Goals of This Presentation:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standard: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Advertisements

Literacy Block Others Parts of the Day 90 Min. Reading Block
Leon County Schools Understanding the Common Core Standards Summer
Common Core for Social Studies Overview 1. What is Common Core? knowledge and skills students should have within their K-12 education so that they will.
Leon County Schools Next Generation Content Area Reading Professional Development (NGCARPD) Summer 2012 Using Common Core to Enhance your Instruction 1.
Making the Connection to Assessment. Three components: Common Core State Standards Excellent Matches to State Curriculum Essential Skills and Knowledge.
Field Testing Testing the Test March PARCC Consortium 2 Governed by the education chiefs in the states.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers September 2013.
Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards
ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
What’s New with PARCC for ELA? January 30, 2014 Vincent Segalini.
Common Core Planning – Deep Dive into Literacy
Shifting Gears! A Professional Development Session Designed to Support Turnkey Training on the Shifting Gears Initiatives Educator.
September Commonly Asked Questions:  What does it mean to ad0pt the Common Core Standards?  How will the Common Core Standards connect to curriculum,
Taking a Look at PARCC Deb Bellinger Elementary Curriculum Consultant Calcasieu Parish.
A New Vision of Assessment Texts Worth Reading Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking 1 September 2013.
East Meets West Conference October 30, Georgia Milestones Comprehensive – single program, not series of tests (e.g., CRCT; EOCT; WA); formative.
Georgia Milestones: General Test Parameters 1. Georgia Milestones General Test Parameters ELA will consists of 3 sections, 1 of which will focus mainly.
Session 2: Informational Text Audience: Science, Social Studies, Technical Subject Teachers.
Understanding PARCC. Diagnostic Assessment PARCC Overview Mid-Year Assessment (MYA) Speaking and Listening Assessment Performance-Based Assessment (PBA)
Common Core State Standards Standardizing What We Know Watch this short video.
Let’s Get to the Core Presented by: Benjamin Joseph Media Specialist
Madison School District Governing Board Meeting March 19, 2013.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
THE ALLENDALE PARENTS AS PARTNERS SERIES PRESENTS: P A RCC AND THE COMMON CORE NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
A Look at the Future of Assessments - ELA Ron Bauman · January 29, 2014.
Nearly every state in the nation is working individually and collectively to improve its academic standards and assessments to ensure students graduate.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
ELA Instructional Shifts and Higher Order Thinking 1.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Science Research Simulation Task Science High School Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
1. Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including Common Core 2 The Oklahoma C 3 Standards, including the Common Core, lay the foundation toward ensuring that students.
Overview of the CCSSO Criteria– Content Alignment in English Language Arts/Literacy Student Achievement Partners June 2014.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.
NEXT GENERATION ASSESSMENT INFORMATION NIGHT Memorial Junior High School Kathybel Ortiz, M. Ed January 22, :30pm THE DESTINATION SCHOOL COMMUNITY.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
PARCC Information Meeting FEB. 27, I Choose C – Why We Need Common Core and PARCC.
PARCC WORKSHOP Preparing Students for the Call to be College and Career Ready.
Adapted from: PARCC Model Content Frameworks English Language Arts/Literacy October 2011.
Overview Dr. Karen Russo 1 As of October 1, 2014.
By Raani Agrawal 1 PARCC Assessment: ELA/Literacy and Math Grades 6-8.
10/11/2015MSDE1 PARCC Assessment Update PARCC Assessment Update Day 3, Session 4.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
Montana K-12 Content Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Text Complexity.
THINK / PUZZLE / EXPLORE Think about what you may have read as part of the pre-reading activity for this workshop as well as what you already know about.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
COMMON CORE OVERVIEW English Language Arts Content Area Specialists Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported.
Quality Criteria for Selecting Texts Worth Reading September
Advances in the PARCC ELA/Literacy Assessment August
New Jersey State Assessments: What do families need to know?
Analysis of Literary Text: Understanding and Preparing for the PARCC LAT and NWT COLLEGE CAREER READY CONFERENCE 2015.
PARCC Assessment Administration Guidance 1. PARCC Assessment Design Summative Assessments 2 Performance- Based Assessment End-of-Year Assessment  After.
Rhode Island Department of Education Diane Girard & Colleen O’Brien.
Understanding the PARCC Prepared for Hillcrest School February 11, 2015.
1. PARCC is designed to reward quality instruction aligned to the Common Core State Standards, so the assessment is worthy of preparation rather than.
Reflecting on the Shifts in Assessment. English Language Arts.
PARCC in New Jersey New Jersey Department of Education March 2013.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
PARCC for ELA and Literacy
The PARCC Vision PARCC states have committed to building a K-12 assessment system that:
Presentation transcript:

ELA/Literacy PARCC Updates The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers

Goals of This Presentation: Provide an understanding of the PARCC Assessment System for ELA/Literacy Provide an overview of the Evidence-Centered Design and updated documents Updates on the PARCC ELA/Literacy rubric Updates on the PARCC ELA/Literacy reduction in test specifications

Purpose of PARCC Summative Assessments Determine whether students are college- and career-ready (CCR) or on track to become CCR Assess the full range of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for reading, writing, and language Measure the full range of student performance, including the performance of high- and low-performing students—with a focus on critical thinking Provide data for accountability, including measures of growth Incorporate innovative approaches throughout the system Comparable scores across states

PARCC’s Core Commitments to ELA/Literacy Assessment Quality Questions Worth Answering: Sequences of questions that draw students into deeper encounters with texts are the norm (as in an excellent classroom), rather than sets of random questions of varying quality. Texts Worth Reading: The assessments use authentic texts worthy of study instead of artificially produced or commissioned passages.  Better Standards Demand Better Questions: Instead of reusing existing items, PARCC is developing custom items to the Standards. Fidelity to the Standards: PARCC evidence statements are rooted in the language of the Standards so that expectations remain the same in both instructional and assessment settings.

Assessments ELA/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades 3–11 Beginning of School Year End of School Year Flexible administration Performance-Based Assessment Diagnostic Assessment Mid-Year Assessment End-of-Year Assessment Speaking and Listening Assessment Key: Optional Required

What’s Next for PARCC 2014 2015 2016 Summer/Fall Winter/Spring Summer PARCC begins building tests Findings from research reported Mid-year assessments available Students take operational tests Performance level cut scores set Results of first operational assessments released Diagnostic assessments available Colleges & universities use scores to place student into credit- bearing courses

PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment: 2014-15 PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment: Performance-Based & End-of-Year

Summative Assessments PARCC ELA/Literacy 2014-2015 Summative Assessments Performance-Based Assessment + End-of-Year Assessment After 75 percent of the school year Extended tasks, applications of concepts and skills ELA/Literacy: Writing effectively when analyzing text, research simulation ELA/Literacy Grades 3-11 After 90 percent of the school year Innovative, short-answer items ELA/Literacy: Reading comprehension ELA/Literacy Grades 3-11 Pba has writing and will need headphones. Maybe because of media Eoy no writing or multimedia

Performance-Based Assessment The Performance-Based Assessment will be: Tied to a Task Generation Model Scored for Writing Eligible Item Types for Performance-Based Assessment (PBA): Evidence-Based Selected Response (EBSR) Technology-Enhanced Constructed Response (TECR) Prose-Constructed Response (PCR) pp. 17-18 Item Guidelines

End-of-Year Assessment The End-of-Year Assessment will be: Focused on supporting Reading Comprehension Claims Machine scored Eligible Item Types for End-of-Year Assessment (EOY): Evidence-Based Selected Response (EBSR) Technology-Enhanced Constructed Response (TECR) Part a accuracy Part b evidence Must get part a right to receive credit

PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment: Evidence-Centered Design

An Aligned System Common Core State Standards Model Content Frameworks Model Instructional Lessons/Units PARCC Assessment System

A Model for Curriculum Developers and Teachers as well as Assessment Illustrates one way of organizing the content of the standards over the course of the school year Reflects the key shifts in the standards Provides insight into the development of the PARCC Assessment System Presents standards in an integrated fashion Weaves standards into modules that progressively develop student understanding Focuses on essential knowledge, skills, and understandings students must develop for college and career readiness Note: The Frameworks are not a complete guide for curriculum.

