Texas Accountability Intervention System Reconstitution Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
JANUARY 30, 2014 TETN EVENT #31593 SpEd Assessment Updates: Assessment Options for Students with Disabilities.
An Update on Novi’s Journey Presentation for MAASE April 13, 2011.
The Principal and Assistant Principal Evaluation Process: Integrating the Teacher Working Conditions Survey.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Campus Improvement Plans
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Part 2. Participate fully Hand in the air for getting attention Problem solve Limit side conversations Silence cell phone Norms.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Reconstitution Planning and Guidance Overview
Professional Development and Appraisal System
HOUSE BILL 5 UPDATE. Curriculum Graduation Plans Endorsement Pathways College Readiness requirements Accountability Community and Student Engagement Student.
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Session Materials  Wiki
1 Role of the Case Manager Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District 2009.
+ HB 5 — School District Evaluation of Performance in Community & Student Engagement.
Administrator’s Academy July 2015 Instruction & Accountability Division.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Developing the Plan. Tier III Developing the Intervention Plan Developing the Intervention Plan.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Texas Accountability Intervention System Part 2 September 23, 2013 Education Service Center, Region 2 Electronic handouts:
SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness:
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
School Improvement Resource Center Supporting campuses entering Title I School Improvement August 1, 2006.
Stage 4 Restructuring Stage 5 Alternative Governance.
Roles and Responsibilities. Welcome to Site-Based Decision Making for NEW SBDM Members Complete the K-W-L Chart while you wait. Grab a water, coffee and.
Stage 3 - Corrective Action. Corrective Action and the Corrective Action Team.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
October Katy Independent School District, the leader in educational excellence, together with family and community, provides unparalleled learning.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
New Teacher Induction Suzanne Smith Assistant Principal Cherry Creek Academy Increasing New Teacher Retention
Summer Summit June 30 – July 1, We needed another acronym in education? TOP REASONS FOR A CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK 4. Our assessment.
Texas Accountability Intervention System Reconstitution Planning Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Turnaround Plan Development Guidance,
Support Connections.
Focus / Priority School Updates
Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS)
Socorro Independent School District
Roles and Responsibilities
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Roles and Responsibilities
TEMPLATE – Annual Title I Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Texas Accountability Intervention System Reconstitution Planning

Who is here today?

Objectives Gain clarification of statutory requirements for making staff determinations in reconstitution Enhance understanding of campus redesign elements Prepare for reconstitution submissions

Answer Answer questions by phone or Provide Provide feedback on submissions Clarify Clarify communications and expectations Work Work in coordination with TCDSS and ESCs

Reconstitution Staffing Campus Redesign

Reconstitution Staffing TAC § (7)(A) PrincipalTeachers Removal/reassignment of some or all campus administrative and/or instructional personnel in accordance with at least the minimum requirements of TEC §39.107

What are your current local policies/procedures regarding staff reassignment, termination, and non- renewal?

Reconstitution Staffing TAC § (7)(A) PrincipalTeachers Removal/reassignment of some or all campus administrative and/or instructional personnel in accordance with at least the minimum requirements of TEC §39.107

Reconstitution TEC §39.107(b)WHO Been employed at the campus for the previous two years – Years for which 1 st year IR and 2 nd year IR ratings were earned – and school year Principal

Reconstitution TEC §39.107(b) WHAT May not be retained on that campus UNLESS retention more beneficial for – Student achievement – Campus stability Principal

Reconstitution WHOTEC §39.107(b-1) Teachers of subjects assessed through state assessments Teachers

Reconstitution WHAT TEC §39.107(b-1) May be retained at campus ONLY IF – Pattern exists of significant academic improvement by students taught by teacher Teachers Can be reassigned to other position in the district

Who makes retention determinations for principals and teachers? Campus Intervention Team (CIT) District coordinator of school improvement (DCSI) Professional service provider (PSP) Campus Intervention Team (CIT) District coordinator of school improvement (DCSI) Professional service provider (PSP) CIT Procedures

Partner Processing What factors does the CIT need to consider given its statutory responsibility for retention determinations?

Process for evaluation Data sources Local policies and procedures Board policy HR procedures Transfer/reassignment Staff conversations CIT CONVERSATIONS

Are retention determinations made for all campus staff? (i.e., assistant principals, counselors, elective teachers) District decision TAC supports if choose to include all staff Minimum requirements – Teachers – Principal Special education considerations

Submission Requirements Principal Principal Retention Framework Summary How going to review Documented in reconstitution plan Decision Teacher Summary How going to review Documented in reconstitution plan Number of retained teachers by subject Number of reassigned teachers by subject Decision How & Draft decisions Final decisions

Determination Summary Determination Process Data sources – statutory requirements How data sources will be used in determinations Type of feedback provided Supports Professional development Data used to monitor progress Other supports Decisions Principal Teachers Aggregate number meeting criteria set in process

Reconstitution Staffing Campus Redesign

Reconstitution Rebuilding Transforming Recreating Redesigning

Curriculum and instruction changes Staffing Personal attention and guidance High expectations for all students Rigorous/relevant academics Structural and managerial innovations Financial commitment Sustained professional development Parent/community involvement Campus Redesign Elements

Table Activity How might these redesign elements look in a school?

Table Activity Rigorous/ Relevant Academics Personal Guidance & Attention High Expectations Curriculum/ Instruction Changes Parent/ Community Involvement Financial Commitment Structural or Managerial Innovation Sustained Professional Development Additional counselors or staff

What will be your foundation elements? Campus Redesign Elements

Submissions

Does a K-2 campus that is paired with a 3-5 campus rated 2 nd year IR also have to plan for reconstitution? Yes Remember reconstitution has two parts – Staffing evaluation/retention – Campus redesign Staff evaluation –subjects assessed – Remember decisions data driven Separate, coordinated plans

Questions?

Resources State Accountability Intervention Resources – Program Monitoring and Interventions - TEA State Accountability Intervention Resources – Program Monitoring and Interventions - TEA Texas Center for District and School Support

Contact Information Division of Program Monitoring and Interventions – – (512) Heather Christie, Manager – Christine Kent, TCDSS – Rachel Simic, TCDSS –