Sentencing After Blakely & the Blakely Bill Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-CH October, 2005 © 2005 Click Here For Sound.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 OVERVIEW OF A VERMONT CRIMINAL CASE Robert L. Sand Senior Policy and Legal Advisor Vermont Department of Public Safety c/o Vermont Law School P.O. Box.
Advertisements

General Criminal Law Principles: Principles of Punishment Keyed to E LLEN S. P ODGOR, P ETER H ENNING, A NDREW E. T ASLITZ, AND A LFREDO G ARCIA., C RIMINAL.
Appeal and Postconviction Relief
2012 ICN Cartel Workshop Panama City, Panama, Thursday, October 4 th, 2012 Lisa M. Phelan Chief of the National Criminal Enforcement Section (NCES) United.
Business Law Essential Standard 1.00 Objective 1.02
Starter What is an appeal? Describe the adversarial nature of the judicial process.
Juvenile Justice system
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
Adjudication hearing More than a million cases of alleged delinquency brought before the juvenile court each year More than half are petitioned to court.
Pleas & Plea Negotiations in NC Superior Court Jessica Smith, School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill N.C. Conference of Superior Court Judges June 2005.
The Organization of the Criminal Justice System
Chapter 13: Criminal Justice Process ~ Proceedings Before Trial Objective: The student should be able to identify the required procedures before a trial.
Question #7 If the President and Congress disagree over a tax bill, the President can veto the bill. Which of these applies to a presidential veto? A.
Objective 1.02 Understand Court Systems and Trial Procedures
Criminal Law Update & Review NC Conference of Superior Court Judges November, 2004 Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill Click Here For Sound.
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) Defendant pled guilty to offense punishable by imprisonment between 5 and 10 years Judge at sentencing hearing.
Criminal Law Update & Review NC Conference of Superior Court Judges November, 2004 Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill.
Blakely Update for District Court Judges October 2005 John Rubin © 2005.
Capital Case Law Issues Challenges to first-degree murder indictment First-degree murder conviction and punishment for other felonies First-degree murder.
Mitigating Circumstances & Resentencing Hearings Professor Robert Farb School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill.
Pleas & Plea Negotiations in NC Superior Court Jessica Smith, School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill N.C. Conference of Superior Court Judges June 2005.
Unit A-Business Law Essential Standard 1.00
The Criminal Justice System
Chapter 16 Lesson 2 Civil and Criminal Law. Crime and Punishment crime  A crime is any act that harms people or society and that breaks a criminal law.
 Gather evidence  Arrest warrant  Booking – finger prints, picture, possible lineup.
Do Now pg What are the steps in a civil court case? 2. Name 3 major differences between criminal and civil cases.
Purpose and Scope of Juvenile Court Act
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
Criminal Procedure -adversarial nature Prosecution-Defense State v. defendant -misdemeanor: A minor crime, punishable by a fine or a light jail term. Common.
Juvenile Justice Ch. 16.
Procedure Procedure at Trial. 1) Court Clerk reads the charge Indictment - if vague - quashed (struck down)
The American Legal System
Criminal Law. Types of Crime Most crime committed in the US breaks state laws Each state has its own penal code, or written laws that spell out crimes.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL CHAPTER 13 (CONT)
Arrests, Interrogations, and Confessions. Definitions Arrest: person is deprived of his or her freedom Interrogation: person accused or arrested is questioned.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial.
Which of the five types of crimes are shown in the pie chart? Bell Ringer.
Criminal Procedure Chapter 16.2 Review. What is a crime? An action that breaks the law Felonies are serious crimes Misdemeanors are less serious crimes.
The Courts What reporters need to know. Civil and criminal  Criminal law covers harms done against the people.  Examples: Murder, theft, reckless driving.
Georgia’s. SS8CG4 – The student will analyze the role of the judicial branch in GA state government. SS8CG6 – The student will explain how the Georgia.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Unit 4 Lesson 5: Criminal Law
THE PENAL SYSTEM AN OVERVIEW. Why do we have a penal system? Incapacitation: remove dangerous people from society so they don’t harm the rest of us. Deterrence:
Constitutional Criminal Procedure
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
This guide simplifies the arrest-to-sentence process in New York County.
Democracy and Constitutions The Texas System of Justice p
Juvenile Justice. Certification Certification – the proceeding in juvenile court in which the court determines if a juvenile will stand trial as an adult.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial – Chp 13 Booking – Formal process of making a police record of an arrest -Give private info such as:
Georgia’s SS8CG4 and SS8CG6. SS8CG4 – The student will analyze the role of the judicial branch in GA state government. SS8CG6 – The student will explain.
Criminal Law. Objective: Students will be able to:  Evaluate info given during a civil law case and determine the award.  Explain what criminal law.
Criminal Court Proceedings. Investigation Police gather evidence in the crime, in order to get an arrest warrant signed by a judge. Police may arrest.
Pretrial and Courtroom Procedures Principles of LPSCS.
Chapter 15 Section 3 Criminal Law. Types of Crimes Criminal law State criminal case v. federal criminal case Criminal justice system.
Criminal Procedure -adversarial nature Prosecution-Defense
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
Government Governments are created to provide safety, order, and to serve the people. They depend on citizens taking active, responsible roles.
CRIMINAL ISSUES IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
Criminal Law ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why does conflict develop? How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly?
Criminal Justice Process
The Participants.
The Courtroom The Basics.
The Criminal Justice Process
CRIMINAL PROCEDUREESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #6 MODEL ANSWER
Key concepts in the Victorian Criminal Justice System
Mitigating Circumstances & Resentencing Hearings
Vocabulary Activity Indictment Grand Jury
Presentation transcript:

Sentencing After Blakely & the Blakely Bill Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-CH October, 2005 © 2005 Click Here For Sound

Apprendi, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) Any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases punishment beyond “prescribed statutory maximum” must be submitted to the jury & proved beyond a reasonable doubt

State v. Lucas, 353 N.C. 568 (2001) “Prescribed statutory maximum” is the sentence in the aggravated range at the highest prior conviction level

Blakely, 542 U.S. 296 (2004) “Prescribed statutory maximum” for Apprendi purposes “is the maximum sentence a judge may impose solely on the basis of the facts reflected in the jury verdict or admitted by the defendant”

Blakely Implications SSA felony sentencing -Aggravating factors -PRL points Non-SSA sentencing: GS

The NC Response The Legislature: The Blakely Bill -Only covers SSA felonies; does not cover non-SSA offenses, such as impaired driving -Even for SSA felonies, only covers those committed on or after 6/30/2005

Allen, 359 NC 425 (2005) “Prescribed statutory maximum” under NC law is presumptive range Aggravators need not be alleged in the indictment Blakely errors are structural The Courts

Speight, 359 NC 602 (2005) Applied Allen to impaired driving grossly aggravating factors Also held error was structural

NC App. Cases Cases on aggravating factors Cases on prior record level points Cases involving presumptive range sentencing Many have been stayed by the NC Supreme Court Some hard to reconcile

Blakely Decided 6/24/2004

Blakely Decided 6/24/2004 Retroactivity?

Blakely Decided 6/24/2004 Blakely Bill SSA Felonies Committed on or after 6/30/2005 Retroactivity?

Blakely Decided 6/24/2004 Blakely Bill SSA Felonies Committed on or after 6/30/2005 Retroactivity? Procedure for pre-Bill SSA felonies?

Blakely Decided 6/24/2004 Blakely Bill SSA Felonies Committed on or after 6/30/2005 Retroactivity? Procedure for pre-Bill SSA felonies? Offenses not covered by the Bill?

Retroactivity? Pre-bill procedure? Applicability? Blakely Decided 6/24/2004

Blakely Decided 6/24/2004 Blakely Bill SSA Felonies Committed on or After 6/30/2005 Retroactivity?

Pre-Blakely Cases Motions for appropriate relief Raises issue of retroactivity

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply

Blakely Decided 6/24/2004 Blakely Bill SSA Felonies Committed on or After 6/30/2005 SSA felonies before effective date

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply Aggravating factors need to be submitted to jury & proved beyond a reasonable doubt

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply Prior record points -Point under 15A (b)(6) (all elements included in prior offense): Blakely does not apply -Point under 15A (b)(7) (offense committed while on probation, etc): NC App. held Blakely applies –decision stayed

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply Trial Procedure -Allen remanded for “resentencing”; Presumptive range sentencing only? Jury trial? -Norris remand instructed trial judge to submit aggs to jury; Norris has been stayed

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply Mitigating factors Judge determines Factor balancing Judge does

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply Presumptive range sentencing— safe harbor? Allen said prescribed statutory max. was presumptive range NC App. has reversed a presumptive sentence when judge found an aggravator – stay has been issued

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply Pleading Post-Blakely NC cases hold that aggs. & prior record points need not be alleged But what of NC law saying elements must be in indictment?

