BY Dr. Khaled Helmy Al Mahmora Chest Hospital BY Dr. Khaled Helmy Al Mahmora Chest Hospital Treatment Of Hypertension In Diabetes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current Management of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Thomas Donner, M.D. Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Advertisements

Slides current until 2008 Nutritional needs of people with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes.
Analysis of the ADVANCE Trial Sapna N. Patel UCSF Pharm. D. Candidate 2008 Preceptor Dr. Craig S. Stern March 28, 2008.
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Benefits of intensive multiple risk factor intervention.
UKPDS Paper 36 Slides © University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit UKPDS slides are copyright and remain the property of the University of Oxford Diabetes.
UKPDS Paper 35 Slides © University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit
Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
The concept of Diabetes & CV risk: A lifetime risk challenge
Type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure How explosive is the cocktail?
Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines Targets for Glycemic Control Chapter 8 S. Ali Imran, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Stuart Ross.
Reference Cooper BA, and the IDEAL study group. A randomized controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med [Accessed.
Clinical Issues in the Management of Non Communicable Diseases Dr Gyaneshwar Rao Colonial War Memorial Hospital Suva.
ACCORD - Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes to Prevent Vascular Disease VADT - Veterans Administration Diabetes.
Hypertensive Management in the Asymptomatic Patient: First do no harm Steven A Godwin MD, FACEP University of Florida, COM-Jacksonville Ponte Vedra 2007.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
IDC Diabetes Update: Recent Research and Impact on Diabetes Management Type 1 DiabetesType 1 Diabetes –Post DCCT findings--improving glycemic control and.
ACUTE STROKE — Hypertension is a common problem in patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes but the time course in relation to the duration.
Joint Effects of Routine Blood Pressure Lowering and Intensive Glucose Control ADVANCE Adapted from EASD 2008.
1 NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health.
Systolic hypertension not an isolated problem Michael Weber, MD Professor of Medicine Associate Dean Downstate College of Medicine State University of.
Rationale, Study Design & Study Population
FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee 1st June 2008 Rury Holman Clinical outcomes with anti-diabetic drugs: What we already know.
Can pharmacists improve outcomes in hypertensive patients? Sookaneknun P (1), Richards RME (2), Sanguansermsri J(1), Teerasut C (3) : (1)Faculty of Pharmacy,
1 Current & New treatment strategies to address CV Risk.
Incremental Decrease in Clinical Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Trial IDEAL Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
Critical Appraisal Did the study address a clearly focused question? Did the study address a clearly focused question? Was the assignment of patients.
Diabetes and the Eye Karen B. Saland, M.D. August 18, 2008.
Lancet 373: , 2009 Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Study Design of Clinical Trials to Compare Intensive glucose- lowering versus.
UKHDS (UKPDS): UK Hypertension in Diabetes Study Purpose To determine whether tight control of blood pressure (aiming for BP
Impact of Diabetes on Cardiovascular Risk C.Richard Conti M.D. MACC Oct 16,2004 GWICC Beijing, PRC.
BRIAN CLAYTON INTERNAL MEDICINE ADVISOR: ANNA MAE SMITH PRECEPTOR: DR. RAJESH PATEL Evidence Based Medicine Spring 2009.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015
MACROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS, DYSLIPIDEMIA and HYPERTENSION 2003 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada.
Treatment of Hypertension in Adults With Diabetes DR AMAL HARFOUSH.
Diabetes and the Kidney Richard Kingston Department of Renal Medicine Kent and Canterbury Hospital.
The MICRO-HOPE. Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Reference Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Flow Diagram of the Trial Selection Process Jeffrey S. Berger et al, JAMA. 2006;295:
Circulation. 2014;129: Association Between Plasma Triglycerides and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Microvascular Kidney Disease and Retinopathy.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Next Steps in Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart.
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
Summary of “A randomized trial of standard versus intensive blood-pressure control” The SPRINT Research Group, NEJM, DOI: /NEJMoa Downloaded.
Antonio Coca, MD, PhD, FRCP, FESC
Dr John Cox Diabetes in Primary Care Conference Cork
Blood Pressure and Lipid Trials: Rationale, Importance and Design
The SPRINT Research Group
Copyright © 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Vanguard Phase Results for the Blood Pressure Component
The IDEAL Study Reference
Copyright © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Heart Rate, Life Expectancy and the Cardiovascular System: Therapeutic Considerations Cardiology 2015;132: DOI: / Fig. 1. Semilogarithmic.
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
AIM-HIGH Niacin Plus Statin to Prevent Vascular Events
Macrovascular Complications Microvascular Complications
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
366 میلیون نفر در جهان مبتلا به دیابت هستند.
Managing Hard-To-Treat Hypertension: What Every Physician Should Know
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Section VII: Summary New focus on treating hypertension beyond the numbers Content Points: In view of current clinical understanding of the link between.
The following slides are from a Cardiology Scientific Update in which Dr. Gordon Moe reported and discussed an original presentation by Drs. Bjorn Dahlof,
Pulse pressure for selecting the optimal cardiac strategy in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease  Tetsuro Tsujimoto, Hiroshi Kajio 
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the American College of Cardiology 2004, Scientific Sessions, in New Orleans, Louisiana on.
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Additional benefit of PCSK9 inhibition in high risk patients after myocardial infarction A FOURIER subanalysis Primary endpoint: composite of CV death,
Meta-analysis of trials examining the effects of aspirin on risk of CVD events in patients with diabetes. Meta-analysis of trials examining the effects.
Relationship between updated systolic blood pressure (SBP), right, and updated HbA1c, left, and the incidence of microvascular complications (closed symbols)
Many post-MI patients are not receiving optimal therapy
Presentation transcript:

BY Dr. Khaled Helmy Al Mahmora Chest Hospital BY Dr. Khaled Helmy Al Mahmora Chest Hospital Treatment Of Hypertension In Diabetes

Hypertension & Diabetes Hypertension & Diabetes

 Hypertension affecting 20–60% of patients with diabetes.  In type 2 diabetes, hypertension is often present as part of the metabolic syndrome while in type 1 diabetes, hypertension may reflect the onset of diabetic nephropathy.  Hypertension substantially increases the risk of both macrovascular and microvascular complications.  Hypertensive diabetic patients are also at increased risk for diabetes-specific complications including retinopathy and nephropathy.  In recent years, adequate data from well-designed randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of aggressive treatment of hypertension in reducing both types of diabetes complications. Hypertension Diabetes

 Diabetes increases the risk of coronary events twofold in men and fourfold in women after menopause.  People with both diabetes and hypertension have approximately twice the risk of cardiovascular disease as non-diabetic people with hypertension  In the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) epidemiological study, each 10-mmHg decrease in mean systolic blood pressure was associated with reductions in risk of 12% for any complication related to diabetes, 15% for deaths related to diabetes, 11% for myocardial infarction, and 13% for microvascular complications. Hypertension Diabetes

Normotensive Hypertension In recent years, adequate data from well-designed randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that structural changes in vessels start 5 years before BP elevated. patients who still have normal BP but have the high risk to develop high Bp(Patient at risk) are classified as normotensive hypertension and of course one of them is diabetic patients and they should be managed as soon as possible.

Strategy for management of Hypertensive Diabetic pts  Proper blood sugar control.  Achieve target level of BP control for diabetic patients  Early Detection of both diabetes and hypertension complications & manage them as well as delay their progression  Improve patients quality of life.

Target levels of blood pressure in patients with Diabetes Target levels of blood pressure in patients with Diabetes The UKPDS and the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) trial both demonstrated improved outcomes, especially in preventing stroke, in patients assigned to lower blood pressure targets. A target blood pressure goal of <130/80 mmHg is reasonable if it can be safely achieved <125/75 mmHg (in proteinuria >0.5-1g/d) It is very clear that many people will require more than one drug to achieve the recommended target.

Non-drug management of Hypertension Moderate sodium restriction,reduce salt intake from 200mmol (4600 mg) to 100mmol (2300 mg) daily  5 mm fall in DBP. Weight reduction (Loss of 1 kg weight  decrease mean arterial pressure of about 1 mm Hg. Moderately intense physical activity: mins of brisk walking most days of the week has been shown to reduce BP. Stop smoking  decease micro, macrovasular Compilications Role of very low calorie diets ? Pharmacologic agents that induce weight loss?

Drug therapy of Hypertension in Diabetes Drug therapy of Hypertension in Diabetes There is strong evidence that pharmacological therapy of hypertension in patients with diabetes is effective in producing substantial decreases in cardiovascular and micro vascular diseases. It must be noted that many patients required more than one drug to achieve the specified target levels of blood pressure control. The UKPDS-Hypertension in Diabetes Study showed no significant difference in outcomes for treatment based on an ACE inhibitor compared with a ß-blocker.

