PCS + ROSETTA = NMR structure determination ?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

The Fall Messier Marathon Guide
Números.
/ /17 32/ / /
Reflection nurulquran.com.
Worksheets.
SIMULATIONS DE REPLIEMENT DE CHAÎNES POLYPEPTIDIQUES
GEn_stat_12-05 Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 5-6, 2005 Status Report: G En G. Cates, K. McCormick, B. Reitz, and B. Wojtsekhowski; spokespersons.
1 When you see… Find the zeros You think…. 2 To find the zeros...
CALENDAR.
0 - 0.
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
Year 6 mental test 15 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, Measures and Shape.
ASCII stands for American Standard Code for Information Interchange
Toward high-resolution prediction and design of transmembrane helical protein structures P. Barth, J. Schonbrun and D. Baker PNAS Sep Tim Nugent.
Patterns and sequences We often need to spot a pattern in order to predict what will happen next. In maths, the correct name for a pattern of numbers is.
Wheres The Peak? Observations of Tidal Marsh Diversity Along The Patuxent and Nanticoke Rivers By Peter Sharpe and Andrew H. Baldwin The University of.
R + Hadoop = big data analytics Antonio Piccolboni Revolution Analytics.
The 5S numbers game..
Section 3A Uses and Abuses of Percentages Reprise
Mental Math Math Team Skills Test 20-Question Sample.
MM4A6c: Apply the law of sines and the law of cosines.
Molecular replacement and model- building using distant homology models as templates ACA Trueblood Award Lecture July 24, 2013 Honolulu, Hawaii Tom Terwilliger.
AMPLE – Using de novo or ab initio protein structure modelling techniques to create and enhance search models for use in Molecular Replacement Jaclyn Bibby,
Christopher Reynolds Supervisor: Prof. Michael Sternberg Bioinformatics Department Division of Molecular Biosciences Imperial College London.
Online Rubric Assessment Tool for Marine Engineering Course
23-8 3x6 Double it Take Away 6 Share By 9 Double it +10 Halve it Beginner Start Answer Intermediate 70 50% of this ÷7÷7 x8 Double it Start Answer.
Before Between After.
ST/PRM3-EU | | © Robert Bosch GmbH reserves all rights even in the event of industrial property rights. We reserve all rights of disposal such as copying.
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
1  Janet Hensley  Pam Lange  Barb Rowenhorst Meade School District.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Miroslav Brumovský28th July 2011 Miroslav Brumovský 28 th July 2011 Methods using polarization for in silico fragment-based drug design.
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Doc.: IEEE /0333r2 Submission July 2014 TGaj Editor Report for CC12 Jiamin Chen, HuaweiSlide 1 Date: Author:
Experimental Characterization of the He + I 35 Cl(E,v † =11,12) and He + I 35 Cl( ,v † =0-2) Intermolecular Potential Energy Surfaces Joshua P. Darr and.
Antibody Structure Prediction and the Use of Mutagenesis in Docking Arvind Sivasubramanian, Aroop Sircar, Eric Kim & Jeff Gray Johns Hopkins University,
Functional Site Prediction Selects Correct Protein Models Vijayalakshmi Chelliah Division of Mathematical Biology National Institute.
SAN DIEGO SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER Blue Gene for Protein Structure Prediction (Predicting CASP Targets in Record Time) Ross C. Walker.
Protein Structure Prediction using ROSETTA
Why multiple scoring functions can improve docking performance - Testing hypotheses for rescoring success Noel M. O’Boyle, John W. Liebeschuetz and Jason.
Incorporating additional types of information in structure calculation: recent advances chemical shift potentials residual dipolar couplings.
Thomas Huber Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Environment ComBinE Department of Mathematics The University of Queensland.
STRUTTURE IN SOLUZIONE VIA NMR.
Chemical Shift And its Use in Structure Determination It has been know for a long while that: 1.The chemical shift is dependant on the secondary structure,
Practical session 2b Introduction to 3D Modelling and threading 9:30am-10:00am 3D modeling and threading 10:00am-10:30am Analysis of mutations in MYH6.
Automatic NMR resonance assignment of methyl groups using paramagnetic lanthanides. Christophe Schmitz School of Molecular & Microbial Sciences University.
Protein Structure & Modeling Biology 224 Instructor: Tom Peavy Nov 18 & 23, 2009
Protein Structure Prediction
Protein Design with Backbone Optimization Brian Kuhlman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Protein docking with PCS restraints Christophe Schmitz29 September 2010.
CS-ROSETTA Yang Shen et al. Presented by Jonathan Jou.
Ab-initio protein structure prediction ? Chen Keasar BGU Any educational usage of these slides is welcomed. Please acknowledge.
Modelling genome structure and function Ram Samudrala University of Washington.
Automated Structure Prediction using Robetta in CASP11 Baker Group David Kim, Sergey Ovchinnikov, Frank DiMaio.
Modelling the rice proteome
Protein Structure Fitting and Refinement Guided by Cryo-EM Density
1. Pure Protein (0.3 mL, mM; ~ 10 mg)
Hahnbeom Park, Frank DiMaio, David Baker  Structure 
Rosetta: De Novo determination of protein structure
Marcelo Nöllmann, Jiuya He, Olwyn Byron, W.Marshall Stark 
Damped-Dynamics Flexible Fitting
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages R95-R106 (October 1996)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Yang Zhang, Jeffrey Skolnick  Biophysical Journal 
M-TASSER: An Algorithm for Protein Quaternary Structure Prediction
Presentation transcript:

PCS + ROSETTA = NMR structure determination ? ECPM2009 Coffs Harbour PCS + ROSETTA = NMR structure determination ? Christophe Schmitz Thomas Huber group The University of Queensland