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply Notice Still some question as to scope of notice requirement

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply Admissions Generally, waivers of constitutional rights, must be knowing & voluntary Best to use same protections as plea/Blakely Bill Effect of a “stipulation”?

Post-Blakely Felonies To Which the Blakely Bill Doesn’t Apply Structural error -S tructural errors require automatic reversal -Allen & Speight held Blakely errors are structural -US Supreme Court has granted cert. on the issue in another state’s case; NC AG has petitioned for cert. in Speight

Blakely Bill Cases Applicability SSA felonies only Offenses committed on or after June 30, 2005

Blakely Bill Cases Aggravating factors -Proved beyond reasonable doubt -With 1 exception, need to go to jury Exception for GS 15A (d)(18a) (adjudicated delinquent) Status of exception in question

Blakely Bill Cases Mitigating factors Judge still determines Factor balancing Judge still does

Blakely Bill Cases Prior Record Points G.S. 15A (b)(7) (offense committed while on probation etc.) must be submitted to the jury & proved beyond a reasonable doubt

Blakely Bill Cases Trial procedure If D doesn’t admit the factor or point under (b)(7), judge can (1) Have 1 trial (2) Bifurcate “if interests of justice require”

Blakely Bill Cases Admissions Under new 15A you must determine whether the state: (1) seeks an agg. sentence & which factors are at issue; (2) seeks a PRL point under (b)(7) & (3) provided the required notice or whether the right to notice was waived

Blakely Bill Cases Admissions Incorporates 15A-1022(a)

Blakely Bill Cases Additional protections: you must (1) Personally advise D that he/she is entitled to have a jury determine the factors/points & has the right to prove mitigating factors before a judge (2) Determine that there is a factual basis & that the admission is the result of informed choice

Blakely Bill Cases Pleading Statutory aggs in (d)(1)- (19) & (b)(7) point need not be charged (d)(20) “catch-all” must be charged

Blakely Bill Cases Notice 30 days before trial

The Rest Blakely Bill Cases

The Rest All aggs. go to jury Again, keep an eye on Yarrell Blakely Bill Cases All aggs go to jury except 15A (d)(18a) (adjud. delinquent) Status of exception unclear in light of Yarrell

The Rest NC App. has said Blakely doesn’t apply to the (b)(7) point but decision has been stayed Blakely Bill Cases 15A (b)(7) point (committed while on probation, etc.) must go to the jury

The Rest Same Blakely Bill Cases Mitigators & factor balancing: you do it

The Rest Trial procedure: some uncertainty about “judicial fix” Remember Norris case remanding for jury trial has been stayed Blakely Bill Cases Trial procedure: can have jury trial on factors/(b)(7) point

The Rest Admissions: best to do it like a guilty plea or follow Blakely Bill procedure Blakely Bill Cases Admissions: detailed statutory procedure

The Rest Notice: need to comply with Hunt but not clear what that means; could comply with Blakely Bill Blakely Bill Cases Notice: 30 days

The Rest Pleading: under Allen and Speight, factors need not be pleaded Blakely Bill Cases Pleading: only catch-all agg. needs to be pleaded

Post-Blakely Misdemeanors Impaired driving related offenses punishable under GS

Blakely Decided 6/24/2004 Blakely Bill SSA Felonies Committed on or After 6/30/2005 Offenses not covered by the Bill?

Post-Blakely Misdemeanors sentencing -Only 2 grossly agg. factors involve prior convictions & thus are excepted from Blakely -Of 8 regular agg. factors, only 3 pertain to prior convictions; plus, there is the catch-all agg.

Post-Blakely Misdemeanors Levels 1-3: Blakely applies unless all grossly agg. or agg. factors pertain to prior convictions Level 4: Blakely probably applies—possible exception if no aggs are found Level 5: presumptive range ?

Post-Blakely Misdemeanors Sentenced Under G.S Pleading Need not allege in indictment. See Speight.

Post-Blakely Misdemeanors Sentenced Under G.S Notice Requirements aren’t clear