Example of depth test Schwarzenegger was born in Austria, so he can’t become the US President. Shallow reconstruction: – If Schwarzenegger was born in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PHIL 148 Chapter 5 Stuff to include in and leave out of the standard form argument.
Advertisements

Knowledge as JTB Someone S has knowledge of P IFF: 1. S believes P 2. S is justified in believing P 3. P is true.
Copyright 2008, Scott Gray1 Propositional Logic 4) If.
Moral Relativism and Conceptual Analysis David J. Chalmers.
Wednesday night seminar. the three week plan Tonight - Discuss first 3 chapters Parent your teen as if he or she is a child Treat your teen as if he or.
THERE SHOULD BE NO TALKING.
Minimum Data-set for all mental health referrals.
Philosophical Reasoning Introduction to Elementary Logic I. Deduction / Induction Distinction Murali Ramachandran University of Sussex.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
PRYDERI.  "Talent" is a term you hear bandied about in all walks of life. It's used constantly to refer to celebrities and famous performers.  In show.
What’s the topic of our essay?
Necessary & Sufficient Conditions Law, Science, Life & Logic.
Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Free will and God’s omniscience
Lineup Card Management
Why is Socrates’ life important?Socrates’. How do I Know?
How do we determine who is a citizen of the United States?
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Gettier and the analysis of knowledge Michael Lacewing
1 Section 1.5 Rules of Inference. 2 Definitions Theorem: a statement that can be shown to be true Proof: demonstration of truth of theorem –consists of.
Lesson 12: The Closing Arguments
Categorical Logic Part I
45 lessons in life Music: snowdream.
39 lessons in life Music: snowdream 1. Life isn't fair, but it's still good. 2. When in doubt, just take the next small step. 3. Life is too short to.
Arguments, validity, soundness, persuasiveness
The Euthyphro dilemma.
CPSC 121: Models of Computation Unit 6 Rewriting Predicate Logic Statements Based on slides by Patrice Belleville and Steve Wolfman.
Look at this receipt, the horrible and annoying 8.5% of sales tax that everyone forgets about is the government creation that bugs me the most in this.
Drawing by David Shrigley
40 th ANNIVERSARY OF ROE VS. WADE. My purpose today is NOT to condemn anyone here who has already had an abortion.
 Assertions: unsupported declaration of a belief  Prejudice: a view without evidence for or against  Premises: explicit evidence that lead to a conclusion.
Refutation, Part 1: Counterexamples & Reductio Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College.
IX Conjunctions of Premises & Conclusions Working with more than two premises.
Deductive Arguments and Inference Rules Terminology: Valid Argument: – truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion – It would be contradictory.
The tripartite theory of knowledge
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
Can you use your clicker? 1. Yes 2. No. Let A = we won the first game, B = we won the second game, and C = we are first in the league. The following sentence.
Topics in Moral and Political Philosophy Democracy.
1.5 Rules of Inference.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 19 Regan & The Case for Animal Rights By David Kelsey.
Section 2 Logic.
 The issue with guns is them being in the wrong hands.  Gun laws are very strict but not strict enough.  Residents with household weapons are also.
{ Digging Deeper Into Argumentation.  When constructing an argument, consider whether your statement requires justification.  A statement that is a.
Sinnott-Armstrong & Fogelin (SAF), III.1 Since Chicago is north of Boston, and Boston is north of Charleston, Chicago is north of Charleston. 1.Chicago.
Steps for Writing a STAAR Persuasive Essay
Who is a citizen? How do we determine who is a citizen of the United States? The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc. © 2011.
Thomson on Abortion. Two old arguments All human beings have a right to life The fetus is clearly human Therefore the fetus has a right to life and abortion.
FALSE PREMISE.
Plato's Crito Crito tries to convince Socrates to escape.
1 Is Abortion Wrong? III. 2 Brody’s Project Brody argues that, given Thomson’s presumption that the squidge has a full right to life, her argument that.
Fire Causes in London —— Smokers 50%37.5% 12.5% Children playing with matches Defective insulation √ √ Class work 1.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Determine if each conjecture is true or false. If false, provide a counterexample.
Logical Fallacies1 This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because pity does not serve as evidence for a claim Just to get a scholarship does not justify.
+ Ethics II The nature of moral knowledge. + Moral knowledge Do you know the difference between right and wrong? Does anybody? Is moral knowledge even.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
The Southwark Judgement Kent Joint Policy and Planning Board.
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
Ethical non-naturalism
Religion and Early Life By Rishi, Conrad and Max.
Abortion is defined as the termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo prior to viability. An abortion can.
Argument reconstruction: the basics Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College.
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics Chapter 1 By Dr. Dalia M. Gil, Ph.D.
Who is a citizen? How do we determine who is a citizen of the United States? The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc. © 2011.
Early Life SHENAL, LUKE AND ANEEK. Key terms  Viability: when the baby can survive outside the womb- early as 24(debatable) weeks  Abortion: the deliberate.
Alternatives to abortion LO: To explore the other options available Starter: ‘Adoption is better than abortion’ Do you agree? Give reasons for your opinion.
FALSE PREMISE.
Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2009
TRUTH TABLE TO DETERMINE
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Truth tables Construct a truth table for the following statements:
Presentation transcript:

Example of depth test Schwarzenegger was born in Austria, so he can’t become the US President. Shallow reconstruction: – If Schwarzenegger was born in Austria, then he can’t become US president. – Schwarzenegger was born in Austria. – So, Schwarzenegger can’t become US president. Deeper reconstruction: – Anyone born outside of the US can’t become US President. – Schwarzenegger was born in Austria. – So, Schwarzenegger can’t become US president.

