Module Two. 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Elementary School Counselor
World’s Largest Educational Community
The Principal and Assistant Principal Evaluation Process: Integrating the Teacher Working Conditions Survey.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. TELL KENTUCKY Survey Data Analysis School-Based Decision Making Council Training Kentucky Teaching.
Office of Student and School Success “Ensure equality of outcome for Washington State’s 1.1 million students” Our Mission… Andrew E. Kelly Assistant Superintendent.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Ways to Utilize the 2012 FCPS Working Conditions Survey April 11, 12, 13 Laurie Fracolli, Sid Haro, and Andrew Sioberg.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Cross State Analyses of Results TELL Survey. New Teacher Center (NTC) worked collaboratively with 11 state coalitions—including governors,
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome to I-CAT Training! Iowa Core Outcome 4 …increase the degree of alignment of each and every student’s enacted curriculum … to the Iowa Core I A.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
At the Mitchell Institute 22 Monument Square, Suite 404 Portland, Maine GreatSchoolsPartnership.org.
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
“NEXT STEPS” BIE FAMILY ENGAGEMENT Facilitated by:
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.
Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2015 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. TELL KENTUCKY Survey Data Analysis.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. STAFF EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Resources to Support Teachers NAME LOCATION DATE.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Copyright © 2011 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. TELL KENTUCKY Survey Data Analysis School-Based Decision Making Council Training Kentucky Teaching.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Office of Service Quality
All Surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart above (and on subsequent pages)
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Cross State Analyses of Results TELL Survey. New Teacher Center (NTC) worked collaboratively with 11 state coalitions—including governors,
Doc Data Do’s and Don’ts *Developed by the New Teacher Center.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
This training references results from the 2017 TELL Kentucky Survey available online at The intent is to begin discussion among staff.
Alexandria City Public Schools Preliminary Results of the 2016 Teaching, Empowering, Leading, and Learning (TELL) Survey. Dawn Shephard Associate Director, Teaching,
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
TELL Survey Background
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Presentation transcript:

Module Two

 Time—Available time to plan, collaborate and provide instruction and eliminating barriers to maximize instructional time during the school day.  Facilities and Resources—Availability of instructional, technology, office, communication, and school resources to teachers.  Community Support and Involvement—Community and parent/guardian communication and influence in the school.  Managing Student Conduct—Policies and practices to address student conduct issues and ensure a safe school environment.  Teacher Leadership—Teacher involvement in decisions that impact classroom and school practices.  School Leadership—The ability of school leadership to create trusting, supportive environments and address teacher concerns.  Professional Development—Availability and quality of learning opportunities for educators to enhance their teaching.  Instructional Practices and Support— Data and support available to teachers to improve instruction and student learning.

 New reporting for results! This year on the results page are icons beside your school's name that show your data in three new ways:  Detailed Results for your school are presented that show your school's results in a bar with colors that indicate the response breakdown for each question on the survey. The district and state results are also shown for each question for comparison.  Summary Results are presented for your school as a snapshot view in each of the main constructs of the survey.  Summary Comparison Results are provided to you this year so that you may compare to the 2008 results to determine areas of growth.

 Illustrate how to access for district and school:  Detailed Results  Summary Results  Summary Comparison Results  Illustrate the drill down tools  tools tools

 Reference pages 77 – 84 of the MELS Handbook  The candidate will lead a team of professional educators in an analysis of the elements of the Teacher Working Conditions Survey (TWCS) and/or other data that are used by the School Improvement Team to draft, monitor, and revise the School Improvement Plan. The candidate will create a visual display that identifies data

 sources and clearly identifies findings from each source. The TWCS Analysis Project will include a visual display outlined above, a reflection on the usefulness of the display related to student achievement and school goal attainment, and a class presentation complete with note-taking guide.

 Module 2 Expectations and Evidences Module 2 Expectations and Evidences

 Remember to always work closely with your school administrative team as you complete your assignments. Seek their advice as you work through your artifacts.

 September 25, 2011

 This artifact will be submitted to me to grade.  After I have graded it and returned it to you with suggestions for revisions, you should make revisions and then upload into TaskStream.

Module Two