PARCC: Creating Task Models to Elicit Evidence Model Content Frameworks ELA/Literacy, Grades 3-5 ELA, Grades 6-11 (with implications for literacy in other disciplines) http://parcconline.org/parcc-model-content-frameworks

Sample Model Content Framework Chart

Claims Driving Design: ELA/Literacy MASTER CLAIM Students are on-track or ready for college and careers MAJOR CLAIMS Students read and comprehend a range of sufficiently complex texts independently Reading Literature Reading Informational Text Vocabulary Interpretation and use Students write effectively when using and/or analyzing sources Written Expression Convention and Knowledge of Language Students build and present knowledge through research and the integration, comparison, and synthesis of ideas SUB CLAIMS Scale scores are tied to master claim and major claims

Classroom evidence of what we see students doing

PARCC: Evidences Evidence Tables Reading Literary and Informational Texts, with Language Vocabulary evidences, at each grade level Writing, includes progressions of standards from the MCF along with statements of evidence for written expression http://parcconline.org/assessment-blueprints-test-specs

Evidence Statements Grade Each bullet lists an evidence statement that is aligned to the standard next to it and to the claim. Claim Each standard may have (1) or more evidences. To refer to the evidences, the following “code” is to be used until metadata and tagging for these charts is completed. 3.RI5.1 = Grade 3, Reading Information Standard 5, Evidence (1). Standards that may be measured to support the claim

Reading the Writing Evidence Tables

PARCC Summative Assessment ELA/Literacy Performance Tasks Two literary passages PCR Item and Reading Comprehension Questions Focus on analysis Literary Analysis Task Two types: narrative story or narrative description One literary or informational passage Focus on elements of narrative Narrative Task One extended text and two shorter texts Informational text Often includes multi-media or audio stimulus Research Simulation Task

PARCC: Creating Task Generation Models Task Generation Models (TGM)—Summer Updates Narrative Tasks 1 literary text Literary Analysis Tasks 2 literary texts Research Simulation Tasks Grade 3, 2 informational texts Grades 4-11, 3 informational texts http://parcconline.org/assessment-blueprints-test-specs

Task Models for PBA Tasks For the ELA/Literacy PBA, all items must align to a task model. Task models identify: The main focus for the task The ES to be targeted with the PCR item The ES to be targeted with the EBSR and TECR items The number of items required for the task

Task Models for PBA Tasks These need to be included in the november day of LDC to plan next module….

The PARCC Summative Assessment: Passage and Item Selection Guidelines

PARCC: UPDATED Passage and Item Selection Guidelines Passage Selection Guidelines (Updated August 2014) with Literary and Informational Complexity Analysis Worksheets Item Selection Guidelines (Updated August 2014) http://parcconline.org/assessment-blueprints-test-specs

Use of Passages on PARCC Assessments Two Summative Assessments: Performance Based (PBA) Literary Analysis Task (paired passages) Research Simulation Task (three passage set, two for grade 3) Narrative Task (single passage) End-of-Year (EOY) Single (3-11) and paired (6-11) passages

Five PARCC Criteria for Selecting Texts Worth Reading Texts Are Complex: PARCC assessments follow the staircase of text complexity in the CCSS to ensure assessments track student progress each year towards college and career readiness. Texts Are Diverse: PARCC texts stem from across the disciplines (e.g. ELA, history, science and technical subjects), are written by authors with diverse backgrounds, reflect the CCSS prescribed balances of literature and informational text, and appeal to a wide range of student audiences. Texts Are Authentic: PARCC texts are authentic works of exceptional craft and/or rich repositories of ideas and information rather than commissioned-for-the-test passages lacking sufficient evidence, organization, and style.