Example of plausibility test Deeper reconstruction: – Anyone born outside of the US can’t become US President. – Schwarzenegger was born in Austria. – So, Schwarzenegger can’t become US president. Plausible reconstruction: – Anyone born outside of the US and whose parents aren’t US citizens at the time of his/her birth can’t become US President – Schwarzenegger was born in Austria. – So, Schwarzenegger can’t become US president.

Step 7

Example of Step 7 Plausible reconstruction: – Anyone born outside of the US and whose parents aren’t US citizens at the time of his/her birth can’t become US President – Schwarzenegger was born in Austria. – So, Schwarzenegger can’t become US president. Make this argument valid: – Anyone born outside of the US and whose parents aren’t US citizens at the time of his/her birth can’t become US President – Schwarzenegger was born in Austria. – Austria is outside the US. – Schwarzenegger’s parents weren’t US citizens at the time of his birth. – So, Schwarzenegger can’t become US president. INVALID!

VI.2. Nixon couldn’t have been president in 1950 because he was still in the Senate. 1.Nobody can be president and a senator at the same time. 2.Nixon was a senator in  Nixon could not have been president in 1950.

VI.18. His natural talents were not enough; he still lost the match because he had not practiced sufficiently. 1.If he won the match, then he has natural talents and practiced sufficiently. 2.He did not practice sufficiently.* 3.  He did not win the match. *You could put a sub-argument here if you want a strict modus tollens, but I’m willing to give you a shortcut.

VI.18. His natural talents were not enough; he still lost the match because he had not practiced sufficiently. 1.If a person’s natural talents are enough and he/she does not practice sufficiently, then he/she will still win matches. 2.He did not win the match. 3.So either he does not have enough natural talent or he practiced sufficiently. 4.He did not practice sufficiently. 5.His natural talents were not enough.

Digging deeper Assessing the truth of the premises The regress problem Fundamental principles Exercises

Assessing the truth of the premises If you agree with premises, others may disagree. – So anticipating, reconstructing, & rebutting their objections is a good way to solidify your argument. If you disagree with the premises, then you need to ascertain whether your rejection of the premises is more reasonable than your interlocutor’s. – So you need to reconstruct the best argument for that premise. So regardless of whether you agree/disagree with a premise, you reconstruct the best argument you can for it.

The Regress Problem, 1 st Step 1.Suppose that you must justify p. 2.You have three options: a.Provide no justification for p b.Provide circular justification for p c.Justify p using some other proposition q. 3.If you provide (a) no justification for p, or (b) circular justification for p, then p is unjustified. 4.So if you must justify p, you must do so using some other proposition q.

Solution to the Regress Problem Suppose that there are fundamental principles—principles that require no further justification. Example: – Fundamental Principle: Murder is wrong. – Abortion is murder. – Abortion is wrong.

IX.10. Morris does not deserve his wealth, for he merely inherited it. 1.Anything inherited is not earned. 2.Anything not earned is not deserved. 3.Anything inherited is not deserved. 4.Morris inherited his wealth. 5.  Morris does not deserve his wealth.

IX.12. There can’t be UFOs, because there is no life on other planets. 1.If there are UFO’s, then they are vehicles from other planets. 2.Vehicles must be operated by organisms. 3.No organisms from Earth operate UFO’s. 4.If there are UFO’s, then organisms from other planets must operate them. 5.There are no organisms from other planets. 6.There are no UFO’s.

XI.14. Parents take care of their children when they are young, so their children should take care of them when they get old. 1.If x does a good deed for y, then y should perform an identical good deed for x. 2.Taking care of someone when they need it is a good deed. 3.  If x takes care of y when y needs it, then y should take care of x when x needs it. 4.Parents take care of their children when they’re young and need to be taken care of. 5.Parents need to be taken care of when they’re old. 6.  Children should take care of parents when the latter get old.

EXTRA EXERCISES. VI.1. Britney Spears is under age 35. Therefore she cannot run for president of the US. 1. Anyone under the age of 35 cannot run for president of the US. 2. Britney Spears is under the age of  Britney Spears cannot run for president of the US.

VI.6. There must not be any survivors, since they would have been found by now. 1.If there were any survivors, they would have been found by now. 2.No survivors have been found by now. 3.  There are no survivors.

VI.8. Philadelphia cannot play LA in the World Series, since they’re both in the National League. 1.Teams from the same league cannot play each other in the World Series. 2.Philadelphia and LA are both in the National League. 3.  Philadelphia and LA cannot play each other in the World Series.

VI.17. This burglar alarm won’t work unless we are lucky or the burglar uses the front door, so we can’t count on it. 1.Burglar alarms that work only by luck or if a burglar enters through the front door have limited coverage. 2.This burglar alarm works only by luck or if a burglar enters through the front door. 3.  This burglar alarm has limited coverage. 4.If a burglar alarm has limited coverage, then we cannot count on it. 5.  We cannot count on the burglar alarm.