The Pseudocontact shift (PCS) NMR effect induced by a paramagnetic lanthanide. Measured on active spin (1H, 15N, 13C…) Long range effect. Effect described within the Δχ-tensor. Combine distance and angular dependence. 40 Å

What is PCS used for? What about structure determination? Structure refinement Allegrozzi, M.; Bertini, I.; Janik, M. B. L.; Lee, Y. M.; Lin, G. H.; Luchinat, C. JACS 2000, 122, (17), 4154-4161. Chemical shift assignment Schmitz, C.; John, M.; Park, A. Y.; Dixon, N. E.; Otting, G.; Pintacuda, G.; Huber, T., JBNMR 2006, 35, 79-87. Protein-protein complex Pintacuda, G.; Park, A. Y.; Keniry, M. A.; Dixon, N. E.; Otting, G. JACS 2006, 128, (11), 3696-3702. What about structure determination?

PCS for structure determination?

Rosetta for structure prediction http://www.rosettacommons.org/software/index.html

Rosetta structure prediction protocol …GFMDYEFSL………….. RQIVLDTET…………..TGMNQIGAH… Fragment picking Abinitio High resolution refinement

Fragment picking with CS-ROSETTA ψ ϕ Yang Shen, Oliver Lange, Frank Delaglio, et al. PNAS, (2008) 105, 4685-4690 • Rosetta Fragments • CS-Rosetta Fragments • Native fragment ϕ ψ

High resolution refinement PCS into ROSETTA Fragment picking Abinitio High resolution refinement

List of protein targets Protein G 56 residues 3GB1 Calbindin 75 residues 1KQV θ subunit 76 residues 2AE9 ArgN repressor 78 residues 1AOY N-t Calmodulin 79 residues 1SW8 Thioredoxin 108 residues 1XOA Parvalbumin 110 residues 1RJV Calmodulin 146 residues 2K61 Myoglobin 153 residues 1BZR ε subunit 186 residues 1J54

Example 1 - ROSETTA only Cα RMSD Density - PCS only ArgN repressor 78 residues 1AOY - PCS-ROSETTA 3 PCS data sets N and H PCS SCORE Cα RMSD • 1000 decoys from low to high RMSD • Native structure ■ Native ■ Best PCS-ROSETTA decoy

Example 2 (it doesn’t work well, but we sort of know why) - ROSETTA only - PCS only Parvalbumin 110 residues 1RJV - PCS-ROSETTA Density 1 PCS data sets H Cα RMSD • 1000 decoys from low to high RMSD • Native structure PCS SCORE Cα RMSD ■ Native ■ Best PCS-ROSETTA decoy

Example 3 (it works and it’s cool because it’s a big one) - ROSETTA only - PCS only - PCS-ROSETTA Calmodulin 146 residues 2K61 Density 4 PCS data sets H Cα RMSD • 1000 decoys from low to high RMSD • Native structure PCS SCORE Cα RMSD ■ Native ■ Best PCS-ROSETTA decoy

Example 5 (it doesn't' work yet, but it really should, and we are going to keep working hard on that one) - ROSETTA only - PCS only - PCS-ROSETTA ε subunit 186 residues 1J54 Density 5 PCS data sets C, N and H Cα RMSD PCS SCORE Coming soon… • 1000 decoys from low to high RMSD • Native structure Cα RMSD

List of protein targets Protein G 56 residues 3GB1 Calbindin 75 residues 1KQV Theta 76 residues 2AE9 ArgN repressor 78 residues 1AOY N-t Calmodulin 79 residues 1SW8 3 11 2 1 4 5 Thioredoxin 108 residues 1XOA Parvalbumin 110 residues 1RJV Calmodulin 146 residues 2K61 Myoglobin 153 residues 1BZR ε subunit 186 residues 1J54

Conclusion 1. New road for structure determination 2. PCS and Rosetta work hand in hand 3. PCS are awesome

Acknowledgments GSRTG Dr Michael John (GAU) Prof. David Baker (UW) Dr Guido Pintacuda (ENS-Lyon) Robert Vernon (UW) Dr Thomas Huber (UQ) Prof. Gottfried Otting (ANU) Dr Xun-Cheng Su (ANU) GSRTG

Different paramagnetic lanthanides…

Example 4: it works and it’s a good surprise because we thought it wouldn’t. - ROSETTA only - PCS only - PCS-ROSETTA θ subunit 76 residues 2AE9 2 PCS data sets H Density ■ θ ■ ε Cα RMSD PCS SCORE • 1000 decoys from low to high RMSD • Native structure Cα RMSD

1KQV - ROSETTA only - PCS only - PCS-ROSETTA 11 PCS data sets Density Calbindin 75 residues 1KQV - ROSETTA only - PCS only - PCS-ROSETTA Density 11 PCS data sets C, N and H Cα RMSD PCS SCORE • 1000 decoys from low to high RMSD • Native structure Cα RMSD

Protein G 56 residues 3GB1 - ROSETTA only - PCS only - PCS-ROSETTA Density 3 PCS data sets H Cα RMSD • 1000 decoys from low to high RMSD • Native structure PCS SCORE Cα RMSD

- ROSETTA only - PCS only - PCS-ROSETTA Thioredoxin 108 residues 1XOA Density 1 PCS data sets H and N Cα RMSD PCS SCORE • 1000 decoys from low to high RMSD • Native structure Cα RMSD

Myoglobin 153 residues 1BZR - ROSETTA only - PCS only - PCS-ROSETTA Density 2 PCS data sets H Cα RMSD PCS SCORE • 1000 decoys from low to high RMSD • Native structure Cα RMSD

High resolution refinement PCS into ROSETTA Fragment picking High resolution refinement Abinitio