Five PARCC Criteria for Selecting Texts Worth Reading, cont’d Texts Are Paired Effectively: PARCC text pairings, where required by the CCSS, have meaningful and significant points of comparison that invite questions beyond superficial observations. Texts Meet Demands of Bias and Sensitivity Guidelines: PARCC texts are carefully vetted to ensure that while they pique student interest and appeal to a wide audience, they avoid highly controversial topics that may be troublesome to students.

Text Complexity Quantitative Readabilities Three readability measures (RMM, TextEvaluator, LEXILE) Evidence statements aligned to CCSS Qualitative Traits Purpose/Meaning, Text Structure, Language Features, Knowledge Demands Professional Expertise    Use of experience to determine appropriateness Keep the most challenging student in mind and ask: Would that student be successful with this passage?

Quantitative Measures PARCC will use the following quantitative measures: The Lexile Framework For Reading by MetaMetrics Reading Maturity by Pearson SourceRater by Educational Testing Service PARCC will use the updated text complexity grade bands and associated ranges of multiple measures from Appendix A of the CCSS Common Core Band The Lexile Framework Reading Maturity SourceRater 2nd – 3rd 420 - 820 3.53 – 6.13 0.36-5.62 4th-5th 740 - 1010 5.42 – 7.92 3.97-8.40 6th-8th 925 - 1185 7.04 – 9.57 5.85-10.87 9th-10th 1050 - 1335 8.41 – 10.81 8.41-12.26 11th-CCR 1185 - 1385 9.57 – 12.00 9.62-13.47 Source: http://www.corestandards.org/assets/E0813_Appendix_A_New_Research_on_Text_Complexity.pdf

Passage Length Grade Band Minimum/Maximum Passage Length for Literary and Informational Text/Literary Nonfiction 3-5 200-800 words 6-8 400-1,000 words 9-11 500-1,500 words **Some types of texts, such as poetry, political cartoons, and advertisements, may fall below the minimum word count. Care must be taken to ensure that these types of texts are robust enough to support a variety of reading comprehension questions.

Qualitative Measures PARCC will use the Informational Complexity Analysis Worksheet and the Literary Complexity Analysis Worksheet to provide reviewers with rubrics to analyze text complexity and place a text within a specific grade These worksheets are valuable tools for educators as they analyze texts for use in instruction as well as assessment.

Visual/Video Stimulus

The PARCC Summative Assessment: UPDATED ELA/Literacy Rubrics

Updated ELA/Literacy Rubrics Grade 3 http://www.parcconline.org/samples/english-language-artsliteracy/grade-3-generic-rubrics Grades 4-5 http://www.parcconline.org/samples/english-language-artsliteracy/grades-4-5-generic-rubrics Grades 6-11 http://www.parcconline.org/samples/english-language-artsliteracy/grades-6-11-generic-rubrics Changes Pulled out narrative task Written expression weighted 3 times Command is not weighted

Grade 3 ELA/Literacy RST and LAT

Grade 3 ELA/Literacy Narrative

The PARCC Summative Assessment: ELA/Literacy Test Design UPDATED ELA/Literacy Test Design

Grades 3-5 Grade 3 – 5 English Language Arts/Literacy end-of-year* Revised 1 short literary passage with 5 questions 1 long informational passage with 8 questions Total: 2 passage sets, 13 items
  Original 1 “Paired” passage set with 8 questions (paired passage set comprised of two short literary passages, two short informational passages, or a literary and an informational passage) 1 short informational passage with 5 questions Total: 4 passage sets, 26 items

Grades 6-11 Grade 6 – 11 English Language Arts/Literacy end-of-year* Revised 1 short literary passage with 5 questions 1 “paired” passage set with 6 questions (paired passage set comprised of two short literary passages, two short informational passages, or a literary and an informational passage) 1 short informational passage with 5 questions 1 long informational passage with 6 questions Total: 4 passage sets, 22 items
  Original 1 short literary passage with 4 questions 2 short informational passages with 5 questions each Total: 5 passage sets, 26 items *All tests will still include some field test questions.

