Reliabilism and virtue epistemology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

Knowledge as JTB Someone S has knowledge of P IFF: 1. S believes P 2. S is justified in believing P 3. P is true.
Free will and determinism
Rationalism and empiricism
Epistemology Epistemology is the philosophical field in which one studies knowledge, understanding, wisdom, justification, the ethics of belief, and various.
Theories of Knowledge Knowledge is Justified-True-Belief Person, S, knows a proposition, y, iff: Y is true; S believes y; Y is justified for S. (Note:
THINKING. Critical Thinking
Plato, knowledge and virtue
Justified True Belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Free will and God’s omniscience
“What Is It Like To Be a Bat?”. Depth Perception The world (visually) appears to us as though it is three-dimensional. Some things appear closer to us.
Support For Morality As A Social Contract
© Michael Lacewing A priori knowledge Michael Lacewing
Empiricism on a priori knowledge
Gettier and the analysis of knowledge Michael Lacewing
PHILOSOPHY 101 Maymester 2007 Day 2 Logic and Knowledge.
Omniscience and immutability Michael Lacewing
Perception & the External World
Explaining the universe
© Michael Lacewing Morality as a social contract Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Scepticism Michael Lacewing
From Anti-Scepticism to the Contingent A Priori Brian Weatherson Cornell University.
Plantinga’s ontological argument
Michael Lacewing Is the mind the brain? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
The ontological argument
Moral truth: relational properties Michael Lacewing
Descartes’ rationalism
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
What Does It Mean to Know Something? Externalism: I know something if my belief correctly matches the “external” world (even if I don’t know how it does)
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
Descartes on scepticism
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ First Meditation
Theory of Knowledge - An introduction. Real Headlines: Elvis found working as Plumber in Poland Alien base found on dark side of Moon Alien base mysteriously.
Knowledge as justified true belief We have knowledge only when a proposition is believed to be true We have knowledge only when a proposition is believed.
Knowledge Belief and Truth By Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader.
Knowledge and Belief Some fundamental problems. Knowledge: a problematic concept “Knowledge” is ambiguous in a number of ways; the term can mean variously:
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Infallible Justification Markus Lammenranta Humanistinen tiedekunta / Markus Lammenranta / Infallible Justification1.
Reliabilism.
Epistemology – Study of Knowledge
Key questions:  What is Reliabilism?  Does Reliabilism describe knowledge well? What are the strengths and weaknesses of Reliabilism?  How well does.
The Nature of Knowledge. Thick Concept When a short definition is not enough, it is called a thick concept word. It can only be understood through experience.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1 By David Kelsey.
Certainty and ErrorCertainty and Error One thing Russell seems right about is that we don’t need certainty in order to know something. In fact, even Descartes.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
Epistemology What is knowledge? and How do we know things?
Accuracy Vs. Precision Unit 1: Scientific Process Physical Science Steinbrink.
Homework Feedback 1)Are there any particular areas you feel confused about? 2)How have you begun to plan this 15 mark question?: Is the Tripartite account.
Reliabilism. Justification I believe that there is a dog tied out in front of the UCen. – I didn’t see the dog on my way here – No one told me about it.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1
Péter Hartl & Dr. Tihamér Margitay Dept. of Philosophy and the History of Science 1111 Budapest, Egry J. st. 1. E 610.
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
Section 7.3 What Do You Know? Knowing What Knowledge Is McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Justified True Belief Understand JTB Know the key definitions
Aristotle’s Causes.
Criticisms of JTB model of Knowledge
Gettier and the analysis of knowledge
Michael Lacewing Reliabilism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
On whiteboards Summarise Gettier’s two examples and explain what they show. Can you think of any responses to Gettier?
Epistemology of perception
On your whiteboards: 3 differences between philosophical scepticism and everyday incredulity What is meant by “infinite regress”? Why is it a problem.
Michael Lacewing What is knowledge?.
2. Knowledge and relativism
Presentation transcript:

Reliabilism and virtue epistemology Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Reliabilism You know that p if p is true; You believe that p; and Your belief is caused by a reliable cognitive process. A reliable cognitive process is just one that produces a high percentage of true beliefs E.g. perception, memory and testimony (A false belief caused by a reliable process is not knowledge.)

An advantage Young children and animals have knowledge. Young children and animals don’t have a sophisticated rational psychology that provides justifications for their beliefs. So knowledge is not justified true belief. Young children and animals do have reliable cognitive processes, though. Knowledge is reliable true belief.

Objection A belief can be true and reliable but not be knowledge Henry in Barn County: Henry believes ‘there’s a barn’ when looking at the only real barn in a countryside full of barn facades, but he also believes ‘there’s a barn’ when looking at the barn facades. The problem is Henry can’t tell the difference between real barns and barn facades.

Improved reliabilism You know that p if p is true; You believe that p; Your belief that p is caused by a reliable cognitive process; and You are able to discriminate between ‘relevant possibilities’ in the actual situation.

Tracking the truth A different definition of ‘reliable cognitive process’ is one that ‘tracks’ the truth. Nozick: you know that p if p is true; You believe that p; In the situation you are in, or a similar situation, if p were not true, then you would not believe that p; and In the situation you are in, or a similar situation, if p were true, then you would believe that p.

Tracking the truth In normal cases, Henry knows whether or not he is looking at a barn If it wasn’t a barn, he wouldn’t believe that it is. In Barn County, Henry doesn’t know Because he would believe something is a barn when it isn’t. Reliability doesn’t mean you wouldn’t be mistaken in any situation, just in ones likely to come up.

Brains in vats I know I have two hands. But imagine: I am a brain in a vat, and all my perceptual experiences are being fed to me by a supercomputer (The Matrix) or a demon (Descartes). Do I know (now) that I am not a brain in a vat? No, because if I were, I would believe that I am not.

The principle of closure The principle: if I know the premises, I know the conclusion of a valid deduction. A valid deduction: I have two hands If I have two hands, then I am not a brain in a vat Therefore, I am not a brain in a vat. Reliabilism says that I know the premises, but I don’t know the conclusion! But if you accept the principle, and you accept that you don’t know you are a brain in a vat, you must accept scepticism – you don’t know the premises either.

Virtue epistemology Intellectual virtue: an intellectual skill or ability or trait that contributes to getting to the truth. You know that p if p is true; You believe that p; and Your true belief is a result of you exercising your intellectual virtues. The fact that you have a true belief is a ‘cognitive achievement’ for which you deserve ‘credit’.

The three As Sosa: suppose an archer shoots an arrow at a target Accuracy: did the arrow hit the target? Adroitness: was the arrow shot well? Was the shot competent? Aptness: did the arrow hit the target because it was shot well? A shot can be adroit without being accurate; it can even be accurate and adroit without being apt, e.g. luck (the wind blows the arrow off target and then on again).

Apt belief Knowledge is apt belief: Accuracy: is the belief true? Adroitness: is the way that the person formed the belief an exercise of their intellectual virtues? Aptness: is the belief true because the person used their intellectual virtues in forming it? Henry: normally, Henry knows ‘there’s a barn’ because he sees and recognises it. In Barn County, his belief isn’t apt Either because Henry can’t recognise barns – he doesn’t have the right intellectual virtues (abilities) Or when his belief is right, it isn’t because he has exercised his virtues, but because of luck.