The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ cosmological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes’ Meditations. Suppose Descartes has proven his own existence as a thinking thing: Can he prove anything else with absolute certainty? Mathematics?
Bigquestions.co.uk1 meditation 3, the trademark argument perfection.
1.Why does Descartes want certainty? 2.What area of philosophy was Descartes concerned with? 3.Explain the differences between the sceptical approach and.
The first proof for God’s existence I have an idea of God (an infinite, perfect being. The cause of an idea must have as much formal reality as objectively.
Lecture Three “The Problem of Knowledge” Think (pp. 32 – 48)  Review last lecture  Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Ideas  “The Trademark Argument”  The.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Meditation One What is the objective of the Meditations? Hint: look at second sentence of Med. I.
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Descartes on scepticism
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
LOCKE 2 An Argument that the External World [the world outside the mind] Exists.
The Evil Demon Argument
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ Epistemology
PHL 201 Problems of Philosophy March 25 th Chapter Five, ‘God’
Descartes’ First Meditation
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
Matter is Not the Object of Our Perceptions (1)Sensible things are just those that are perceived by the senses. (2)The senses perceive nothing that they.
Descartes & Rationalism
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Cartesian Meditations From the Destruction of our Beliefs to the Beginnings of Certainty.
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
Meditation 6. Trusting the Senses The senses certainly appear real. Rejects God or himself as the source of sense impression & concludes they are real.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
1 What’s wrong with the cogito? 1) Is there a questionable hidden premise?  Most criticism is of the cogito in its earlier format: “I think therefore.
Meditation 3. Clear & Distinct Ideas Knows that he, “a thinking thing”, exists. Believes he exists because it is so “clearly and distinctly” so – this.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
Meditations: 3 & 4.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Rene Descartes The Father of Modern Philosophy
DESCARTES: MEDITATION 3 OR: THE WORLD REGAINED — WITH CERTAINTY(?)
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Skepticism.
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
Concept Innatism.
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain
Descartes -- Meditations Three
On your whiteboards: 3 differences between philosophical scepticism and everyday incredulity What is meant by “infinite regress”? Why is it a problem.
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context Trying to refute scepticism Descartes becomes an ultra sceptic as a method of refuting scepticism. Using arguments from illusion, dreaming and evil demon Descartes has undermined all sensory and mental knowledge – a priori and a posteriori paths to certainty. Finds his foundation point in the Cogito. Establishes the principle that whatever is clear and distinct is reliable. But since Descartes is still in the position of being in the grip of the evil demon how is he to establish that the clear and distinct rule is trustworthy and proceed to rebuild the house of knowledge? To do this he needs God and proceed to try to prove the existence of God in Med 3. But this must be an a priori proof!

The Role of God in the Meditations (2) The Trademark Argument There is an idea of perfection in the mind. This is an innate idea. Descartes accepts the causal adequacy principle. The origin of something must at least be the equal of what it causes. Effect cannot be greater than the cause. Humans cannot be the cause of the idea of the perfect God because we are not perfect. Descartes notes his many imperfections – and ours! Nothing else in nature has the concept of perfection so nothing else can account for the presence of the idea of a perfect God except a perfect God. The a priori concept of a perfect god in our minds has been placed there almost like our creator’s stamp upon us – his trademark. Thus the concept of God is proof of his existence.

The Role of God in the Meditations.(3) God’s Guarantee. Having “proved” God’s existence Descartes has taken a major step towards rebuilding our knowledge on certain foundations. Descartes assumes God is not merely a “first cause” but the omnipotent, omniscient and good God of the Christian tradition. Thus “God is no deceiver” – God is totally good after all! So such a God will be greater than the evil demon whose power is now seen to be broken – being omnipotent and good Descartes’ God would not allow the evil demon to deceive. So God guarantees clear & distinct perception, sense experience and is foundational for knowledge. Reality & perception of it are resting upon God.

The Role of God in the Meditations (4) Criticisms The Cartesian Circle. Descartes needs God to guarantee the clear and distinct rule – but God is one of the clear and distinct perceptions! Catch 22! The idea of perfection may have little meaning outside Maths. Do we have a concept of perfection in our minds at all, let alone a perfect God? God is invoked as a matter of desperation and convenience for Descartes just as God was invoked at the end of a messy Greek play to tidy the plot up – Deus ex Machina. Descartes is now accepting things his own method as outlined in Med 1 would never allow. Descartes merely assumes a God who is good but does nothing to prove such a God

Role of God in the Meditations (5) Criticisms Causal Adequacy Principle. This is contradicted by experience of evolution. Evolution shows clearly that the greater arises from the lesser – more complex species have their origin in simpler creatures. If we could conceive of a perfect island or perfect body would it have to exist just because we can think of “perfection” without actually seeing it in life? If God is good – no deceiver – why am I still seriously wrong about some things sometimes – if I can be deceived once – why is God no deceiver? If God is good then why is there evil and suffering in the world? The old problem of evil. Descartes claims goodness and omnipotence for God but the evidence points to a God who cannot be both. A good God would want to stop pain – a powerful God could stop pain.

The Role of God in the Meditations (6) Conclusions. Descartes knows he is dependant upon God. Cannot get out of solipsistic position without God. God is pivotal and foundational. God more important as a foundation than Cogito? Trademark Argument fails. Therefore reality and human perception of it is not shown to be certain. Descartes has not been successful in solving the problems of Med 1. Failing to prove the existence of God and failing to establish the nature of God as good and omnipotent mean the Cogito is the only credible certainty but without God being proven this is a dead end.