Two Kinds of Reasoning Chapter 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 1. Claims A claim takes the form of a proposition. A proposition has a similar relation to a sentence as a number does to.
Advertisements

Deductive Validity In this tutorial you will learn how to determine whether deductive arguments are valid or invalid. Go to next slide.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Fate Is Fate Invincible?. The Logical Argument 1)It’s either true that you will eat dinner tonight or it’s true that you won’t. 2)If it’s true that you.
OBJECTIONS Fate. The Logical Argument 1)It’s either true that you will eat dinner tonight or it’s true that you won’t. 2)If it’s true that you will eat.
Critical/“Critiquing” Thinking Objective & Subjective Claims Fact & Opinion Issue & Argument Cogency Reasoning Premise & Conclusion Cognitive Biases Belief.
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
Survey of Mathematical Ideas Math 100 Chapter 1 John Rosson Thursday January 18.
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Basic Argumentation.
Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1, Unit 1D, Slide 1 Thinking Critically 1.
Is It Inductive or Is It Deductive?
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Argument Basics Getting to Accept - Reject - Suspend Judgment.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
FALSE PREMISE.
Aristotelian Logic & Fashioning an Argument A Study of Deductive Reasoning.
 Review: an argument can have an unstated premise. ◦ For example, “No motorcycles are allowed in the park because the regulations state that motor vehicles.
Deductive vs. Inductive Logic This course is about deductive logic. But it is important to know something about inductive logic.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
What is Good Evidence? You are studying emerald samples from all over the world for your geology class. “This Columbian emerald is green…this South African.
Argument Diagramming Part II PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 1, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
Logic and Persuasion AGED 520V. Logic and Persuasion Why do scientists need to know logic and persuasion? Scientists are writers and must persuade their.
Arguments, translation, representation -Sign In! -Quiz -Review Quiz -Unstated premises and translation -Things that look like arguments but aren't -Representing.
Chapter 1A God and Science.
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
2.3 Methods of Proof.
(not about ships this time)
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
Jamie S. Burton PHI 103 Gloria Zuniga y Postigo April 21, 2014.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.
Deductive reasoning.
a valid argument with true premises.
FALSE PREMISE.
Critical Thinking Lecture 1 What is Critical Thinking?
Chapter 9 Persuasion.
The Ontological Argument
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
The Ontological Argument
A Closer Look at Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Making Sense of Arguments
Critical Thinking Review Notes
The most important idea in logic: Validity of an argument.
Logic & Reasoning.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1b What is Philosophy? (part 2)
From Informal Fallacies to Formal Logic
Logical Fallacies.
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Arguments Sign In! Review Conclusions and Conclusion/Premises
Patterns of Informal Non-Deductive Logic (Ch. 6)
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Two Kinds of Reasoning Chapter 2

Arguments: General Features Review: What is an argument? God exists. This is a statement, not an argument. God exists. It is as plain as the nose on your face. This is a more emphatic statement, but it is still not an argument. God exists. There are no atheists in foxholes. From a logical standpoint, these two statements are not related.

Arguments: General Features I think God exists, because I was raised a Baptist. This is not an argument, rather it is an explanation about why someone believes in God. God exists because something had to cause the universe. This is an argument because it has a premise that supports a conclusion.

Unstated Premises and Conclusions “Of course tennis players aren’t weak, in fact, no athletes are weak.” This argument is missing a premise. “All true democrats believe in freedom of speech, but there are some Americans who would impose censorship on free expression.” This argument is missing a conclusion. We will talk about this much more in chapter 8.

Deductive arguments We talked about deductive arguments in the last chapter. However, there are more things to know about deductive arguments. Validity – if it isn’t possible for the premise(s) to be true and the conclusion to be false. When the premise(s) of an argument are true and the argument is valid, then it is a sound argument. We will talk about this much more in chapter 8, too.

Inductive arguments The premises of inductive arguments don’t prove their conclusions; they support them. For example: “The vast majority of entertainers are extroverts. Dave Letterman is an entertainer. Therefore David Letterman is an extrovert.” Inductive argument. The premises support the conclusion, but they do not attempt to show that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.

Exercises 2-5. (A few exercises from 2-5, page 57-58 of the text) Which of these items are intended to be deductive demonstrations and which are intended to provide inductive support? 1. No mayten trees are deciduous, and all nondeciduous trees are evergreens. It follows that all mayten trees are evergreens. 2. Mike must belong to the Bartenders and Beverage Union Local 165, since almost ever Las Vegas bartender does. 3. I’ve never met a golden retriever with a nasty disposition. I bet there aren’t any. Please turn to page 56 of your textbook. Identify the premises and conclusion in the first 5 exercises in exercise section 2-3.