The Rationalists: Leibniz Individual Substances

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Art Foundations Exam 1.What are the Elements of Art? List & write a COMPLETE definition; you may supplement your written definition with Illustrations.
Advertisements

By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
İDB 408 LINGUISTIC PHILOSOPHY 2010/2011 Spring Term Instructor: Dr. Filiz Ç. Yıldırım.
© S Haughton more than 3?
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Modern Philosophy Part two.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
Leibniz Part 1. Short Biography Leibniz ( ) was the son of a professor of philosophy who had earned his doctorate in law by 21. He invented.
HUMAN NATURE AND MODERN PHILOSOPHY HUME PHILOSOPHY 224.
1 The Rationalists: Spinoza Human Beings Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
The Basics: Some Familiar Territory Plato’s knowledge as memory, learning as remembering. Innate ideas. A priori knowledge. Logical “truths” that describe.
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
1 5 Leibniz ( ): Metaphysics. 2 TAs office h. TAs office h.none.
1 The Rationalists: Descartes The Cartesian Doubt Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
1 The Rationalists: Leibniz Freedom, Responsibility, Evil Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
The “Explanatory Gap” Where it is said that identity theory is not necessary false, but merely unknowable.
PHILOSOPHY 101 SPRING 2010 INSTRUCTOR: WILBURN Lecture 1: Introduction and Problems 6/26/20151.
1 The Rationalists: Leibniz Rationalism and Theodicy Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
1 Kant, The Copernican Revolution Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
The Empiricists: Locke, Introduction and the Criticism of Innate Ideas
Parsing Categories of Belief Why Early Modern M&E divides belief into two types: Sensory & Mathematical.
MARK PEREZ JULY 29, 2012 What is a Worldview?. A worldview is the set of beliefs about fundamental aspects of reality that ground and influence all one's.
Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana
Modern Philosophers Rationalists –Descartes –Spinoza –Leibniz Empiricists –Locke –Berkeley –Hume Epistemology - the theory of knowledge (what and how we.
Epistemology Revision
GOTTFRIED WILHELM VON LEIBNIZ References: Russell, Bertrand The History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster. Stumpf, Samuel Enoch.
1 Morality and Religion. 2Outline Introduction: To what extent is religion a basis for morality? The Divine Command Theory The Natural Law Theory Conclusion:
9/18/2015 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant I Charles Manekin.
1 The Empiricists: Berkeley Idealism Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Metaphysics…an Introduction Some Guiding Questions: What is Reality? What is a personal identity? Is there a Supreme Being? What is the meaning of life?
1 The Rationalists: Descartes Rational Truth, God (the return), and the Cartesian Circle Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Kant Deontology Categorical Imperative. Immanuel Kant Profile: Dead German Time of Berkley, Rousseau, Hume, Bentham Not a fan of music or arts.
1 The Empiricists: Hume Theory of Ideas Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Owen Flanagan James B. Duke Professor of Philosophy Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience Co-Director Center for Comparative Philosophy Duke University.
1 The Rationalists: Spinoza Substance, Nature and God Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
1 The Rationalists: Descartes The Material World Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana Jack Nichols, Living in the material world.
11/26/2015 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant III Charles Manekin.
Philosophy.
1 The Empiricists: Berkeley Immaterialism Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Leibniz
© Mark E. Damon - All Rights Reserved Meta- what?? Those Greek Bastards To Torture or not to Torture? I Think, Therefore I am Confused Don’t Touch my.
1/19/2016 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Spinoza – Ethics Two Charles Manekin.
Introduction to Humanities Chamberlain Academy. What is the study of Humanities? Humanities is the study of classical languages, literature, philosophy,
1 The Empiricists: Hume Induction, Causation, Skepticism Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Introduction to Philosophy
The Battle for God Copyright Norman L. Geisler 2005.
Do Things Move? Spacetime and the Problem of Modern Science.
The Nature of God Nancy Parsons. Attributes- Nature of God Candidates should be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of: 1.God as eternal,
The Battle for God Copyright Norman L. Geisler 2002.
Lecture 1 What is metaphysics?
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
A Failure of Recognition Pt. 2
Three kinds of dependence
Presentation transcript:

The Rationalists: Leibniz Individual Substances Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Individual Substances and Predication 3. Individual Substances as the fundamental constituents 4. Individual Substances are ``self contained” 5. Individual Substances and their Substantial Form 6. Individual Substances: Independent Mirrors 7. Pre-established Harmony 8. Conclusion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Review: Leibniz: Rationalism Epistemology: Granted to the empiricist: empirical knowledge Against the empiricist: knowledge of eternal truths Granted to the empiricist: senses as necessary triggers Against the empiricist: ultimately grounded in pure reason Compromise, but still eternal truths Two kinds of truths: Necessary Truths – Contradiction Contingent Truths – Sufficient Reason Contingency exists, not chance Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana Review: Leibniz: Theodicy Starting Point of Leibniz’ philosophy: God is absolutely perfect Hence the world is perfect Perfect in which sense? God’s Freedom is enlightened, not arbitrary Perfection = minimal means, maximal complexity  The best possible world Challenge: Design a worldview which makes sense of the traditional view of God Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana Introduction: Leibniz: Metaphysics The dangers of the modern reductionism Descartes: matter = extension and movement Spinoza: one single substance  Materialism, necessitarianism, atheism The conceptual problems within modern reductionism: Individuation Freedom with teleology Moral responsibility These are the desiderata for a good metaphysical account of the universe for Leibniz Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Individual Substances and Predication 3. Individual Substances as the fundamental constituents 4. Individual Substances are ``self contained” 5. Individual Substances and their Substantial Form 6. Individual Substances: Independent Mirrors 7. Pre-established Harmony 8. Conclusion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Individual Substances and Predication Previous notions of substance self-sufficient being (Spinoza) what remains constant under changes (wax) Substance as the subject of predication What is predication? Assign a predicate to a subject Jalisco is a cat From language to metaphysics Substances are these beings which are referred to by subjects which cannot be predicated Which are they? The fundamental constituents of the world are individual particulars Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Individual Substances and Predication 3. Individual Substances as the fundamental constituents 4. Individual Substances are ``self contained” 5. Individual Substances and their Substantial Form 6. Individual Substances: Independent Mirrors 7. Pre-established Harmony 8. Conclusion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Individual Substances as the Fundamental Constituents of the Universe Taking seriously the notion of substance: Unique individuals – Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles Indivisible – ultimate elements Immutable – except by God Depend only on God – emanation from God Unique and stable building blocks of the universe Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Individual Substances and Predication 3. Individual Substances as the fundamental constituents 4. Individual Substances are ``self contained” 5. Individual Substances and their Substantial Form 6. Individual Substances: Independent Mirrors 7. Pre-established Harmony 8. Conclusion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Individual Substances as Self-Contained Requirements for a satisfactory metaphysics: Fundamental constituents Recover appearances Problem: How come that individual substances appear to undergo accidental changes? Solution: Self-containment The complete notion of an individual substances contains all the predicates that the substance has had, has and will have Examples? Complete notion. In principle, complete comprehension is possible. But what does define an individual substance? Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Individual Substances and Predication 3. Individual Substances as the fundamental constituents 4. Individual Substances are ``self contained” 5. Individual Substances and their Substantial Form 6. Individual Substances: Independent Mirrors 7. Pre-established Harmony 8. Conclusion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Individual Substances defined by their Substantial Form The old notion of substantial form: Crucial notion for Aristotle and the Scholastics Example: the socrates-hood of Socrates  What makes something what it is Despised by modern philosopher: vacuous explanation Defended by Leibniz for metaphysics: vacuous explanation in physics - clock necessary in metaphysics – unity and individuation Every individual substance has an intrinsic principle of unity and individuation. Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Individual Substances and Predication 3. Individual Substances as the fundamental constituents 4. Individual Substances are ``self contained” 5. Individual Substances and their Substantial Form 6. Individual Substances: Independent Mirrors 7. Pre-established Harmony 8. Conclusion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Individual Substances as Independent Mirrors of the Universe Requirements for a satisfactory metaphysics Problem: The appearance that each substance interact with the external world? Solution: Mirrors of the Universe Each individual substance expresses the entirety of the universe from its own perspective Analogy: movie theater So: each substance actively unfold itself, i.e. expresses the entire universe from its unique perspective. Pb: why are our movies consistent with one another? Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Individual Substances and Predication 3. Individual Substances as the fundamental constituents 4. Individual Substances are ``self contained” 5. Individual Substances and their Substantial Form 6. Individual Substances: Independent Mirrors 7. Pre-established Harmony 8. Conclusion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Pre-established Harmony Requirements for a satisfactory metaphysics Problem: Correlations between our world – causal connections Are we watching movies independently or acting in the same movie? Solution: Pre-established Harmony - Correlations: direct causal influence vs. synchronization - Super synchronization by God’s decree Analogy Appearance of causality: Causality is an illusion Causal Influences: restriction/expansion of the domain of expression Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Individual Substances and Predication 3. Individual Substances as the fundamental constituents 4. Individual Substances are ``self contained” 5. Individual Substances and their Substantial Form 6. Individual Substances: Independent Mirrors 7. Pre-established Harmony 8. Conclusion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Conclusion on Leibniz’ Metaphysics Fundamental Level: Independent, self-contained, unique, indivisible and immutable substances emanating from God: Each possesses an intrinsic principle of unity Each expresses the entire universe from its unique perspective All perspectives are synchronized Phenomenal Level: Well grounded illusion of a causal order between interacting systems in a common, material world. Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana