How to write a good paper.. Subbarao Kambhampati Arizona State University How to write a research paper (and not to die trying it)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reading for an English Class (created by Jim Burke)
Advertisements

LO: To know about the work of a Christian organisation that supports others.
Collaborating By: Mandi Schumacher.
How to Have a Conversation
+ I’m Almost Done! Preparing your Thesis draft Assoc. Prof. Dr. Neo Mai (Chair, FCM Postgraduate Affairs Committee) Postgraduate Affairs Lecture Series.
Paper 2 – Section B Writing to Inform, Explain, Describe.
Revision Or, No One runs the Play Perfectly the First Time….
You’re the author – what were your intentions?  A dot point outline of unrelated, random thoughts loosely connected to your writing  A plan for your.
Reflective Listening Lawyers Assistance Program Facilitated by Robert Bircher.
Audio-feedback Background – why I did it. My experiences – what I did. Student feedback – how did it go?
Improving your paper SUGGESTIONS FOR SUCCESS. Writing = Revising  Writing IS a process  This paper WILL take hard work to get a good grade (or even.
The Governor’s Scholars Program GSP For Juniors Only (but you have to prepare for it in 9 th and 10 th grades)
Self assessment of reading rate Instructions On the following page is some text. To show the text, click the mouse then begin to read as soon as the.
WRITING CRITIQUE GROUP GUIDELINES Writing responses to your group members’ work and receiving responses from others is the most important step in revising.
Today's training was a "classical" kind of training on one of the maps of St Etienne area. Since most of our maps are quite hilly here,
ASU 101 (Fall 2010) Subbarao Kambhampati. ASU 101 Instructor: Rao (Subbarao Kambhampati) Meets once a week for 10 weeks (50min each) Class home page:
Miscellaneous topics and advice Never ever ever ever ……… EVER ….. What you should never ever ever ever ever do Light bulbs, planters, tough experiemts,
Your Super Brain Power! You have a super brain power that you can use anytime! Jill Kuzma 5/2010 -
Lecture 3: Writing the Project Documentation Part I
Writing for Social change. “…publish, or democracy perishes." Cornelia Wells.
Writing Workshop Constructing your College Essay
Bellringer Oct. 9 Which letter indicates the error in the following sentence. If there is no error, select E. Wynton Marsalis (a)emerged as one of the.
Welcome to our first Writing Celebration. Sponge: Writing Celebration Entitle a Source book entry “Writing Celebration.” When you accomplish something.
Writing Articles. Articles take a considered view of events, including opinions and sometimes refer to related issues. Reports are more immediate and.
Concepts about print Title Page Left before right Word Letter Cover Punctuation Where to start.
The Writing Process Invention Planning and Drafting Feedback Revision
 The ACT Writing Test is an optional, 30-minute test which measures your writing skills. The test consists of one writing prompt, following by two opposing.
Writing a Persuasive Essay
Unity in Paragraphs. A. Unity: It means that all the sentences refer to the main idea, or the topic of the paragraph. Exercise 1: The original student.
IMPROVING WRITING IN THE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM Écrivez Mieux!
Narrative – A spoken or written account of connected events; a story.
Writing a Persuasive Essay
1 st Grade. Agenda  Welcome  Reading  Math  Word study  Home Work  Home Connections  Questions and Answers.
Revising Introductions and Body Paragraphs
STEPS TO SUCCESSFUL WRITING!. The writing process consists of strategies that will help you proceed from idea or purpose to the final statement.
Revising and Editing: What Is the Difference?. What does it mean to REVISE? Revision literally means to “SEE AGAIN” to look at something from a fresh,
CLT is based on the idea that the goal of language learning is communication. And it considers that many fundamental communication activities are spoken.
Listen and learn!. * “READ THE BOOKS. I don't understand why some kids think they can take a test on a book they have never read. That is actually crazy,
1 Communication Skills Kathy McCoy CIS Department University of Delaware.
Tips for writing Aim: This study guide gives you some general ideas on improving your own writing skills.
Reflection helps you articulate and think about your processes for communication. Reflection gives you an opportunity to consider your use of rhetorical.
English 10 Week 2. Turn in Do Now Procedure Do nows must be loose leaf paper. If multiple pages, name on every page and stapled together. Each Do Now.
CS 4001Mary Jean Harrold1 Writing Arguments (Chapter 3)
Letter Writing: Reading and Thoughtfully Corresponding Letters About Literature 12/5.
Close Reading Intermediate 2. Time The Close Reading exam paper lasts for one hour. (Date and time for 2011: Friday 13 May, 1.00pm to 2.00pm.) NAB: Friday.
Right from the Beginning… Introduction to the Flee Map Created by Mrs. Senko Write.
Excerpted and adapted from “Brilliant Revision Worksheet”
CS 4001Mary Jean Harrold1 Class 11 ŸVisualization of data (cont’d) ŸDiscussion of Tufte paper ŸWriting arguments discussion ŸAssignment ŸWA Ch 4: 9/27.
Written Presentations of Technical Subject Writing Guide vs. Term paper Writing style: specifics Editing Refereeing.
Sight Words.
Strategies Good Readers Use
Tuesdays with Tiffany Reading Disabilities. Visual Notes Today we are going to visualize some reading disabilities. Instead of writing words as you take.
Essay Writing mini-workshop
By Ms. Schmidt.   Fiction  Non-fiction  Biography  Autobiography Narration is writing that tells a story.
Listen and learn!. * “READ THE BOOKS. I don't understand why some kids think they can take a test on a book they have never read. That is actually crazy,
What is the Story Really About ? When you were younger, and it came time for revision, many of you probably took out a special colored pen and added in.
Updating your Phone Messages. Don’t start with your name first Every phone message starts the same way: “Hi, this is Sharon from Original Works”. When.
How to write a great research paper Dr.Wesam Saber Shehab.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
INTRODUCTION PARAGRAPH. The Introduction paragraph is made up of three parts; the hook, background information and the thesis statement. A successful.
Warm-up: First, write down the three milestones that you would like to write about for your Milestones essay. Next, get out the maxims that you wrote down.
Sharing your experience... From Reading to Writing In their essays, Emerson and Thoreau reflect upon some basic truths about life that they derived.
Writing Semester 1 Reflections Decide on What you want to say Analyze rather than summarize your experience(s) Focus on specific examples that illustrate.
How to start…. Broad / General Specific/Narrow The introduction should start with big/general statements, and then gradually move to state your specific.
Ch. 5 LISTENING SKILLS.
An Inspector Calls GCSE Literature Paper 2 Fri 26th May
The Importance of Goals
Have your notebooks open and a pen/pencil out ready to take notes
Writing the Introduction
How to improve your listening skills
Presentation transcript:

How to write a good paper.. Subbarao Kambhampati Arizona State University How to write a research paper (and not to die trying it)

Thanks to all my Guinea pigs er.. students ICAPS Best Dissertation Award 2009 winner ICAPS Best Dissertation Award Honorable mention

Process of Producing a Good Paper Think up a good idea Think up a good way of evaluating it Write a convincing paper explaining the idea Grow old and wait for a classic paper award. Disclaimer: A great idea can eventually transcend bad presentation; but I tend to think posthumous rewards are way over-rated Scope of this talk

Why is paper writing hard? We tend to think that what is obvious to us is obvious to the readers We tend to think that since we wrote term papers on other people’s work for courses, writing about our own ideas should be easy We tend to focus on the perfection in the small instead of coherence in the large We tend to believe that reader/reviewer has way more patience for spotting diamonds in the rough that we ourselves have

Maxims of Paper Writing Judge your paper the way you judge others’ It is not about you(r head; but your readers’) Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. No hook, no fish (or no claims, no readers) Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) The better the draft, the better the comments Related work section is not expendable

Maxims of Paper Writing Judge your paper the way you judge others’ It is not about you(r head; but your readers’) Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. No hook, no fish (or no claims, no readers) Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) The better the draft, the better the comments Related work section is not expendable

Judge your papers the way you judge others’ ( or How paper writing is like Bathroom Singing) Paradox: –Beginning researchers tend to write some of the most cutting reviews –And yet seem to be too nice on their own papers Sort of similar to what happens in the bathroom singing –Except there is a remedy for bathroom singing—you just record your singing and listen to it for an eminently cringe- worthy experience Do the same thing for the paper –Read it like it is written by someone else …and do JUDGE other people’s papers none of the “judge not lest ye be judged” nonsense

Maxims of Paper Writing Judge your paper the way you judge others’ It is not about you(r head; but your readers’) Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. No hook, no fish (or no claims, no readers) Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) The better the draft, the better the comments Related work section is not expendable

It is not about you(r head; but the readers’) Rao’s first draft was very nifty and to the point. Larry’s comment: remove the italics It took another 3 months and n-drafts to get the magic back to the paper

Maxims of Paper Writing Judge your paper the way you judge others’ It is not about you(r head; but your readers’) Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. No hook, no fish (or no claims, no readers) Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) The better the draft, the better the comments Related work section is not expendable

Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. Since English is the “lingua-franca” and most of seem to be as fluent in it as we are in French, there is a tendency to blame poor writing on new language. Often organizing the thoughts appropriately is a different issue from “foreign language” issue.

Maxims of Paper Writing Judge your paper the way you judge others’ It is not about you(r head; but your readers’) Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. No hook, no fish (or no claims, no readers) Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) The better the draft, the better the comments Related work section is not expendable

No hook, no fish (aka No claims, No readers) Too many beginning writers tend to be defensive about making any claims, lest they might be viewed as falling short But without claims, no one pays attention anyway Critical for the introduction to lay out your claims and their importance

Maxims of Paper Writing Judge your paper the way you judge others’ It is not about you(r head; but your readers’) Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. No hook, no fish (or no claims, no readers) Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) The better the draft, the better the comments Related work section is not expendable

Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) You cannot systematically search over full paper configurations –Can only do Iterative improvement Have no allegiance to the intermediate drafts –Be ready to rewrite anytime to improve coherence Don’t try to improve the paper by focusing just on specific sections –Once in a while, you will have to read the whole draft –*AWAY* from the computer

Maxims of Paper Writing Judge your paper the way you judge others’ It is not about you(r head; but your readers’) Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. No hook, no fish (or no claims, no readers) Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) The better the draft, the better the comments Related work section is not expendable

The better the draft, the better the comments (…or commenting is as much a hill-climbing) Tension: –Shall I give a poorly written first draft –Or a more polished fifth draft? Remember: –Just as writing is iterative, commenting is iterative and the depth of comments depends on the draft With poorly written draft, most comments are likely to be syntactic. [Xuanlong Story]

Maxims of Paper Writing Judge your paper the way you judge others’ It is not about you(r head; but your readers’) Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. No hook, no fish (or no claims, no readers) Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) The better the draft, the better the comments Related work section is not expendable

There is a tendency to make the related work section smaller and smaller as the camera-ready deadline approaches.. Not a smart idea –Especially in planning where we are, in some ways, re-inventing the ambitiousness of yester years, in the context of increased scale-up of today

Maxims of Paper Writing Judge your paper the way you judge others’ It is not about you(r head; but your readers’) Don’t be easy on yourself—it is not your “English” skills. No hook, no fish (or no claims, no readers) Say no to systematic search (over paper configurations) and local evaluation (over paper coherence) The better the draft, the better the comments Related work section is not expendable Bonus maxim on good Talks: SOUND EXCITED!