engineer Office of Pavement Technology Federal.
NACLA Annual Forum February 2009 Welcome. NACLA Annual Forum February 2009 Presidents Report.
NACLA Value – Navy METCAL Perspective
Why NACLA in the United States The Laboratorys Perspective.
Why the United States needs NACLA Recognition of Accreditation Bodies One Accreditation Bodys Perspective.
February 11, 2009, 2009 Forum/AGM NACLAs Support of the US Accreditation Community National Cooperation for Laboratory Accreditation Reliable Results through.
NACLA Annual Forum and Workshop April, 2008 Presidents Report.
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
MainTasksof ILAC and IAF 1.Harmonizationofaccreditationpracticesbetween members(establishingguidances) 2.Establishing multilateralrecognition agreements/arrangements.
WTO Workshop on the different Approaches to Conformity Assessment March 2006 Geneva, Switzerland.
1 Using the ILAC MRA to Gain Marketing Advantage Cheryl O. Morton, Director AIHA Laboratory Accreditation, LLC 2011 Accreditation Forum Sunday, May 15,
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
J Garza Consulting and Associates 1 Pilot Car Escort Certification Model For State Implementation.
Administration, Management, and Coordination of Supportive Housing: Guidelines from CSH’s Dimensions of Quality MHSA TA Operations Call September 1, 2010.
Latest developments Merih Malmqvist Nilsson, ILAC Vice Chair
International Recognition System for Accreditation
Why the United States needs NACLA Recognition of Accreditation Bodies Federal Highway Administration’s Perspective Mike Rafalowski Materials Engineer Office.
B-BBEE VERIFICATION FRAMEWORK.  The BEE Verification process evolved since the release of the B- BBEE strategy in 2003  The dti was requested to provide.
How to Document A Business Management System
Conformity Assessment Practical Implications InterAgency Committee on Standards Policy June 2007 Gordon Gillerman Conformity Assessment Advisor Homeland.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology The U.S. Conformity Assessment System and the Role of NIST Ileana M. Martinez National.
Motivating Best Practice in Lab QMS 1 Principles behind ISO/IEC J.E.J. (Ned) Gravel, CD, PEng, CAE, CA-LS, IPL Principal, MOTIVA Training Inc.
Overview of Accreditation in the United States Peter Unger President, A2LA March 20, 2007.
Quality Management Systems
ISO/TC 176 Quality Management Standards “Meet the Family” Presented by David Zimmerman Project Manager Project Manager ISO/TC 176 Secretariat.
ANSI ISO ICCA Program. ISO Standards ISO sets an internationally recognized benchmark to assure that the certification organization meets the set.
Basic Research Administration Principles Presented by Ronald Kiguba Research Coordinator, Makerere Medical School.
An introduction to the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program Sally Bruce, Chief for the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Internal auditing for credit unions Nuala Comerford, Chair IIA Irish Region Committee Pamela McDonald Council Member IIA Credit Union Summer School Thursday,
The Development of a Higher Level Apprenticeship in Construction Operations Management and an Integrated Foundation Degree.
Accreditation & Certification in Forensic Science Understanding the Difference Phil T. Pulaski, Esq. Retired Chief of Detectives, NYPD.
Codes, Standards & Conformity Assessment GP Russ Chaney CEO, The IAPMO Group
The Institute of Internal Auditors
John Neuner, Program Manager ASCLD/LAB-International CWAG January 28, 2010 Sacramento, California.