Drug therapy of Hypertension in Diabetes,cont ACE inhibitors and ß-blockers appear to be superior to DCCBs therefore, DCCBs appear to be appropriate agents in addition to but not instead of ACE inhibitors, and ß-blockers. The UKPDS-Hypertension in Diabetes Study showed no significant difference in outcomes for treatment based on an ACE inhibitor compared with a ß-blocker. There are no long-term studies of the effect of ß -blockers, loop diuretics, or centrally acting adrenergic blockers on long-term complications of diabetes

A variety of trials have demonstrated that ACEIs / ARBs therapy should be considered the standard therapy to retard worsening albuminuria and subsequent renal disease. In Addition to their proper BP control, ACE inhibitors can retard the progression of microalbuminuria and can lower the percentage of patient who progress to end-stage renal disease and death. All patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction should receive an ACE inhibitor. Approximately 50% of patients post-MI have significant left ventricular dysfunction and could benefits from ACE inhibitor therapy. Role of ACEIs & ARBs in Diabetes

 A meta-analysis of 20 published and two unpublished trials was carried out to determine whether ACE inhibitors could slow the progression of renal disease of varying degree showed that treatment of chronic renal insufficiency with ACE inhibitors delayed the progression of disease compared with placebo.  ACE inhibitors have a favorable effect on cardiovascular outcomes, this cardiovascular effect may be mediated by mechanisms other than blood pressure reduction. Role of ACEIs & ARBs in Diabetes, cont

 There are numerous studies documenting the effectiveness Of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in retarding the development and progression of diabetic complications :  EUCLID Study (Lisinopril vs placebo) Type1 Diabetic retinopathy  CALM study (Lisinopril vs Candestran & combination) BP & Microalbuminurea  RENAAL study(Losartan vs placebo) Type 1 Diabetic nephropathy  HOPE study (Ramiplil vs placebo) Reduction of MI,stroke,CV death All- cause death in high risk pts esp DM.  IDNT study (Irbesartan vs amlodipine vs placebo)  MARVAL study (Valsartan) Type 2 Diabetic nephropathy Irbesartan & Valsartan delay nephropathy amlodipine no better than placebo

ACEIs Vs ARBs

Angiotensinogen Other Substrates? Angiotensin I Angiotensin II Bradykinin & other substrates Psychological actionsActions? AT 2 AT 1 Renin ACE Renin Blockade ACE inhibitors Angiotensin II receptor antagonists blocking the Renin-Angiotensin system ? ACEIs Vs ARBs

 Evidence for beneficial outcomes (especially renal) with ARBs is growing but varying opinion on their optimal role.  Unfortunately, several ARB outcome trials have avoided a head-to-head comparison with ACEIs.  Losartan was not superior to captopril in patients with heart failure ( ELITE II), captopril reduced CV-death in post-MI patients more than losartan( OPTIMAAL ) However, both of these studies found that less patients discontinued losartan due to adverse effects  ARBs are an alternative in patients who develop ACEI induced cough but are more expensive than most ACEIs  ACEI-ARB combinations show some promise for renal outcomes ( CALM, COOPERATE), however they are expensive.

Approach to Combination Therapy The ABCD Approach A = ACEI or ARB B =  -blocker C = CCB D = diuretic low-dose  If initial drug is A or B  adding drug C or D provides a synergistic effect.  If initial drug is C or D  adding drug A or B provides a synergistic effect; (C+diuretic, also option). Verapamil or diltiazem with a β-blocker negative effects on heart (e.g. ↓ heart rate and ↓ cardiac output) CCBS and α-blockers potential for excessive hypotension; increased risk of falls, etc.

Thiazide like diuretic (low dose→HCT mg od) B blocker (cardioselective-e.g. atenolol, metoprolol) Long acting calcium channel blockers (amlodipine) 1 st potion ACEIs Monotherapy Drug therapy in Hypertension with Diabetes Drug therapy in Hypertension with Diabetes 2 nd option ARBs OR + Combination

Summary  Non-pharmacological measures (particularlyweight loss and reduction in salt intake) should be encouraged in all patients with diabetes, independently of the existing blood pressure.  The goal blood pressure to aim at during behavioural or pharmacological therapy is below 130/80 mmHg.  To reach this goal, most often combination therapy will be required.  It is recommended that all effective and well tolerated antihypertensive agents are used, generally in combination.

 In diabetic patients with high blood pressure, who may sometimes achieve blood pressure goal by monotherapy, the first drug to be tested should be a blocker of the renin–angiotensinsystem (ACE & ARBS)  The finding of microalbuminuria in type 1 or 2 diabetics is an indication for antihypertensive treatment, especially by a blocker of the renin–angiotensin system, irrespective of the blood pressure values(normotesive Hypertension). Summary, cont

DCCBs (compared with ACE inhibitors, ARBs, ß-blockers, or diuretics) should be used as second-line drugs for patients who cannot tolerate the other preferred classes or who require additional agents to achieve the target blood pressure. Other classes, including Alph -blockers, may be used under specific indications such as symptoms of BPH. Achievement of the target blood pressure goal with a regimen that does not produce burdensome side effects and is at reasonable cost to the patient is probably more important than the specific drug strategy. Summary, cont

Thank you Thank you