6th Grade PBA Test Specs

6th Grade PBA Test Specs Continued

6th Grade EOY Test Specs

The PARCC Summative Assessment: Item Prototypes and Sample Items http://parcconline.org/samples/item-task-prototypes

Item Prototypes and Sample Items PARCC: Item Prototypes and Sample Items

2013 Grade 6 Benchmark Released Item: Vocabulary Which word can best replace the word salvaged as it is used in paragraph 26 of the passage? *A rescued B plucked C bundled D discarded

Grade 6 Evidence-Based Selected-Response Item #1 Part A What does the word “regal” mean as it is used in the passage? generous threatening kingly* uninterested Part B Which of the phrases from the passage best helps the reader understand the meaning of “regal?” “wagging their tails as they awoke” “the wolves, who were shy” “their sounds and movements expressed goodwill” “with his head high and his chest out”*

2013 Grade 3 Benchmark Released Items: Reading Open Response & Writing Prompt Reading Open Response: Which tree is most important to koalas? Give three details from the passage to show how it is important. Writing Prompt: Your teacher has asked you to write about a time you had fun with a friend. Think about a time that you had fun with a friend. Who were you with and what did you do? Now write about that time. Give enough detail so that your teacher will understand your ideas.

Grade 3, Item #3 You have read two texts about famous people in American history who solved a problem by working to make a change.   Write an article for your school newspaper describing how she and  faced challenges to change something in America.  In your article, be sure to describe in detail why some solutions they tried worked and others did not work.   Tell how the challenges each one faced were the same and how they were different. After the verb is what the student is expected to complete.

Possible Supporting Details Main Ideas Supporting Details Grade 5, Item # 2 Choose the two correct main ideas and drag them into the empty box labeled “Main Ideas.” Then choose one detail that best supports each main idea. Drag each detail into the empty box labeled “Supporting Details.” Possible Main Ideas Possible Supporting Details Jonathan has his own 1000-yard zipline. "In fact, as a tree house architect, Jonathan has built more than 380 custom tree houses across the United States."* Jonathan is an experienced tree house builder.* “Jonathan’s love of tree-house living began when he was a kid.” Jonathan works carefully so that tree houses do not hurt the trees.* "It was the most fun I ever had." Jonathan lived in a tree house when he was in college. "'I build a tree house so it helps the tree,' he says."* Jonathan advises readers to learn the names of trees. "'Walk in the woods and learn the different trees. Spend time climbing and learn how to do it safely.'" Jonathan once built a house in a crab apple tree. “One of his favorite names is ‘Ups and Downs.’”   Main Ideas Supporting Details

ELA/Literacy Practice Tests The online ELA/Literacy PBA 3-11 practice tests were released last spring. They can be accessed at http://www.parcconline.org/practice-tests. The paper ELA/Literacy PBA practice tests are scheduled to be released in November. The online ELA/Literacy EOY practice tests are scheduled to be released in January.

Websites to Access Additional CCSS-Aligned Resources

Resources for Aligning Instruction and Assessments to the CCSS PARCC Website: Assessment tools and resources for use in instruction http://parcconline.org Achieve Website: EQuIP (Teachers Evaluating Quality Instructional Products) http://www.achieve.org/EQuIP Student Achievement Partners Website: Teacher/ Administrator Resources http://achievethecore.org/

Student Assessment Director ELA/Literacy Assessment Specialists Contact Information Student Assessment Director Hope Allen hope.allen@arkansas.gov ELA/Literacy Assessment Specialists Sheree Baird sheree.baird@arkansas.gov Jessica McIntosh jessica.mcintosh@arkansas.gov Teresa Moka teresa.moka@arkansas.gov JJ Morley janice.morley@arkansas.gov (501) 682-4558