NACLA Update ACIL Midwinter Meeting February 2006 William J Tilstone President, NACLA.
Laboratory Accreditation as a Component of the Help America Vote Act Mary H. Saunders Chief, Standards Services Division.
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
Conformity Assessment Overview Nuclear Energy Standards Coordinating Collaborative November 2009 Gordon Gillerman Chief Standards Services Division National.
1 Jordan Institution for Standards and Metrology Our Vision A pioneer and distinguished institution nationally, regionally, and internationally in the.
The Electric Reliability Organization: Getting from here to there. Gerry Cauley Director, Standards ERO Project Manager ERO Slippery Slope NERC Today Uphill.
UNECE – SIDA “ SOUTH EAST EUROPE REGULATORY PROJECT” FIRST MEETING OF REGULATORS FROM SOUTH EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES PRESENTATIONFROM THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Principles behind ISO/IEC 17025
MNAS MONGOLIAN ACCREDITATION SYSTEM
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Implementing the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act in the Federal Government.
The New IPPF: What to Know and What Does It Tell Us?
Most Common Deficiencies Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC.
THE ROLE OF PROFICIENCY TESTING - A PERSPECTIVE FROM AN ACCREDITATION BODY Randall Querry American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) November.
1 Accreditor’s View of the Value of MRAs: the APLAC View Helen Liddy APLAC Secretary.
ACCREDITATION PROCESS AND THE BENEFITS OF ACCREDITATION dr. Tina Pirš, dr. vet. med. Quality Manager, Veterinary Faculty, Slovenia.
© A2LA Understanding the Accreditation Hierarchy - Who’s Who and What’s What ? NCSL International Conference Orlando, FL August 7, 2008 by Roxanne.
THE NATIONAL VOLUNTARY LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (NVLAP ) DECEMBER 3, 2015.
What do Accreditation Bodies currently do to engage with regulators? Some common approaches.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment ANSI-HSSP Workshop Emergency Communications December 2, 2004.
National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia NATA accreditation and criteria for validation and verification Mark Worrell – RACI.
NCSLI 2002EA-MLA aspects EA-MLA Aspects Dr. Jos Leferink RvA, Utrecht, The Netherlands Chair EA-MAC Committee.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
High Level Symposium to Enhance Regulator Expertise on Good Regulatory Practices and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
Deputy Head of Federal Accreditation Service Sergey Migin Preparation for the accession of the Russian Federation to ILAC and IAF.
An Overview of ISO/IEC Accreditation in the Field of Digital Forensics Karin Athanas A2LA 7th Annual Prescription for Criminal Justice Forensic Science.
The ISO system and ISO UM Welcomes ANSI CMF May 11.
Inter American Accreditation Cooperation
Excellent Healthcare Service: A structured approach through ISO Accredited Biomedical Laboratory 17 February 2016 Presented: Roziah Abdul Latiff.
REGISTRATION OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC SECRETARIES BOARD (RCPSB)
Emanuele Riva – IAF Vice-Chair
The Electric Reliability Organization: Getting from here to there.
ASEFA … An internationally recognized Certification Body for the certification of your electrical products! CERTIFICATION – WHY? HOW? TEST LABORATORIES.
HKAS Accreditation Service for Certification of Management System of RCHE Service Providers Mr WONG Wang-wah Assistant Commissioner for Innovation and.
Presentation transcript:

WHY DIDN’T THE HORSE DIE? Monday / July 30, 2012

Background Who Shot my Horse? –1998 to 2004 History –Paper well done The Need to continue the story Disclaimer

“The horse is born – Malcolm’s title...” NACLA was formed in 1998 as a not-for-profit organization Founded by public and private sector organizations for laboratory accreditation programs in the United States ANSI, ACIL and NIST

“The horse is born – Malcolm’s title...” NACLA’s primary mission is to evaluate U.S. laboratory accreditation bodies (ABs) and to grant recognition to those ABs found to be in compliance with NACLA procedures and the relevant international standards for competent ABs.

“The horse is born – Malcolm’s title...” The NACLA leadership is composed of balanced representation from the four key stakeholder groups: –Government / Industry Specifiers –Laboratories –Accreditation Bodies –Users / General Stakeholders

“The horse is born – Malcolm’s title...” The balanced representation gives all the involved parties input into: –Decisions affecting accreditation bodies and other groups. –Policies and procedures for the recognition process.

The horse stands on its own Until NACLA’s formation, there was no independent, US-based recognition entity. Signs MoU with NIST, IAAC and SCC Starts to recognize ABs New applications start coming in Interest on the activity and future She is too young to run fast

Youthful ABs with high expectations Rubber Bullets Traceability requirements Measurement Uncertainty Precious Time Needed for everyone

She never really came up lame (Malcolm’s Veterinary Report – post script) International Rejection Domestic Battles Volunteers stayed working ABs met the requirements and finished the process Regulators and Specifiers started to believe

Real Bullets – why? Domestic ABs made some tough decisions –Some went to IAAC for ILAC –Some went to APLAC for ILAC –Some dropped out of NACLA –Some stayed with NACLA Real bullets (those that hit in the pockets) –Why? –What changed?

Good advice to keep running NACLA isn’t in the business of “dumbing down” accreditation (recognition) – it’s in the business of building it up Where is the benchmark for US ABs and their accredited laboratories? Core Values Future Goals

NACLA’s Purpose, Vision and Objectives VISION OF NACLA The NACLA vision is to establish national and international stakeholder confidence in the competence of Accreditation Bodies (ABs) and their accredited laboratories (technical confidence in the results contained in reports and certificates issued by these laboratories). This NACLA vision achieves the following: For NACLA recognized accreditation bodies, a NACLA scope of recognition to a common international model, and, where applicable, with fields of recognition specific to supplemental technical programs that meet specifier and/or regulator requirements. For ILAC recognized accreditation bodies, a NACLA scope of recognition utilizing the ILAC recognition as the basis for meeting the international model, and, where applicable, with NACLA approval of each field of recognition to sector-specific technical programs that meet specifier and/or regulator requirements.

The Purpose of NACLA To provide coordination and focus for laboratory accreditation in the United States of America by: Developing evaluation procedures and requirements that are in accordance with international standards and guidelines and that are accepted by all NACLA members and stakeholders. Administering NACLA evaluation procedures with impartiality and integrity. Recognizing accreditation bodies (ABs) for compliance with the NACLA requirements. Coordinating the development of sector specific technical requirements and associated programs that meet industry specifier or government/regulatory agency requirements for use by all accreditation bodies and testing or calibration laboratories.

The Purpose of NACLA To provide coordination and focus for laboratory accreditation in the United States of America by: Developing evaluation procedures and requirements that are in accordance with international standards and guidelines and that are accepted by all NACLA members and stakeholders. Administering NACLA evaluation procedures with impartiality and integrity. Recognizing accreditation bodies (ABs) for compliance with the NACLA requirements. Coordinating the development of sector specific technical requirements and associated programs that meet industry specifier or government/regulatory agency requirements for use by all accreditation bodies and testing or calibration laboratories.

The Purpose of NACLA To provide coordination and focus for laboratory accreditation in the United States of America by: Reducing redundant AB evaluations through the acceptance of NACLA and/or International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) recognition. Promoting the acceptance of NACLA and ILAC recognition. Working with industry specifiers and government/regulatory agencies in the United States to coordinate the development of sector specific technical requirements beyond those included in international guidelines used for AB recognition and laboratory accreditation.

Good friends to help ACIL MoU Bring some of the original ideas and make them work with ACIL’s and FHWA’s help CMET Recognition and Accreditation Program US Navy, AIAG, AAPM, AASHTO, AIHA, CIEMS, CSA, CMEC, Cummins Engine, HPSLAP, L-A-B, NCSLI, NSWC, PJLA, Retlif Testing, RTI International, Sandia National Laboratories, and many others

The horse continues to want to work ANSI/NCSL Z540.3 ‐ 2006 Recognition Program NACLA changed bylaws Offering Training General and Specific Recognition Programs

Good purpose and the future NACLA’s purpose is good and just based on sound principles The future is hard to predict NTTAA, 15 CFR 287 and the OMB A-119 Stakeholder Cooperation(s) have merits Transparency is key It has no horse in the race... it is the horse

Questions? or call