Life Choices Statewide Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing a New Accreditation Program in the U.S.
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
State of New Jersey Department of Human Services Division of Addiction Services (DAS) Adolescent Task Force.
Legal Work Group Developing a Uniform EHR/HIE Patient Consent Form.
HISPC-Illinois II The Public-Private Partnership Moves Forward on Privacy and Security.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Technology Integration Plan (TIP) Overview Meeting Welcome TIP Teams.
Medicaid Division of Medicaid and Long-Term Care Department of Health and Human Services Managed Long-Term Services and Supports.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
What It Means for HCS Participants & Their Families Hill Country Community MHMR Center March 23, 2010 Changing from HCS Case Management to Service Coordination.
Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative COSA Conference Presenters: Erinn Kelley-Siel Mary Lou Johnson Larry Sullivan.
1 Transition FUTURE. 2 WHY FOCUS ON TRANSITION? One of the primary purposes of Public Law , the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
___State Program Improvement Planning (PIP) Process and Expectations Date (7/30/07)
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
Life Choices Project Year 2014 and Beyond Greg Fenton DDD January 7, 2015.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
OSCODA COUNTY Ending The School to Prison Pipeline.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Using and Implementing Goal Attainment Scales as a way to Measure Progress 1.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
PRESENTATION TO THE MHSA PLANNING STAKEHOLDER STEERING COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 24, 2014 MHSA THREE-YEAR PROGRAM AND EXPENDITURE PLAN –
Life Choices Statewide Meeting Meeting with PAS Agency, Service Providers and DD Staff 11/12/ :00 AM to 3:00 PM Vision Statement: All children and.
May 20, Purpose of the Self- Assessment Required by the Head Start Performance Standards (i)(1) Head Start Ac 2007 Head Start Act Section.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
The Arizona Community of Practice (AzCoPT) June 12,
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Education & Training Curriculum on Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC) Strategies & tools to support health professionals caring for people living with MCC.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
HCBS Community Rule & Delaware’s Transition Plan JULY 22, 2015.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
PART I: THE PEPSI PROJECT Pamela Sulmer, MS -- DHS Disability Services Division Leah Zoladkiewicz -- DHS Disability Services Division.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Life Choices Statewide Meeting Meeting with PAS Agency, Service Providers and DD Staff 11/12/ :00 AM to 3:00 PM Vision Statement: All children and.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Unit 8: Implementation, Part II Seminar Wednesday pm ET.
DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFORM CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT POLICIES  Procurement Reform Task Force Recommendation #7  Approach  Key Initiatives  “Go Forward”
Goal Attainment Scales as a way to Measure Progress Amy Gaumer Erickson & Monica Ballay December 3, 2012.
Parent Involvement Meeting April 3, Please sign in….
Pediatric Regional Integrated Services Model. Purpose The purpose of the Pediatric Regional Integrated Service Model (PRISM) is to provide streamlined.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Pickaway County Board of Developmental Disabilities THREE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN
1.  Overview of the HCBS Settings Final Rule  Implementation Requirements for States  Arkansas’s Transition Process 2.
Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Julia LePage and Terri Rodgers Missouri DDD.
Division of Long-Term Services and Supports
The Process for Final Approval: Remediation
The Process for Final Approval: Ongoing Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Life Choices Statewide Meeting Meeting with PAS Agency, Service Providers and DD Staff 11/12/2014 10:00 AM to 3:00 PM Vision Statement: All children and adults with developmental disabilities living in Illinois receive high quality services guided by a Person-Centered Plan that maximizes individual choice and flexibility in the most integrated setting possible. All areas of the State have available a full array of services that meet the needs of children and adults with developmental disabilities living in their local communities regardless of intensity or severity of need. There is no waiting list for services.  

TEAM 5: Service Monitoring and Collaboration for Quality Purpose: The Monitoring and Quality Team will provide recommendations for establishing better collaboration and creating synergy opportunities between PAS Agencies and service providers that lead to better quality and improved health and safety outcomes. Tasks assigned: Create new ISC Individual Visit and Interview Document Create Interpretive Guidelines to assist ISC’s Interview Develop Augmentative Communication Resources Determine Performance Indicators Team Recommendations

TEAM 5: Service Monitoring and Collaboration for Quality TITLE NAME AFFILIATION EMAIL Facilitator Mary Lou Bourne Support Development Associates marylou@sdaus.com Chair Person Patty Walters Developmental Services Center pwalters@dsc-illinois.org Communicator Shawna Egan Little City/Parent segan@littlecity.org Liaison Joe Turner Division of Developmental Disabilities/ Bureau of Quality Management Joseph.Turner@illinois.gov Members Joshelle Gildon Williams JGildonWilliams@swgk Mary Jane Friedrich Western Illinois Service Coordination mjf@macomb.com Matt Toohey Access Services of Northern Illinois MToohey@accessni.com Steve Zider Community Alternatives Unlimited szider@cau.org Patty O’Brien Suburban Access, Inc. pobrien@subacc.org Deb Stanley dstanley@subacc.org Trevelyn Florence –Thomas Division of Developmental Disabilities/Bureau of Transitional Services Trevelyn.Florence-Thomas@illinois.gov

TEAM 5: Service Monitoring and Collaboration for Quality Recommendations I. Create Individual Interview Tool A. Use a document separate from the Individual Visit and Interview Notes for “additional monitoring”. Review if necessary and implement consistently across all 18 PAS agencies. B. New Individual Visit and Interview Notes to be phased in as a pilot project to be revised after a trial period. C. Revise and standardize ISC Individual Visit and Interview Notes and Interpretative Guidelines to solicit meaningful feedback as proposed. Attachment B. D. Identify system/process, resources and training for soliciting input from individuals who require alternative communication methods. Attachment C. II. Training A. Provide uniform training for all stakeholders – PAS/ISSA, providers, families, regional facilitators and DCFS/DHS reviewers. 1. Announce date of implementation of new recommendations, distribute documents and offer multiple mandatory trainings across the state over several months.

TEAM 5: Service Monitoring and Collaboration for Quality II. Training Recommendations – continued C. Create a visual ”flowchart” of the Illinois Service Delivery System for DD/ID. 1. ISCs to share/review with families as a Resource Guide 2. Outline steps to access system and the general PUNS process 3. Review with families annually, discuss their current “position” in the system and next steps moving forward 4. Incorporate a guide that identifies each Team Member’s roles – Individual, Parent, Guardian, ISC, ISSA, Provider D. Establish competencies for Service Coordination staff, enhanced QIDP training and continuing education. E. Enhance/develop continuing education for greater understanding of ISC roles to all stakeholders. Refer to flowchart of delivery system. F. Require training on person centered planning to be consistent for all stakeholders – individuals, families, guardians, PAS/ISSA and providers. G. Define what the Satisfaction Survey is to be used for and emphasize that it is not designed to be used punitively towards any stakeholder. H. Division to share Satisfaction survey results with the ISC and provider agency. I. Define the process and feedback for how Division will respond to technical assistance referrals from ISC. J. Communicate a clear definition of the “TEAM” – Interdisciplinary Team, Support Team. The final say should be driven by families not professionals. K. Develop a standardized process to address people who are satisfied. L. Conflict Resolution should be changed to Resolution of Issues and/or Concerns to demonstrate collaboration.

TEAM 5: Service Monitoring and Collaboration for Quality III. Performance Indicators A. Develop ISC performance indicators that focus on measurable quality outcomes of ISC services/supports rather than validation of services completed. Adopt proposed Performance Indicators. Attachment A. B. Measure responsiveness to families. Conduct sample satisfaction interviews and surveys as proposed. Attachment A. C. Measure the length of time from date individual is determined eligible to the date services begin. Defined as the first billable day/ hour with chosen provider. IV. Central Data Information and Reporting System A. Standardize forms across all 18 PAS agencies and enable writable via PC and accessible on DHS website. B. Develop a central data reporting/managements system that is accessible to multiple users.

TEAM 5: Service Monitoring and Collaboration for Quality Next Steps: Pending Steering Committee Approval Establish pilot roll out and timeframe Identify 6-10 ISC agencies, Providers and parents/guardians to participate in the pilot of the Individual Visit and Interview Document and Interpretive Guidelines; schedule training to initiate pilot Team 5 to evaluate feedback following pilot and provide revision recommendations Final recommendations submitted to state for approval Full project implementation hosting multiple, mandatory joint trainings for ISC’s and providers on how to use the new tools, adopt person centered planning practices and understand the new performance indicators. (Parents/guardians encouraged to participate) State will develop a realistic timeline to phase in project implementation consistent with revised CMS and BQM guidelines to ensure all stakeholders can be successful.